Private Insurance Companies to Make Out Like Bandits Under So-Called "Healthcare Reform."
BUZZFLASH EDITOR'S BLOG
By Mark Karlin
In a stunninng revelation in the LA Times today, it appears that that the for-profit health insurance companies are poised to make out like bandits under the so-called "health reform" bills being considered by Congress, particularly if they succeed in defeating the "government option" in the Senate.
The LA Times article is a must read because it shows that the "change" being supported by the WH is going to make the for-profit companies fatter and wealthier at the expense of a healthcare system bloated by the excessive administrative, profits, and grossly high salaries of the health insurance and drug companies.
Here is one of the more understated quotations in the article about how the insurance companies are crying wolf while they tailor the bills to insure even greater profit at government expense:
"The insurers are going to do quite well," said Linda Blumberg, a health policy analyst at the nonpartisan Urban Institute, a Washington think tank. "They are going to have this very stable pool, they're going to have people getting subsidies to help them buy coverage and . . . they will be paid the full costs of the benefits that they provide -- plus their administrative costs."
Particularly concerning is that Tom Daschle has emerged, according to the mainstream press, as Obama's key go-to guy for mediating between the gang of six in the Senate, led by Max "Where are my K Street Campaign Contributions from the Insurance Companies and Big Pharma" Baucus, and the insurance companies. Daschle was almost Secretary of HHS until he ran into some lobbyist reporting problems involving a free chauffered car, but the biggest concern anyone worried about lowering healthcare costs should have is Dashcle's history as a lobbyist for the for-profit health insurance industry:
UnitedHealth spent the most, $2.5 million in the first half of 2009, and hired some of Washington's most prominent political players, including Tom Daschle, the former Senate majority leader who served as an informal health policy advisor to Obama.
So the Obama Administration, which was elected on the promise of shaking up Washington, has an ultimate Washington insider giving our tax dollars and running up the costs of healthcare to benefit for-profit insurers. Tom Daschle is bearing everything but frankincense and myrrh to Big Insurance and Big Pharma:
Consumer advocates argue that a lower government minimum might quickly become the industry standard, placing a greater financial burden on patients and their families.
"These are a bad deal for consumers," said J. Robert Hunter, a former Texas insurance commissioner who works with the Consumer Federation of America.
Meanwhile, companies would probably see a benefit by providing less insurance "per premium dollar," Hunter said.
"It would be quite a windfall," said Wendell Potter, a former executive at Cigna insurance company who has become an industry whistle-blower.
Consumer and labor advocates acknowledged the industry's lobbying success.
In the first half of 2009, the health service and HMO sector spent nearly $35 million lobbying Congress, the White House and federal healthcare offices, according to data from the Center for Responsive Politics.
That's some chunk of change lavished on the Repulicans, Blue Dogs, and the revolving door lobbyist Tom Daschle, who was a "centrist" lapdog to the GOP when he served as majority leader because of concern if he were perceived as "too liberal" he would be defeated in his home red state of South Dakota, which he was anyway in a dirty -- of course -- Republican challenge.
But Daschle is back fixing things up good for the for his K Street profiteers.
In a cynical and disingenuous statement that undercuts any WH claim to be seriously backing a government insurance option, Daschle laughably told the New York Times that "he sees no conflict between advising the president as well as private clients for whom he's working, such as the insurance giant UnitedHealth and the Tennessee Hospital Association, because he's telling them all the same thing -- there is not enough support in the Senate to pass a public option component."
And the "change" that Obama promised is really just more of the same, on steroids, a current mega-bucks lobbyist for the profiteering medical industry being his de facto point person and declaring the government option DOA in the Senate, based no doubt on Daschle's coordination with the gang of six. Because without the public option, this "healthcare reform" will be a windfall for Daschle's clients
This is like Medicare Part D all over again, where Big Pharma practically wrote the bill to increase their profits, even though it is part of a "socialized medicine" program. Seniors got breaks on prescriptions, but the bill was constructed through fees for drugs to enrich pharamaceutical firms. The seniors were a cover for a major contributor to the Republican party to get their payback.
The LA Times article ends with a telling quotation:
"They [the insurance lobby and Big Pharma] have beaten us six ways to Sunday," said Gerald Shea of the AFL-CIO. "Any time we want to make a small change to provide cost relief, they find a way to make it more profitable."
Oh, how much we would like to hope for that change that Obama road to a landslide victory promising. But more and more it just seems like a Trojan Horse.
There are many BuzzFlash readers who are upset that we criticize Obama. But we lost about 20% of our readership when we criticized the conduct of Hillary Clinton's primary campaign (and she is making a fine Secretary of State). That is why we are fully independent. We're Democratic and progressive, and the policies we support -- when presented to the American public free of the misinformation of the right wing and mainstream media, not to mention the GOP -- are generally supported by the majority of Americans.
But Obama has bought into the great "centrist" myth that is perpetrated by FOX and the corporate media -- on behalf of the entrenched corporate and D.C. insiders and wealthy -- and he is being led rather than leading.
The biggest irony about healthcare reform is the reality that it it is only going to jack up the cost of healthcare because of the for-profit industry.
As the LA Times revealingly notes:
Some insurance company leaders continue to profess concern about the unpredictable course of President Obama's massive healthcare initiative, and they vigorously oppose elements of his agenda. But Laszewski said the industry's reaction to early negotiations boiled down to a single word: "Hallelujah!"
That's not change you can believe in. That's fraud upon the American public, a giveaway at a time when our nation is economically in dire straits, and change that is for K Street, not for the average American.
The House is ready to pass at least one bill that might herald some reform, including a government option (although single payer makes the most economic sense). But Obama has left it to Daschle and Rahm Emanuel to let 6 senators in the Senate Finance Committee produce a bill that provides all sorts of gifts at our expense to insurance companies and pharmaceutical firms. These senators, as others have noted, represent less than 2% of the American population.
As BuzzFlash has observed, "The health of the individual insures the health of the American nation."
It is tragic for us that President Obama doesn't have the courage of his promises to ensure such a goal.
BUZZFLASH EDITOR'S BLOG
Afternote on Medicare Part D: We try not to quote from Wikipedia, but sometimes on deadline it is the most expedient. So read this revealing passage, which is exactly what the White House has done with Big Pharma:
By the design of the program, the federal government is not permitted to negotiate prices of drugs with the drug companies, as federal agencies do in other programs. The Veterans Administration, which is allowed to negotiate drug prices and establish a formulary, pays 58% less for drugs, on average, than Medicare Part D.[32] For example, Medicare pays $785 for a year's supply of Lipitor (atorvastatin), while the VA pays $520. Medicare pays $1,485 for Zocor, while the VA pays $127.
Former Congressman Billy Tauzin, R-La., who steered the bill through the House, retired soon after and took a $2 million a year job as president of Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA), the main industry lobbying group. Medicare boss Thomas Scully, who threatened to fire Medicare Chief Actuary Richard Foster if he reported how much the bill would actually cost, was negotiating for a new job as a pharmaceutical lobbyist as the bill was working through Congress.[33][34] A total of 14 congressional aides quite their jobs to work for the drug and medical lobbies immediately after the bill's passage.
Tauzin negotiated the agreement with the Obama White House that would prohibit the government from negotiating rates with Big Pharma.
- Login or register to post comments
- Printer-friendly version
Buzz this on Buzzflash.net




Technorati Tags:
Thirty young Afghan
Fitch store in
Fitch store in general Abercrombie And Fitch , everything a good matrimony before marriage have nothing to retain the preceding "female mad batch - Abercrombie" part of the two is the first home in new york city a horde promotion sportswear for men and it is a successful lawyer, that is, fitch.Ezra fitch in a charge over a very intricate to read from the abercrombie is obstinate to read and long abercrombie & fitch. He's also very good brand Abercrombie and Fitch Hoodies, including Abercrombie And Fitch Clothing and Abercrombie and Fitch Jeans, Abercrombie and Fitch Pants, Abercrombie and Fitch Tees. Has become a fashionable personage's first choice, Abercrombie and Fitch Sweaters is all over the world, of course, is also expected to Abercrombie and Fitch Shorts. New Year was coming, everyone wants new clothes to disguise themselves,Abercrombie Clothing is a good choice. BecauseAbercrombie Sale is a well-known brand, Abercrombie and Fitch Outerwearseverywhere, abercrombie is very much a Cheap Abercrombie. There has Abercrombie and Fitch Polos, Abercrombie Womens and Abercrombie and Fitch Shirts. Personally, I'm looking forward to Abercrombie Hollister's 2009 New Arrivals, such as Abercrombie Ruehl No.925 like this style.
I wish they would have gone
What?
If his prez evaps I'll do like the previous, I wont lift a finger.
What makes you think Democrats are on your side?
Democrats are in bed with Wall Street bankers and oligarchs + Republicans in bed with corporate CEO whores = an outcome where Americans are perpetually screwed.
When organized labor was cast aside by Clinton and the new Wall Street, pro NAFTA DLC Democrats the only political power base that actually worked to the benefit of average Americans was lost.
When the Democrats screw this up...
...and they will, I say dump BOTH the Democrats and Republicans. There are many other political parties that deserve a look. It is time to break the corporate control of Congress and as long as we keep rewarding the Republicans and Democrats for bad behavior we will get more of the same.
Nothing good
In reading the proposal by the gang in Congress I found it to be too lacking in any real reform.
I am for Universal/Single payer health INSURANCE, but not some give-away to the pharmaceutical companies and insurance companies.
Dr. Bob Seward, Internal Medicine, Portland, OR, Graduate University of Wisconsin Medical School, 1966 Of Mad as Hell Dr's said.
“I’m mad as hell because we wouldn’t dream of running a for-profit police force or a for-profit fire department. We assign these functions to government because they are a matter of public concern. It guarantees that everyone has equal access to basic services regardless of their ability to pay. Why should public health be any different than safety or fire protection? It’s not just good government, its good sense.”
Wouldn't it be nice if Congress felt that Health Insurance were as much of a basic service as police forces and fire protection?
It's time we stood up and said: NO MORE HANDOUTS to large corporations under the auspice of helping Americans.
A BAD bill is not worth the paper it is printed on and we should NOT SETTLE!
Yes it would be
However before your vision for American can ever be realized two amendments to the United States Constitution must be initiated and ratified:
Mere state or federal statute law will not do, anything less than Constitutional amendment will be challenged in court. Since the make-up of state and federal courts have shifted toward reaction a states law, say, on public funding of campaign finance will likely be overturned.
Amending The Constitution is the only logical, political remedy to prying the hands of corporate interests off "...government of the people, by the people, for the people...
Failing that the only recourse is the tumbrels and guillotines. And, unfortunately, despite all the braggadocio I do not think for a minute well-fed, well-paid, contented white, suburban coordinator class America, left or right, has the stomach for revolution.
ET Spoon
Right to Vote ammendment
Another ammendment to the US Constitution that Americans need is a Right to Vote. Supreme Coutr Justice Per Curiam wrote in his or her opinion in "Bush v. Gore", that there is no right to vote in the US Constitution - for most Americans it was the first time and probably the last that we ever learned that Americans don't have a Right to Vote. Conservatives do very well by using constitutional ammendments to increase vote turnout. It's a great idea, because how can anyone professing Democracy come out publicly against a "Right to Vote" for Americans?
Peacefollower - "It's time we stood up." 7 months LATE actually
But better late than never.
Last week BF carried a piece by PM Carpenter, I think. It was about the Netrrots conf. The author related how Bill Clinton was asked at the conf., 'Why didn't you repeal Don't Ask Don't Tell?' 'I'll tell you why! Because you spent all your time attacking me instead of GETTING ME THE VOTES I NEEDED IN CONGRESS!!!!!!!!!!!' Deja vu all over again with Health Care Reform.
Peacefollower, may we heed your call - "It's time we stood up."
Yes peacefollower - it is time for BuzzFlash and its readers to
...PUT UP or SHUT UP.
No? (Hmmmm. Yes, I know how comfortable are all the Arm Chairs for so many of the Brave, Couragous - Progressive Arm Chair Quarterbacks that get their rocks off Crucifyiing, hmmm, whoever is in office actually TRYING to DO something. Choices, choices... so MANY chioces - stand up and fight, or keep jerking off. Hmmmm. Let me see.)
He bravely smeared from the comfort of his mud puddle arm chair
"Start Loving", what's in a name besides the irony?
"Crucifying"???
The really funny thing is, ...
... that was unintentional.
I would not hesitate
They will be and are bandits, not "like" bandits!
Yeah, gee. That's, um, "stunning."
Mission accomplished!
Our Congress hasn't represented the people for years. They represent the corporations and only a chump would think otherwise.
Revolution or evolution. Our choice.
Wow Mark. Just what is it you want?
What world are you for Mark? Is there one? It is seeming to me that you are obsessed with the world that you DON'T want; like Ahab? Yes, it would be great to start from scratch wouldn't it? Just knock down everything we hate, maybe by hanging it all on Pres. Obama, and collaborating in his political assination, thereby destroying all that is Evil - just like it works with a voodoo doll. Except it doesn't work that way Mark.
Is there something, some world you want to construct Mark? I mean, some reality based world, or shall we just kill time, what little is left, in your fantasy world where, if one man, abandoned by his troops (us), Pres. Obama in this case, can't take us from horror to perfection / nirvana in one fell swoop, then he is a worthless, sellout turd. Is that it Mark?
You could do better for us Mark, as President I mean? ANYONE that has ever lived can do better for us Mark than Pres. Obama is doing? Please, tell us who, and how; umm, in the REAL world I mean (sorry to impose that irritating little constraint of REALITY).
Mark, people are dying for lack of ANY significant healthcare reform. How many more people shall die while you distract us with rants about unavoidable (in the REAL world) imperfections in Pres. Obama's heroic, courageous and brilliant attempts?
Your brother, Start
Wow starr....
...do you have anything other than snide platitudes Start? Can you defend Obama's Dealing with Big Pharma Start? Is it ever, in your mind, proper to critise one of our own people Start? Are you that enamored with the persona of Obama that you incapable of seeing any bad in him Start? Do we just let Tom Daschle and Rahm Emmanuel do all our negotiating for us Start? Do you trust in them that much Start? Are you really that short sighted Start? Please Start, defend the dealings with Big Pharma, Start. Start, Start, are you there Start?
Henk -
You are not worth responding to Henk. Enjoy your day.
That's because Henk is correct and Start is Wrong
Yes, enjoy your day Henk, knowing full well you are 100% correct and without any credible counter argument from Start.
what world do you live in ,Start
What world do you live in Start.The business people make their own world and the politicians they buy do the same.You say by not supporting a crappy bill we condemn people to die.What happens when because of lack of reform people keep paying higher and higher prices or get policies that have such hugh deductibles they go bankrupt.If people like you were around during the revolutionary war you would be saying what chance do we have against the British just accept their rule,this is reality.
godblessfdr - "All Quiet on the Western Front"
You, and articles like this above by Mark (who often does extremely constructive work) bring the blow-hard old men of "All Quiet on the Western Front" to mind. Not putting their own butts on the field of battle they spin these imaginary yarns to whip others into a suicidal frenzy. And they destroyed Germany and half the word doing it. Twice. How does that old song go, "Masturbation, can be fun...."
Spare us the uncivil illogical BS
Spare us your mental masturbation Start, and so early in the morning too!
Get back to us when you can address the message civilly and intelligently, without attempting to smear the messangers by slinging mud... or spunk.