Good Odds that Rupert Murdoch Will be Responsible for the Next Timothy McVeigh or Assassination Attempt
THE BUZZFLASH EDITOR'S BLOG
by Mark Karlin
Yes, with the civil war talk on the program of the recently acquired FOX News demagogue, Glenn Beck, inflammatory talk by Sean Hannity, and Rush Limbaugh's nativist rants that equate Obama to something akin to an amalgamation of Karl Marx and Adolf Hitler, the right-wing media is stirring up the dangerous angry white male resentment to a dangerous frenzied pitch.
And we all know where that ended up with Timothy McVeigh and the militia movement of the '90s, which was enabled by the right-wing media barons -- such as Rupert Murdoch -- to create a literal armed militia movement against the government of the United States.
Call it treasonous, call it demagoguery, call it treachery: it is what comes down the pike when the wealthy Democratic elites are more content to fund organizations that criticize the apocalyptic, brown-shirted Murdoch media barons rather than buying up media and delivering an alternative message that emphasizes loyalty to the truth, Constitution and democracy.
Sure, we love Media Matters, but they are just a fly on a donkey's butt as far as Rupert Murdoch and the gang are concerned. Media Matters will get an occasional correction of factual errors -- if they pull out all their guns for one, but it's too little a compensation for the energy put into the effort. And the people who take in the corporate media remember the misleading assertion, not the rare convoluted retraction.
The reality is that the only thing that matters in media is owning it. Murdoch knows that and couldn't give a horse's fart for what Media Matters has to say, nor does CBS which just hired a Democratic-hating Republican stalwart as their senior communications executive.
Nor do any of the mainstream corporate media: including radio, television and print. They will just keep on doing what they are doing because they own it and they know what they want: an oligarchy.
The troops for this formidable army of images, mistruths, and emotional manipulation are the angry white males, the guys who have felt displaced by minorities and women and immigrants ever since the Civil Rights and Feminist upheaval began in the '60s.
And these displaced white guys are armed to the teeth, courtesy of the NRA and the senators and representatives who lie down like doormats for the gun lobby in Congress.
And bristling with guns -- including the .50 caliber sniper rifle that is legal in all but California -- they feel enabled and patriotic in rising up against the legitimate Constitutional government of the United States.
As rabid as Hannity and Beck and Limbaugh may seem, their ratings have actually gone up since Obama's election. The white male who has been shafted by the wealthy elite, pickpocketed and left in humiliation, falls prey yet again to the siren song of the Murdoch/Ailes stable of Goebbels disciples and their cohorts such as Limbaugh and Savage.
This is no exaggeration. Glenn Greenwald discusses it as do the superlative FOX trackers at FOX Newshounds.
And its impact is seen drilling down to discussions on Sean Hannity's website of armed rebellion, military coup, and secession.
Those Obama supporters who think I am being hyperbolic have a short sense of history. This is what we saw in the Clinton administration that led to the domestic terrorist Oklahoma bombing and trumped up impeachment.
And before the right-wing media was as consolidated as it is today, we saw our liberal leaders gunned down one by one in the '60s, resutling in the election of Richard Nixon -- and the beginning of the well-funded corporate mainstream media consolidation owned by people beholden only to the oligarchy, not the American public.
Yes, there are exceptions, but they are few in number, far too few.
And Murdoch may do his own non-apology about his New York Post's thinly veiled racist incitement cartoon of two white police officers shooting a chimp representing -- in full bigoted Murdoch fashion -- Obama.
But when the armed angry white males decide to act because of the Murdoch/Limbaugh et al. incitement to rise up ringing in their ears, the blood will be on the hands of Rupert and his fellow right-wing corporate media barons -- and he won't be sorry for it.
He'll only feel one thing: Mission accomplished.
A BUZZFLASH EDITOR'S BLOG
- Login or register to post comments
- Printer-friendly version
Buzz this on Buzzflash.net


Technorati Tags:
Deeply ingrained, deeply personal - not easy to change...
Inciting violence on either side is ugly, but from most forums I visit, I have to say, the most violent aggression is from the right. They, however, simply cannot see it. To them, it is logical and is "common sense". I have given up. One of them constantly posts bumper stickers from a website called impeachobama.com. Some of it is truly alarming, but when you say something, they drag out the First Amendment! LOL! That same amendment that doesn't apply to the rest of us!
Unless you interact with right-wingers, you cannot grasp the depth of their convictions. No matter how wrong-headed, they are deeply convinced that they are right (their preachers as well as Rush tell them so), that they are the only "true" Americans, the only "true" patriots, fighting against a vast leftwing conspiracy. Leftwing media? LOL! I keep pointing out that Murdoch owns a wide swath of it, and he is hardly a leftist, but that pales in comparison to the power of Air America! (I wish.)
These people are, at heart, also hardcore racists. They will not admit it, probably even to themselves, but even their denials are filled with bigoted statements. They have defended the "chimp" cartoon, and no matter how many people point out the racism in it, they either don't see it, or they embrace it at some level.
But, at the same time, they are human beings, and I count some of them among my friends. Some of them even helped me out in an emergency, even though we have never met. I have more in common with some of them than I have with urban white-collar liberals. And I hope that the respect I have earned from them in our debates will cause them to think a little more deeply, even when they don't agree.
I think we have to understand that political/social orientation is largely a result of our natural personality orientation. People who are authoritarian, who are probably a majority, have a very black-and-white outlook, and have trouble seeing things in a more multifaceted way. Liberals tend to be non-authoritarian in their outlook, and don't understand the security needs that drive the conservatives.
And that is what drives the hate jocks. These guys are insecure, and hate anyone who threatens the status quo. Maybe the pertinent question is how can they be made to feel secure in a multi-cultural, global society? How can they be made to understand that having a Black president does not denigrate their whiteness? How can we raise boys (and girls) who are secure, and who grow into secure adult men (and women)?
An understanding of the authoritarian mindset is pretty important to understanding the right wing - and a portion of the left wing as well. A good primer is found in an online book here:
www.members.shaw.ca-drbob-theauthoritarians.pdf
You will have to cut and paste, sorry. I can't embed a link, it seems.
Spell Out What They REALLY Are. . .
Can we not go there, please?
Words of Some Comfort
devil's advocate
apples and oranges
Smirking chimp?
There is a difference here...
organize peacefull, widespread opposition
Not really
The M$M will never hold Murdoch accountable
Nor would it hold a Sean Hannity or a Rush Limbaugh or a Glen Beck to account.
Even if the evidence was clear that an article or statement by any one of the above mentioned right wing media owner or any one of the cadre of right wing radio/television bloviators directly incited a deranged individual to commit an act of civil violence against the president or Congress or federal agency, the mainstream media, M$M, would not have the courage to lay responsibility at their feet.
I beg to differ
backfire
More seditious than anything
Good comments from the
Softball vs. Hardball - Left is Losing
Why can't they be arrested
Revoke Murdoch's U.S. Citizenship
Murdoch got U.S. Citzenship under false pretenses. He had no interest in being an American citizen. He just wanted to own media interests here, and he couldn't do so without becoming a citizen. His incitement of treason, rebellion, and secession is reason enough to revoke his naturalized citizenship. I wonder if the Obama administration has the guts to do it?
If his naturalized citizenship were revoked, that would send a clear message to (and perhaps the fear of God into) the rest of the entrenched corporate media. If an oligarch like Murdoch could be brought down, it could happen to anybody. The message to the oligarchs: Incite riots and treason, and get your license to broadcast revoked!
Murdoch, secession, etc.
Well Said
AMEN MARK
Mark Karlin's editorial on Rupert Murdoch
Be forearmed
Weapons for the left
Hate to confess, I have done the same.
I have never liked guns in general, but everyone has a right to self-protection.
People like Limbaugh, Hannity, Coulter and other right-wing terrorists say and do what they do because they believe their own propaganda; that liberals are wimps who could not whip their way out of a wet, paper bag with a machete let alone fire a gun.
My grandfather taught me to shoot when I was 9 years of age. I've never shot at anything but tin cans and targets. I consider myself moderate to liberal and I know they are wrong. I'm prepared to defend myself if I have to. When we live, as we do, in an open air mental institution, we should all be prepared to protect our selves from ditto-heads and other followers of the evil blow-hards like Hannity, Limbaugh, and the rest, who are finally pushed over the edge by their hate-speech.
What do we do?
Tough toenails
right on
Exactly
Nations like Sweden; who never experience any difficulties unless the World economy is suffering,should be proof of how well Socialism can operate, sustain, maintain, and preserve a Democracy when applied correctly. Swedish citizens actually have more civil liberties and personal freedoms than American citizens and they haven't been in a war in well over three hundred years or longer. Nuts like Rush Limbaugh are not heard on the airwaves in places like Sweden; nor, do they have any of their own nut jobs like Sean Hannity in the media like we have over here. I'll rest my case on that point. When asked if an American auther would be considered for the Nobel Literature prize; the man from the Swedish Academy in charge of the nominations for that category said something to this effect...
The following is an excerpt from radio sweden's coverage of the Nobels..
"In an interview with the Associated Press, Horace Engdahl, the permanent secretary of the Swedish Academy, says the United States is too insular and ignorant to compete with Europe when it comes to great writing."
With this information... I rest my case.
Sweden has its problems too
Nazi Germany got its power