Get FREE BuzzFlash News Alerts

Email:  

For Selling Out a News Program for Coffee, Morning Joe Wins BuzzFlash's Media Putz of the Week

BUZZFLASH MEDIA PUTZ OF THE WEEK

r

The Daily Show With Jon Stewart Mon - Thurs 11p / 10c
Corporate SynerJoe
www.thedailyshow.com
Daily Show
Full Episodes
Political Humor Newt Gingrich Unedited Interview

"Morning Joe"

For reporting that is an embarrassment to the profession of journalism, and for being beholden to corporate paymasters rather than the citizens of America.

Commercials are flooding our TV shows. Not alongside them like in commercial breaks, but actually in the shows themselves. Product placements are designed to "get past the hype" or "break through the cloud of advertising." They seem to be more designed to annoy us in practice, but selling out is the trend.

But when it comes to news shows, there are supposed to be boundaries of ethics and taste. But not on Morning Joe, "brewed by Starbucks."

Yes, the MSNBC morning news program is now hawking Starbucks as part of its morning news(?) programming. The reported price tag on the deal is more than $10 million.

It would be difficult to imagine that Starbucks would pay $10 million just to have coffee cups visible on the set of the basic cable morning show. Sure enough, as part of the [wink] deal, Joe Scarborough and Mika Brzezinski gave a softball interview to founder and CEO Howard Schultz. But even that doesn't buy $10 million worth of product placement.

As Jon Stewart and "The Daily Show" (above) pointed out last week, there was unofficial commercials scattered throughout the morning program. And unlike commercial breaks, Starbucks doesn't have to compete with other commercials.

But "Morning Joe" is a news show. And even if you pretend that Joe Scarborough and Willie Geist are not "journalists," Brzezinski is as is contributor and noted alleged plagiarist Mike Barnicle.

The Starbucks tie-ins aren't limited to the hosts, Brzezinski is also involved, which violates every modern journalism standard.

MSNBC President Phil Griffin said "Morning Joe" would still cover Starbucks if warranted. "They understand that we have standards."

But what isn't clear is whether "Morning Joe" might not cover them on a questionable story or give them better treatment. Or even worse, the show could treat a competitor in a worse fashion, such as Dunkin' Donuts, on a story.

This is why news shows avoid such conflicts, so they don't have these ethical issues. This is why newspapers have walls between advertising and editorial, so conflicts don't come up.

Clearly, this isn't the first instance of a company infiltrating a news program. Many sources have noted the old-time Camel News Caravan from (ironically) NBC in the 1950s. And this isn't even the first time BuzzFlash has taken on this disturbing trend, noting last year when a Las Vegas TV station had a deal with McDonald's Iced Coffee.

When advertising is alongside news programming, there is the fear that advertisers could make an impact on the content, either with a specific product or an "understanding" that controversial topics being covered might get ads yanked from the program. Not to be sanctimonious, but BuzzFlash has no fear from advertisers about what it covers since the Web site doesn't accept advertising.

If somehow -- and this is a stretch -- the news consumer were to get $10 million toward news investigations such as a 3-part series on health care or the homeless or whether "clean coal" is clean, then maybe there would be a silver lining. Since we know that isn't coming, there is absolutely no merit to this deal.

Especially on the television side, we have seen a precipitous decline in standards and ethics in news programs. Local newscasts run "news" stories that tie-in to prime-time network programming that they run. Gaining back waning credibility won't be accomplished by having ads for a product during a news program.

The major problem with TV news programs is there isn't enough time for real news stories. If we are going to lose precious air time to commercials within the program, we lose more than time and news stories. We lose the opportunity to be a better informed society, unless of course, we are trying to learn more about corporate coffee chains.

For selling out your program, we award "Morning Joe" the BuzzFlash Media Putz of the Week award. No sponsorship required.

You can see a list of all previous nominees here.

BUZZFLASH MEDIA PUTZ OF THE WEEK


shilling

Please don't forget that Joe Scarborough also has spent the last two weeks almost exclusively shilling his new book and getting his guests to debate the proposition that Republicans need another "sunny" Ronald Reagan to present their thoroughly discredited policies again. He doesn't even understand that the premise of this, i.e. that the policies are so negative that they have to be packaged to be shilled, should be embarassing to anyone but hard core Rethuglicans. The lack of self-knowledge is epic. The ironies of the sell outs here are abundant. And they are an indicator of the fascistic mix of money, power, policy, access, etc. that has so damaged the political discourse of this country.

Well?

Have you told Starbucks what you think?

This might acutally be good!

It can be a shortcut to a news item. For example an item regarding a white supremicist can be introduced as a Starbucks with cream. And an item regarding a party 'of color' --Starbucks black. Crude but effective. And if there is an occassion to review the 'death' of an intern in Scars office--a Starbucks spilled.