The Legal Case Against Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Et Al., Is Murder One, Not Just War Crimes
THE BUZZFLASH EDITOR'S BLOG
by Mark Karlin
BuzzFlash fully supports trying Bush, Cheney, and their band of fellow sadists for war crimes, but while they are in the courtroom, let's not forget Murder One. Apparently, many in the mainstream press and blogosphere already have.
The focus right now is on legal memos justifying the horrifying and numbing repetition of torture against "high profile" targets. We have a short memory in America -- and most of what was in these memos -- except for the diabolical excess of the waterboarding and the medieval torture by insects -- was, as President Obama has said, pretty much already known.
Also known, but not discussed at this time, is that less upper echelon Al-Qaeda figures were murdered as a result of the Bush/Cheney/Rumsfeld torture jihad (euphemestically called in the mainstream corporate press "harsh" or "enhanced interrogation").
Uh, remember those photos of bludgeoned prisoners in body bags that came out of Abu Ghraib? (And we still have only seen a small portion of the visual evidence.) Those people were murdered as a result of the green light on torture. Even the Pentagon has declared some of the Guantanamo dead were victims of homicide. Then there are many "renditioned" individuals who disappeared into torture prisons around the world and have never reappeared.
In 2008, Lawrence Wilkerson, former Chief of Staff to Colin Powell and a man who came over from the dark side to tell the truth, testified before Congress that a minimum of 25 people died in U.S. detention as a result of homicides -- and that the figure was probably higher.
Indeed, other estimates put the figure much, much higher -- and that doesn't include the prisoners who were sent to "black holes" and never reappeared. It doesn't include the hundreds of Taliban prisoners who were transported to a remote spot in Afghanistan (shortly after the U.S. invasion) and machine gunned to death in container tracks by Afghan soldiers with a green light from Rumsfeld.
The number of people murdered during torture ("harsh interrogation") will likely never be known, but as a governor in Texas, George W. Bush executed the highest number of people for far fewer murders each. Some of them just killed one person, unlike Bush, Cheney and their crew of arm chair executioners.
If there is an Anne Frank who symbolizes the horrific death that befell those who fell into the Bush/Cheney/Rumsfeld torture machine, it is the innocent Afghan whose story of being murdered while mistakenly incarcerated and tortured was compellingly detailed in the 2008 Academy Award winning Alex Gibney documentary "Taxi To the Dark Side."
Some background on "Taxi to the Dark Side" reveals, once again, that we should be concentrating both on War Crimes and Murder One when it comes to pursuing charges against Bush Administration officials:
In December 2002, Dilawar, a young rural Afghan cabdriver, was accused of helping to plan a rocket attack on a U.S. base, clamped into prison at Bagram, and subjected to physical torture so relentless that he died after two days of it. But Dilawar was innocent--and he'd been denounced by the real culprit, who thereby took the heat off himself and won points with U.S. forces by giving them "a bad guy." Dilawar was the first fatal victim of Vice President Dick Cheney's devotion to "working the dark side"--torturing, humiliating, and otherwise abusing prisoners in the "Global War on Terror." His story, developed in horrific detail with testimony from the soldiers who tortured him, and also from two New York Times investigative reporters, becomes a prism for slanting light onto the "dark side" policy and the mindset behind it. The program at Bagram was deemed such a success that it served as the model for Abu Ghraib the following year in Iraq, and both prisons became pipelines to the detainee facility at Guantánamo, Cuba.
And Vincent Bugliosi, the author of a book on how the Supreme Court stole the 2000 election for Bush, penned a "J'Accuse" whose title makes the case that we are asserting on BuzzFlash: "The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder."
Even for progessives, the news cycle has been shortened to a nano-second; and right now the focus is on the legalese used in the just-released memos to justify torture. And the Bush defenders are countering with an allegation that the torture of two or three suspects produced important information (which thus far has not been proven by any facts).
But in some ways, the focus on two or three Al Qaeda leaders has taken attention away from an organized system of torture that resulted in untold deaths, also known as murder.
For these murders, George W. Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld -- who have always had a mean streak of sadism running through their blood, as they micro-managed torture and personally reviewed torture tapes -- should be charged and tried for War Crimes -- and Murder One.
Out of such trials, perhaps the truth will be revealed about the number of detainees who died under "harsh interrogation," as did the innocent taxi driver from rural Afghanistan who was pulverized to death in a matter of just two days at Bagram.
If we do not bring justice to their deaths, who will?
THE BUZZFLASH EDITOR'S BLOG
- Login or register to post comments
- Printer-friendly version
Buzz this on Buzzflash.net




Technorati Tags:
I Totally Agree
Phillip Zelikow
McDonalds claim against Move-on ad may ask to prosecute
and obama too
We'll never know
28 Confirmed homicides, 100+ died in US custody
Failure to act is complicity--
If this administration does not pursue justice with respect to Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld--these three at the very least--then the blame for an eventual future recurrence of these types of crimes can be laid squarely upon Obama. The fact that Nixon escaped prosecution no doubt emboldened his spawn (Cheney, Rumsfeld, and others) to commit their own subsequent crimes. By failing to insist that the law be upheld, Obama will be adding to the general breakdown of standards to which we should be holding our government.
Yes. I have an email to the heads of BBC and leadng UK media
Kudos to BuzzFlash!
Nazi denouement
Finally, I'm not alone
The order to torture had to
The order to torture had to have come from the highest levels. These Interrogatories as they want to call them are repulsive acts and these people who allowed it should face the harshest sentence.
I support this editorial 100%
There is no statute of limitations on murder. It's a crime that endures, one that demands punishment. This excellent editorial makes clear that we're dealing with a lot more than torture, if that's imaginable.
As noted, Vince Bugliosi, one of the very best prosecutors in our history, makes the case that Bush, Cheney, and Rice are guilty of murder for the deaths of each American soldier lost in Iraq. He argues that they bear the moral responsibility for the deaths of more than one million Iraqi civilians.
Were there a federal indictment for torture and a local district attorney indictment for murder (see Bugliosi's approach), it would be possible to get the torture defendants to roll over and testify against Bush for the murder indictment. This isn't fantasy. It's the way prosecutions are conducted in big cases. It's not unreasonable to charge Bush-Cheney with murder, it's the law -- they deliberately lied us into a war where U.S. soldiers, citizens, died who should not have died.
Let's make sure that the powerful know that they can't kill at will so the next time their political or financial interests call for a war, attack, or even a total embargo, they'll think twice because Bush and company had to face the same laws that apply to everyone else .
Murder
the Bush admin. war crime.. primacy of charges.
Primacy of the crimes
In the Year 2050