
Is Sarah Palin a huge problem for Obama or just a news cycle?
BE ELECTED
by Christine Bowman
This whole week has been entirely Sarah Palin's news cycle. She was announced as the GOP's VP pick last Friday, she spoke to the nation Wednesday night, and every pundit on the political circuit has tried to wrap his/her mind and words around Sarah Palin all week long.
What should the Obama campaign do about that news cycle dominance, and ultimately, about her?
Hillary Clinton might offer a solution, as The New York Times has surmised. In the primaries Clinton certainly earned a reputation as a fighter and fearless champion. At a campaign stop scheduled for Monday in Florida, could she come out with guns blasting, so to speak, or will she tiptoe around the topic of Sarah? It could be a perfect time to assert a unique role, but in doing so Clinton would certainly risk seeming jealous if she launches an attack on a fellow "female pioneer." Critics from the right would be all over a "girl-on-girl fight" narrative.
The Times reports that Obama's initial strategy is to downplay Palin and stick to his own message:
David Axelrod, the Obama campaign’s chief political strategist, said Mr. Obama would not raise questions about Ms. Palin’s experience. Mr. Axelrod said the campaign would work instead to impress upon voters the seriousness of the race and continue to try to link the McCain-Palin team to President Bush.
Meanwhile, cognitive linguist and progressive George Lakoff has a different recommendation. He sees Sarah Palin as a huge threat, precisely because she is a walking, talking symbol of conservativism. In part, Lakoff writes:
Our national political dialogue is fundamentally metaphorical, with family values at the center of our discourse.
... Palin is the mom in the strict father family, upholding conservative values. ...
Palin is masterful at the Republican game of taking the Democrats’ language and reframing it—putting conservative frames to progressive words: Reform, prosperity, peace. She is also masterful at using the progressive narratives ...
What is at stake in this election are our ideals and our view of the future, as well as current realities. The Palin choice brings both front and center. Democrats, being Democrats, will mostly talk about the realities nonstop without paying attention to the dimensions of values and symbolism. Democrats, in addition, need to call an extremist an extremist: to shine a light on the shared anti-democratic ideology of McCain and Palin, the same ideology shared by Bush and Cheney. They share values antithetical to our democracy. That needs to be said loud and clear, if not by the Obama campaign itself, then by the rest of us who share democratic American values.
Democrats Need to Shine a Light on the Shared Anti-democratic Ideology of McCain and Palin (BuzzFlash)
Former Reagan speechwriter and columnist Peggy Noonan seems to concur that Palin might be a game changer. Noonan assesses the speech:
Which gets me to the most important element of the speech, and that is the startlingness of the content. It was not modern conservatism, or split the difference Conservative-ish-ism. It was not a conservatism that assumes the America of 2008 is very different from the America of 1980. It was the old-time conservatism. ...
This was so old it seemed new, and startling. ...
It all left me wondering if this campaign is about to take on a new shape, with the old time conservatism on one side, and a smoother, evolved form of the old style liberalism on the other.
It doesn't get more dramatic, or dramatically drawn, than that. ...
It is starting to look to me like a nation-defining election. And in this it seems almost old-fashioned. 1992 for instance didn't seem or feel nation-defining, not as I remember it, nor did 2000. 1964 did, and '80 did, but they both ended in landslides. Landslide is not what I'm seeing here.
Where are the Democrats going to go? I suspect to foreign policy. In politics it used to be called Tolstoy: war and peace. McCain-Palin will mean more war, Obama-Biden will mean peace.
This campaign is about to become: epic.
Peggy Noonan: 'A Servant's Heart' (The Wall Street Journal)
Is this indeed a battle for America's soul? How big a threat is Sarah Palin?
Weigh in with your comments.
BE ELECTED
»
- Login or register to post comments
- Printer-friendly version
Buzz this on Buzzflash.net




Technorati Tags:
Lift the Gag Order - Let Her Speak!
Don't Panic. Organize.
Sarah Palin is a curveball, but she was an incredibly stupid choice by McCain. She has serious, serious flaws (see my post below--she actually publicly endangered the life of an infant, just like Michael Jackson). She has committed several crimes, and the chances of her cobbled-together image of a perfect family staying pristine in a sustained national spotlight are pretty slim.
She's no barracuda, just a MILF the GOPers are hot for. I hear she's real mean and tries to get people fired a lot, but that's about the extent of her powers. McCain found out about her from some blogger's website; she's not some shadowy mastermind.
All we have to do is keep up the pressure. Take some time every day to comment on the stories about her, stating plain facts and citing sources. We can't depend on the MSM ever picking anything up, because they're just plain lazy, and their editors censor them.
Some people say the National Enquirer knows all, and intends to reveal all, but they are doling it out week by week to sell magazines. Well, America can't afford to wait. People need to know NOW about the things that make her unelectable. It might take eight full weeks just to let it sink in with people who don't watch any news at all but still intend to vote.
If enough blog pressure is generated, the MSM would have to at least comment on the fact that the blogs are talking about her many scandals, since they've now made segments about the blogosphere part of their daily lineup.
Just take it one step at a time, one scandal at a time, make it simple, and tell the truth. She's a varnished facade puffed full of hot air, nothing more, but we can't afford to take even such a ridiculous threat nonchalantly. This nation must have change, and anything that stands in the way, MILF or not, must go.
Give me a break!
Lakoff is Right, this race is about symbolism!
_______________________________________________________ The Solution to the Middle Class Financial Problems! http://TheInstantPayRaise.Com
Is Sarah Palin a Threat?
Sarah Palin IS the candidate
PALIN FLEW ACROSS A CONTINENT WHILE IN LABOR. THAT'S HUGE!
The Silver Bullet:
http://startelegram.typepad.com/politex/2008/04/governors-water.html
I first read this story on BuzzFlash and my jaw hit the floor. This is enough to take anyone down. Men simply don't realize how explosive that is. She took Trig away from any possibility of medical care for over 10 hours. That's child endangerment and it's against the law.
Let's organize and get a group of prominent OB/GYNs to take out an ad in The USA Today as a public service to impressionable first-time mothers who may think it's okay to follow the example of the governor of Alaska and board a plane while in labor. For the public's benefit, these doctors would spell out exactly what could have gone wrong.
No accusation, no political comment, just a public service explaining that you should not make this choice, even though a prominent and popular female politician did it.
Certainly she could be a problem, but......
She's more like a mini 9-11 ..
...something like a ...7-11. A temporary distraction, full of junk food and big gulps. And then 4 years later we'll be worse off than we are today because we fell sucker to the second biggest snow job in American History.
For that reason, I suggest we do completely ignore Palin.
Obama and Biden should start some Republican ass kicking -forget McCain and Palin specifically. They're small players in the bigger and more ominous scheme of things.
We all should LOUDLY remind Americans who stands lurking in the shadows, BEHIND them, who props them up and pulls their strings.
It's time to stopped the centrist ass kissing and call out all of the extremists in the Republican party, Bush is an old story - there's hundreds more of 'en still standing in Congress ready to do more of the same!!
DO YOU WANT MORE REPUBLICANS IN THE WHITE HOUSE??
But the media won't stop. They admitted their support of George Bush and the war in Iraq totally destroyed this country and killed millions - but they'll do it again in a heartbeat - for profit.
The real question is:
Is this country just as stupid as they are -still?
Nationalism is not terrorism. And an adversary is not an enemy.
Palin - attractive but flawed
It would be a big mistake for the Democrats and the Obama campaign to ignore Sarah Palin. Many voters
are going to connect with her personal story, as if she were on Oprah. At the same time she has, it seems, a background that could make her as much a liability as an asset for the McCain ticket.
Already there's a Newsweek story online about how the national RNC and McCain campaign are trying to
shut down, or at least postpone, the already ongoing Alaska investigation into so-called "trooper-gate." If the Democrats are smart they won't let this go on behind the scenes. They should make such a stink about the outside interference that whether or not the investigation is completed early in Oct or late Oct, everyone hears about it. The Republicans should not get away with presenting her as Mrs. Clean, Mrs. Maverick etc etc. She apparently left the town of Wasilla with huge bonds or something for the construction of a sports facility.
Last night Jon Stewart, or was it Rachel Maddow on Countdown?, said that Rove said it made no sense to go after your opponent's weaknesses. You had to go after their strengths.
So Mom of the day is prepared to leave the care of her children, well, let's just think of the 3 youngest - 4 months, 8 (?) years and 15 - to others while she goes out on the campaign trail? That's not the right-wing picture postcard mom. Every day there should be a new revelation about her public political history. Did she really "flip flop" on the notorious "bridge to nowhere?" Is it true she never sent back the money to the federal government? What about Alaska being the recipient of huge Federal largesse? I think per capita it's the state that gets the most from Washington. I suspect that most of the states that consume more Federal $$ than they pay in federal taxes are "red" states. How about it investigative journalists? This information must be easy to get from the public record.
Just ignoring Sarah Palin because most of us know she isn't the least bit qualified to be VP is not smart. The stakes are too high. The future of our republic is in jeopardy.
Colleen Clark
Cambridge, MA
Palin a huge problem?
war and recession
Sarah Palin
Wow -
Sarah Pallin - Repub Super-Hypocrite par excellence...
But Sarah Palin's "ABSTINENCE ONLY" agenda denies America's teens & young men and women the information they need to have less risky sexual experiences, and thus subjects them to unnecessary risks of pregnancy and especially SEXUALLY TRANSMITED DISEASES. And, despite the MILLIONS of taxpayer dollars Palin and Repubs spend on their theocratic "Moral Values" agenda, "abstinence only" didn't work... even in her own family.
America has been given yet
America has been given yet one more intelligence test.
Yes, I'm concerned.
Fool me once, shame on you.
Fool me twice, shame on me.
Fool me three times, just shoot me.
Test
Palin Flash
CORPORATE CONRTOLED MEDIA!
A Battle For America's Soul & For The Survival Of Life On Earth
This AIP stuff is explosive,
THE CLOCK'S TICKING & THE HOUR IS LATE!
This is PATHETIC
Linking McCain to Bush is
Don't assume the best....
old news
A FEW DAYS TO KICK HER ASS... then turn her over to BIDEN.===>