Get FREE BuzzFlash News Alerts

Email:  

Why Bush Will Pardon Libby If He Has To: Because Otherwise George and Dick Would Face Impeachment and Jail Time

A BUZZFLASH EDITORIAL

BuzzFlash has had a personal interest in the Libby case, since we were the second online – and for that matter journalistic source of any sort – to report on the importance of the outing of Valerie Plame in the infamous Bob Novak column.

David Corn, of The Nation, was the first person to recognize the potential significance of the brief passage in Novak’s column. Corn wrote a commentary in The Nation that speculated that the two senior administration staffers who confirmed Plame’s covert role to Novak might have violated Federal law. Specifically, they might have broken a Congressional prohibition on outing covert CIA staff.

After Corn’s column broke (with the mainstream press still silent), we interviewed Corn and wrote a few editorials and alerts about the potential damage to our national security caused by a White House seeking vengeance.

Eventually, the CIA filed a formal request to the Justice Department to investigate whether the law had been broken, thus compromising the CIA’s efforts – in Valerie Plame’s case – to track (oh the tragic irony) the illicit sale and transfer of Weapons of Mass Destruction.

At that point, Bush said that he would fire anyone responsible for the leak, if such a leak took place. He never asked his staff about the leak, for obvious reasons. Because Bush and Cheney – as the Libby trial revealed – were aware of and involved in the leak planning, with Bush even declassifying national security information for Libby to use to try and smear Joe Wilson.

At the point Bush made his pledge to fire anyone involved in the Plame outing, the mainstream press started to periodically cover the story. Bush also then put Attorney General John Ashcroft in charge of a cover-up. After that, the White House adopted the mantra that they could not answer any questions about the leak because there was a legal investigation going on.

In fact, when asked yesterday about whether or not Bush might pardon Libby, a White House spokesperson called the question hypothetical and that the White House wouldn’t comment because Libby’s lawyers were going to appeal the case (actually, first request a new trial) and so legal proceedings will still going on – and the White House won’t comment on an ongoing case. Sure, right.

Last week, Bush himself was asked about the possibility of a Libby pardon were Libby to be convicted, and Bush indicated that he wouldn’t answer such a question.

What the White House is going to do is wait and hope that the D.C. Court of Appeals, on which the infamous partisan Federal Judge David Sentelle sits, will save them from the issue of a pardon by overturning Libby’s conviction on some technicality.

Sentelle has an interesting history in this area. He was one of the judges who overturned the Iran-Contra felony convictions of Oliver North and John Poindexter on a technicality.

We have written about Sentelle several times. Not only is he a right winger who believes that there is a liberal conspiracy to destroy America, he is the one that appointed Ken Starr as the Clinton Special Prosecutor after Jesse Helms and another Neo-Confederacy senator told him to. Sentelle is a partisan GOP judicial operative, who is there to save Republicans from legal jams that they get into.

He also does the ideological bidding of the White House. In the last two weeks, he has been part of a 2-1 majority on the D.C. Court of Appeals ruling on the side of the White House to suspend Habeas Corpus.

It is important to also remember that Poppy Bush pardoned Caspar Weinberger so that he wouldn’t "flip" and spill the beans on Daddy Bush in terms of his neck-deep involvement with Iran-Contra.

Pardons by Bushes to save their own necks are in the bloodline.

Bush will pardon Libby if he needs to, because Bush is already implicated in the Valerie Wilson outing – as we know from the Libby trial.

If Libby were to "flip" and spill the beans to Fitzgerald, Bush and Cheney would be forced to resign or face impeachment.

But Bush is going to wait it out and hope that the back bench of activist partisan right wing judges appointed during the Reagan, Bush and Bush administrations will save him the politically costly act of pardoning Libby.

If for some unexpected reason, Judge Sentelle doesn’t get the job done – or Nino "the Fixer" Scalia fails if the Libby appeal reaches the Supreme Court – then Scooter knows Bush will do the deed and grant him the ultimate Bush get-out-of-jail card: a pardon.

Because if Libby talks, Bush and Cheney will likely face some hardcore jail time themselves.

A BUZZFLASH EDITORIAL


How To Make Sure That Bush Gets Jail Time

We pressure Congress into cutting off all funding for the Iraq war, that's how. Because one victory, that's all it'll take.

Libby pardon

It certainly seems that Libby would receive a pardon from bush2, but not necessarily. First, bush2, son of poppy, is not necessarily a guy who is sympathetic to other's difficulties even if the person is somewhat close to him. It almost seems like he perceives sympathy as a weakness, and forget about his ability to be empathetic. It doesn't exist.

Second, he also doesn't follow in poppy's footsteps; i.e., the iraq commission is a good example. He told them all to go home after he told them that he would take their recommendations under consideration. And look what happened with that - he has done exactly the opposite. It is obvious that his authority is exclusively his own and he's the 'decider.'

An editorial in the Wall Street Journal yesterday (03.07.2007) made the case for a pardon based on the bad memory scenerio. It seems reasonable that he will be pardoned, because this is an administration that lies so much that all of the lying in the past 42 administrations combined pales in comparison.

There is no doubt whatsoever.

Irving Libby will sit tight while free on appeal knowing that bush will pardon him long before there is any possibility that he might serve time for his crimes.

Deal with it. No shred of justice will ever touch his treasonous ass.

Focus

What's happened.

bush&co. got four things done and are looking to get the fifth.

They got the documents forged. Who else? Why? Who gains?

Only one entity gains - the ones looking to go to war.

One of the most overlooked aspects of this affair is who ordered the documents to be forged? Follow that chain and watch where it goes.

But no one's even asking.

Next, bush&co got to use the false information when needed and has yet to suffer any penalty for lying us into a war.

Third & forth, Brewster& Jennings and Plame were put out of play - leaving fifth - Iran.

We stop the fifth, we go back to the first , we get them all!

My Thoughts Exactly

Your editorial fit with my thoughts and predictions exactly. I predicted a pardon, if all else fails, before the trial even started.

Bush and Chaney knew that Fitzgerald would try to convict a small fish to get to them, so they had to have a backup plan in place before hand.

My current prediction is that Sentelle will overturn Libby’s convictions on the technicality that his convictions were all based on hearsay evidence (not a valid reason for overturning in the first place).

My next prediction is that the Dems. in the house won’t pursue the issue, because they are afraid that the American people don’t want another impeachment. They are wrong, but inside the beltway, they can’t hear us.

Constitutional Amendment?

The father and son Bush duo seems to be providing us a good argument that we need a fundamental change.

Perhaps the founders did not anticipate the depths that we have sunk with these Presidents, but the actions of the father in issuing pardons to those involved in Iran-contra are now apt to be followed by similar behavior on the part of the son. In both cases, the President pardons members of his own administration, arguably to avoid prosecution of the President himself.

Maybe one thing good that can come as a result of these two administrations is a Constitutional Amendment to forbid a President from pardoning anyone who has served in an appointed office his or her administration.

Not mutually exclusive.

The one doesn't exclude the other, by any means. Bush pardoning Libby doesn't mean that Bush and Cheney won't face impeachment and/or jailtime for outing Valerie Plame's name. And even were Libby to be pardoned, that wouldn't exclude him from being subpoenaed as a witness in some possible future court case against Bush and Cheney.