Get FREE BuzzFlash News Alerts

Email:  

All Barack Obama should worry about is picking the best vice president

BE-ELECTED
by Chad Rubel

For the first time in our nation's history, a woman is being seriously considered as a vice presidential selection. Geraldine Ferraro, the only woman so far to be on a major party national ticket, wasn't a subject of speculation by the pundits, amateur and professional, in 1984.

What if a woman runs for vice president of the United States in 2008?

And it's not just a question for Barack Obama to decide. Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchinson (R-TX), Condoleezza Rice, and former Hewlett-Packard CEO Carly Fiorina have been mentioned as possible selections for John McCain.

In the original dynamic, the thought of Obama selecting a woman was considered to be bold and dynamic, showing a new face of American leadership.

Given the recent charges of sexism by Hillary Clinton supporters, and if Obama does select a woman who is not Hillary Clinton, how would a selection of a woman who is not Hillary Clinton be seen by Clinton supporters?

Hillary Clinton is the first woman to be a serious contender for a major party's presidential nod. Yet if Gov. Janet Napolitano (D-AZ), Gov. Kathleen Sebelius (D-KS), Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-MO), Caroline Kennedy Schlossberg, or Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-CA) gets picked as the running mate for Obama, that person could be the first woman to serve as vice president and possibly, the first woman president.

One name I would love to put on this list is Michigan Gov. Jennifer Granholm (D-MI), who is highly qualified but unfortunately is ineligible since she was born in Canada.

So the delicate question that Clinton supporters may have to consider is whether having a woman in the number 2 slot is a good thing, even if it isn't Hillary Clinton.

Clinton supporters have a legitimate beef when it comes to sexism and Obama supporters have a legitimate beef when it comes to racism. And the Republicans and the MSM will subject the Democratic Party nominee to those attacks in the fall. Quite frankly, the "first" to break the mold is going to deal with these issues. And Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama have tough enough skins to be able to cope with the backlash.

The good news in 2008 is that in the Democratic Party primary season, the Clinton/Obama battle has been decided by the quality of the candidates and their campaigns, and not because of gender or race. And that is what equality should be about.

But Obama supporters should understand that there are Clinton supporters who think Clinton should be the first woman president, not Napolitano, Sebelius, McCaskill, Kennedy Schlossberg, or Boxer. They look at her 35 years of public service and consider her to be the best qualified candidate, regardless of gender. And they may be less than thrilled with a woman that they don't know, especially if she is an Obama supporter. Whether or not there will be fallout from this in November is a question that needs serious consideration.

Hillary Clinton has spoken in her speeches about the young daughters being brought by their parents, and the underlying symbolism that if you are female, you really do have a shot of being president of the United States. Barack Obama, who has two young daughters, has brought similar language into his speeches lately.

We are ready to have a woman be in top leadership in this country. In 2008, there are dozens and dozens of well-qualified women in both parties who could lead this country. But we also don't want to be put in a situation where a woman is placed onto the ticket to satisfy a "quota." Obama is starting the process of picking a running mate. If Obama picks Napolitano, Sebelius, McCaskill, Kennedy Schlossberg, Boxer, or yes, even Hillary Clinton, it should be because Obama thinks that person will be the best vice president.


It may all be academic

Florida Dems have filed suit against the DNC. If this goes all the way to August, through challanges and lawsuits, it won't matter who is on the ticket. John McCain will be in the White House. If Obama picks "that person" who would be the best vice president, he will pick Jim Webb. Senator Webb, though you wouldn't know it from reading news on the net, managed to get his GI Bill through the Senate today, without the vote of the Republican nominee, who is out west campaigning, and fundraising. The longer this primary drags out --- the more certain this is what we are looking at for at least the next four years.

Jim Webb is the most logic choice to be the Dem VP candidate

No offense to all the possible female candidates, Obama needs a military guy as his VP to unscrew the mess "Dick" and Dumbyass have put us into. As the former Secretary of the Navy, Webb is uniquely qualified to cut the bloated Defense budget while keeping America strong. We need the military top brass out of the political equation. Who do you think aided and abetted "Dick" and Dumbyass over the last 7 years? Where did the Anthrax that almost killed our Democratic Senators in 2001? Who keeps supporting violations of the Geneva Convention? No, it isn't Newt Gingrich and his band of philandering hypocritical creeps. Jim Webb knows who the true patriots are in the military and who are the traitors. Obama will need to clean house and Jim Webb is the right man to do the job.

Military experience

I agree with Norm. The number one issue right now for voters might be the economy but just wait until we get a little closer to November. Fear of terrorists will be back at the top of the hit parade and John McCain will be cast as the war hero who can protect the fearful. Obama will need to counter this with someone seen as tough on defense and experienced in military matters. Fear based politics works and it's all the Republicans have since it appears gay bashing and flag burning are yielding diminishing returns for them. Prepare for orange/red national threat advisory and start interviewing some of the retired generals who spoke up about the Iraq fiasco and got booted out because of it. Or Jim Webb.