Get FREE BuzzFlash News Alerts

Email:  

Corrupt Media Update: CNBC Hypes Its Owner, General Electric, As GE's Performance and Stock Plummet

THE BUZZFLASH EDITOR'S BLOG

By Mark Karlin

BuzzFlash has written a lot lately about the economic infomercial known as CNBC, which burst into the national discussion due to Jon Stewart's searing take down of the network after Rick Santelli's televised "stunt" defense of the moneyed-class.

As Stewart recently pointed out while guesting on the Letterman show, the Wall Street cheerleading (advertising) that CNBC does is pretty typical of the financial networks. Why you even have CNBC -- after the complete failure of de-regulation due to greed and legalized financial gambling debts in the hundreds of billions of dollars -- blaming Obama (who has barely got his feet wet) for the drop in stocks because he won't hype their "salesperson value" over their actual value.

Now, it turns out -- and follow me on this -- that General Electric, the parent company of CNBC, NBC and other media outlets, may be going down the tubes.  In fact, GE may have misled stockholders about its ongoing performance just before a critical report.

We know this because Joe Nocera -- the old-style real kind of financial journalist from the NYT who professionally dissected AIG on "The Daily Show" the night that Jon Stewart decimated CNBC -- wrote a March 6th article in the NYT entitled, "Behind the Curtain at GE" In that analysis of GE's plummeting prospects, Nocera wrote:

"G.E. Capital," wrote Nicholas P. Heymann and Matthew Kelley, two bearish analysts at Sterne Agee, "is now confronting the prospect that a downward trend in fundamental performance, fueled by weakening end markets and magnified by several liquidity constraints, could potentially lead to an extended period of steadily lower earnings, depleted loss provisions, lower credit ratings, rising borrowing costs" ... well, you get the picture. Mr. Heymann, who has followed G.E. for 27 years, issued his report on Tuesday morning — just two business days after G.E. cut its previously sacrosanct dividend by two-thirds.

Within 24 hours of Mr. Heymann's report, the company's stock, which had been $17 a share just a couple of months ago, dropped to under $6: "That's a scary number for G.E.," said Richard Hofmann, an analyst with CreditSights who is also a G.E. bear. The credit-default swaps spread suggested that investors were worried about default.

But when you own the media, you always have a megaphone for hyping up your faltering financial condition.

So it was hardly a surprise that as CNBC blames Obama for not cheerleading on an underperforming market (because of mismanagement and greedy financial plays by many CEOs and their manangement teams of "bonus baby" con artists), it also -- according to Nocera -- gives its parent company, GE, a national television audience to tout "how well" it is doing.

According to Nocera,

On Thursday morning, the company's chief financial officer, Keith Sherin, appeared on CNBC, which G.E. conveniently owns, and offered a passionate defense of the company. "We have an incredibly strong liquidity position," Mr. Sherin said. "We have $45 billion in cash," he added. "We have no triggers that we can see that would have any call on our cash in the short term." Later that afternoon, I had my own conversation with Mr. Sherin. "We don't need more capital," he insisted. "On a tangible common equity basis, we are fine. Our tangible common equity for GE Capital is higher than any of the big banks." He added: "We are trying to rebuild credibility and also trying to be clear and open and honest." By the end of Thursday, the stock closed at $6.66; by Friday, it stood at $7.06. For the moment at least, the pressure had eased.

There could be no greater ethical conflict of interest than CNBC letting its parent company use its media subsidiary to basically issue a 3-dimensional press release.  But that is what comes with big corporations owning big media.

If this episode of corporate/media incestuousness with critical financial implications to stock holders doesn't serve as an example of what a serious threat we face from Wall Street ownership of the media, we might as well just take a goblet of hemlock -- as Socrates did -- and kiss our dreams of economic recovery goodbye.

BuzzFlash is here -- pleading daily for support -- as are other progressive Internet sites. Pro-economic fair play advocates have the slimmest of toe-holds on television with Maddow, Olbermann, Stewart, and Colbert -- and some successful progressive radio talk show hosts.

But the "Big Media" is still one big corporate shill for the most part, some more egregious in their public relations role for the rich than others.

CNBC is in the shameless "red alert" category, but it's not unique.

For nearly nine years, BuzzFlash has been confronting this threat to our economic well-being and democracy head on.  But we don't have billions of dollars and national television and cable networks.

We just have you and a dedictated staff who work for peanuts.

It's not an easy task taking on the entrenched oligarchy, which runs our big national media.  Sometimes it's damn depressing. 

But after a few punches from the schoolyard bully, you can either run or stay and fight.

We plan on holding our ground for awhile. In 2010, it will have been a decade of BuzzFlash.

Help keep us punching away, because we don't have the corporate "welfare limousine" backing to state our case on CNBC.

And if General Electric starts to go under, it will probably get a government bailout of some sort through an "arranged" merger. If we miss a payroll at BuzzFlash -- and Lordy we come close nearly every two weeks -- there's going to be no helping hand from Washington, nor should there be.

We are in Chicago, a long way from Wall Street; BuzzFlash is populist-progressive, not D.C. endorsed.

We plan on keeping it that way, with your help.

We're in a recession/depression, but it's going to stay that way if the only media survivors are the likes of CNBC.

THE BUZZFLASH EDITOR'S BLOG


What is sauce...

What is sauce for the goose...

Three Cheers!!! Go BuzzFlash!

I own a soap box too and what you hear from me will be mine, with all that it entails, my perspective and my commercial message...

Just like we hear from GE and just like we heard from Mark, and I have no problem with that... As the previous extended comment pointed out, all media is slanted, NBC and BuzzFlash just happen to be slanted in different ways... What? You just notice?

I am proud to have been a longtime financial supporter of BuzzFlash, and that support will continue. I cut the DCCC and DSCC off, and if the DNC doesn't evidence some basic smarts and fire the "pros" who work the phones for 'em (and start saying more nice things about Howard), they'll get the axe too...

The impact you have had on recent political events is only just beginning to be noticed and you look good on TV, I hope to see more of you. The Second City, which I haven't visited since late August 1968..., is now outshining New York as both a power center and a source of news both sublime and ridiculous. And it ain't even summer yet...

I urge my fellow readers and writers to set up a small monthly donation to BuzzFlash at Pay Pal as I did or directly if you still write actual checks. As we amply proved in 2008 large numbers of small donations not only add up but they allowed Barack Obama the political freedom during his campaign that I believe made the difference and still does.

BuzzFlash and its young and talented writers, as well as its more old and in the way types, need and have earned our support...

But he's right, you know, hyperbole and economics rarely mix as well as hype and politics do...

RG Johnson
San Jose, CA

Suprise! Surprise!

Being a retired broker from a Wall Street firm that is still standing, CNBC has been a daily part of my life ever since my workstation was capable of displaying a TV show, which was in the mid-nineties. The station is invaluable as far as broadcasting events live featuring newsmakers, like Former Fed Secretary Greenspan testifying before Congress. It is a given however that the network is corporately owned and will reflect the philosophy of management which back in the early days consisted of Jack Welch. One also learns early on that with few exceptions the "guests" on the program have their own agenda, don't know squat, or both. The hosts of the programming are GE employees, what does one expect from them, the unvarnished truth (One exception is Jim Cramer,who Jon Stewart did an uninformed hit job on. While he may be one of the best he is still fallible. The thing about Jim is that he always believes in what he says and his heart is in the right place. He always attempts to help the "little guy")? Basically the programming is "noise", similar to the normal up and down fluctuations of the market. CNBC is no better or worse than the current event news propaganda from their parent network now disseminated by Brian Williams. BuzzFlash has been an excellent alternative to the political crap that passes for learned commentary from mostly clueless pundits on cable. And there is no doubt that the liberal community using the net contributed mightily to the election of the man that will pull the country out of this financial hole. However, when I read headlines on BuzzFlash such as "Kiss the Banks Good-bye" I realize the gap in expertise between politics and economics on this site. Unless the readers of this site want a second American Revolution, and all of the violence that would entail, I would suggest that we all band together behind President Obama's economic program which includes replacing regulations that were discarded by free market political hacks, quit bank-bashing and root for the free flow of credit to resume, and do something very patriotic by going out and buying a big ticket item.That may sound Bushian but that was his proposal after 9/11. In the end, it will take a new found confidence by the American consumer to revive the economy.