Get FREE BuzzFlash News Alerts

Email:  

Dave Lindorff: Memorial Day in America -- Land of the Weak and Home of the Wussy

There may have perhaps been a time when America was a land of at least some brave people, although arguably a nation that celebrates as heroic a history that features lots of people with modern guns and cannons conquering and destroying another people who were living in the stone age and fighting back with bows and arrows, and that built its economy on the backs of men and women held in chains certainly has a tough case to make. What is clear though is that there is nothing brave about modern-day America.

Whatever we were, we have degenerated into a nation that finds glory in deploying the most advanced high-tech, high-explosive weaponry against some of the world's poorest people, that justifies killing women and children, even by the dozens, if by doing so it manages to kill one alleged "enemy" fighter. A nation that exalts remote-controlled robot drone aircraft that can attack targets in order to avoid risking soldiers' lives, even though by doing so, it is predictable that many, many innocent people will be killed. A nation that is proud to have developed weapons of mass slaughter, from shells laden with phosphorus that burns to death, indiscriminately, those who are contacted by the splattered chemical to elaborately baroque anti-personnel fragmentation bombs that spread cute little colored objects designed to look like everything from toys to food packages, but which at the slightest touch explode, releasing whirling metal or plastic fleschettes which shred human flesh on contact.

The Marines who battled their way up the hillsides of Iwo Jima, or the soldiers who struggled ashore under withering fire on the beaches of Normandy would be appalled at what passes for heroic behavior in today's American military. But that's not the worst of it.

The worst of it is back home in the USA, where millions of citizens who bitch about their taxes and who pay as little attention as possible to the fact that their nation is deeply mired in two wars, routinely refer to those who do their fighting for them as heroes, but then want nothing to do with the consequences of those wars (or for that matter the people who actually fight them).

One particularly telling consequence of those wars is that the U.S. now has several hundred prisoners, mostly at the prison camp on the U.S. Naval Base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, whom the American people don't want to have moved to their shores. And why won't we Americans accept the responsibility for incarcerating and trying these captives? Because we are so afraid that their comrades will strike back at us with acts of terrorism if we bring them here.

First of all, a moment of rational thought, please. Does anyone seriously think that the radical Islamic groups and independence fighters who are battling American forces in places such as Somalia, Iraq, and Afghanistan are so symbolically obsessed that they would only attack places in America where their fellows are actually being held? Do people actually think that such people would not attack some place in the continental U.S. right now if they could, in retaliation for people being held at the inaccessible base in Guantanamo?

Please. Let's get real.

Moving captives from Guantanamo to prisons in the U.S., pending trial, would merely make the job of agencies such as the FBI easier by narrowing the list of likely terrorist targets in the U.S. from thousands to dozens. But even then, is there any reason to think that a prospective terrorist group would be more likely to bomb Leavenworth Prison or the town of Leavenworth than the White House or the Pentagon to protest the holding of people at Leavenworth? Of course not.

The goal of a terrorist action is to cause as much fear and disruption as possible, and bombing some remote commuity where a federal prison is located isn't going to do that. You want to bomb a transportation or communications hub, or a major population center. So bringing prisoners to the U.S. from Guantanamo doesn't really do anything to raise the risk for anybody.

But we Americans are irrational, panicky cowards. We worry that the terrorists will come and get us.

My guess is that a lot of this is mass guilt. Whether people admit it or not, I suspect most people know on some subconscious level that we Americans have been living off the rest of the world's misery. We know we're stealing oil from the people of nations such as Iraq and Nigeria. We know that our toys, our electronics devices and our fancy name-brand running shoes are being made by people who cannot afford to buy them themselves. We know that for decades, we have been overthrowing elected governments and propping up fascist dictatorships to keep the exploitation going so that we can buy cheap goods and extract cheap resources (As Marine Medal of Honor hero Smedley Butler long ago admitted, that's what our "heroes" in uniform are generally doing overseas).

The whole thing is sickening -- a kind of nausea-inducing feeling that comes on me whenever I hear the last screeched line of the "Star-Spangled Banner" -- but there is something particularly pathetic about this latest bout of collective wussiness on the part of the American people.

I mean, even if you bought all the tripe about our soldiers having to kill and occasionally die in Iraq and Afghanistan so we can "fight the terrorists there instead of here," even the charlatans in the White House and the Pentagon are claiming that keeping captives in Guantanamo is generating hatred abroad and putting U.S. troops at greater risk, so you'd think it would be the least that this "home of the brave" could do to close that base and accept some of the added risk -- if there even were any -- of bringing those prisoners here.

If we can't even handle that, we're simply going to have to write a new ending for the national anthem:

"...Oh say may that Star-Spangled Banner yet flap

O'er the land of the weak, and the home of the sap."

DAVE LINDORFF is a Philadelphia-based journalist. His latest book is "The Case for Impeachment" (St. Martin's Press, 2006). His work is available at: www.thiscantbehappening.net.




Sickeningly sad, but all too true--

Dave's piece should be compulsory reading for anyone contemplating enlistment in our glorious volunteer armed forces. Do not fall for the 'defending the homeland' line--look at the record of what U.S. military involvements have wrought on innocent third-world populations over the past few decades. Is this what being a 'hero' means?

And also think about the current, rapidly deteriorating situation of working class folk in this country. The corporate interests for whom you would be fighting don't give a flying f--k for you or your family's welfare. You have more in common with the civilian populations you will be annihilating than with the banksters, corporatists, and corrupt politicians who are staging these military excursions for their own interests.

Repeat after me: Hell No, DO NOT GO.

Too true for comfort!

The older I become, the more cynical I get. How sad that we in this narcissistic country don't learn from experience. This article is all too true!

Lily Tomlin

"No matter how cynical I get, I can't keep up."

:)

Karma..........

Fears of others doing unto you what you have done to them --

The subtext of fear towards the Gitmo detainees is similar to the fear of an African American administration. In both cases, there's a fear of retaliation for the injustices inflicted on both groups. For instance, some whites may fear power abuse and entitlement, which was so clearly the case in reverse for centuries. Likewise, people could fear retaliation from someone, who before may or may not have had terrorist links, but who after years of incarceration and torture at Gitmo, has been rendered a prime candidate for a future act of terrorism. One of the most insidious forms of cowardice is to fear receiving a potential consequence of your actions, while not even having the courage to admit to it. I think that's the cowardice behind the loudest and most self-righteous voices currently speaking.

I agree with a lot of this article. Cowardly americans

like Bush and Cheney have gotten us into a place that is indefensible. When we were attacked on 9/11 we should have stood up and let the world know that we would prosecute the perpetrators if they fell into our hands but otherwise we should have just told the world that no attack no matter how symbolic or heinous will bring down the U.S. We as a democracy are too strong for the lousy little terrorists to have an effect on. We should have said something similar to what you tell a school-yard bully. "That did not faze me". Instead we squandered our wealth, our security, and a generation of our young people on trying to control a couple of small unimportant countries that could be left alone with little consequence to us.