Tell Us Your Thoughts on the Choice of Rick Warren to Give the Inaugural Invocation. Add Your Comments Below.
BUZZFLASH EDITOR'S BLOG
by Mark Karlin
We have tried to offer both sides of progressive views on Obama's cabinet picks. BuzzFlash is giving Obama some running room. He hasn't even been sworn in yet.
And what matters are the policies that come out of the Oval Office, not the establishment cast to his cabinet. So, we will withhold judgment on the cabinet appointments until we see what a President Obama does through his cabinet.
However, we have to side with those individuals who see the selection of anti-gay, anti-choice Rick Warren to give the inaugural invocation as a mistake and not in keeping with the solemnity of the extraordinary transfer of power that occurs in a democracy when a new president is sworn in. This appears to be a calculated, transparent political act not worthy of the historic moment and the need to unite all Americans in actual and symbolic deep reflection. Obama, to us, seems to have overreached and in trying to embrace a mega-church -- albeit more contemporary -- minister who is opposed to many core principles shared by many Americans, he has alienated many of us at a time when he should have selected a non-partisan spiritual/religious leader who would be non-controversial, one who would reflect upon the spiritual seriousness of the occasion in a unifying manner.
Obama has turned a profound moment into a political one -- and unnecessarily. It may be forgivable
(what will be remembered most will certainly be a remarkable inauguration speech), but it is a mistake that is not in tune with a President-elect who has such reverence for the symbolism of the grand occasion.
That being said, we want to hear from you.
Was the choice of Rick Warren to give the inaugural invocation something you agree with, reject, or don't care about? If you think it is a mistake is it a serious one?
Share your thoughts with the BuzzFlash community.
Mark Karlin
Editor and Publisher
BuzzFlash.com
BUZZFLASH EDITOR'S BLOG
- Login or register to post comments
- Printer-friendly version
Buzz this on Buzzflash.net




Technorati Tags:
KKK, et.al.
"Reaching out"
Closing the deficit
Very Disappointing
Rick Warren speaking at the Inauguration
Rick Warren
Total Agreement
A "diversity" scam.
Rick Warren
Nope
History, Folks, History...
Disagreement Is Inevitable
It's a common problem.
Re: Rick Warren
On PE Obama's choice of Rick Warren to give the inaugural invocation. Granted, I totally understand why many are seething concerning Obama's choice, and I too felt it to be a mistake also. However after thinking about it, it dawned on me, perhaps we are a bit myopic in our response. We all know that there has been a We vs Them mentality in this Country , especially over the last 8 years that has been fostered and allowed to permeate our politics. The separatist type division has done nothing to promote a unified nation. We've become what "they've" sowed and it has not worked. A nation divided will never heal. Yet ,we're conditioned to take sides and hope that our side wins. The cycle of wins and losses, We vs Them, has continued through the Bush Administration and the nation sank deeper .
On fortifying the notion of separatism. America has been doing this for eons. The Bush Administration ran on the "You're either with us or on the side of the terrorists" mentality. No matter where we look, the Right's hate wedge has been alive and well in areas of Religion, Education, Women's Reproductive Health, etc.
How long must we continue to maintain the status quo of hate and division in this country before we realize that it does not work. It does not allow for positive change. It merely perpetuates a divide. Don't you think that at some point in time , it would behoove all of us to finally realize that we cannot continue in this vein. As the saying goes, " insanity is to do the same thing over and over and expect different results."
This Country obviously came together in November, by electing Barack Obama to be our President, and to think that he would merely work from the same premise that has kept this country divided would be a grave mistake. Is it possible that Obama actually meant CHANGE? Not merely changes that we agree with, but total revamping of our social collective consciousness. It is obvious to me that Barack Obama is not homophobic, and while his choice of Rick Warren appears to be right leaning, perhaps this is different way to do things in order to achieve a more desired result in order to close the gab that has been skillfully choreographed by right wing conservative movement. If we fail to respond in a separatist way, then doesn't that sort of deflate the air of a hateful movement?
It appears that the country as a whole has gone beyond the GLBT issues because a majority in this country came together and voted Obama in and the main issue was not sexual preferences, or same sex marriage . It was not the lead issue that it has been in the past. Given that, perhaps Obama , by naming Rick Warren to provide the inaugural invocation, is simply the first attempt at demolishing a divide. Because Gay Issues did not play an important role in electing Obama, then the entire issue is one that's been fostered and maintained while in reality, has little relevance to us as real people. Though the issue is still being generated by the conservative media, while in fact there are more people that do not have a problem with people's sexual preferences. Yes there are still those groups that have been able to continue their hate fest.Such as Prop 8 . Which is being contested.
However, I feel that the issue continues on only because of groups such as American Family Association that continue to receive air time, have remaining finances , order boycotts against companies, of which have never worked. So they seem to be talking to themselves as the Country moves on to confront real issues that face all of us. We're not about to waste our energy on an illusion , or a demand by a select few groups that will eventually fade from the forefront.Especially as the financial train wreak worsens and those groups financial resources dwindle even further. Those groups merely have the appearance of having large followers. Because if they did have a large following with any weight, Obama would not have even been elected. I feel that by having Rick Warren provide the inaugural invocation, places Warren in spot where he realizes that he cannot spew anything but positive. Even if he's lying through his teeth and is as hypocritical as they come, he's still being placed in the center.
And just as Barack Obama had stated that he would attempt diplomacy with Countries that Bush has deemed as terrorists, Obama has THE AUDACITY to go right to the enemy sort to speak and say, ok, I'm giving you air time, knowing that Warren cannot use it as a way to continue to spew hatred and inequality. Obama has control over Warren in a way.:-)
The time has come when we must unlearn the conditioned responses we've been taught for so many years and perhaps this is a start. After all, how better to UN-DIVIDE a Country than to place those that divided it by projected hate, and discrimination into a global limelight where they are no longer protected or supported by a majority of right wing conservatives. They may still have their agenda, however, they've lost their 15 minutes of fame and shame in a global sense. Even the UN on Thursday signed onto a human rights measure calling for worldwide decriminalization of homosexuality. While the US failed to sign on, I trust this is due to whats left of the Conservatives and this will change in the future.
I believe that we are a lot stronger than the debilitated and dieing conservative movement. The election proved that. And while Warren may represent homophobia and thinks women are not allowed reproductive rights,and everything else I do not believe in, his message is not being received on the level it was 8 or 4 years ago. People are trying to figure out how to pay a mortgage, feed their children, and find employment as life has become harsher in these united states. And the financial downfall will also effect hate fest groups as even wealthy conservatives are loosing millions. America's priorities are being forced to change and we are re-prioritizing our needs.... Maslow was right. The Physiological level. Breathing, Food, Safety. We're all back at level one. Our financial downfall just may be our only salvation. Because when we thought that we had it all in terms of financial security and global superiority which meant you could buy and write your own hate filled political agenda , design special interest loopholes and project a false illusion , was when groups such as AFA and the ideals of Rick Warren, had the luxury to permeate a society that was ripe for abuse.Because everyone wanted to hold onto what they felt was important, in a material sense. So scapegoats were the order of the time. Well that has lost it's luster and is no longer in vogue amongst many that supported it.
Lastly, I also am not threatened by what Warren thinks,because I refuse to allow others to define or threaten or project on to me, their insane fears. I believe that many in this Country are strong in their beliefs, so much so, that Warren's words won't do squat . It merely makes him have to reposition or be real careful of how he speaks on Inauguration Day. Because it is quite evident, America has spoken and it will only be a matter of time before the hate fest is totally ignored and ultimately faded into oblivion as the real world addresses real issues, not wedge issues from an overly out dated worn out cookbook of hate. It just won't work and so what, Warren will have a few minutes on stage, don't let his presence affect or diminish the enormity of this historical event. It's an opening prayer, not a Bill. And it's up to us to show the dying conservative hate movement, that we are grounded and united by something other than the separatist, we vs them mentality . The hate fest movement has lost its political and financial clout, as well as the wind from their bleak sails which helped to promote it. Hopefully the divisions that were so carefully choreographed through the ages will fade away and we can move on as a Country which offers positive support in the diverse global world we live in. But! In order to do that, we must first close the division in our own Country, before we can become part of a new global peaceful tomorrow.
(excuse my wordiness and spelling errors)
Jude Rouslin
Maybe He Will Have an 'Amazing Grace' Moment and Beg Forgiveness
Miracles do happen. Rick Warren could have seen the light and have realized the errors of his ways in a clarifying 'Amazing Grace' moment.
During his invocation he could confess he was wrong to have encouraged divisiveness and hatred towards God's creatures. After all, God doesn't make mistakes when he creates another gay person, gay penguin or other kind of gay animal, humans do in their nonacceptance and hatred of God's reality.
Warren could also confess that since he himself is so lost in the spiritual wilderness, he is not worthy of leading anyone to anywhere, so he will be disbanding his mega profit producing church, selling off all the assets, and donating all the proceeds to starving children around the world.
He could also ask everyone to embrace gays, and non Christians as being God's children too.
He could say a lot of things that would be inspirational and unifying.
I doubt he will come over from the dark side and reject his anti Christ, but one can always hope for a miracle. After all, we do have the first biracial president in modern times, who at this moment, still seems to be working mostly for the benefit of WE THE PEOPLE.
BLACKS TIRED OF EQUATION
Whose BS is that?
heard and read what you wanted
Sen. Carol Moseley Braun
Yeah, you're right ....
You're right, ......
... it is ridiculous. They should just sit down and shut up.
White Vigilante shoot blacks
Already saw it
Beyond that, you're whining about "gays" not speaking out against discrimination against AAs, because you didn't see it. Hate to tell you, but just because you didn't see gays protesting these issues doesn't mean they weren't there.
The argument "my group has suffered more so don't you dare compare our struggle to yours" is just stupid. Homosexuals are discriminated against every day, and they are also victims of horrible hate crimes (including assaults and murder) because of their status. And the argument that discrimination against homosexuals cannot be analogized to discrimination against AAs because of Algiers Point is just idiotic. To paraphrase your first sentence, "When we hear about white non-Jews going through the streets, rounding up 6 million Jews and killing them and the media not say one damn word about it then I will agree there is an comparison." See? Pretty silly, huh?
So you want "gays" (you know, the ones who you haven't seen fighting for civil rights of AAs) to stop criticizing Obama because of his decision to have a homophobic bigot lead the inauguration invocation? You want them to "be patient" because he has "a plan". Okay .................
Would it be okay if Obama had chosen
this guy? He's the Reverend James Wickstrom .....
from the Aryan Nation.
Oh, come on ...... be patient ............... It's part of the plan.
Ym
You mean "operative", ...
What's even more bullshit is the suggestion that anti-Semitism is old news. In terms of the holocaust, my point was that AAs aren't the only ones who have been murdered (by the millions, by the way) while the media and the world looked the other way. Funny how you think 1942 is old news, yet you cite the Middle Passage (hundreds of years ago) as evidence of how AAs have it worse than homosexuals. Do you seriously believe that there aren't contemporary examples of anti-Semitism? You do know that there are Jews being beaten and murdered today because they are Jews, right? Come to think of it, I guess you're right, though ...... unlike AAs they could just hide the fact that they are Jewish, so what the hell are they complaining about? Yeeeesh ....... get over it already.
I do like this one, though: "You see he (Obama) even got a lot of so-called liberals who were really UNDER COVER RACIST (sic) to vote for him." Is an "undercover, racist liberal" like a Narc? How many is "a lot", and how do you know they exist? Don't bother answering ... the answer is obvious.
You just make it up.
And who said AAs should shut up about discrimination now that Obama got elected? Not me. I think everyone should speak up loudly against discrimination in all its forms whenever they see it. I also think that we should not legitimize those who promote discrimination (i.e. Rick Warren) by allowing them to give the invocation at a Presidential inauguration. Beyond that, those who whine that homosexuals, despite being discriminated against (including employment, marriage, adoption, inheritance, and yes, being raped, beaten and murdered) have it easier than AAs because "They can hide, we can't", are just another form of bigoted assholes. I would be just as outraged by a homosexual activist complaining that AAs better not compare their discrimination to "gays" because, hey ... in addition to being discriminated against (including being murdered), homosexuals can't serve in the military. They can't marry. They can't get health benefits and legal protections for their families. AAs can do all of those things, so they better not dare compare their discrimination to the real discrimination suffered by homosexuals.
See? ..... It's a stupid argument.
BTW, "Do you know your history fool." (sic) Yeah, ....... I also know my English.
BBTW, dumbass, you seem to be under the impression that I'm gay.
As usual, you're wrong.
Childish imbecile
Darnell, Darnell ....
Trying to "tie Gays" to discrimination suffered by AAs and Jews is attempting to minimize the suffering of AAs and Jews? Nooooo ......... whining about analogizing the civil rights of "Gays" to AAs and then trying to demonstrate how easy "the Gays" have it (after all, they can hide) compared to AAs is minimizing the suffering of "Gays", Darnell. What's even worse is when it's done by someone who is totally ignorant about history (Well, to be fair ....... ignorant in general, as well). How can anyone who is even semi-educated make the ridiculous claim that "Gays have not experienced a Middle passage nor a holocaust"?
Really?!?!?!
Do you have any clue what this is Darnell? Let me help you out once again. It's a memorial to the homosexual victims of the Holocaust who, along with Jews, Slavs, the disabled, and other political/religious groups were specifically targeted by Hitler for extermination. In fact, here's a little light reading for you, Darnell. "Gay men suffered unusually cruel treatment in the concentration camps. They faced persecution not only from German soldiers but also from other prisoners, and many gay men were beaten to death. Additionally, gay men in forced labor camps routinely received more grueling and dangerous work assignments than other non-Jewish inmates, under the policy of "Extermination Through Work". SS soldiers also were known to use gay men for target practice, aiming their weapons at the pink triangles their human targets were forced to wear. There were several cases in which gay men imprisoned in camps ripped the Star of David Patch off dead Jews and put it on it place of theirs, hoping it would grant them better treatment."
Beyond the Holocaust, Darnell, you should know that the modern persecution of homosexuals was inaugurated in 325 CE by the Council of Nicea. Since that time, homosexuals have been persecuted and discriminated against across the entire world in the vast majority of cultures. They have been socially ostracized, beaten, imprisoned, raped, mutilated, burned at the stake, castrated and murdered, simply because they were gay. To this day, homosexuality is still punishable by death (sanctioned by the governments) in seven countries, and imprisonment in many others. The fact that you would even attempt to deny that homosexuals were victims of the Holocaust demonstrates that you are precisely that which you accuse others of being ..... an ignorant, homophobic bigot.
As you say, "Do you know your history, fool"? (That's a hypothetical question, Darnell ...... the answer is obvious).
BTW, angry Darnell. Happy to meet with you to "continue the conversation 'face to face'". Curious, though ........ Why is it that the angry, ignorant idiots who want to "meet face to face" are always the same ones who are unable to form a logical argument? It's kinda funny, too, because they're also the biggest "wussies" ......
..... with a capital "P".
Boy you are clever but wrong
DC It is amazing how you keep trying to turn this discussion into a discussion about anti-semitism. Thank you for the information on the Memorial. You did educate me and I will keep that in mind. But my larger point is our discussion on oppression and as it is dealt with America. It was also on Rev. Warren being invited to give the invocation. You are like the Religious Right who love to take one scripture and distort the whole view of the bible. It is a clever tool but wrong of course.
Here what you forgot to discuss. Many great men in America started off as bigots but through discussion with people like Frederick Douglass, Dr. King, Ralph Abernathy their views changed and our country was made the better because of it. That too was discussed in my last post but you seem to miss that.
So let me remind your sorry ass again about what is going on here in America in 2008 not in 325 C.E.
From BUZZFLASH Report: White vigilante groups blockaded small town in post-Katrina New Orleans and murdered blacks.»
Earlier this week, A.C. Thompson of The Nation revealed that after Hurricane Katrina, white vigilante groups patrolled New Orleans, blockaded streets, and shot at least eleven black men. It “was like pheasant season in South Dakota. If it moved, you shot it,” said one vigilante. Color of Change is organizing a campaign to tell Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal (R) and state officials to investigate the shootings, as “Louisiana’s broken law enforcement agencies have refused to investigate these crimes.” Watch Thompson’s video on his report:
Thousands of blacks were displaced, left homeless, put in mobile homes by our government that created negative health issues. You intetionally left out the fact that dispite blacks having rights they are still far more underserved in education, health care, the justice system and employement then anyothe group exept maybe Native Americans. All of this did not happen at the Council of Nicea but at the White House and Congress in 2000 you ass hole.
It is amazing that you quote events from the Council of Nicea and its discriminating lanquage against homosexuals but that Council also dealt with and decreed against what they concluded was heresy. Proponents of those decreeds would eventually lead to the Crusades which millions of Arabs would be wiped out.
It seems your only focus is on gays and anti- semitism. The difference between you and Obama he is not just about securing rights for blacks or gays but all American. Blacks fought for Human rights you just want to secure rights for gays.
Obama went against black preachers when he refused to give "walking around money" in Philedelphia to secure their vote. I am also glad he is standing up to people like you who want him to just focus on one issues. He is trying to do what has been lacking the past eight years and that is find true bipartisan to address issues of all underserved people. I talked about that in the last post but you failed to address that.
In the general election people like you who voted for Obama rejected the notion that the GOP voiced. They too said that if Obama sat down with Iran and Cuba dictators that they would legitimize those leaders. They too said Obama should not give those haters a worldwide plateform. But now when the shoe is on the other foot you change your tune. You fu..HYPOCRITE. I wrote about that in the last post but you forgot to mention that issue.
Let me tell you what i saw in Israel. I went to the Holocaust Memorial. I also went to the Temple Mount where I saw a little Palestinian boy walking down the street Israelie troops jump out of thir jeep, shoved the boy against the wall and stuck an AKA at his head. After detaining that young man for what was about ten minutes for me and probably and eternity for him they let him go. They laughed mocking at him as he walked away. That young man's experience reminded me of what thousands of young African-Americans like myself have gone through. Let me remind your dumb ass again that racial profiling drains the African-American community of hundreds of millions of dollars through fines,higher insurance rates,court cost and lawyer fees. Many of those poor, blacks and brown folks are now incarcerated for crimes that whites get probation for.
I talked about that in the last post but you failed to mention that.
Thus, the negative affect on families is devastating. Palestinians have to have cards and ID to get through check points. They have a fence that separtes them from the Israelies. It keeps them boxed in so the Israelies basically dictate the very existence of the Palestianians. I do not say this in judgement of the Israelies, both sides have work some things out. I only say that to say their are many places where blacks are still fenced off in America.
Blacks today in many places in America have to show ID to get in certain neighborhoods. Yes, in Washington D.C blacks had to show ID to be in a particular place. I don't have to go back to 325 C.E you bitch laws are still being put in place to detain people of color. Again, to have a right does not mean that those rights are being upheld by the courts. The Bush administration is not even looking into the thousands of black voters that were disinfranchised in the 2000 and 2004 elections.
Hispanics Americans have to show drivers liscense in some places to vote go to school and to provide for their families. So while it was terrible for gays to wear pink and be tortured in concentration camps in Nazi Germany in 1942 how much more wrong is it that a nation that is suppose to be free can hold Muslims, blacks and brown people without any charges. It allowed a blacks to be shot 50 times for pulling out their wallets.
Police officers putting plungers up the rectum of those they are suppose to protect. In the state of Ohio there has been a average of 5 blacks a year being killed by the police for the last ten years. Police in Los Angelas had a choke hold just for black and brown men. You must be losing your short term memory so let me remind you. We are not talking about these events happening in "seven other nations" we are talking about America where the rule of law is suppose to be equal for all.
Your sorry ass wants to quote from an article about the events of 325 C.E what a dick. Here is my email Secretadd7@yahoo.com tell me the place and the time bitch. Again people like you feel secure under the sheet. But this is a new day and we have a President who is President of blacks, whites, brown, gay, straight, disabled, liberals,conservatives and yes even closet bigots like yourself.
I am "cleaver"?
Honestly, ............... I feel kinda bad.
And I'm not trying to turn it into a discussion about anti-Semitism or homophobia, except to point out the hypocrisy of those who attempt to minimize the suffering of other minorities by whining about drawing analogies to discrimination against AAs. And I don't have to go back to 325 CE to show examples of homophobic hate crimes (although it's funny how you have no trouble citing the Middle Passage. Weird, huh?). My point was that homophobic bigotry began hundreds of years before the Middle Passage, and still continues to this day. I could post pages of hate crimes committed in the United States in the last 20 years against homosexuals, but then I'd have to wait several days for you to figure out how to read it, then try to wade through your meandering, incoherent response, so I thought I'd make it easier on both of us. What can I say, Darnell ........ I'm just a nice guy.
Finally, I don't want Obama to focus on one issue. I'd prefer he focus on discrimination against all Americans, including those who's experiences are minimized by uneducated idiots who whine "Don't you dare compare your experience to AAs! You don't have it nearly as bad as we do ....... At least you can hide! And 'the Gays' didn't have a Holocaust!" I'd prefer that he'd support gay marriage, but I don't expect him to, particularly since he said he does not favor gay marriage. So if you want to be accurate, when you argue that Obama is fighting for equal rights for all Americans, you should say ... "sort of".
As for your tough-guy act, I'll be happy to meet you. Tell you what ...... I'll be doing a little shopping at the Toys R'Us in Times Square (that's NYC, Darnell) the day after Christmas, so I'll be out front at 1:00 (black Northface jacket, grey wool cap, just to make it easier).
Oh ..... and no need to thank me for educating you. Some people just need to be "schooled" now and again.
OTOH, in your case, it's now and again ....... and again ........ and again ....
How about Gene Robinson and Rick Warren
If the Gang Of Pirates think that the only good Democrat is a dead Democrat, only a fool would think it bipartisan to accommodate them.
I'm boycotting the whole thing too.
How about no invocation?
please stop pushing religion on atheists
Enough Mr. Obama
I will not be watching my President being sworn in.
For the first time in my life. I choose not to be part of this great event. He has made an unforgiveable mistake as far as I am concerned. I am not part of the community which he has stabbed, just an American who believes in all Men and Women have equal Rights in all things. Marriage is a Basic Human Right. The Supreme Court agrees with me on this one.
That a man who is being sworn into the position of President of the United Staes, because many of those who are LGBT fought for his Right to be a full American citizen, is using a person who denies their Rights as American Citizens to gain points with those people who deny Rights to those they oppose, is outrageous.
I would think that Loving v. Virginia, would make this whole argument mote. This is what the trial judge said which was overturned in this decision on marriage: "Almighty God created the races white, black, yellow, malay and red, and he placed them on separate continents. And but for the interference with his arrangement there would be no cause for such marriages. The fact that he separated the races shows that he did not intend for the races to mix". Does this not sound like every Christian extremist when they quote the Bible for their stand against Gay Marriage?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loving_v._Virginia; one would think that the decision ending all race-based legal restrictions on marriage in the United States would have covered this whole debate. But for some reason Race being used to deny the Right to marry is different than Sexual Preference. Hopefully the Loving ruling will eventually aid the marriage equality movement for same-sex partnerships, if courts allow the Equal Protection Clause to be used. But only if we do not give a platform to those who oppose Equal Rights for All Americans.
I have given Mr. Obama some slack on his appointments, which have disappointed me to no end. Where is the Progressive, Fresh, Non-Washington Insiders that we were promised? He was elected with a Mandate to change this country, to change Washington, to bring Justice back. To bring about a more perfect Union. To stop with the old Extreme Religious Right ruling of our Country.
Then he goes and gives a world platform to the New Face of the Hateful Religious Intolerance that American's said "NO" to with our money given to elect Mr. Obama, with our hard work by the millions, to get Mr. Obama elected and with our precious vote, which did get Mr. Obama elected. We told him what we wanted. He said he listened and would always listen to us. And he told us that he was CHANGE! He told us that words did not do it, but to watch him and by his actions we could judge him. He told us that those who hate would not have a place at the table anymore. That Justice mattered. Well, he has given a hateful little man a place at the table. There were so many other Spiritual Leaders he could have chosen for this position. The whole world will be watching and will believe that Mr. Obama agrees with this man and the hate that he preaches, the divisive that he lives, and that America has not changed.
I have now judged Mr. Obama by his actions. And found him wanting. I am looking for a person who will do as she/he said she/he would and bring about true justice for all Americans. I am afraid that it past time for a new Party to emerge. Maybe two new Party's. One for the Conservatives and one for the Progressives. I think all sides are becoming more and more disappointed in the two Party's we now have.
Keep religion in the homes and churches and out of our Government. The Founding Father's had much to say about this subject. Look it up and read about it. Then let's talk. Don't allow those who believe a certain way, which hurts fellow Americans, a place at the table. Only those who want all Americans to be able to stand up and count on their Basic Civil Rights, which the Supreme Court said that Marriage was, a Basic Civil Right.
I am sorry about my vote. The first time that I have been sorry so soon afterward. I am ashamed that a man used me and millions of others to get power, but then turns on our core beliefs, because he now has this power, and thinks he does not need his base.
Too bad he thinks this. He will find out that he does. He truly does need the Progressive base.
Where does he think all the money came from? Where does he think all the passion came from? The volunteers were Progressive! The money and the passion are with the Progressives. The most Progressive people in America, and he has just slapped them down. Bad move, Mr. Obama!
People have given him a soap box
Inauguration Day - New Beginnings and Finding Common Ground
Rick Warren
I'm Not Sure If It Changes Anything...BUT....
I STILL think that makes his choice as cynical a case of unprincipled triangulation as you'd get from the Clintons - and yes, I see that pissy little Hillaryinsta troll Yman worming his way through this thread, so I know what response I can expect for disrespecting His Empress Hillary. But - I put Lowery's record out there for your consideration, just the same....
Who cares ...
BTW - You keep calling Obama's decision a "Clinton"-like decision. Hate to tell you. But HC didn't choose him. She didn't decide to expand the war in Afghanistan. She didn't decide to keep Gates. And she didn't vote for the FISA "compromise". You can keep whining "Hillary would have been worse!!!" all you want. It doesn't make it true.
But like I said, if it makes you feel better about being duped yet again, I understand
I feel your pain.
BTW - "Empress"? Naaaaahhhhhh .....
But it's nice to know you think so highly of her.
And "pissy little Hillaryinsta troll"??? "Doc" ........ I'm hurt.
Change
Political necessity
It's Time
Rick Warren?
a further notion
A Progressive Case for Rick Warren
"A Progressive Case for Rick Warren"
...The real story here is not that President-elect Obama has somehow blessed Rick Warren's views on abortion or gay rights, but that one of America's leading evangelical pastors has decided to bless the presidency of someone who is strongly pro-choice and committed to the civil rights of gays and lesbians. That's a rather extraordinary development.
..Rick Warren is the one who is making the bigger statement here. In no uncertain terms, the best known pastor of our time will be telling his followers and fellow evangelicals that there is nothing ungodly about a president who believes that government shouldn't interfere with a woman's right to choose and that gays and lesbians deserve the protection of our laws as much as any other American. That's a moment progressives should celebrate...
--------------------------------
IMO, prayer should actually be private.
Obama is just publicly saying to all those who did not vote for him: "You need not worry. Look who wants to pray with me."
In the meantime, try to remember this: Obama is in office -- and has power. That fact still counts. A lot. Do not feel sad that Obama does not want a civil war in this country. Neither do I. Those who lost this election will take heart when they see this pastor. That is something you should feel good about. Because: you are the ones in power. Be humble at times like this one.
Remember this: you have the power. (Thank God...)
independent florida voter - now registered as a Dem voter
The case for Warren is not progressive
re your reply
I also want to respect the choice President Elect Obama made, even if the choice stinks, or others think it stinks. I want to celebrate the fact Obama is president, and not the KKK, for example.
As for civil war, as much as I like peace, I think this country is in for more hard times. Right now in Arizona they are training the military for how to handle "economic unrest" in this country. A military response. Inside the country. For protests. It sounds from the article below the Bush years have not ended. But I want to believe they have.
Peace to you, too.
Ariz. police say they are prepared as War College warns military must prep for unrest; IMF warns of economic riots
Sincerely,
independent florida voter - now registered as a Dem voter
My Country Tis of Thee, Sweet Land of Bigotry
A Fight To The End Is The Only Option!
Rick Warren