Get FREE BuzzFlash News Alerts

Email:  

The Bush Administration Helps Terrorists Accomplish Their Main Goal: Terrorizing Us and Curtailing Our Freedoms

A BUZZFLASH EDITORIAL

BuzzFlash has written many an editorial and news analysis that comes to the same conclusion: Bush gives the terrorists what they want by playing to their hand. In return, Rove gets to use terrorism as a tactic of fear to keep American voters in the Republican camp.

In short, in the true fashion of demagogues, fear becomes the cudgel to amass power. The terrorists need Bush to help create a market for more terrorists; and Rove needs terrorists to keep the radical GOP at the center of a one party country for years to come.

It’s a betrayal of America. It’s political cynicism at its most brazen and traitorous.

We’ve talked about the many reasons that BuzzFlash has made – and continues to make – such a bold assertion. (Although if you doubt its validity as being “too over the top,” let us ask you this: tell us how the Bush Administration would still be in power if 9/11 had not occcurred?)

An August 24 Wired News commentary entitled “Refuse to be Terrorized” offers more corroboration for BuzzFlash’s charge. In a compelling, succinct column, the case is made that by constantly bombarding us with sensationalistic announcements of “terror threats,” the Bush Administration and the media are accomplishing one of the key goals of the terrorists – which is to terrorize us.

The fact is that by keeping us in a constant state of fear, the Bush Administration creates a state of terror even if no terrorist act occurs (and, if one does, all the better to roll out the Hollywood image of Bush as “the Great 9/11 Leader.”)

Some excerpts from the Wired News analysis will say it better than BuzzFlash can:

“The point of terrorism is to cause terror, sometimes to further a political goal and sometimes out of sheer hatred. The people terrorists kill are not the targets; they are collateral damage. And blowing up planes, trains, markets or buses is not the goal; those are just tactics.

The real targets of terrorism are the rest of us: the billions of us who are not killed but are terrorized because of the killing. The real point of terrorism is not the act itself, but our reaction to the act.

And we're doing exactly what the terrorists want.”

“Our politicians help the terrorists every time they use fear as a campaign tactic. The press helps every time it writes scare stories about the plot and the threat. And if we're terrified, and we share that fear, we help. All of these actions intensify and repeat the terrorists' actions, and increase the effects of their terror.”

“The implausible plots and false alarms actually hurt us in two ways. Not only do they increase the level of fear, but they also waste time and resources that could be better spent fighting the real threats and increasing actual security. I'll bet the terrorists are laughing at us.”

And the author of the column, Bruce Schneier, exhorts:

“But our job is to remain steadfast in the face of terror, to refuse to be terrorized. Our job is to not panic every time two Muslims stand together checking their watches. There are approximately 1 billion Muslims in the world, a large percentage of them not Arab, and about 320 million Arabs in the Middle East, the overwhelming majority of them not terrorists. Our job is to think critically and rationally, and to ignore the cacophony of other interests trying to use terrorism to advance political careers or increase a television show's viewership.

The surest defense against terrorism is to refuse to be terrorized. Our job is to recognize that terrorism is just one of the risks we face, and not a particularly common one at that. And our job is to fight those politicians who use fear as an excuse to take away our liberties and promote security theater that wastes money and doesn't make us any safer.”

Well said, indeed.

The reality is that when you have an administration and political party who are so radical and incompetent that they can only rule and amass dictatorial powers by suffocating us in fear and terror, then it is hard to turn the intentional state of mass hysteria around.

Yes, there are terrorists. Yes, there is cancer. Yes, there is poverty.

Yes, there are 40,000 automobile deaths a year.

But we don’t see sensational political and media campaigns about the number of people killed in car accidents, do we?

And the American love affair with the car hasn’t resulted in a fear of driving because of all the people killed while in an automobile, has it.

More importantly, our love affair with the American Constitution shouldn’t result in a divorce from that document because of a cheap and sleazy manipulation of our emotions by the White House that only helps terrorists achieve their primary goal: a state of terror.

A BUZZFLASH EDITORIAL






Technorati Tags:Technorati Tags:

Bush and Liberals

Is this one-in-the same? I suggest that it is. Bush spends a ton on every cause that comes along, considers the Saudis and Mexicans as his good friends, and enables the youth to get highly toxic morning after pills. I suppose liberals would not agree pointing to Iraq but he did that for his daddy and after consultation with his good friends the Saudis. I could cede you this point but I bet you're wrong. Bush is a liberal. He has zero conservative characterists. Stop hating this cretin and embrace him- he's you!!

both sides rule in the same manner

both the terrorists and our administration rule in the same way, with terror. look back at rummsfeld durring the coldwar, especially during his time with nixon and ford. he was all about scaring the crap out of us. the point is well made. but bush and company not only help the terrorists acieve their goal of terrorizing many citizens, they also work hard making sure that there will be pleanty of extremeists wanting to continue the vicious cycle. they are all somehow cut from the same cloth.

Bush Helps Terrorism

Well said. I agree absolutley!

This is a perfect example...

"there are 40,000 automobile deaths a year" and it's not on the Left's agenda to criminalize automobiles? yet, when it comes to guns... I think you know what I'm sayin'. To think we are dealing with the prospect of a tyrannical police state and the Left wants to disarm non-criminals? Whoa, Nelly.

Perfect example!

Your comments are a perfect example of what liberals and moderates are dealing with in this twisted and divided political world we live in...... You intend to shoot it out with the U.S. Military? Because that's who would be guarding your loss of liberties -- *smile* Think you'll have a gun then, huh? Hell, all the wingnuts leading us towards Tyranny are also gun nuts -- see the connection? You don't do you? That's what we're up against and thanks for your post - It WAS a perfect example! Ian Monte Bright

IMPOTENTES DEFENEDRE LIBERTATEM NON POSSUNT

". . Totalitarianism is on the rise everywhere because advocates of big government have taken leadership control of the power centers within every society. Power centers are organizations and social groupings – such as political parties, labor unions, church groups, media centers, and professional societies – that hold political power based on their claim to represent their members and on their ability to lead public opinion. It has taken many years for them to achieve this dominance over society, but they have succeeded. It does no good to complain or to theorize about what should be done. As long as advocates of big government hold the power, nothing will change." G. Edward Griffin, author of "Creature from Jekyll Island." http://www.freedom-force.org/

Bush/World Terrorist

On the home front we now have laws that allow search and seisure without a warrant and the threat of imprisonment if you complain publicly or if you know of someone else being secretely searched and you notify them or make that public. Did Bin Laden or Hussein have anything to do with those laws? Did George and the republican congress? There is eves-dropping on our private conversations and phone records of our calls being turned over to the Government under pain of threat and possible prosecution. Who's made that decision to trump our own liberties and freedoms with the continued wiretapping of our private conversations? Bush and the republican congress or Sadam and Osama? We have periodic "terrorists monitoring reports" provided to the local police from the Homeland Security Dept that details war protesters in the communities but nothing about terrorists. It gives advice how to deal with dissident Americans but is lightly seasoned with suggestions about dealing with terrorists. More and more prominent democrat Americans are finding themselves on no-fly lists and finding that their money transactions are being froze for 7 - 10 days at a time. Some are even denied access to their funds equal to the transaction for the same period of time. Osama and Sadam or Bush and Company? We have a color coded terror alert system that is being manipulated so intensely to control the fear factor among the citizenry that the first "Bush Appointed" head of the Homeland Security Dept resigned and has since sighted that revelation as the prime reason. On the foreign policy front we have a situation where soon after 9/11 we had the world behind us pledging all of their resources to help us rebuild and bring the bombers to justice. We now have a fractured relationship with almost every other country in the world - specifically those that would have made great allys in a genuine war on terrorism...fought through sharing of intelligence resources and surgical maneuvers. We have a terrorist network never seen before in the world. Young men and women from all over the middle east are signing up with terrorist groups in record numbers out of fear of us. Iran was our biggest fear in the middle east and Iraq was the best buffer against Iran's Islamic fundamentalist expansionist agenda -- now Iran practically owns Iraq and has been using it, along with many other terrorists groups, as a killing field and training ground for gorilla warfare. Our soldiers being some of the main practice targets. Other terrorist groups have gained respect and dignity under this administration -- Hezbollah is being feted by some of the most unlikely heads of state after their political/military trouncing of Israel, and Hamas is the elected government of the palestinian people. We now have two of three countries that Bush originally designated as "The Axis Of Evil" showing unprecedented arrogance in our face by firing strategic missles at will and re-energizeing their nuclear capabilities without fear of reprisal because we're militarily weakened by the folly of Bush and company. And meanwhile they're both - Iran and North Korea - getting stronger and stronger militarily while we get weaker. How much of the above has accured at the hands of Sadam or Osama or any other terrorist in the world? How much of it is the sole agenda and collateral damage from Bush and Company? When you consider that Bush and company are the singular architects of our domestic misery and fear and the chaos on the world front it's difficult to find any terrorist living or dead that can match up. The Bush Administration has shown it's ability to terrorize domestically and internationally on a scale never before seen in history. No other terrorist group could have ever accomplished what this administration has. He's made us more unsafe and less free than any terrorists ever could. Ian Monte Bright

one hand washing the other

It sounds reasonable to believe that Bush has no idea he is doing the terrorists work for them. That his incompetence has led to situations that just happen to be good for Al Qaida. Except that those conditions are also good for a powergrabbing Bush administration. First, by hyping the fear card at home this admin controls us and convinces us that unilateral presidential power is a wartime necessity. Second, by occupying Iraq and rattling sabers all across the mideast, it forces hoards of angry young muslims into Bin Laden's camps. Its a win/win for Bush and Bin Laden.

Funny how we never made much attempt to capture him. and funnier that the Bush family has been in Business with the Bin Laden family for ages. Its almost as if they might be in cahoots!

Don't kid yourself... it wasn't incompetence that created the quagmire in Iraq. The busheviks never and don't have any intention of leaving. I figured that out myself in 2003 and I'm no genious. They knew getting rid of Sadam would ultimately lead to perpetual unrest, the perfect excuse for a perpetual occupation.

To what end? Who is profitting in the short and long term?

Hurricane coming in Florida...

Election cycle coming up.. Hurricane coming.. If you make less that $30,000 a year and choose to buy a generator for the hurricane, Fema will reimburse you for not only the generator but the gas to operate it after the hurricane.. I got hit by 3 hurrcanes in 2004 (big election year) Fema tried to pay me 3 times for the same generator.. I actually got paid twice for the same generator.. I had a helluva time returning one of the checks but I did.. I heard a lot of poor and retired people say 'they are voting for Bush because he paid for their generator'.. Been everywhere but the electric chair.. Seen everything but the wind.. V.A medical benefits taken away in Dec., 03..

Bush helps torrists

The editorial misses Bush's intent. You are sucked into their diversion. Before Bush is finally out of office he may have turned our independent nation into a North American entity without borders and embracing the lifestyle and economics of Mexico and Bush and his good friends the Saudis will have gutted our Nation of it's military pride and dominance. I think it is all about our borders and our culture. Nothing else matters. Bush and liberals have almost succeeded in reducing a proudly independent nation into 2nd world status. We are being lead at all levels by people without a vested interest in our Nation and are morally bankrupt.

Diversion --

Bush isn't smart enough to create a diversion -- He can't create a proper sentence or a complete thought about anything deeper than "slicin' the pig"..... And "Bush and the Liberals?" are respondsible? There's about as much a connection to Bush and anything liberal as there was with Osama and Sadam.....(sorry to bring that up) That's quite a leap in logic I've never seen before. Kudos!! LOL You do realize that all of what you see in government and political policy is purely conservative. You have all the power right now -- all of it. You must be accountable! Recognize that word? LOL Ian Monte Bright

House Committee on Un-American activity

Sen. Joe McCarthy used fear to ruin thousands of American lives. The Republicans had control of Congress, tore up the US Constituton, and put you in jail for what you were thinking. All this in fear of "The Commies". I'm 70 and now i worry about the Bush crime family taking social security away. When I was younger, we were told by our teachers, "Anyone can become President of the USA" Look what we have now, a president with a mental problem AND an IQ score of 83. If the Dems can't get off their spineless ass's this November, you can kiss your ass goodbye. Doesn't anyone read history?

Media manipulation

In case anyone missed it, Keith olbermann's Countdown aired an important segment on how whenever there is a politically sticky situation developing for the Bush Administration, there shortly follows a "terrorist threat". Here's a link to the video. Olbermann should get a Pulitzer for this report. http://www.rawstory.com/news/2006/Olbermann_The_Nexus_of_politics_and_0815.html I might add that it's not just terror threats that are being manipulated to distract attention. The Bush Justice Department had been investigating Jon Benet Ramsey's purported murderer for about three years, and the timing of the dramatic arrest in Thailand is suspect. Things were getting very sticky over the Lieberman/Bush "kiss of death" defeat in the Connecticut primary. Now that the public's attention has been diverted once again away from BushFailure, Inc., serious questions are being raised about John Karr's guilt. It looks more and more like a nutcase who confessed to a crime he didn't commit. Where's the DNA evidence?

bin Laden, Bush, 9/11 and Reason

Bush isn't just helping the terrorists, he is ignorant to this fact and the mere idea is not open to discussion. I'm posting this comment, however, in reference to the link to the Washington Post article about the omission of 9/11 connections to Osama bin Laden on his FBI most wanted listing. Has there been an analysis of this news story? If not, I would just like to point out a few things. "and bin Laden and other al-Qaeda leaders have proudly taken responsibility for the hijackings." This is not a true statement. The only statement reasonably attributed to bin Laden is to the effect that he had "nothing to do" with the attacks of 9/11 and "they seem to have been carried out by individuals with their own motivation." Further, the article uses the famous bin Laden tapes as proof of his confession. If the tapes were authentic, they would constitute credible evidence, plenty for an indictment in a federal court. But the tapes are not authentic, they have been dissected by experts and from tape to tape it's not even the same man posing as bin Laden. The government has not used the tapes as actual evidence because they would need to hold up to the thorough scrutiny of the courts, and they can't, so no indictment for bin Laden. The most disturbing omission of the article relates to the war in Afghanistan. We invaded Afghanistan because Osama was the KNOWN MASTERMIND of 9/11, and we knew he was hiding there, and the Taliban supported him and sheltered him, so Afghanistan was harboring terrorists thereby justifying our ground invasion. Here's a question: If we're invading a country with military ground forces because they are harboring the mastermind of 9/11, shouldn't we be able to prove at that point that he was in fact, the mastermind? Considering this conundrum, the Afghan pipeline debacle becomes a far better reason for our invasion of Afghanistan. "We must not believe the many, who say that only free people ought to be educated, but we should rather believe the philosophers who say that only the educated are free." - Epictetus

9/11 and reason

Excellent analysis and comments. How many alleged 911 masterminds have been taken into custody? Why didn't we invade the countries harboring them? That OBU masterminded and orchestrated 911 from some cave in the mountains of the Pakistan - Afghan border region totally defies reason and common sense. It's all about oil and always has been.

Bush Admin keeping us terrified

We have been operating under such awful fear since this Administration took power. The use of fear as a tactic by rulers is as old as the human race and for good reason. It works so well, and it works long enough for the rulers to achieve most, if not all of their goals. Asking people, especially Americans, to resist fear tactics is like shoveling sand against the tide. This country has been insulated from the horrors of warfare since the Civil War. One would think that the destruction of the Twin Towers would be a wake up call as to how terrible bombing is. Unfortunately 9/11 only served to put Americans in a constant state of terror, demanding that our government protect us at all costs. Who needs freedom and liberty? What we want is safety and security, neither of which truly exists if one lives in the real world and not some manufactured fantasyland. We have also lost our ability to empathize with others, who do experience constant bombardments and who live with daily threats to their lives. When I hear someone utter that ridiculous phrase: "We're fighting them over there, so we won't have to fight them here". What I'm hearing is "As long as people over there are dying, I don't care as long as it stays over there". Until we can truly understand that people are the same no matter where they live, no matter what religion they practice and no matter what system of government they embrace, we will be doomed by our own elitist arrogance. Sincerely Trudy Springer Olympia, WA

Bush helps terrorists

There are so many flaws in Bush foreign policy, including the war on terror that it would exhaust anyone to read or list them. How so many are flim-flammed by his lame pronuncements is beyond me. Certainly, that many Americans cannot be dumber that he is.

The Other Plan

We've missed the other prong of the Bush plan to fight terror. Remember when he said, "They hate us for our freedoms"? The way things are going, they won't hate us for that anymore. It's one of those rare instances where the administration is actually practicing the art of compromise. If you can't lick 'em, join 'em, right?

GOP / Terrorists use same tool

It's generally accepted the tool of terrorists is to blow things up. This is wrong - the tool of terrorists is terror, to create fear. Blowing things up is just the one of the ways to use the tool.

The bushies/GOPers also use the same tool, but in a different manner. They use the tool to generate terror with threats.

Although I have yet to hear it said specifically, the implication is very clear when GOPers "warn us" - basically saying If Democrats take over the House and/or Senate then we are all going to die.

not much difference in my mind between a "terrorist" suiciding in the streets and a GOPer threatening us with suiciders in the streets. Produces the same results - fear and terror.

Original Political Cartoons:

http://radfringe.tripod.com/radicalfringecartoons/

Surviving Katrina

While watching the Surviving Katrina special on Discovery last night, I couldn't help but feel that the terrorists must get a tremendous amount of satisfaction watching us helplessly let a major American city perish because our resources are being wasted in Iraq. If that doesn't signify a victory for them, I don't know what does.

Why have there been no attacks?

A reality-based article in Foreign Affairs explores the question, "Is there Still a Terrorist Threat?"

Good article, but I think it misses the most obvious (at least to me) reason why we haven't experienced a major terrorist attack in five years: The one on 9/11 succeeded so spectacularly. In fact, Osama himself told an associate that the bombings had succeeded beyond his wildest dreams (or words to that effect). He could hardly believe his luck.

I think the people in this administration assume that terrorism is a mindless, purposeless act, perpetuated by crazies whose sole motivation is that "they hate our freedoms." Our leaders believe that the crazies will continue perpetrating these purposeless acts of terror as long as we and they exist.

I don't believe that's the case at all. A well-planned act of terrorism by an organization such as al Qaeda always has a purpose, a goal. Even if you believe the goal was simply to "strike terror," 9/11 accomplished its goal. The United States has been so terrorized by the incident that we have been step-by-step dismantling those very freedoms that the terrorists supposedly "hate".

If the goal was more sophisticated - say to inspire "jihadists" and serve as a recruiting poster, it accomplished that as well. If it was to chase us out of Saudi Arabia, it accomplished its purpose within months of the event.

And 9/11 just keeps on paying dividends. The memory of it and fears of further attacks keep us re-electing the same people -- the ones that dismantle our freedoms, inspire and enrage the jihadists, and serve as poster boys to help al Qaeda recruit more terrorists.

It may not be politically correct to say this, but here goes: 9/11 was such a rousing success that one should wonder why Osama bin Laden's boys would even want to bother attacking us again for a very long time to come.

Bob at 55-40

9/11 just keeps paying dividends

For the most part, this is true. But there's another card up the Rethuglicans' sleeves as well. Easily hackable electronic voting machines. So, they have their one-two punch. As for the 9/11 event itself: I think there are serious questions to be asked about who exactly carried out that monstrous act. Bin Laden denied it initially. Later, we saw a fuzzy video of someone who was supposed to be Bin Laden talking joyfully about the unexpected success of 9/11/. But the man in the video did not look like Bin Laden. There may be more to this whole thing than meets the eye.

exactly

al-Qaeda is the new Lee Harvey Oswald
wastedspace.com

Our leaders are themselves cowards

And they fear men like McCain, Gore, Powell, and Kerry, who are not. It would be better, in Jimmy Breslin's phrase, if our wars were not waged by men who had "never heard a gun go off."

The fear they peddle is their own.

Exactly. Call the cowards for what they are.

Why should we deplore their ridicule tactics when we could employ them ourselves? We ought to use images of chickenhawks all the time to describe these hidden-bunker-babies. And ask every Republican if they wear Depends because they pee themselves over these fantasies of "terrusts" invading backwoods main street?