Get FREE BuzzFlash News Alerts

Email:  

Dave Lindorff: Palin is the Real 'American Taliban'

Back in the early days of the seemingly interminable Afghan conflict, a young American, trapped in Afghanistan by the U.S. invasion of that country, was captured along with Taliban fighters and, after a bit of captivity and "enhanced interrogation" at the tender mercies of U.S. troops, was transported back for trial in the U.S., where then Attorney General John Ashcroft excitedly labeled him the "American Taliban."

But John Walker Lindh, railroaded into a 20-year jail sentence and slapped with a gag order that bars him from talking about how he was tortured for the entire length of his incarceration in Afghanistan, is not the real American Taliban. That title should probably belong to our new Republican vice presidential candidate, Sarah Palin.

According to reporting in the latest edition of the National Enquirer, a paper routinely maligned as a grocery-store scandal sheet, but actually boasting a skilled investigative reporting team that makes what passes for investigative reporting these days at most corporate media shops look like bad jokes (the Enquirer exposed John Edwards' extra-marital affair and blew his political career out of the water), Palin sought to cover up, perhaps even from John McCain, her 17-year-old daughter's pregnancy until after she was safely nominated. Her plan, says the Enquirer, which spoke to acquaintances and neighbors in Palin's hometown of Wasilla, Alaska, had been to get through the convention, then get daughter Bristol married to the infant-to-be's father, 18-year-old Levi Johnston, and only then announce the pregnancy.

That plan was reportedly scotched by Bristol, who the Enquirer reports was "at war" with her mother over the idea of a politically motivated shotgun wedding.

According to the Enquirer, it was that paper's contacting of both Palin and the parents of Johnston, with word that it was publishing the pregnancy story, that led Palin to break the bombshell news about the pregnancy ahead of her nomination -- a move that left the McCain campaign embarrassed and exposed to ridicule over its obvious haste and undeniable lack of any vetting of its vice presidential nominee.

Why should we care about this domestic melodrama? Because, besides revealing the casualness with which the 72-year-old, health-impaired McCain is willing to treat the job of picking his alternate, it reveals the deceptiveness and the inhumane, ruthless fanaticism of Palin, a candidate who is trying to market herself to voters as "Everymom."

Few real, caring moms or dads in their right mind would try to force a 17-year-old daughter and an 18-year-old boy to get married, simply because they had accidentally conceived a baby. All the odds predict that such parentally imposed pairing are doomed to failure, with much unnecessary trauma and psychic damage to both kids and to their future child along the way. Is Palin afraid her fellow believers on the religious Right would condemn her if her child were allowed to bear her child as a single parent? Is she afraid the child would be a (gasp) "bastard"?

This kind of fanaticism, in which the welfare of young children is run roughshod over for the sake of Biblical correctness, has been evident and roundly condemned by Americans as practiced in Taliban-run Afghanistan, or Wahabi-run Saudi Arabia, where women don't get any choices about their futures. We don't need it coming from the White House.

I say, three cheers for Bristol for standing up to her tyrannical mom and saying no instead of "I do" on command.

Given the domestic drama, it was shameful that the Palins dragged their daughter and Johnston down to the Twin Cities to be paraded in front of the nation for the sake of their self-described pit bull mom's political career. You knew what the real story was by the embarrassed deer-in-the-headlight looks on the two unsmiling teens' faces as they were on display. You knew it too by the way Palin, who devoted a considerable portion of her acceptance speech to talking up her family life, said not a word about her daughter's impending marriage -- the date for which has been left unstated.

My guess is that the supposed wedding will be conveniently pushed back past Election Day, after which, if those two kids are lucky, or plucky enough, it will be quietly forgotten.

With any luck, Palin's vice presidential hopes will be history by then too, and with them, the era of "Just Say No" sex education in our nation's schools.

Teens have enough trouble making their way in this world without having loopy, self-involved, religious fanatic parents mucking their lives up further. And the last thing they, or the rest of us, need is a national "Mom" pushing her Taliban-like moral agenda on the whole nation through laws and the appointment of like-minded judges.

DAVE LINDORFF is a Philadelphia-based journalist and columnist. His latest book is "The Case for Impeachment" (St. Martin's Press, 2006 and now available in paperback). His work is available at www.thiscantbehappening.net.


PALIN THREW HER DAUGHTER UNDER THE STRAIGHT TALK EXPRESS BUS!

The wedding will go off as Sarah plans, if she wants it to. Nothing those two children can do about it. If Sarah demands the wedding, the boy has no choice. He will be threatened with Statutory Rape charges. Now, will Bristol allow him to go to prison? Probably not. What I would hope she does is to hold a press conference and tell the world that this is happening and that she does not wish to marry. But, what child that has been brought up in such a restrictive religious family ever has that much guts at seventeen?

I wish both of them well and that does not mean a shotgun wedding forced upon them.

The video of those two children at the convention, especially the boy, was scary. He looked so frightened and wanting to run. How abusive can these people be for their own political needs?

They brought this all out into the open when she didn't say, "Thanks, but no thanks". A truly good and righteous Mother thinks about what is best for her family. And does that.

They tried to hide it at the first outing of Palin, when McCain introduced her as his choice. I thought at the time, how weird that the daughter is holding the child asleep against her chest, instead of the father. (Hiding her growing belly well). She looked very unhappy.

"Think of the children! And what will we tell the children"? Do we hear any of that talk now? No. But now the American people are having to have conversations around the dinner table about teenage sex and unwanted pregnancies. That seems to be alright with the Republicans, but having to talk about adult sex was going to ruin our children.

I am so tired of the double standard.

Statutory rape?

Interesting theory, but not based on reality. Barring some kind of familial relationship (parent, step-parent, etc.) or position of authority (teacher, etc.), Alaskan law provides there is no statutory rape unless the "offender" has sex with someone under 13 years old, or is at least 3 years older than the "victim". Most states have similar provisions to avoid having teenagers engaging in consentual sex with someone close to their age charged as sex offenders.

Google Alaskan statutes Title 11, Ch. 41, Article 4, Sections 11.41.434 through 11.41.440 if you're interested.

Sarah Palin - American Jihadist

A coerced wedding of a young couple expecting a new child is hardly out of character in the US for most of its history. Where Palin is extreme is in her jihadist views, that the US wars against the civilian populations of Iraq and Afghanistan are God's wars. Admittedly, she has much company in these views, but that does not mean they are not extreme, especially in the context of "Who Would Jesus Bomb?".

Sarah Palin - American Taliban

Dave: This is a good post. I have been saying to friends for a while now that we probably have as much to fear from the extreme religious fundamentalists in our country as from the Taliban or al-Qaeda. After all, they are already in the country and lust for political power. I have my own faith in God and am more than willing to let the other guy have his. I don't want anyone telling me what or how to believe, and that is what our American Taliban are attempting to do.

As much to fear from within our country....

The anthrax terrorist(s), who shut the US government down two weeks after the 9-11 terror attacks, were most certainly _not_ Taliban or al Qaeda. The _moment_ it was discovered that the anthrax strains used in the attacks came from within the very 'secure' rooms of America's own premier bio-war facility, the Army's AMRID labs in Ft. Dietrich, MD, _every single person_ with access, past or present, to those spores should have been locked down and vetted for their whereabouts in the weeks and days leading to the deadly letters being mailed from a NJ mailbox.
The fact that the government did not, and would not, take this "investigation 101" steps, hints that indeed the lust for power within American politics may not stop at the line of terrorizing the US government (even assuming the anthrax mailer did not intend to kill postal workers).

Anthrax Mailer's Intent

Why should we assume that the anthrax mailer did not intend to kill postal workers? Considering the extreme care required to handle such anthrax mailings, there is no way that the mailer did not intend to kill. Specifically, the Democratic majority leadership offices of the Senate were shut down for the months of October, November, December, January and part of February for clean up purposes making it impossible for them to access their computers, their files and their mail. It stopped hearings on the PATRIOT Act dead in their tracks. When the Democrats tried to run the thousand plus page bill past legal minds in the Supreme Court Building, a trace of the anthrax was suddenly found in the basement causing a shutdown of that building. Congress passed the PATRIOT Act which violates four of our constitutionally protected rights. The Republicans became the majority leaders in 2002. Ever wonder why it took over four months to clean up the anthrax in the offices? Ever wonder what else might have been done with the Democrats' computers and files. Pat Williams