Get FREE BuzzFlash News Alerts

Email:  

Will Alaska voters vote for the convicted Ted Stevens on November 4?

UPDATE: A small clarification to Alaska's senator replacement. If Stevens gets elected, and he can't fulfill the term (in jail, etc.), since there would be more than 30 calendar months after the date of the vacancy, a special election has to be called. Gov. Palin could still run in that seat, and only give up her governor's chair if she wins.

Okay, Alaska voters. It's up to you. Do you vote for a sitting U.S. Senator, your Senator since Christmas Eve 1968, even though he's been convicted on all 7 counts of falsifying disclosure forms?

Ted Stevens' fate, on one level, was decided in a courtroom earlier this afternoon. But the voters still get a say. Stevens is on the ballot, and will remain in a race against Anchorage Mayor Mark Begich on Tuesday.

In most situations, a conviction would be good enough reason to not vote for a candidate. And the consensus from Alaska is that Begich now has a big advantage due to the conviction.

But this is Alaska, where anything can happen. After all, Stevens got 63 percent of the primary vote, even though he was under indictment.

And to be fair, there is precedent for Alaska voters to vote for Stevens. If we go back to 2000, when Missouri Gov. Mel Carnahan, who was running for the U.S. Senate, was killed in a plane crash on October 17. And in 2002, Paul Wellstone, running for re-election in the U.S. Senate from Minnesota, was killed in a plane crash on October 25.

Missouri voters in 2000 knew they were really voting for Jean Carnahan, Mel's widow. In Minnesota, Wellstone was replaced on the ballot by former Vice President and U.S. Senator Walter Mondale. But voters were voting for the spirit of the recently deceased men.

Stevens, 84, is very much alive, even if he is facing jail time. But Alaska voters could vote for the spirit of Stevens, with the understanding that Sarah Palin would likely control the destiny of Stevens' Senate seat.

Palin, or Lt. Gov. Sean Parnell if Palin is elected vice president, would have the sole discretion to select a replacement. Like Jean Carnahan, that replacement would serve for two years until another election to fill out the term.

The question is whether Gov. Palin will tip her hat and say who might be the replacement for Stevens. Then again, with appeals, who knows when (or if) Stevens would go to jail. Palin is in a difficult situation, also running for vice president, is letting on that she might pick herself.

All of this becomes irrelevant if Alaska voters vote for Mark Begich on Tuesday. But with 8 days until the election, voters will have to decide which direction they want from the U.S. Senate. And we may be up late on November 4 trying to find that out.


Quo Vadis, Alaska?

For a region that prides itself on its Christian virtues (like much of Palin's "real America"), one has to wonder why it is considered appropriate that the rules don't apply to the members of that very self-selected group. I can only hope that Alaskans have finally had enough with this phony religiousity which masquerades as piety and send the entire bunch packing.

Senator Stevens,

You know what IS a series of tubes?

Prison Bars. Enjoy your next tax payer paid vacation.

STEVENS.... grab your ankles... it's gonna be a BUMPY ride...lol

too fucking funny.... go take a wide stance with craig and enjoy the view....

will Ted Stevens be re-elected?

How many millions of dollars has Ted Stevens brought home to Alaska since 1968? Beyond counting, probably. Will Alaskans remember this and feel gratitude and then protective of Uncle Ted? Or, have Alaskans been in the process of educating themselves about what's right and what's wrong: to have followed this trial is to have been engaged in an exercise of hilarity, not to say, absurdity. Well, Alaskans are not fools and I doubt that they are going to relish Uncle Ted's travails when they, themselves, need as much help as the lower 48. I expect Alaskans to vote in their own self interest and that means they will vote Democratic for their Senate seat this year. And, Sarah, Sarah, Sarah, may find her homecoming less than Queenly after November 4th.

?????

How is it that convicted felons can't vote in many many states, but a convicted felon US Senator can continue to serve in in the US Senate? What is wrong with this picture?

There's a lot wrong with this picture...

You echo the question that shocks me as well. Now that Teddy boy is a convicted felon, and as such is unable to vote, how is it that he can still run for office? And if by some insane act of ignorance and stupidity on the part of Alaskan voters he ends up winning the election, what happens then? Does he operate from Club Fed, or the state pen? How the hell would that work?

I would like to hope that this situation would bring to light the obvious hole in the law that exists. I like so many others cannot understand how this disconnect ever came to be. Maybe the founding fathers were so worn out after crafting the Constitution that they just missed this one. Forget about all the talk of ridiculous amendments like banning gay marriage and prosecution for flag burning, lets have an amendment that fills this major hole.

I have to say that this will give an interesting look into the types of voters in Alaska. I plan to keep an eye on this particular facet of the elections just to see how many morons with cast their vote for this convicted felon. At least we know one person who won't be able to vote, eh Teddy boy...

WTF??

My question exactly.