Get FREE BuzzFlash News Alerts

Email:  

John McCain may be the benefactor of too much Barack Obama coverage

This has been the longest presidential campaign ever with the longest primary (Democratic) in the history of primaries. And on top of that, the MSM has been obsessing over Barack Obama.

So it can't be too much of a shock that in a poll released Wednesday by the nonpartisan Pew Research Center, 48 percent said they're hearing too much about Obama versus 26 percent for John McCain.

When McCain's camp has complained that the press gives more coverage to Obama, the campaign people should probably shut their traps, since it could hurt Obama.

And just because Obama is being talked about doesn't mean it's all good. Sure there has been some fawning here and there from the MSM, but in a way, that has hurt Obama as well. The coverage has been very shallow about his actual policies, and then turning around and criticizing the candidate for not articulating his positions. As well, there is a pattern of obsessing about Obama, and trying to find flaws even when they aren't there.

McCain, who complains about his lack of coverage, should be happy since the MSM undercovers his mistakes, and won't point out elements of McCain that might have been written about in 2000, since "everybody knows that about McCain" and so they don't want to write it up again.

The "logical" coverage of the candidates is that we don't hear too much about who they are and what they've been until after Labor Day, given the attention span of those who casually follow the presidential race. So even if Obama and McCain have been overexposed, it's not like most of the public knows a whole lot about these people.

Perhaps we have been biased for Obama, not so much because he is the Democratic Party nominee for president, but because we have been following this person for awhile in the Illinois State Senate and the U.S. Senate. We do know more details about his life since we live here. As a contrast, I learned about the life of John Kerry as most people did, through information during the campaign, and he had been in the U.S. Senate for some time.

Maybe it's a good idea that Obama is going on vacation next week in Hawai'i. A few days out of the news, while many Americans tune out the news (except to hear about the Olympics) might make Obama seem a little fresher.

But it also means that the Democratic National Convention will be the ideal time to teach Americans about who Barack Obama is. Bill Clinton was a master at selling "the man from Hope" to convey who he is and where he has been. Obama could really use either Clinton himself to teach him how to market who Obama is.

Casual observers to the presidential race think they know who Barack Obama is. But a lot of that perception is misinformation, either directly from FOX "News," the McCain campaign, Internet rumors, or MSM scare tactics about Rev. Wright or something equally irrelevant.

The 2000 race was noteworthy in that we knew very little about Texas Governor George W. Bush (and still don't know a lot even now). And despite what the MSM says, we don't really know that much about John McCain as a person.

Hopefully, when the American public learns new and positive things about Barack Obama, perhaps it won't be as "tired" about hearing about Obama. After all, this person will be the next leader of the free world -- shouldn't we know quite a bit about that person?


Obama VP

He should consider Sarah Palin that would be a change. Female, Rep., and not afraid to stand her ground.

John McCain may be the benefactor of too much Barack Obama cover

Surely, McCain should be grateful for the media's intense spotlight on Obama, whose every word, gesture, and expression is gone over with a fine-toothed comb for signs that he might not be Just Exactly Like Every Other American, and thus unqualified for the Presidency. McCain, meanwhile, is free to breeze along as The Other Guy--you know, that Maverick War Hero Who Tells It Like It Is. He doesn't have to provide any specifics, explain his numerous grotesque misstatements, rationalize his recent about-face on every position he ever took that suggested any integrity--and deep down inside, he knows that a lot of close scrutiny, even with friendly reporters and their even friendlier corporate owners, would nix any chance he has of backing into the White House after the media has turned Obama into a child-gobbling killer alien.

Still and all, I think the word would be "beneficiary," not "benefactor."

Centrism

If Mr. Obama keeps "moving toward the center" coverage of him will indeed help McCain. If he can manage to develop "a pair", perhaps coverage will help him. "The Audacity of Hope" made him sound as if he stands for something. His recent waffling and pandering to the right makes him look as if he stands for nothing. I will vote for Senator Obama(as long as he is not accompanied by Senators Nunn, Lieberman, or Bayh), but it seems to be increasingly evident that we will have to fight him post-election.

"Whatever"

I read on Daily Kos that only about 35% of population follow the election like 'We' do so I can see how it would do in a poll. Instead of asking people are the tired of seeing Obama they should of ask are you tired of politics. Replacing 'politics' with 'Obama' is just a feeble ruse by the right wing, polls is this election are more off course than ever before. Wait until the debate

Too much coverage?

From the amount of attention, mostly positive, given to Paris Hilton's energy policy statement, there definitely is "campaign fatigue"

But the article nails it on the abyssmal media coverage of Obama's policy positions. He gives a detailed energy policy speech, McCain's minions trump up the tire pressure point and make complete fools of themselves. But Rove's strategy is effective in distracting the media and the populace from the details.

The media are either completely ignorant of economics, international issues, environment and governance, or they believe that the citizens are completely uninterested in that stuff and will change channels if the talking heads discuss any really omportant stuff.

Probably both.

IT'S UNBELIEVABLE?!

WHAT A PROFOUNDLY STUPID ARTICLE?! It's akin to a 1,000 word essay on 'ELEPHANTS ARE GREY BECAUSE...'! As long as the MSM FOCUSES ON OBAMA, Stupid, Insane MCCAIN ESCAPES COVERAGE THAT WOULD EXPOSE HIM AS AN INCOMPETENT 'FRONTMAN' & 'COVER' FOR THE WEALTHY WHITE BOY 1%-ERS TO CONTINUE ROBBING TAXPAYINGS & USING THE U.S. TREASURY LIKE THEIR PIGGYBANKS! POOR, STUPID 'Progressives' & 'Liberals' must understand the GOP & Wealthy White Boys will KILL ANYBODY & EVERYBODY IF NECESSARY TO WIN IN 2008 & KEEP THE DESTRUCTION OF AMERICA ON SCHEDULE!

too much Obama coverage?

No way. People don't care right now. It is August and people are concerned about how much money they have to pay to go on vacation and how they can figure out how to go on vacation regionally. They are going, alright. But, they are going close to home. This is August. People are letting things go because all the rest of the year they have to make decisions about things over which they have no control whatsoever. So, August doesn't count in terms of what is going to happen in November. And, that's good.