The Green Revolution is Electrifying in Its Courage on the Streets: America Needed Such Public Demonstrations in 2000
BUZZFLASH EDITOR'S BLOG
BY Mark Karlin
If the American public who was outraged by the theft of the election from Al Gore in 2000 were as courageous and defiant then as the Green Revolution in Iran is now, we may not have had to endure 8 years of destruction to America and the world under Bush and Cheney.
That's not to say there weren't public demonstrations in the U.S. in 2000 -- as the much underrported oppostion protests during Bush's first inauguration proved in January of 2001 -- but they paled by comparison to the sense of longing and outrage demonstrated not just in words, but with bodies, in Iran.
For all practical purposes the "Supreme Commander" and his puppet Ahmadinejad are really the Shah and his Savak in new clothing. The "Supreme Commander" uses religion in a way that all overbearing and pompous theocrats who want to preserve their power do, as a way of invoking alleged divine authority.
I recently wrote an editor's blog supporting the United States staying out of the conflict directly, but supporting the right of the Green Revolution to protest freely. Obama is playing this exactly as he should.
The clergy in Iran came to power because the Shah, a puppet of the U.S., wouldn't pay his due to the mullahs. So they took their revenge against a corrupt regime that came to power in a CIA coup against a democratically elected leader of Iran in 1953. The recent special criticism that the "Supreme Leader" had for Britain was in large part due to the reason for the 1953 CIA organized coup, the preservation of British "sovereign" control of the Iranian oil fields for the West.
But whatever the motivations of the Iranian Revolution against the Shah, the mullahs have turned into political hacks seeking to preserve their power: absolute power corrupts absolutely as it did for the Shah, for Cheney and for Bush.
The theft of the 2000 election was a seminal event for BuzzFlash readers and made our website, at the time, one of the top ranked Internet destinations. There was a palpable sense in our reader commentaries that democracy had been betrayed, as it had been.
But we did not take to the streets in electrifying waves.
Iran has a distinct culture, and Mousavi, who was one of the leaders of the revolt against the Shah understands what he is up against, because he was one of them. He is not naive.
To those who are being beaten and dying today in Iran because they believe in breaking off the chains imposed by tyrants, we stand with you -- and we hope to learn from you to have the courage of our convictions.
BUZZFLASH EDITOR'S BLOG
- Login or register to post comments
- Printer-friendly version
Buzz this on Buzzflash.net




Technorati Tags:
IRAN IS RELEVANT NOW IN THE U S
WHERE OUR CITIZENS ARE
Congress cares what their campaign funders want and so, to a great extend does the executive. The media wants what their owners want. Not much room seems to be left for what citizens want.
health care
Al Gore did all he could in 2000
Gore should have demanded Federal troops in Florida
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL ......
this might even top your white males are being persecuted by the divorce industrial complex conspiracy theory.
You may be one toy short of a Happy Meal, Norm, .....
.... but you are seriously funny.
Another Point of View
But another viewpoint is to take notice that the Persians had the opportunity to watch the utter disaster of the Bush administration. They had eight years to ponder the consequences of inaction and to think about how they might have done better in similar circumstances. Perhaps they learned something useful from our disappointing example.
I Hope Some Of That Green Rubs Off On Us
There were huge demonstrations, but no twitter, or cell cameras
More importantly the demonstrations would have been a lot bigger if the actual facts were known. During the Y2k Fiasco there was a lot of knowledge on the Internet, but there were fewer people able to tell what was happening and more importantly, still fewer who were able to learn what was known.
Had the Internet been at current levels of use and technology the whole Bush v Gore fight would have been a lot different. Even as late as 2004 senior Democratic Leaders in Florida were not aware of knowledge, commonplace on the Web, of how they had been snookered.
If the Gang Of Pirates think that the only good Democrat is a dead Democrat, it is not any part of Bipartisan to accommodate them and roll over and play dead.
But unlike Moussavi, Al Gore
Absolutely
The Federal Reserve is only a symptom of the disease
You are almost as bad as
(And I say that despite having been at one time a major funder of Votermarch.)
The Matrix
The "Democrat" Party is, at every turn, Complicit in treachery.
This creates an institutional bias in Dem "leaders" to DEFER to RIGHT-WING MEDIA LORDS.
As a result - Democrats INSTITUTIONALLY DEFERING to Right-Wing media lords - Dem "Leaders" often DEFER to Right-Wing talking points. For example, Al Gore selecting Joe Lieberman as a "Moral Values" VP candidate - Gore was just too blinded by the relentless (corporate) media JIHAD against Bill Clinton to see that Lieberman has even less "moral character" than Clinton!
Then there is Bill Clinton himself -
"TRIANGULATING" - shoving Right-Wing Talking points down Democratic voters throats, knowing that Democratic voters had no where else to go.
With the Democrats continually producing CORPORATE LOBBYISTS "leaders" like Clinton, (NAFTA, WTO, China MFN), Lieberman, Daschle, and Baucus (even uber-"Environmentalist" Al Gore bowing to Right-Wing talking points) it's no wonder that Democratic voters can't muster up the enthusiasm to take to the streets to support these clowns.
And as tragic and appaling as this record (of Democrats' defering to Right-Wing talking points) is, haven't even touched on the Neo-Con Democrats (such as Lieberman, Feinstein, Harman, Emanuel, et al) blatantly supporting the full Neo-Con agenda: expanding wars, police-state war-powers, and loot-the-treasury "economics" !!
(In sum of the above: without extremely charismatic leaders the Democratic Party is NOT UP TO THE TASK of PROVIDING LEADERSHIP in an America where MASS MEDIA COMMUNICATIONS _DOMINATES_ the election process: almost every dime that Democratic voters sends to their candidates, gets spent buying air-time on RIGHT-WING CORPORATION OWNED media companies!
Modern mass-media communications powered the rise of the pre-WWII dictators, and with all media corporations now owned by bean-counters and profit-maximizing executives, Democratic voters end up funding THEIR OWN POLITICAL OPPOSITION.
Today in the Obama presidency, even when we do have a "charismatic" leader - he has been CO-OPTED by the Big Finance & pro-wars lobbies!
Apples and Oranges
i'll tell you why
Iran won't become Chile [an Iranian protest chant]
are we?
Different Republicans