Get FREE BuzzFlash News Alerts

Email:  

Now Hiring: No Grudges in Barack Obama's HR Approach

BE ELECTED
by Christine Bowman

President-elect Obama has filled some administration slots quickly, but many others remain up for grabs. Who else could he or should he hire?

The Chicago Tribune mentioned some cabinet-level openings at the Departments of the Interior, Agriculture, Labor, Housing and Urban Development, Transportation, Energy, Education, and Veterans Affairs. (Presumably, Richardson will get the Commerce job on Wednesday.) Obama also still needs to find a U.S. trade representative, a director of national drug control policy, and an administrator for the EPA.

Barack Obama Wants YouBarack Obama Wants You

In response to Tuesday's foreign policy and national security announcements, international law professor Mary Ellen O'Connell suggested Obama could use some successful diplomats: James Baker, Jimmy Carter, John Danforth, Anthony Zinni. Now there's a list with someone for anyone to dispute, but her point is a valid one. Put the skilled negotiators to work.

A prevalent view is that Obama appointments so far have been made on the basis of experience, excellence, and intelligence. Yet many critics are saying -- with a straight face -- that that isn't real "change." Have so many forgotten so quickly that Bush and his recruiters heavily weighed neocon ideology as well as personal and party loyalty when making appointments? Remember the US Attorneys scandal? FEMA director Michael Brown? Gonzales as AG? Harriet Miers' nomination to the Supreme Court?

For Obama "change" evidently means no litmus tests. And no grudges. And the bar was set high already by his much lauded, top-flight campaign staff.

Still, Obama is recruiting, and not just for the top jobs. Maybe there's an Obama administration job you would like to snag? Here's where to apply: 

http://change.gov/page/s/application

BE ELECTED




One sort of experience painfully absent.

Nobel Prize winners of course would seem at first blush to be ideal picks, but Paul Krugman, and Al Gore for two are notable by their absence. Among those lesser lights (without Nobel but still experienced and deeply thoughtful)in no particular order, Naomi Klein, Paul Begala, any of the Bush appointed US Attorneys who got fired for doing their jobs (thus proving they would do their jobs) Wes Clarke, James K. Galbraith, Robert Kennedy, Caroline Kennedy, Mike Papintonio, Dennis Kucinich, Greg Palast, Richard Clarke, John Dean, Howard Dean, and I'm sure I left a few dozen out. Not all would even qualify as very leftish, but all have been real agents of change, have no grudges with Obama (yet)and represent what the electorate was clamoring for. So far any would be a good sign, but RFK is the only name even a little bit mentioned anywhere

The appointment of Janet Napolitano by contrast shows a definite political blindness to the effects that such a nomination would have back in Arizona, and what she brings to the table as well. All not very good.

If the Gang Of Pirates think that the only good Democrat is a dead Democrat, only a fool would think it bipartisan to accommodate them.