Dave Lindorff: Growing Fears of a U.S. Attack on Iran, and an Easy Way to Stop It
Even as one faction of the American government, the military and the corporatocracy grow collectively more alarmed about the possibility of a U.S. attack on Iran, the Bush/Cheney Administration and its allies seem increasingly moving towards just such a new war.
Okay, so Sen. James Webb (D-VA) and 29 other U.S. Senators who oppose such a mad plan have done what? They've written a letter to the president telling him that he cannot attack Iran without express approval in advance from the Congress.
A letter! Boy, that'll stop him. What's the matter with these people?
A few months back, the Senate overwhelmingly passed a resolution authored by war cheerleader Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-CT), declaring the Iranian Revolutionary Guard to be a "global terrorist organization." In President Bush's pathologically twisted view of his power, that resolution gave him all the go-ahead he needed, because Bush and his legal apologists claim that back on Sept. 18, 2001, Congress, in passing an Authorization for Use of Military Force against the Taliban and al Qaeda in Afghanistan, were actually declaring a War on Terror -- a conflict without end and without borders. Under this crazy logic, any attack on a terrorist or terrorist organization is simply another battle in that "war."
If Sen. Webb and his colleagues really want to stop the president from further murderous madness, they need only revoke that 2001 AUMF. A simple resolution declaring it ended, and stating that the war on terror is not a war would do the trick.
Why hasn't the Congress done this? Are they afraid the president will call them "soft on terror"?
No doubt he would, but I think most Americans have grown weary of Bush's name calling. People are pretty aware now that the raised and lowered colored alert flags, the periodic dire warnings of impending doom, all conveniently timed to coincide with moments when the president or his allies are facing legal or political difficulties, are just cheap scare politics.
Any member of Congress with a scintilla of courage could easily make that case to constituents.
People know this president is a whack job and that the vice president is a liar.
So why doesn't someone propose revoking the 2001 AUMF?
The aircraft carriers, loaded with Tomahawk missiles and the largest bomber fleet ever assembled, are in place. Stealth bombers are being retrofitted to carry a new 15-ton bomb. The army has built a base right near the Iranian border in Iraq. There was the bizarre case of the six missing nuclear missiles. The verbal threats against Iran are increasing. U.S. special forces are reportedly already operating in Iran, encouraging and perhaps participating in acts of terror against the regime and its military forces there.
Oil prices are starting to rise to unseen levels as commodities traders bet on the impact of a closing of the Persian Gulf to oil traffic.
Time grows short to stop a catastrophe. If Congress doesn't act soon to pull the legal rug out from under the president, we could well see a catastrophe. If the U.S. does attack Iran, the global economy will go into a tailspin as oil soars past $200/barrel. The war in the Middle East would become a vast regional conflagration. U.S. troops in Iraq, already thinly stretched, would come under attack from all sides. A draft would certainly be required.
And if the Iranians respond to a U.S. attack with asymetrical warfare by attacking targets in the U.S., we could see military rule at home.
This is no time for members of Congress to write letters to the president. It's time for them to revoke the 2001 AUMF and to tell the president that an attack on Iran would be an impeachable offense.
In fact, why wait? It's time for them to impeach him now! This is just his latest crime in the making. And even threatening a war of aggression against a nation that doesn't pose an immediate threat is a violation of the UN Charter, a treaty the U.S. signed years ago and is bound by.
DAVE LINDORFF is a Philadelphia-based journalist and columnist. His latest book, co-authored by Barbara Olshansky, is "The Case for Impeachment" (St. Martin's Press, 2006 and now available in paperback). His work is available at www.thiscantbehappening.net.
Okay, so Sen. James Webb (D-VA) and 29 other U.S. Senators who oppose such a mad plan have done what? They've written a letter to the president telling him that he cannot attack Iran without express approval in advance from the Congress.
A letter! Boy, that'll stop him. What's the matter with these people?
A few months back, the Senate overwhelmingly passed a resolution authored by war cheerleader Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-CT), declaring the Iranian Revolutionary Guard to be a "global terrorist organization." In President Bush's pathologically twisted view of his power, that resolution gave him all the go-ahead he needed, because Bush and his legal apologists claim that back on Sept. 18, 2001, Congress, in passing an Authorization for Use of Military Force against the Taliban and al Qaeda in Afghanistan, were actually declaring a War on Terror -- a conflict without end and without borders. Under this crazy logic, any attack on a terrorist or terrorist organization is simply another battle in that "war."
If Sen. Webb and his colleagues really want to stop the president from further murderous madness, they need only revoke that 2001 AUMF. A simple resolution declaring it ended, and stating that the war on terror is not a war would do the trick.
Why hasn't the Congress done this? Are they afraid the president will call them "soft on terror"?
No doubt he would, but I think most Americans have grown weary of Bush's name calling. People are pretty aware now that the raised and lowered colored alert flags, the periodic dire warnings of impending doom, all conveniently timed to coincide with moments when the president or his allies are facing legal or political difficulties, are just cheap scare politics.
Any member of Congress with a scintilla of courage could easily make that case to constituents.
People know this president is a whack job and that the vice president is a liar.
So why doesn't someone propose revoking the 2001 AUMF?
The aircraft carriers, loaded with Tomahawk missiles and the largest bomber fleet ever assembled, are in place. Stealth bombers are being retrofitted to carry a new 15-ton bomb. The army has built a base right near the Iranian border in Iraq. There was the bizarre case of the six missing nuclear missiles. The verbal threats against Iran are increasing. U.S. special forces are reportedly already operating in Iran, encouraging and perhaps participating in acts of terror against the regime and its military forces there.
Oil prices are starting to rise to unseen levels as commodities traders bet on the impact of a closing of the Persian Gulf to oil traffic.
Time grows short to stop a catastrophe. If Congress doesn't act soon to pull the legal rug out from under the president, we could well see a catastrophe. If the U.S. does attack Iran, the global economy will go into a tailspin as oil soars past $200/barrel. The war in the Middle East would become a vast regional conflagration. U.S. troops in Iraq, already thinly stretched, would come under attack from all sides. A draft would certainly be required.
And if the Iranians respond to a U.S. attack with asymetrical warfare by attacking targets in the U.S., we could see military rule at home.
This is no time for members of Congress to write letters to the president. It's time for them to revoke the 2001 AUMF and to tell the president that an attack on Iran would be an impeachable offense.
In fact, why wait? It's time for them to impeach him now! This is just his latest crime in the making. And even threatening a war of aggression against a nation that doesn't pose an immediate threat is a violation of the UN Charter, a treaty the U.S. signed years ago and is bound by.
DAVE LINDORFF is a Philadelphia-based journalist and columnist. His latest book, co-authored by Barbara Olshansky, is "The Case for Impeachment" (St. Martin's Press, 2006 and now available in paperback). His work is available at www.thiscantbehappening.net.
»
- Login or register to post comments
- Printer-friendly version
Buzz this on Buzzflash.net




Technorati Tags:
Iran in the Crosshairs
Since the last election where the Dems got their slim majority nothing has changed for
the war president & the rest of the neocons.
Their agenda is on track and they're ticking off their goals, one after the other, from war with Afghanistan, regime change in Iraq, execution of democratically elected Saddam Hussein, a possible attack on Syria last month & the inevitable war with Iran right on schedule.
W/o impeachment, the america of the last 80 years is kaput. We are no longer a nation that adheres to the rule of law, we break international treaties routinely, we are casually lied to by Presidente Bush & his lackeys more often than not.
Justice in 2007 Amerika is an obscene joke;
just contrast the treatment of Scooter Libby, a traitor in war time to that of
Mr. Arar, renditioned from JFK airport to Syria, tortured & illegally detained for months -- for no crime whatsoever, except the crime of traveling while being Muslim.
No one in the senate or congress seem able to check the dictatorial power of the pres.,
the media, except for independent net sites,
is continuously failing us, by reporting only the administration's point of view and
refusing to cover any dissent.
What to DO?
There will be NO impeachment! There will be no taking back laws already passed. Our Congress actually wants whatever Bush wants. They all are a bunch of war criminals and .....so are we by representation! Yes, we have given them permission by voting them into office! So, we are complicit! Woe is me!
Get ready for all HHHHH to break loose whenever they put their plan into action! There is nothing we can do about it! Take to the streets? Americans/US'ns don't have it in us! We're too lazy...too scared...to ignorant(I didn't say 'stupid' and there IS a difference!).
citizen accountability?
I disagree with you on this point, the 2000 election was "decided" by supreme court justices chosen by Bush the elder, they owed
their jobs to the bush cartel.
the questions surrounding the 2004 election are too numerous to go into, but the diebold computers get special mention on how to rig
elections.
Last but not least, all candidates are corporately vetted before they are chosen to receive enormous contributions and media support - we the people - are completely left out of this equation.
Any candidate that appeals to the public (Howard Dean, Dennis Kucinich, Paul Wellstone, Ron Paul) are marginalized, swiftboated and even assassinated.
How To Get Congress To Revoke The 2001 AUMF?
We see to it, that's how.
What's More The President Can't Veto It
Which means that we see to it that Congress revokes the 2001 AUMF and we not only prevent a war, we change the world.
Impeach or Fold
Last month I read Dave Lindorff's "A Case for Impeachment" and discovered 8 or 9 other books on the exact same subject; which must surely be a 'new world record for number of books written about impeachment of any one President'. I suppose the Guinness people should be duly notified.
Lindorff''s book was published in 2006 and the case for impeachment has been piling up since then. I would venture that Bush is the most impeachable U.S. President to ever walk the Earth....yet he goes completely unimpeached. I can't figure it out. Can so many Democrats be so spineless? ...so stupid? They act like they're the last ones to know. We want justice, damn it! But they just sit there and fiddle with their bills. What do we need to do...waterboard them?
Its my contention that it is our solemn patriotic obligation to impeach this tyrant...for the sake of future generations. And our failure to do so will only be a huge disgrace on our own generation. If we don't impeach him, we can count on another tyrant, just like him--or worse, "ruling" our children...as certain as if he were already in office today. This will be our legacy to future Americans. Pretty sad.
Isn't there a way to force impeachment proceedings by way of a grand jury...or something?
Isn't there a way to put a fire under the buts of this useless Congress? To be sure, there is not a single one of them that I would vote for again.
Of course, impeachment would likely force Bush's hand to War on Iran...a very big mistake...we would all regret. But man....he has to be stopped...for the sake of the Nation.
Impeach or fold--that's my motto.
van
amen
too many brain dead, methed,coked out to give a zhit from sea to shining sea
Flogging A Dead Democracy
It has long been evident that prompting our "representation" to act on our behalf is a waste of our time.
While we have a much better chance at the state level to bring about an impeachment through our Constitutional options, there really isn't time to convince enough of those still on the fence (or on the wrong side of it) to support such an effort before martial law is declared by the Decider.
It's even becoming too late for the economic interests to wield their considerable influence to stop the coming war. In fact, if the Jerusalem Post is correct, it has already begun. Don't you wonder if one of those nuclear missiles reported to have arrived at Barksdale AFB aboard a B-52 "by mistake" is missing?
The Media is lying to you
americanre's Aeonity Blog
http://www.aeonity.com/americanre
The Dems have to realize
The Dems have to realize that IMPEACH is a word that the general public wants them to use.
There sure is something wrong with our elective reps.
They seem to have a secret agenda that they are they only ones who know what it is. Between all these invasions, moving jobs and factories out of the country as fast as possible, and letting the dollar become a worthless piece of paper, it seems we're going somewhere and I don't think I like where we're going. It seems the only difference between the Dems and the Repubs is the Dems give We the People some crumbs. But they all same to be on the page - whatever that page is.
They know what they are doing, maybe.
Cynical as it is, I believe the Dems think they know what they are doing. They don't care that millions of Iranians will die and tens (perhaps hundreds) of millions of others around the world will suffer massive hardship (including plenty of Americans -- the people they supposedly represent).
The Democrats in Congress WANT Cheney/Bush to attack Iran and start a total meltdown of the US Economy and an increasing spiral of death and destruction in the Middle East and around the world.
They think this will guarantee them victory in 2008, as the Rethuglicans show themselves to be incapable of planning or executing anything but a bad bathroom pick-up (and in some cases, not even that very well).
Idiots and cynics. The Rethuglicans are idiots, the Democrats cynics.
The risk that the Democrats are taking is that the spiral of destruction and mayhem might include the imposition of Martial Law and the suspension of the 2008 elections, thereby giving the Democrats NONE of what they are hoping for.
Damned if I can figure it out?
As a life-long independent, it is not out of my realm of thought to consider that Dems can be as evil as the ReThugs. They are all just people; capable of just about anything. Of course "just about anything" also means great acts courage and having faith in one's own mind, at least enough to break away from the herd.
I lean toward the Dems for the simple reason that they don't scare me. The Republicans always have.
But I must admit they are scarying the crap out of me now. Daily, I ask myself if they have all lost their minds. Did someone put something in the water suppl
Hillary y? They just go on with politics as usual, as if nothing has changed. The media reports what they report, as if nothing happened.
When I think how long most of us have known that Bushco were lying out their arses every damn day about everything from the election of 2000 to the Iran war plan of today, it makes me want to bash my head against a wall, but then I realize that's exactly what we have all been doing on a psychic level for years now.
Lindorff is right. Congress can stop this PNAC wet dream right now if they want to. They show no sign of doing it, or even contemplating such a thing.
So, what can we do? I do know that the first thing we absolutely must do is let go of all the illusion we have that we live a a democracy. We haven't had even representative democracy in a very long time. Now, our Republic is crumbling as well. Chances are excellent that we, the people, are going to be the ones who will have to re-build it. Our leaders can't or won't even admit there is a problem. We can't even begin to solve the problem if we are still delusional enough to go along with politics as usual.
A few thousand people protesting, with permission at that, is a huge waste of time and energy, if it is meant to change Bush's insane policy. My generation got clubbed, jailed and killed. Some of the devices for crowd control they have today would make us welcome death. So, what's left?
Another illusion that has to go? "We are a nation under law." Anyone who actually believes that anymore is as a lamb led to slaughter. Either the law applies to all of us, or it applies to none of us.
I am not suggesting anarchy. What I am suggesting is civil disobedience and non-compliance. To the degree we continue to obey Bush when he tells us to mindlessly shop and travel for Uncle Sam and Old Glory, we are as guilty as Bush and Cheney. We don't have to wait patiently for election day to vote. There is a far more powerful way to vote every day. Change your behavior.
Don't we all feel like rats in a Skinner box by now? Anyone who doesn't needs to read Greenspan's book. We talk about cconsumerism if it is a bad word, and yet it is the single greatest power we have and it is one of the easiest to exert. So far, it isn't illegal.
Spend less before you have nothing left to spend.
Not all corporations are evil incarnate. Do a little research. Find out which businesses you want to support and which you don't.
Above all else, think of gasoline as poison. Use no more than necessary to meet the needs of life, not the wants.As long as we, the people, are willing to pay outrageous prices for gasoline, the prices will go up. That's capitalism. Whatever the market will bear. Stop bearing it, to the degree that you can.
This is a great time to teach the kids about true sacrifice, before they are old enough to be made to sacrifice their lives.
Economic chaos lies just around the corner. We might as well get used to poverty because a vast majority will be living in it very soon.
Screw taxes. Junior is right about one thing. We, the people, know better how to spend our money, especially when he and Cheney seem hell bent on spending it on nothing but death and destruction, than the federal government does. I would rather my tax money go to care for the elderly, disabled and children, to New Orleans and the Gulf Coast, for education from cradle to grave, for healthcare for all...there are so many things that need to be done and none of them involve bloodletting and that's exactly where my tax money has gone since October 2002, when it became clear to me what was about to happen. War tax resistance is probably as old as income tax itself. Doing it for me came easy because making the decision wasn't a political one, but a spiritual one. I wanted no part of the crime that was about to be committed. It doesn't get much worse than a war of aggression and all of the war crimes that are bound to follow.
As Americans we have to decide what we are willing to do to wash the blood from our hands, start a movement and let the middle men and women in Washington know what we intend to do. In short, we will crash the whole damn system. We have to. We all know it on some level. The system is too corrupt to fix itself.
The word "empire" has no place in a Democratic Republic. The Empire must go, like a horrible malignancy, if a healthy USA can ever be hoped for again.
As far as the candidates go, the most feared by America Inc. is John Edwards.
Think about it. Rudy G is probably the most amoral piece of humanity we have ever had run for president, yet the media mouths cannot go a day without mentioning Edwards' $400.00 haircut. That's how one knows who the money-whoring, bottom-line feeders do not want us to have as a choice. Just see who the media starts picking on about stupid stuff early on, while they ignore a candidate's possible personal ties to the mob.
Hillary is really not the exception to the rule she seems to be. The more they bash her the better it is for her. Decent people, who do not hate the woman, feel for her, even protective of her.
I couldn't agree more
What a shame our present Democrats in Washington seem unwilling
to step up and fulfill the wishes of 70% of Americans being polled.