White House Authorized Leaks on Brit Raid That Compromise National Security
A BUZZFLASH EDITORIAL
Okay, BuzzFlash is going to "catapult" some more truth here.
If the Busheviks are so concerned about national security, why are the British intelligence agencies furious that the White House is leaking information that compromises efforts to stop terrorists?
If the Busheviks are so concerned about beating terrorists who Bush says hate us for our liberties and freedom, why is Bush working so aggressively to curtail our liberties and freedoms? Isn't that accomplishing what the terrorists seek as a goal, according to Bush's own words?
If the Busheviks are so concerned about terrorism, why did they abandon the battle against bin-Laden -- despite Bush's vow to catch him dead or alive -- and start a war in a nation state that posed no immediate or imminent terrorist threat to the United States?
If the Busheviks are so concerned about plots such as the alleged ludicrous "terrorist cell" that was allegedly planning to flood lower Manhattan by blowing up a Hudson River tunnel (which could not -- as BuzzFlash was the first media outlet to point out -- cause Wall Street to become flooded due to the laws of gravity), why is Bush ruining our economy for the terrorists by spending hundreds of billions of dollars destroying Iraq and bankrupting our nation? Isn't Bush accomplishing the goal of al-Qaeda to economicaly destroy America? Bush is doing their work for them.
If the Busheviks are so concerened about reducing the number of terrorists, why is it creating more terrorists in Iraq and Lebanon through its alienation of the Muslim population by killing so many civilians and being the cause of the commencement of a civil war in Iraq that is creating terrorists by the minute?
If the Busheviks are so concerned about reducing the number of terrorists, why is it spending hundreds of billions of dollars on destroying nations and killing people rather than spending hundreds of billions of dollars on improving the lives of people and building infrastructure in the nations it is destroying?
If the Busheviks are so concerned about reducing the number of terrorists who make money off of the drug trade, why is Afghanistan having a record-breaking year for harvesting opium, the raw ingredient for heroin?
If the Busheviks are so concerned about reducing the number of terrorists, why are the Taliban making a ferocious comeback in Afghanistan?
BuzzFlash could go on and on. The betrayal of America's national security by the Bush Administration is broad and deep.
The Bush "war on terrorism" is a domestic propaganda campaign for political purposes to achieve unprecedented, anti-Constitutional dictatorial powers. It doesn't exist in reality, except as a failed effort to unilaterally assert the vision of the "Masters of the Universe" in the White House -- and grab as much oil as possible.
It is a "war on terrorism" that only increases terrorism and makes our nation less secure.
Through skillful propaganda, the Busheviks play America for a nation of suckers, while they accomplish the goals of the terrorists for them.
A BUZZFLASH EDITORIAL
See also Larry Beinhart’s commentary in BuzzFlash, "Republicans are Bad on National Security." Beinhart is author of "Wag the Dog.”
»
- Login or register to post comments
- Printer-friendly version

Fear Finally Strikes Out
That's the title of Frank Rich's latest editorial in the NYT. He notes that the political payoff of foiled terror plots have reached the point of dimishing returns. Even with the hype level turned up to bombastic levels on the Fox and CNN outlets, Bush seems to have gotten hardly any bounce in his popularity from the latest terror scare.
It seems the American people have finally had enough. The last few purported terrorist plots have turned out to be a lot less than meets the eye. On review, these "grave terrorist threats" dissolved into pathetic affairs involving homeless down-and-out simpletons entrapped by FBI sting operations.
Take June's big terror bust in Miami for example. "FBI arrests 7 Planning to Bomb the Sears Tower" announce the headlines, but if you follow the story you find that the "terrorists" were homeless men living in a warehouse provided by the terrorist recruiter who was also the FBI informant. They had no weapons, no explosives, no actual plans, just a lot of bluster. Global Research
Then there was the big Canadian terror plot foiled in earlier in June. Among their "plans" was one to storm parliament, sword in hand, to behead the Prime Minister. Does this sound like a serious group worthy of international press coverage, or a pathetic band of undermedicated misanthropes?
Now we come to the latest "Big Terror Scare"; the London liquid explosives plot. This one is definitely in a league of it's own in both the level of hype accompanying the announcement as well as the paucity of the evidence against the accused. CNN and Fox went hyperbolic in their coverage, dedicating entire days to terror pundit blather. "America under attack"; "worse than 9/11", "up to ten planes". But when we look at the actual facts of the case this is what we find: No witnesses; no evidence; no explosives; no plane tickets; no passports; no charges and no real prospects that any terror related charges will be forthcoming. In fact; were it not for the recent changes to rules regarding the detention of suspects without charge, those arrested would have been released already due to lack of evidence. In other words; the entire London scare has evaporated, and while the media pretends not to notice the public does seem to be catching on.
infowars
In light of the publics new understanding of the misuse of terror for political purposes, many Americans will now be replaying in their minds all the terrorist events of the last few years. And like Keith Olberman has shown very convincingly on his show, Countdown, Americans will find a disturbing pattern. Whenever Republicans need a distraction, or a boost in the polls, like a miracle, a terror alert appears.
Faketerror London
Bush and Cheney better hope that Americans don't look back five years to 9/11, because if they do, the public may realize that 9/11 fits the pattern as well.
Mattnet
"All great truths begin as blasphemies." G.B.Shaw
9eleven.info
George Vreeland Hill Exposes President Bush And The GOP
White House Authorized Leaks on Brit Raid
This has come down to a
Benjamin Franklin said:
"Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both."
where are the terrorists?
Give me a break
What Can I Say?
A different kind of sense