Dave Lindorff: Gonzo's Gone. Now Let's Go After Cheney
Let's be clear. Alberto Gonzales is resigning as attorney general not because he's become an embarrassment to the Bush Administration -- which has repeatedly shown itself to be beyond embarrassment -- but because he is no longer useful. Exposed as a serial liar and an administration hack, he can no longer be relied upon by the Bush Administration to carry forward its criminal agenda of subverting the Constitution, the electoral process, and the Bill of Rights, because his every step is being watched by the public and the Congress.
But this is no victory unless Congress follows up by pursuing those who put Gonzales up to his crimes. The whole reason felons and hacks such as Gonzales resign from office is to bury their misdeeds by leaving town. If Congress then obliges by moving on to other things, the resignation will have succeeded.
Next, it looks like we might have Michael Chertoff as AG. On one level, this might seem to be an improvement. Gonzales was a both a house servant to Bush through his years as governor and president, doing whatever was necessary to tidy up after Bush's messes, such as hiding evidence of his drunk driving record and his dereliction of duty during the Vietnam War, and a kind of mob attorney, developing legal loopholes to protect the president from prosecution (or impeachment) for various crimes as president, such as violating the Geneva Conventions or unleashing the nation's spy apparatus against Americans. Chertoff, not a part of the Texas Mafia, may not be so ready to cross the line into rank sycophancy and to play the role of co-conspirator, particularly given that it's only for another 16 months.
Then again, Chertoff, in his short stint at what is still referred to as the "Justice" Department, headed up the anti-terrorism unit under Gonzales' predecessor, John Ashcroft, and willingly played along with the sham prosecution of John Walker Lindh, the kid captured in Afghanistan and inflated by Ashcroft and Chertoff into "the American Taliban." It was Chertoff who successfully deep-sixed evidence of Lindh's weeks of torture at the hands of American forces, by threatening Lindh with a treason prosecution, while holding out the offer of a deal -- "just" 15 years in the can if he agreed to sign a fraudulent statement saying he had "never been mistreated" in U.S. captivity, and to accept a gag order barring him from talking about what had happened to him for the entire length of his sentence -- an unprecedented gag order.
That prosecution and silencing of Lindh, which prevented the public from exploring the deliberate campaign of torture developed in Afghanistan, later to "migrate" to Guantanamo and thence to Abu Ghraib and Iraq, was in its way as damaging to the nation as was Chertoff's other signal disaster -- his inept and callous mishandling of the catastrophe of the Katrina flooding of New Orleans.
If Chertoff -- a demonstrable failure both as an administrator and as a defender of justice -- is the best this Administration can come up with as a replacement for Gonzales, we should be worried about the future of the nation's "justice" system. (Okay, I concede that the Justice Department has as much to do with justice as the Defense Department to defense or the Education Department with education.)
In the interim, it is apparently going to be Solicitor General Paul Clement, a hard-right attorney who since 2005 has been the administration's chief attorney, who will take over as interim AG when Gonzo goes home to Texas on September 17. Clement, a former Federalist Society member who clerked for Antonin Scalia as a young man, can be expected to take his view of an all-powerful chief executive with him into the AG's office with him, which will probably mean a continued hard line on both Congressional subpoenas, and on Congressional requests for special prosecutors to investigate White House wrongdoing. Going with Clement, next in line to Gonzales, with both the assistant and deputy assistant AG already resigned, also conveniently spares Bush the task of having to get somebody through a Senate confirmation.
The one good thing that can be said about the Gonzales resignation is that it eliminates the Democratic leadership's latest gambit for attempting to derail the impeachment movement. As support for the impeachment of Vice President Dick Cheney has grown, both among the public at large and in Congress, where there are now at least 20 co-sponsors for Rep. Dennis Kucinich's Cheney impeachment bill, the Democratic leadership in the House scrambled to get behind a purely inside-the-beltway "campaign" to impeach Gonzales -- a move that did succeed in dividing the real, authentic impeachment movement.
The interesting thing is that in backing the impeachment of Gonzales, those leaders and senior House Democrats who have been brushing off the broader impeachment movement gave the lie to two of their main arguments against impeachment -- that it would be "too divisive" and that there "isn't time" for impeachment. Clearly if it wasn't too late to impeach Gonzales, and if impeaching Gonzales would not be too divisive, neither is it too late to impeach Cheney and neither would impeaching Cheney be "too divisive."
So let's hail the departure of Gonzo; let's demand a thorough vetting of the demonstrably incompetent and unprincipled Chertoff; and most importantly, let's move forward with the campaign to impeach Cheney, starting with a full-court campaign to get all those who so readily signed on to Washington Rep. Jay Inslee's Gonzales impeachment bill to now sign on to Rep. Kucinich's H.Res. 333, a resolution to impeach the vice president.
Dave LINDORFF is a Philadelphia-based investigative reporter and columnist. His latest book, "The Case for Impeachment," co-authored by Barbara Olshansky (St. Martin's Press, 2006) was just released this summer in a paperback edition. His work is available at www.thiscantbehappening.net.
- Login or register to post comments
- Printer-friendly version
Buzz this on Buzzflash.net




Technorati Tags:
White House/Lafayette LA coincidences
Just making notes of very REPEATED very strange coincidences in relation to White House resignations and the outrageously crazy behavior directed toward me and my b/f in Lafayette LA.
(Not to much relevant to the posts). If only one person sees this, that will be enough if it is the right person.
Yesterday, numerous people on the streets, in the store-everywhere were acting outright neurotic in Lafayette LA, in the River Ranch, Superfoods on Ambassador Cafferey, almost always in Albertsons. Cell phones, self checkouts were used both to disguise and as a form of harassment directed toward us. In the store, completely normal, competent people were using the longer shopping carts with the pink animal extensions, and 2 different parties would park these kiddie carts side by side blocking the entire isle, then walked away from their carts. NEITHER ONE HAD ANY KIDS WITH THEM AT ANY TIME IN THE STORE. Other things they are doing are paying for 20.00 or more worth of stuff with nickels and dimes, or in the self checkout paying for a bunch of things with ones-or even scanning everything in the self checkouts, and then leaving without completing the transaction.
Today, Gonzales resigns. But there has been numerous incidences when someone in Lafayette LA seems to be about to be brought officially confronted and something happens to someone in the White House. In Sept 2005, it turned out it was the ballet professor at ULL who went to the 70508 post office, told them I was in a domestic violence situation-and that somehow excused her for having my mail misdirected. She called off ballet classes at the university the rest of the week, but we could not miss more than four days. A few days later, Tom Delay is indicted.
I KNOW THERE HAS TO BE SOME CONNECTION BETWEEN LAFAYETTE GOING CRAZY TRYING TO GET US TO REACT IN THE STORES AND THE INCIDENCES IN WASHINGTON. I CANNOT FIGURE IT OUT-AND EVERYONE WHO KNOWS WHAT IS GOING ON IS NOT CONCERNED ABOUT THEIR NOSE GROWING LONGER, THEY INSIST THERE IS JUST OVER ONE THOUSAND STRANGE COINCIDENCES, AND EVERYDAY THE LIST OF THESE MYSTERIOUS COINCIDENCES GETS LONGER AND LONGER.
Today, when my b/f and I got back from my sisters house, I went to watch Dirty Dancing Choreography, someone comes knock on our door, claiming she has not seen us in the past week. OKAY…This was said from a woman whom made it very obvious she was following us-literally begging us to complain to the City of Lafayette, let us know she followed us seventy miles to Lake Charles beach, drive up the same time we would. She said she did not know we were home in the past week, but they played their television real loud a couple of mornings ago-about 1:30 am and again 6:00 am hoping it would irritate us. They have been slamming doors real loud in their garage all hours of the night, thinking it is bothering us. She left the same time we would leave making it look like a coincidence. She did not know where we were in the past week, but she knew to come knock on our door within five minutes after we got back. Pretty good guessing for someone you do not know where they are in the last week! Yesterday, I stayed in the house all day, STILL recovering from a sunburn and doing my 4 ½ hour Jane Fonda workouts. I know they heard my music going when they were slamming doors in the driveway and talking real loud hoping I was hearing them.
I am just making public notes of incidences as I see them, intending to discourage lies or more lies from being fabricated from conversations they start with us. Anyone who is not catching all of these people tripping over their own lies as they are making them up, is just looking at their status, or how much money they got. Their behavior before they come talk to us have already revealed their deceptiveness.