First, "Free Market" Welfare for Wall Street: Now Max Baucus's Welfare for Big Insurance and Big Pharma
BUZZFLASH EDITOR'S BLOG
By Mark Karlin
The other day, just before Max Baucus released a "mark up" of his fearfully anticipated bill, I wrote an editor's blog entitled, "Big Insurance to Government: You Make it Affordable, We'll Gouge the Profit!"
Just a few hours later, Baucus shared his bill with the public -- after first getting a sign off from K Street lobbyists -- and it confirmed my basic premise: the Baucus, Big Insurance, Big Pharma, Rahm Emanuel "Health Reform" Bill would be a massive financial boon to insurance companies and pharmaceutical firms, at the expense of the working stiff and the U.S. taxpayer.
As others have noted, healthcare insurance and pharmaceutical stocks rose after Baucus showed his hand.
The basic reason is that Baucus-- as I argued in "Big Insurance to Government: You Make it Affordable, We'll Gouge the Profit!" -- allegedly with White House backing -- would bring perhaps 30 million new premium payers (who will of course buy more medications, enriching Big Pharma) to the insurance companies, but we the taxpayers will pay for their profits.
Senator Jay Rockefeller, no profiles in courage in general, knew that the Baucus bill could economically devastate the generally low-paid, poor, and unemployed of his home state of West Virginia, so he protested about the financing scam to once again redistribute wealth by getting those without many financial resources to enrich those who already have more money than they know what to do with.
Rockefeller, for his concerns about what's left of the middle class and the economically imperiled working class in WV, was according to the New York Times, called to the White House for a dressing down.
Obama should put a stop to this perversity and stop toying with the public option like a cat with a mouse.
Either this White House is going to stand for the people of America by speakig out loudly and clearly -- and educating the masses in the process -- about who is really picking their wallets, or we are going to see Glenn Beck's legions growing.
Massachusetts has tried a plan similar to Baucus's -- it was supported by then Governor Mitt Romney, if you must know -- and it has run into problems because there isn't enough money in the state coffers to adequately subsidize the windfall profits for Big Insurance.
Many progressives, such as BuzzFlash, support Obama's back -- as we did Bill Clinton's -- but we're tired of giving up the game to entrenched corporations and the wealthy.
Universal coverage and the elimination of denial of care, enrollment, and care is a key progressive goal, but not at the price of being blackmailed by Big Insurance and Big Pharma to use taxpayer money to fund their increased profits.
Health Insurance is a business in which no value is added to one's medical care by the insurer; i.e., the insurance company doesn't provide one iota of treatment. So why should they receive a gross profit for pushing papers around?
What Baucus is proposing is nothing more than corporate welfare at our expense.
Reagan got great right wing support for pejoratively attacking "the welfare mom with the pink Cadillac."
Why isn't the White House attacking the welfare health insurance corporations with "the CEOs with $17,000 Rolexes and three luxurious homes"?
After all, we are paying for their gluttony, and all they do is run bureaucracies that do the same thing Medicare does for 30% more in cost, thus bloating the price of our healthcare system.
The Baucus bill would be laughable, if it weren't so predictable. The economic health of the nation gets screwed again by corporate control of Capitol Hill and an accommodating White House.
Real healthcare reform means providing universal care while bringing down the cost of the system and reducing the profit motive from healthcare, because otherwise we are all just going to get killed in the pocketbook.
BUZZFLASH EDITOR'S BLOG
- Login or register to post comments
- Printer-friendly version
Buzz this on Buzzflash.net




Technorati Tags:
Baucus is bogus
He's a turncoat and a traitor to his party and our people, just like Joe Leiberman.
Perhaps...
It's time for we cash cows to have an insurance strike. I realize it is scary to think of going without it, we have been brainwashed into thinking we need it for so long, but having said that, the only way to hit them is where they live...in their pocketbooks. Let's face it, we may all be priced out of the insurance market soon anyway. Oh, wait...it's going to be MANDATORY like car insurance. How democratic....and so free-market...
Why hurt ourselves?
Instead of an insurance strike let's have a Democrat strike when the Democrats screw this up. We gave them huge majorities AND the White House. If the Democrats think that whoring for corporatations is more important than our welfare they can see which is more important next November when we withhold our votes from ALL Democrats.
ALL Democrats ? Really ?
Because a majority of Democrats in the House are fighting hard for real reform. Some want single payer, and most will insist on a public option. Yes, the Band of Six headed by Baucus are corporate whores, but they hardley represent ALL Democrats. Four of the five committees have produced bills containing a public option. Absolutely NO Republicans support the option, or reform in general.
Democrats also are working to help the middle class, or what's left of it after near annihilation by Reagan and the Bushes. They support workers rights, including the EFTA. They support climate change reform and the creation of green industries. They support programs to improve education including early childhood programs.
Let's see. Vote against ALL Democrats you say. Are you suggesting we not vote? Or are you suggesting we vote for 100% corporate-sponsored, middle-class opposing, right-wing extremist Republicans?
Uh, nice try.
Nice try?
There are options other than the two wings of the Corporate Party of which you sound like a Kool-Aid drinking member. The Green Party agenda is a perfect fit for Liberals and they do not accept corporate bribes. Find me a member of your Corporate Party that refuses corporate bribes and I'd say take them off the list. Any list you compile will have exactly -0- names.
All of the things you say the Democrats support are worthy but one average size bribe away from going down in defeat or watered down so much that they are meaningless or will not happen in our lifetime.
The problem with picking "good" Democrats is that most people think their member of Congress is good and all the others are the problem. That's why we have entrenched members that have NO fear of accepting corporate bribes and regularly voting against OUR interests. That's why I say it's time to completely clean the House and start working on the Senate. Some good will go with the bad but when getting rid of rot you have to lose some good wood.
Sweeping Generalities Are Always Inaccurate
When the Green Party becomes viable, I will vote Green. Until then, it's just a wasted vote.
I stand by my statement that there are plenty of decent, non-corporate Dems in Congress truly working for "the people", and that Baucus is an exception rather than the rule. Kucinich and the late Ted Kennedy have always been my favorites in the Senate. In the House, too many to list. Compile your own list. And try paying attention. There are scores of Dems in the HOUSE who are refusing to vote for a bill without a robust Public Option?
Your generalities clearly reveal your inability to discern differences.
Oh, and throwing in a Kool-Aid insult just further diminishes any credibility you might have had.
Enough said. Won't be back.
B'Bye.
.
It Is To Laugh
The idea that Mr. Obama is somehow "dithering" while considering which way to go, is bullgoo. He has done nothing to push single payer or the public option - and never will. He is a DLC type to his bones.
He Has A Plan
If you and I can discern what's going on with the Baucus bill, certainly Obama knows as well. He does not strike me as someone who is still "trying to figure out" this whole health care reform thing, so either it is his plan to ultimately get it done right, or it is his plan to sell us out. And we will all know sooner rather than later.
If it is his plan to sell us out, the "reform" will clearly not work. Costs and premiums will continue to soar and the entire system will very soon implode. Neocons will put the failure on him, so will progressives, and he will absolutely not get re-elected.
I certainly hope he's bright enough to figure THAT out.
No one can know what his plan is, so, for the moment, I'm still in wait-and-see mode.