Get FREE BuzzFlash News Alerts

Email:  

If You Want to Be a President Who Moves America Forward, You Have to Just Say "No" to the GOP

MARK KARLIN, BUZZFLASH EDITOR FOR TRUTHOUT

I was going to write about the injustice that only 3,500 inheritances a year would be subject to the White House's proposed estate tax.

Then I was going to write about how the Obama plan would actually increase taxes on the poor.

Then I was going to opine on how public employees will pay more under the White House/GOP agreement.

Then I rewatched President Obama's December 7 news conference and stopped reading about all the adverse impact of the "deal," and I just got angry.

Obama ran on a narrative of changing the ways things work in DC and throwing out the lobbyists and entrenched interests. This was his overarching appeal, not what he said on specific issues, although those, too, had some impact. But he won a mandate on shaking up DC, getting rid of the "old ways," offering transparency in government, holding political wrong doers accountable and promising, above all, audacity in achieving these goals.

And a whopping mandate it was that he scored. In addition to his own overwhelming victory, Democrats seized sizable majorities in both houses.

Yet, Obama, from his first days, squandered all the goodwill and enthusiasm built up in the American public by arguing that he had to cater to the GOP. He appointed key advisers who were part of the very Washington establishment that he promised to show the door. His economic team was recycled from a pro-Wall Street revolving door of insiders. He quickly went from bold promises of altering DC to pleading that people expected too much of him given the power of the entrenched elite, particularly - and ironically - a weakened GOP.

It's as if a law enforcement officer ran for sheriff on a platform of getting rid of all the gangs in town and never giving into them. But when confronted in an alley by a bunch of thugs, the new sheriff gives them his wallet, the keys to police headquarters, the car that he hasn't paid off yet and his ATM card. He also promises that they will have an open door to his office. In return, they laugh contemptuously at him and toss him a half-drunk bottle of cheap wine. The next day, at a press conference, the sheriff blames the local crime prevention commission for expecting too much of him.

Obama had a mandate for change, and now he wants the public to protect him from critics because he immediately accepted the DC insider "reality" upon assuming office.

The Republicans may be the party of "No," but if you want to be a Democratic president, you have to have the skills to say "No" to the party of "No" - and get the public behind you through fulfilling your campaign narrative.

****

If you'd like to receive these commentaries daily from Truthout/BuzzFlash, click here. You'll get our choice headlines and articles too!




Who calleld Obama "the last cheerleader for a dying empire"

That is so true. It's a pervasive condition...he's now cheer leading for the ultimate insiders, those who want to drive down Social Security. He's got his party loyalists in line and the media. But when Senators like Landrieu and Corker come out against you on this issue, you're in huge trouble.

The people are in bigger trouble. He's admitted to being a Blue Dog Democrat.  It is entirely possible that Obama will cut deal after deal with the Republicans in the 112th Congress and destroy as much as he can of the social welfare program.  If he doesn't hold Social Security sacred, why expect anything more.

at some point, merely observing the problem is not enough

I guess it makes us feel good for a moment to complain, quite rightly, about how bad Obama has been for the party and for America, but it doesn't seem that we can change things.

This country is on a long decline to corporate fascism, and the only difference between Democrats who get elected and Republicans seems to be that the Democrats feed the servants, and the Republicans figure they'll get something somehow.