Get FREE BuzzFlash News Alerts

Email:  

Murder He Wrote: Why Aren't Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld Being Prosecuted?

THE BUZZFLASH EDITOR'S BLOG

By Mark Karlin

If you're a mafia kingpin and you authorize a "hit," the feds will nail you for murder if they can prove the case.

As I have detailed in two recent BuzzFlash editor blog entries, the proof that Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld authorized, promoted and ordered actions that led to the murder and deaths of perhaps hundreds of detainees and merely "assumed bad guys" -- not to mention rapes and other brutality -- is overwhelming.  The authors of legal memos, whose writers include Bush-appointed Federal Judge Jay Bybee, should certainly be disbarred.

But that doesn't begin to address the underlying crimes that include the unnecesary and horrifying deaths of anyone that Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld -- and Condoleezza Rice -- believed was in the way of their demonic "War on Terrorism" (which for Cheney and Rumsfeld -- and others -- was really a war for natural resources). 

Details abound in the public record -- as we have mentioned -- of the homicidal acts that led to the deaths and disappearances of countless of individuals the Bush Gulag apparatus deemed "suspicious."  Some of the bodies have been accounted for; some of the alleged "enemies" just disappeared -- as was the case in Chile and Argentina during the infamous reign of terror in those countries.

As I noted:

It's not considered politically correct -- even among the high-profile progressive political blogs that are now quoted by the D.C. Beltway corporate media -- to accuse the Bush Administration of murder and sadism. It's "the wave" now to urge an investigation of the torture memos and potential prosecution, but the reality that torture resulted in the murders of an untold number of detainees in the Bush/Cheney/Rumsfeld Gulag is not discussed much.

That's why I wrote a BuzzFlash Editor's Blog yesterday, "The Legal Case Against Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Et Al., Is Murder One, Not Just War Crimes." Yet, as much as I agree that the torture memo authors should be tried (and Judge Bybee impeached), the MSM and progressive Internet's focus on the memos discounts and dishonors the justice that is necessary for those perhaps hundreds of detainees -- many of them, if not most of them, innocent of any actual crimes -- who were murdered as a result of torture.

That's why it's not surprising to see the multi-billion dollar corporate media machine continue to intentionally and ineptly still debate whether torture took place, as in this exchange between NBC's latest insipid enabler of the status quo on "Meet the Press" and King Abdullah II of Jordan:

DAVID GREGORY: 'Do you think the United States engaged in torture?'

KING ABDULLAH: 'Well, from what we've seen and what we've heard, ... there are enough accounts to ... show that that is the case. But there is still a major battle out there. ... [A]nd I think this is what President Obama is trying to do, is make sure that the legal system that America is known for [its] transparent to make sure that illegal activity-'

DAVID GREGORY: 'That's an important point. You actually do believe that the United States engaged in torture.'

KING ABDULLAH: 'What I see on the press ... shows that there were illegal ways of dealing with detainees.'

Some of the Bush era memos legalizing torture, just recently released by the Obama Administration, are an important corroboration of what we already knew, just as we knew that people were being murdered under the Pentagon and CIA torture guidelines distributed to commanding officers of known and secret detention sites around the world. 

The evidence of criminal abuse, including rape and murder, that was authorized as a general torture and abuse policy directly from the White House on down is abundant.  It only need be assembled as legally admissible proof of guilt in an American court of law or International War Crime tribunal.

As just one of literally hundreds -- perhaps thousands of examples -- a Salon article in 2004 noted a report by the indefatigable "last of his kind" investigative journalist, Seymour Hersh:

Debating about it, ummm ... Some of the worst things that happened you don't know about, okay? Videos, um, there are women there. Some of you may have read that they were passing letters out, communications out to their men. This is at Abu Ghraib ... The women were passing messages out saying 'Please come and kill me, because of what's happened' and basically what happened is that those women who were arrested with young boys, children in cases that have been recorded. The boys were sodomized with the cameras rolling. And the worst above all of that is the soundtrack of the boys shrieking that your government has. They are in total terror. It's going to come out."

"It's impossible to say to yourself how did we get there? Who are we? Who are these people that sent us there? When I did My Lai I was very troubled like anybody in his right mind would be about what happened. I ended up in something I wrote saying in the end I said that the people who did the killing were as much victims as the people they killed because of the scars they had, I can tell you some of the personal stories by some of the people who were in these units witnessed this. I can also tell you written complaints were made to the highest officers and so we're dealing with a enormous massive amount of criminal wrongdoing that was covered up at the highest command out there and higher, and we have to get to it and we will.

How much evidence has been destroyed -- the CIA "disappeared" the torture tapes -- we don't know, but clearly the shredders and "burn bags" were kept busy in the last days of the Bush Administration.  Still, the Obama WH is ordering more devastating detainee abuse photos released in the near future.

But all of these are just small pieces in the very large puzzle of a massive White House orchestrated sanctioning of War Crimes, including rape and murder.

It is not unexpected that the corporate mainstream media would attempt to minimize the criminal behavior of the Bush Administration, because D.C. insiders -- the villagers -- and the corporate oligarchy protects its own.

But I am a bit mystified why the progressive blogs and most liberal and civil liberties websites are more caught up with fingering the authors of the memos than the masterminds of the War Crimes policies: Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld and Rice (not to mention Wolfowitz, Feith, etc.).

As has been pointed out by others, after WW II some Japanese tried for War Crimes were hanged for waterboarding allied prisoners.

The torture unto death, rape, sexual violations, and abuse that violated the Geneva Conventions was rampant in the Bush Gulag.

The most pressing issue of justice is not who wrote the enabling torture (murder and rape) memos -- although the attorneys should be held accountable -- but who should be tried for inititiating and promoting War Crimes.

Murder is not something to split hairs about on Sunday morning talk shows.

It belongs in a courtroom so that justice is rendered, the perpertrators jailed, and the Constitution preserved.

THE BUZZFLASH EDITOR'S BLOG


Thanks for sharing this

Thanks for sharing this useful info. I would wait until your next article. Have a look at this great list of scams. I hope this would help somebody.

It ain't what you know, but WHO you know

Has been modified by the Navy as "It aint who you know, but who you blow". This may or may not be appropriate to this subject, but, at the same time, may go a long way towards explaining many of the actions and policies of the bush disaster.

We Got These War Crimes Because Clinton Let Iran-Contra Slide

We better not make the same dumb mistake again !

Investigate !

Prosecute !

Punish !

If we don't then the World Court at the Hague should take over.

The Question Is: Why?

Considering that Rep. Jane Harmon was likely blackmailed over her conspiracy with AIPAC, knowing what we know about Bill Clinton's extramarital activities had to have put him in a similar spot. It's the only logical explanation for the many things Clinton allowed (NAFTA, GATT, ...) that went against the grain of both the traditional Democratic positions and the needs of the nation. Deep Throat's advice still stands regarding this: follow the money. Who benefited? The same people who benefited under Bush and who continue to benefit now under Obama. Dave Lindorff opined that Obama was being blackmailed, and I can't say that isn't possible. It is - again - the only logical explanation.

As much as I would like to say that the Democrats are the answer to the problems caused by the Republicans, it's clear that the Democrats have been co-opted beyond recovery. While I hope we don't have to resort to Jefferson's extreme solution to this condition, I can see where that might become the only option - and that means this nation is finished.

jaydiamond

Absolutely correct. Short, sweet, and to the point.

Seriously?

By the time Clinton got in to office, there had already been several investigations by Congress (including the well-publicized hearings), the Tower Commission, and a Special Prosecutor who investigated for 5 years. Special Prosecutor Walsh had brought charges against fourteen administration officials and had gotten eleven convictions, and Bush I pardoned them all shortly before he left office.

Given all of this, what was left for Clinton to do? Try to bring criminal charges against Bush or Reagan? Besides the fact that Lawrence Walsh (the Special Prosecutor) had already looked at their roles and found there was not nearly enough evidence to prosecute, do you think it would have been even possible to successfully prosecute Bush and/or Reagan based upon their inconsistent statements and the fact that they each "failed to recall" what they knew and when they knew it? Particularly after all those involved had already been pardoned, and Casey was dead?

Yes, the Tower Commission was a joke and the pardons were a cover-up by Bush I, but there is no way Reagan or Bush could have been successfully prosecuted.

Debunking the arguments used against prosecution.

I believe that it is about getting the public 100% behind supporting prosecution. It is sad commentary that our elected officials need to be assured that letting justice take its course is politically safe, but I guess those are the times we live in. Here is a great article I found on a progressive blog debunking the arguments used by so many conservative slappies that oppose prosecution. Don't worry it's short. http://progressnotcongress.org/blog/?p=411

Around the Bend

I do not know what resources to do mischief are available to the Bush/Cheney axis, but I'd be surprised if they were not considerable. They will save themselves if they can, and there may well be no price they are unwilling to have the rest of us pay to do it. Just maybe the stooges who represent us quake in their shoes at the mere thought of it.

Our leaders have become what we revolted against in 1812

and just as in 1812-1814 we have the "Tories" on one side, the "Whigs" on the other... "Broadly defined, The Tories beleived in the divine right of Kings to rule - that they were ordained by God. Whigs believed that the King was there at the request and goodwill of the ruling families of the country so could only continue to rule at their approval." Any way you slice it a few (hopefully a minority) have come to believe in the divine rights of the "ruling class" (mostly funded by (campaign funds) by the huge corporations and Wall Street) not "the people"..and there's the danger..we have given away our freedoms (most only have guns so they can keep their guns, don't care about any other civil rights) our honor doesn't appear to exist any more either...(torture!!)

The only good thing about

The only good thing about the latest torture revelations is that maybe more Americans will wake up and realize the American government was taken over in a coup de' tat by the criminals a long time ago. Now the crime family that we call congress is being aided and abetted in the most egregious, treason by the MSM whores and presstitutes as they are attempting to obfuscate the torture issue by debate. The only rational debate is when and how to start prosecuting the criminals that try to deflect their heinous crimes by using the whores that want to debate what shouldn't be debateable. Torture is immoral, illegal,doesn't work, and is against the Geneva Conventions and everything America stands for.

Here comes the whitewashing . . . .

A current argument among the public and pundits against release of the torture videos is that their release would spawn ME outrage, further eroding security. As if the atrocities Hersch brought up weren't already communicated among the Iraqi and ME populations. Sometimes it's the guilty conscience that denies and fights truth the most aggressively. Excuse me, first and foremost, it's the culpable and then the denial of the supporters, who refuse to acknowledge their government's capacity for the unspeakable. It would surprise me if the videos Hersch referred to were not destroyed, much less ever accessible to the public. His 2004 assertions were surely one of the major catalysts in the ACLU demanding videos and photographic evidence. I hope somehow the truth emerges to the public consciousness without an excessive amount of bleaching.

Bush/Cheney unmentioned crime

The Bush/Cheney administration was informed/warned about terrorist/AlQaeda efforts to attack US facilities in Dec. 2000 by the Clinton team meeting with the Bush/Cheney transition team. In Jan./Feb. of 2001 at the first of the new cabinet meetings there were discussions of removing Saddam Hussein from power. Cheney was named as the head of the a Terrorist Task Force and proceeded to never call any meetings in the spring/summer of 2001. CIA director Tenet tried to get Rice to be concerned about terrorist rumblings in the summer of 2001. August 2008 Bush, at a PDB, was warned about Al Qaeda desire to attack US. Bush's reaction to the aforementioned--"OK, you've covered your ass"(with your report). There were efforts time and time again to get the Bush/Cheney administration to be concerned about the known terrorist events (Trade Tower incident 1993, Cole bombing) as being indicators of a continuing effort to attack the US. The response of the Bush/Cheney administration? No response! Why? Because they didn't believe anything presented by the Clinton transition team? Because they didn't trust reports by the CIA? Because they are so all knowing, that if they didn't initiate the activity, it wasn't worth pursuing? I don't know the answer to the question. But I do think it is worth us trying to get the answer the 9/11 commission wasn't willing to pursue. The Bush/Cheney answer of "no one could have expected such an event" as the 9/11 attack doesn't cut it in light of what we now know about the information bombarding the Bush/Cheney presidency. In addition to the above, we now know the Bush/Cheney minions were also ignoring the law, the Constitution, and international treaties/obligations in an effort to torture to get a confession of a Al Qaeda-Hussien connection. And the suggested response to all of this is to forget it all? Not the way I see it. We need more investigations. We need investigations of just about every major activity of the Bush/Cheney disaster. We need to prove to the American people that the guiding principles of the conservative/GOP/fundamentalist movement is a formula for destruction of a modern, technological, 21st century society. In fact, the destruction has already happened, now it's time to have everyone learn how it came to be.

Bring the S.O.B.s to justice

I remember when Gerald Ford pardoned Richard Nixon, essentially absolving him of any and all Watergate wrong-doing in advance of any grand jury indictment, because, said Ford, it was time for the nation "to heal." That little act of mercy healed nothing.

I remember President Bill Clinton ignored all the blatant crimes committed by the Reagan administration in the name of stopping "communism" in Nicaragua. What did it get Clinton? A opera buffa impeachment for a blowjob in the Oval Office and Oliver North on the radio. Certainly healed me, didn't it you?

Now we have nearly irrefutable evidence that high crimes and misdemeanors, torture, were in fact committed under orders of highly placed officials in the Bush administration, Vice President Richard Cheney. Yet in the face of mounting prosecutable evidence the president dithers while Democratic Senate Majority Leader, Harry "Cap'n Milquetoast" Reid, plans strategies to delay and derail even a toothless "truth commission." To what f*cking end? So Ivy League-educated weasels, who came from "good" families and had terrific resumes before entering government service will never have to spend a day in one of the federal prison system's country club facilities. Utter nonsense!

How is letting fat-fingered John Yoo walk going to "heal" the country? Or his pal Steven Bradbury? Or Judge Jay Bybee?

If by "healing the nation" one means sending the signal to poor young black men and poor young white men and poor young Hispanic men that there is, indeed, two systems of justice in this country: one for well-connected and wealthy "whites" (Yoo, a Korean, like so many of his compatriots is accorded honorary W.A.S.P. status) who can commit heinous crimes, especially in the name of "national security," until someone on Wall Street loses a sh*tpot of money, and the other for the rest of us.

No wonder Americans are cynical about our system of justice. Johnny next door gets pulled over for his third DUI and gets sent to jail for 60 days, followed by years of probation and worthless, privatized rehab he must pay for out-of-pocket. Meanwhile Cheney, Yoo, Bradbury and Bybee wander round free to continue fomenting whatever nefarious schemes their black hearts desire.

You see the difference, in the eyes of what passes for jurisprudence in the United States these days, is that Johnny here is a drunk and a danger to himself and the community whenever he gets behind the wheel of a car. Dick Cheney, John Yoo, Steve Bradbury and Jay Bybee all are members of "good" families, went to the right schools, have great resumes and long years of "faithful" service to the country. Gee, can't we just give these poor guys a break?

Utter nonsense.

The New York Times' Frank Rich says it best in concluding his Saturday column:We don’t need another commission. We don’t need any Capitol Hill witch hunts. What we must have are fair trials that at long last uphold and reclaim our nation’s commitment to the rule of law.

More Than Torture

Forget torture. What kind of country do we live in where our leaders are allowed to break the law and violate the Constitution with impunity? Torture is the lesser issue. The Republic can survive state-sponsored torture in wartime. The real issue here is whether the President and those he commands are above the law. Where does it say in the Constitution that laws passed by the Legislature can be ignored by the Executive? We’re talking felonies here: kidnapping, murder and torture. You can add tapping our phones, which is the same issue. All these were illegal, unconstitutional acts by a president who claimed virtually unlimited executive power in wartime and acted on it. All we have to remember is this: the law is the law. If we simply enforce the law, the Constitution will take care of itself.

Murder Schmurder They Wrote

I tuned into CNN this morning long enough to hear John King question Diane Feinstein, Joe Lieberman, and Lindsey Graham (now there's some diversity)about the torture investigation. Feinstein said it would take between SIX TO EIGHT MONTHS to finish her investigation, and that Dick Cheney had sent her some papers showing how torture had worked to gain valuable information and blah blah. Lieberman said it was wrong of Obama to release the memo's, and Graham muttered something, but I had already stopped listening, and then turned it off. So we're going to see a long, drawn out, spin war which will probably eventually lead to a whitewash with a few wrist slaps. I just hope Obama has the guts (and I believe he does) to keep releasing information to the public, so that this story of MURDER, not just torture, will stay on the front burner. God help us if we don't punish these crimes. America will never be a beacon for freedom and justice. We will be just another corporate slave-labor camp in the global economy, empty of even sound and fury and signifying nothing. It is up to US, people, first as Americans, then as citizens of the world community to bring justice down on the murderers in our midst.

"rule of law" always favors one's "own" class

Perhaps there is an ever simpler, more fundamental reason for the bi-partisan reluctance to do anything concrete to respond to very solid documentation of very high crimes: in spite of all our talk about "rule of law", we rarely apply the law with full force to our "own kind".

Just as we whites (speaking for myself) find it so much easier to arrest, prosecute, and punish those who are not our "own kind", and thus minorities disproportionately suffer the force of "the law", so too do our highest officials find it difficult to apply the law to their "own kind".

What we are seeing is indeed the "rule of law" as we actually practice it.

I said months ago

that the low-ranking enlisted people who were prosecuted (England, Graner) were scapegoats and that these people wouldn't have "just done this" unless they had been greenlighted by higher-ups. The rot of all this started at the top and needs to be prosecuted starting at the top. Like others have commented, I too grew up when we started our school week with the flag raising ceremony and the Pledge and the flag lowering at the end of the school week. That is precisely WHY I am so angry and disgusted with the spin on all of this. I'm a child of a WW II vet and his wife (both now deceased) and grew up believing that my country stood for justice and freedom and that we also stood for humanistic principles (not to be confused with religious principles). To see now that this is not what my government stands in is very disconcerting and disturbing. The bottom line is this: We are a principle member of the United Nations and we are also signatory (still are last I checked) of the Geneva Conventions. What our government did was to violate those laws. I believe our government MUST investigate, and if not willing to prosecute of their own volition, turn the information to the UN and the International Court and let them make the decision to try and adjudge these war criminals known as "The Bushies." If we fail to this, I will never believe my government again, nor trust it and I will become an aging anarchist instead of a pissed off flower child.

Childhood Training

I recall that when I was in grade-school, along with my classmates I was subjected to daily training in patriotism. We said the pledge of allegiance and we sang the national anthem along with a variety of other patriotic songs. This is how we started our school day, every day for a long part of our formative years.

Maybe it is less true today than it was in the 1950's, but this daily training built some things into the very fiber of our being and among those things was a reverence for our country and for its president. It is hard for people to turn against this kind of childhood religious training.

I think this is at the root of why we hear demands for prosecution of the lawyers who were instrumental in bringing to the point of being a country that tortures, but we still shy away from calls to punish those who are actually most guilty in this matter. How can we punish someone who was president or vice president? Can you do that?

Of course matters were different in the case of punishing Clinton for a sexual matter; maybe our reticence to punish is tempered with partisanship. In the 1950's the president was a Republican after all.

justice

When justice is done, Bush, Cheney, Wolfowitz, Powell, Rice, Feith, Perle, Rumsfeld AND about 300 members of congress who voted for Iraq will hang at Nuremberg. Well, it's a pleasant fantasy.