Get FREE BuzzFlash News Alerts

Email:  

Tell Us Your Thoughts on the Choice of Rick Warren to Give the Inaugural Invocation. Add Your Comments Below.

BUZZFLASH EDITOR'S BLOG
by Mark Karlin

We have tried to offer both sides of progressive views on Obama's cabinet picks. BuzzFlash is giving Obama some running room. He hasn't even been sworn in yet.

And what matters are the policies that come out of the Oval Office, not the establishment cast to his cabinet. So, we will withhold judgment on the cabinet appointments until we see what a President Obama does through his cabinet.

However, we have to side with those individuals who see the selection of anti-gay, anti-choice Rick Warren to give the inaugural invocation as a mistake and not in keeping with the solemnity of the extraordinary transfer of power that occurs in a democracy when a new president is sworn in. This appears to be a calculated, transparent political act not worthy of the historic moment and the need to unite all Americans in actual and symbolic deep reflection. Obama, to us, seems to have overreached and in trying to embrace a mega-church -- albeit more contemporary -- minister who is opposed to many core principles shared by many Americans, he has alienated many of us at a time when he should have selected a non-partisan spiritual/religious leader who would be non-controversial, one who would reflect upon the spiritual seriousness of the occasion in a unifying manner.

Obama has turned a profound moment into a political one -- and unnecessarily. It may be forgivable
(what will be remembered most will certainly be a remarkable inauguration speech), but it is a mistake that is not in tune with a President-elect who has such reverence for the symbolism of the grand occasion.

That being said, we want to hear from you.

Was the choice of Rick Warren to give the inaugural invocation something you agree with, reject, or don't care about? If you think it is a mistake is it a serious one?

Share your thoughts with the BuzzFlash community.

Mark Karlin
Editor and Publisher
BuzzFlash.com

BUZZFLASH EDITOR'S BLOG


KKK, et.al.

Believe it or not, the KKK was founded, in part, as a charitable organization to assist those (whites) devastated by war and reconstruction. I understand Warren also decries poverty (and AIDS), and, since he cannot vent his smallness and hatred upon Blacks, Jews, and Catholics, a la the KKK, who's left? As Obama wouldn't have invited the Kraven Klaven, or whatever, he really would have been better advised not to invite the religiotard, Warren.

"Reaching out"

Given the recent history of the Christ-tards in the U.S., apparently Obama is reaching out to the pedophile crowd.

Closing the deficit

Let Rick Warren's church pay taxes, since he's contributing to the ongoing "establishment" of religion in the U.S., contrary to the constitution. In fact, let all churches pay taxes. We plow their streets and put out their fires. Let them pay their way for a change

Very Disappointing

What is Obama thinking?!?!?!?! Sure, I understand his concept of, "extending the olive branch" to those who he/we may disagree with, but I think this is taking things a bit far. How willing would he be to have the KKK attend his swearing in ceremony? Though I think members of the KKK have a right to their opinions, there comes a time when it begins to make the person look simply rediculious and honestly almost crazy to choose to include such individuals. This is what Obama is beginning to look like to me - a fool. He is willing to offend some of his most loyal followers just so he appears, "willing to work with everyone"? This isn't a case of inviting Arlen Spector (R-PA), who some people may not agree with. This is the case of a RELIGIOUS representitive who considers a certain segment of the human race scum! I commend Obama's philosophy of "agreeing to disagree", but that doesn't mean we should allow such people the limelight to shine on this historic and special day. His message of "change" should be reflected upon the people he chooses to paricipate in the ceremony. Like a previous person said, why not have someone who has demonstrated and lived the life of a christian (or whatever) by encouraging peace and harmony between everyone? Haven't we lived with division for the the past eight years? Why bring it into the next cabinet and why choose someone who wants to split everyone???? Yes, I am disappointed with his choice.

Rick Warren speaking at the Inauguration

I think it is "much ado about nothing." Remember, the present administration is terrible and we should be praying them out of office instead of worrying about Rick praying at the Inuaguration. It will be ok. Obama is a smart man and hopefully, he will make wise choices. zell

Rick Warren

Most unfortunate choice... If a Christian minister is to be used, why not a truly Christian (loving,inclusive,non-judgemental)one. It is more and more disheartening to see base supporters and surrogates left under the bus while those that were anti-Obama get plum jobs and rewards.

Total Agreement

I've seen enough of republicans over the last 8 years which tells me they can't be trusted further than they can be thrown. Obama has done the wrong thing by kissing up to people like Warren. His Cum-Bi-Ya gestures will eventually bite him in the butt. My opinion is based on a "Once a republican, always a republican track record!" So, let's move away from playing politics where politics do not belong. That was Bush's game.

A "diversity" scam.

Higher the worst of the worst will heal the country? Going for the Evangelicals - this nut cases who want to slaughter all Muslims. Sorry, Mr. Obama in 2 years you and the Democratic party will suffer. Mr. Warren and his hate rants about gays/lesbians is diversity Mr. Obama? Where did you learn that?

Rick Warren

A complete flat-out mistake. The only way O. can save this situation is not by dis-inviting Warren (too totally rude & anger provoking) but by inviting a few other pastors to also give invocations. One gay, lesbian, or transgendered (oh, hell, maybe 2, as long as one isn't christian) and one non-christian. Maybe Rick would back out!

Nope

If you invite the leader of the KKK, you cant't negate it by inviting the head of the NAACP, Southern Poverty Law Center, ADL and NOW.

History, Folks, History...

Obama has always been a student of history and has specifically studied the Clinton administration. Remember what happened early on? He got bogged down in the "Don't ask, don't tell" issue and lost momentum for many other issues he wanted to take on. Recently, Colin Powell has even mentioned the need to repeal it. I believe the selection of Warren is a subtle message to the gay community that now is not the time to fight this battle. It isn't that it is unimportant, but Obama has much on his plate for his 100 days - and he isn't going to have a repeat of the Clinton 100 days. If the gay community will give him a chance, he will be in a position to help far more at a later time.

Disagreement Is Inevitable

I never vote for any candidate because I expect him/her to entirely coincide with my views. It would never happen. So Obama's choice of Warren doesn't bother me that much. Obama has explained his reasoning, making good points about working together where we agree. We have seen eight years of outrageous government rejection of our Constitutional law, our rights and our opinions capped by sneering, "So?" and "So what?" We've seen a political strategy used to divide and conquer the electorate using derision, fear and hatred. I've had enough of that. America has had enough of that. Democracy was designed as a way to live together with conflicts and disagreements. True, it's messy. But it's a heck of a lot better than what the Bush administration has been doing to crush democracy for eight years. Justice and human rights will be served best in the long run when we are able to come together on issues of paramount import such as the law, the economy, global warming and the environment. Pat Williams

It's a common problem.

People ascribe moral equivalence to the right and the left. There is none. If I say the Robert de Niro is a better actor than Al Pacino, that's an opinion. If I say that Italian Americans should not have the same civil rights as myself, that's psychological disorder, and not worthy of conversation. Too many people on the left think these people can be reasoned with. They can't. They're not normal. They act upon every negative trait a human being can have. Indigenous people around the world hav no "conservatism." It would severely impact the life of the tribe. When the occasional conservative shows up, he is shunned. Exactly what we would do. A former boss described it as "point, label, and dismiss." "Oh, you're just another Republican, There's no reason to talk." Leaves them very perplexed.

Re: Rick Warren

On PE Obama's choice of Rick Warren to give the inaugural invocation. Granted, I totally understand why many are seething concerning Obama's choice, and I too felt it to be a mistake also. However after thinking about it, it dawned on me, perhaps we are a bit myopic in our response. We all know that there has been a We vs Them mentality in this Country , especially over the last 8 years that has been fostered and allowed to permeate our politics. The separatist type division has done nothing to promote a unified nation. We've become what "they've" sowed and it has not worked. A nation divided will never heal. Yet ,we're conditioned to take sides and hope that our side wins. The cycle of wins and losses, We vs Them, has continued through the Bush Administration and the nation sank deeper .

On fortifying the notion of separatism. America has been doing this for eons. The Bush Administration ran on the "You're either with us or on the side of the terrorists" mentality. No matter where we look, the Right's hate wedge has been alive and well in areas of Religion, Education, Women's Reproductive Health, etc.

How long must we continue to maintain the status quo of hate and division in this country before we realize that it does not work. It does not allow for positive change. It merely perpetuates a divide. Don't you think that at some point in time , it would behoove all of us to finally realize that we cannot continue in this vein. As the saying goes, " insanity is to do the same thing over and over and expect different results."

This Country obviously came together in November, by electing Barack Obama to be our President, and to think that he would merely work from the same premise that has kept this country divided would be a grave mistake. Is it possible that Obama actually meant CHANGE? Not merely changes that we agree with, but total revamping of our social collective consciousness. It is obvious to me that Barack Obama is not homophobic, and while his choice of Rick Warren appears to be right leaning, perhaps this is different way to do things in order to achieve a more desired result in order to close the gab that has been skillfully choreographed by right wing conservative movement. If we fail to respond in a separatist way, then doesn't that sort of deflate the air of a hateful movement?

It appears that the country as a whole has gone beyond the GLBT issues because a majority in this country came together and voted Obama in and the main issue was not sexual preferences, or same sex marriage . It was not the lead issue that it has been in the past. Given that, perhaps Obama , by naming Rick Warren to provide the inaugural invocation, is simply the first attempt at demolishing a divide. Because Gay Issues did not play an important role in electing Obama, then the entire issue is one that's been fostered and maintained while in reality, has little relevance to us as real people. Though the issue is still being generated by the conservative media, while in fact there are more people that do not have a problem with people's sexual preferences. Yes there are still those groups that have been able to continue their hate fest.Such as Prop 8 . Which is being contested.

However, I feel that the issue continues on only because of groups such as American Family Association that continue to receive air time, have remaining finances , order boycotts against companies, of which have never worked. So they seem to be talking to themselves as the Country moves on to confront real issues that face all of us. We're not about to waste our energy on an illusion , or a demand by a select few groups that will eventually fade from the forefront.Especially as the financial train wreak worsens and those groups financial resources dwindle even further. Those groups merely have the appearance of having large followers. Because if they did have a large following with any weight, Obama would not have even been elected. I feel that by having Rick Warren provide the inaugural invocation, places Warren in spot where he realizes that he cannot spew anything but positive. Even if he's lying through his teeth and is as hypocritical as they come, he's still being placed in the center.

And just as Barack Obama had stated that he would attempt diplomacy with Countries that Bush has deemed as terrorists, Obama has THE AUDACITY to go right to the enemy sort to speak and say, ok, I'm giving you air time, knowing that Warren cannot use it as a way to continue to spew hatred and inequality. Obama has control over Warren in a way.:-)

The time has come when we must unlearn the conditioned responses we've been taught for so many years and perhaps this is a start. After all, how better to UN-DIVIDE a Country than to place those that divided it by projected hate, and discrimination into a global limelight where they are no longer protected or supported by a majority of right wing conservatives. They may still have their agenda, however, they've lost their 15 minutes of fame and shame in a global sense. Even the UN on Thursday signed onto a human rights measure calling for worldwide decriminalization of homosexuality. While the US failed to sign on, I trust this is due to whats left of the Conservatives and this will change in the future.

I believe that we are a lot stronger than the debilitated and dieing conservative movement. The election proved that. And while Warren may represent homophobia and thinks women are not allowed reproductive rights,and everything else I do not believe in, his message is not being received on the level it was 8 or 4 years ago. People are trying to figure out how to pay a mortgage, feed their children, and find employment as life has become harsher in these united states. And the financial downfall will also effect hate fest groups as even wealthy conservatives are loosing millions. America's priorities are being forced to change and we are re-prioritizing our needs.... Maslow was right. The Physiological level. Breathing, Food, Safety. We're all back at level one. Our financial downfall just may be our only salvation. Because when we thought that we had it all in terms of financial security and global superiority which meant you could buy and write your own hate filled political agenda , design special interest loopholes and project a false illusion , was when groups such as AFA and the ideals of Rick Warren, had the luxury to permeate a society that was ripe for abuse.Because everyone wanted to hold onto what they felt was important, in a material sense. So scapegoats were the order of the time. Well that has lost it's luster and is no longer in vogue amongst many that supported it.

Lastly, I also am not threatened by what Warren thinks,because I refuse to allow others to define or threaten or project on to me, their insane fears. I believe that many in this Country are strong in their beliefs, so much so, that Warren's words won't do squat . It merely makes him have to reposition or be real careful of how he speaks on Inauguration Day. Because it is quite evident, America has spoken and it will only be a matter of time before the hate fest is totally ignored and ultimately faded into oblivion as the real world addresses real issues, not wedge issues from an overly out dated worn out cookbook of hate. It just won't work and so what, Warren will have a few minutes on stage, don't let his presence affect or diminish the enormity of this historical event. It's an opening prayer, not a Bill. And it's up to us to show the dying conservative hate movement, that we are grounded and united by something other than the separatist, we vs them mentality . The hate fest movement has lost its political and financial clout, as well as the wind from their bleak sails which helped to promote it. Hopefully the divisions that were so carefully choreographed through the ages will fade away and we can move on as a Country which offers positive support in the diverse global world we live in. But! In order to do that, we must first close the division in our own Country, before we can become part of a new global peaceful tomorrow.
(excuse my wordiness and spelling errors)
Jude Rouslin

Maybe He Will Have an 'Amazing Grace' Moment and Beg Forgiveness

Miracles do happen. Rick Warren could have seen the light and have realized the errors of his ways in a clarifying 'Amazing Grace' moment.

During his invocation he could confess he was wrong to have encouraged divisiveness and hatred towards God's creatures. After all, God doesn't make mistakes when he creates another gay person, gay penguin or other kind of gay animal, humans do in their nonacceptance and hatred of God's reality.

Warren could also confess that since he himself is so lost in the spiritual wilderness, he is not worthy of leading anyone to anywhere, so he will be disbanding his mega profit producing church, selling off all the assets, and donating all the proceeds to starving children around the world.

He could also ask everyone to embrace gays, and non Christians as being God's children too.

He could say a lot of things that would be inspirational and unifying.

I doubt he will come over from the dark side and reject his anti Christ, but one can always hope for a miracle. After all, we do have the first biracial president in modern times, who at this moment, still seems to be working mostly for the benefit of WE THE PEOPLE.

BLACKS TIRED OF EQUATION

This BS needs to stop. When blacks were fighthing for civil rights of all people, I never saw a Gays for Civil rights sign in the south. I never see a Gays against Racial Profiling sign. I never saw Gays fighting for the brother who got shot in New York on the eve of his wedding. I guess I missed the Gays in Jena. I don't hear Gays speaking up about the hundreds fo thousands of black males in prison. Where are the Gays fighting against unequal and unjust sentencing laws. I don't hear Gays talking about the lack of black people represented on the major media. Another white male was just picked to Meet the Press without even considering a black person. But there was no Gay out cry against that blatant discrimnation. I don't hear about Gays talking about the discrimination against black coaches. I don't hear Gays talking about black women's health issues. Black women are dying by the thousands not just from HIV/AIDS but cancer,high blood pressure,diabetes and fibroids. Where is your damm out cry. Black boys are dying on the streets of Chicago, Washington, Atlanta and Detroit in record numbers but we don't here Gays speaking out on the genocide on our streets. Open housing, access to schools, access to better opportunities and other rights were secured mainly by the efforts of black men and women. These brave heros/Sheroes were locked up and locked out for gay rights, disbility rights, women's rights and most of all human rights. Black people who died and were marinalized,ostracized,black-listed, black balled specifically did so to secure rights for all. Where in the hell were Gays when Fannie Lue Hamer fought at the Democratic convention or when Bull Conners was unleashing the dogs or when Gov. Wallace stood in the front of the doors. We know there had to be some Gays involved one brave so was Bayard Rustin. But his sexual preference had to be exposed his race was self evident. Rustin was a though not a Christian was an advocate for turning the other cheek. Obama is doing what not only waht the bible says but every major religion and what Martin Luther King and Bayard Rustin did and that is turn the other cheek. Obama is not fighting hate with hate but fighting hate with love. As he opens a door of friendship with the so-called religious right he will also push for more rights for Gays. It is going to be genius. OBAMA IS GOING TO LOVE THE HELL OUT OF THE SO-CALLED RELIGIOUS RIGHT. It is time whites and Gays really try Change. We have been trying it and doing it White boys ways all this time now just wait and see change in action. It was King who show this country how to be Christian to love your neighbor. Many blacks wanted to pick up guns but King said no and embaraced those who spewed hate. Gays want an "eye for and eye." Dr. King said that type of attitude will leave all of us blind. Finally, while many blacks do want rights for Gays they do not equate what blacks went through with the Gay experience. A whole continent was disrupted with the slave trade. Whites stoled hundreds of trillions of human and material resources from Africa. Some estimate that their were 600,00 million Africans lost in the Middle Passage. Whole townships were destroyed in cities like Tulsa OK because blacks were doing better then whites. Black women were raped, children torn from them, and husbands sold and castrated. There were lynching parties for black men who dared look at white women or who dare to stand up to racist. I know that Gays have suffered too but to compare the two is insane. There are many Gays in the house and Senate who we don't know about because they can hide. Gay J. Edgar Hoover even ran the CIA. There has been one black male in the Senate since reconstruction and not one black women. What Gay person has said anything about no black women ever being in the Senate? Black people have had to be patience with the bad decisions of whites for 400 damn years, but Gays and I dare say probably mostly white Gays are already abandoning Obama. No I do not agree with the pick but I do think the same man that ran that great campaign has a plan. So be patient.

Whose BS is that?

Whose BS is that? Perhaps setting your bullshit aside might be a first good step. Rick Warren’s giving the invocation during this historic moment clearly presents a Civil Rights matter of concern for all progressive human beings. Blacks don't have a monopoly on (civil rights) as an issue only applicable to them. People of different races, ethnicities, and yes sexual orientation have faced discrimination. Your posting is very hostile, angry, and negative. Many whites both gay and straight fought for the civil rights of blacks. Gay people wrote about almost every instance you site, on Buzz Flash, and many other media sources, very often. You cite the word Gay to many times to count in your tirade. Your words roll of the page as if an angry man (whose contention is that only blacks suffered civil rights violations) was screaming them; and anyone else who has a civil rights claim, can’t cite the black civil rights movement. That’s preposterous. Furthermore, you contention that Obama’s selection of Warren: “Obama is only doing what the bible tells”. Great, not everyone on planet earth follows the bible, and as long as the Red White and Blue are waving in the wind over this nation, and not a swastika the Constitution is what I intend to uphold, not the bible. King led the national civil rights platform (previously used by Gandhi), which was based on peaceful resistance. Your venomous rant about gays doesn’t hold up under sructiny: therefore, your little temper tantrum essay is worthless drival. Peace Out.

heard and read what you wanted

DC I did not say that blacks were the only ones being discriminated against or the only ones fighting for civil Rights but what I do stand by is that black folk from Richard Allen to Malcom X blacks have been in the forefront of that movement. That movement secure rights for even people who were not willing to stand up for themselves but benefited from their sacrifice. If you call me angry that is OK too. Just as you voice your opinion in the manner you want so do I and I will. And Yes many of the people that fought for human rights did not beleive in the bible but you need to acknowledge many did. King and his family will tell you he was first and foremost a Baptist Preacher. Trying to deny that fact is either intellectual dishonesty or an outright lie. Rev. King came out of very conservative family and conservative community and it was most likely through his networking with others that his views were changed. He stood by Bayard Rustin when others turned their backs. Once again just like Frederick Douglas did with Lincoln and Martin did with Kennedy they voted and supported them and even when they were upset with them. It is amazing you want to get mad at me, but allow people to say I will not suupport Obama because I don't agree with his choice. Again your damn skippy when I say you whites and gays can learn from black folk. What would have happen to us if we had given up and taking our cookies and ran after every white politician disppointed us. Your BS lets me know you don't even consider other points of view because if you really cared about the many blacks experience you would not minimalize the atrocities committed against blacks as just discrimination. Whites in this country tried to systematically distroy African people. There were test by the government on blacks. Bombing of whole towns. Read the cases of riots on Tulsa and Florida. The war on drugs is a war on the poor, brown and black people. The highest unemployement rates is not amongst gays but blacks. Blacks recieve longer sentencing then any other group. That is not discrimination that is breaking up of families, that is draining households of needed income, that is leaving people in a eternal state of poverty. It is not discrimination blacks are fighting against it is racism. Racism a politcal system design to oppressed. Thank God or maybe for you Thank the good will of people of all races who helped overcome many of the barriers blacks faced. Many of those with that good will were people who once thought like Rick Warren. They sat and sit on college boards, corporate office,school boards, senate and house sits and yes the White House. Now it is time yes for gays to take a page from the Civil Rights struggle and for blacks who yes lead the way and turn enemies into friends or at least arm length allies. Finally, I guess it is wrong to say Gay when we are talking about Gay rights? Your posting was not as long as mine but you use the word black four times. So should I assume that you are an angry person? What a stupid comment. If I was angry and negative as you presume me to be, I would have stopped suporting my white candidates like some on this site say they are going to do.

Sen. Carol Moseley Braun

You forgot Sen. Carol Moseley Braun from IL, first black female U.S. Senator. And IL is, of course, the home of Barack Obama, our first black (actually biracial) president.

Yeah, you're right ....

There's no comparison. Gays haven't fought for civil rights for AAs. They haven't been discriminated against in employment, beaten, raped, castrated, or killed. Like AAs, they can serve openly in the military, get married, and have all the legal protections afforded to other families. There are sooooo many openly gay Senators/Congressmen. And of course, we all know that the country is ready for a gay President.

You're right, ......

... it is ridiculous. They should just sit down and shut up.

White Vigilante shoot blacks

When we hear about white vigilantes going through the streets shooting gays and the media not say one damn word about it then I will agree there is an comparison. How do you know there has never been a Gay president? There is no comparison. Sure Gays have been discriminated against and no one is saying they should shut up and sit down. But they should look at what Obama is trying to do instead of saying they will not go to see this historic event. He is trying something different then just the "eye for and eye" mentality that has caused the mess we have in Washington. Again their is no comparsion. Earlier this week, A.C. Thompson of The Nation revealed that after Hurricane Katrina, white vigilante groups patrolled New Orleans, blockaded streets, and shot at least eleven black men. It “was like pheasant season in South Dakota. If it moved, you shot it,” said one vigilante. Color of Change is organizing a campaign to tell Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal (R) and state officials to investigate the shootings, as “Louisiana’s broken law enforcement agencies have refused to investigate these crimes.” Watch Thompson’s video on his report:

Already saw it

I was arguing that the country isn't ready for an openly gay President, not that there has never been a gay President. That's precisely my point. Only a very few members of Congress from a few very liberal districts (and no Presidents) have been elected after coming out. You argue that there are "many gays in the House and Senate that we don't know about because they can hide." My point is they shouldn't have to hide, and while the country as a whole showed it is ready to elect an AA President, if you think an openly gay candidate could get elected, you're delusional.

Beyond that, you're whining about "gays" not speaking out against discrimination against AAs, because you didn't see it. Hate to tell you, but just because you didn't see gays protesting these issues doesn't mean they weren't there.

The argument "my group has suffered more so don't you dare compare our struggle to yours" is just stupid. Homosexuals are discriminated against every day, and they are also victims of horrible hate crimes (including assaults and murder) because of their status. And the argument that discrimination against homosexuals cannot be analogized to discrimination against AAs because of Algiers Point is just idiotic. To paraphrase your first sentence, "When we hear about white non-Jews going through the streets, rounding up 6 million Jews and killing them and the media not say one damn word about it then I will agree there is an comparison." See? Pretty silly, huh?

So you want "gays" (you know, the ones who you haven't seen fighting for civil rights of AAs) to stop criticizing Obama because of his decision to have a homophobic bigot lead the inauguration invocation? You want them to "be patient" because he has "a plan". Okay .................

Would it be okay if Obama had chosen ?
this guy? He's the Reverend James Wickstrom .....

from the Aryan Nation.

Oh, come on ...... be patient ............... It's part of the plan.

Ym

DC I guess Openly is the omptimum word for you. Blacks are still discriminated against Openly. Unlike you they have no choice. There is no hiding anything against us. To try to make an moral equivalence with Rick warren and the Aryan Nation is crazy. When has Rick Warren or anyone in his church ever murdered or been even accused of having murdered or supported murdering a Gay. His views have to be changed and I belive that when Obama changes his view a lot of good people who call themselves Christians will also change. I don't agree with his (Warren) stance but I think he would be one of the first people to not only condemn but see to it that any person participating in violence against Gays should be prosecuted. Black folks have embraced a lot of former racist. In fact many voted for Gov. George Wallace. Black folk have a history of turning once hard core racist into allies. Old Honest Abe at one point held very racist views of blacks. Lyndon B. Johnson is heard on tape calling blacks niggers. Do you know your history fool. Dr. King wrote letters from a jail cell to white ministers who wanted him and to show more patience. His letters on "Why we Can't Wait" turn the hearts and minds of many white pastors. You also sound like a racist. The reason Obama got voted into office was because he was the best candidate and at the right time. There were a lot of circumstances that came together to get Obama the first African-American elected and one of those things was that a got a lot of those Bubba voters who never thought in a million years that they would vote for a black man. You see he even got a lot of so-called liberals who were really UNDER COVER RACIST to vote for him. Obama as you know was not the first black to run for the Presidency. It took a number of tries for this to happen. From Shirley Chisolm to Jessie Jackson to Al Sharpton and even the crazy Allen Keyes, Americans got to see a wide range of views from blacks. Obama was not only a black bringing a great message but he was different, and learned from those that came and paved a way for him. What OPENLY Gay person has had the courage to pave the way and build a foundation for other gays. Jessie and even Obama had to OPENLY run even under the threat of being killed. When has a OPENLY Gay tried. Also, Obama ran on a message not only of change but that he was OPENLY fighting for everyone. I will say now and I will say again when blacks see Gays openly fightging for things that they deem important gays will get more support on issues that they find important., You are great at calling names so unlike Obama I responded the same way because by you basically dismissing millions of blacks who went out and voted against gay marriages because they don't see you standing with them they will not change. The only way they are going to change is to tune out folks like you and focus on people like Obama toi show them how to reach out and change the mindset. And your damn skippy it is important that blacks know that Gays are out their suporting the causes that they find important. If you want to be recongnized openly to run for office then stand up openly on the issues that matter to Blacks so that when gays run they can say this person stood with us. Have the same courage that blacks have to have ever day. We have no CHOICE in the matter to OPENLY be black. Now for your stupid reference to Jews in 1942. This is America not Nazi Germany. I don't have to go to 1942 to to talk about Jews being rounded up and shot to support my argument. In 2008 it is being reported on the Buzzflash Site that Blacks are being shot as they tried to flee from the worst natural disastert his nation has ever faced. In 2008 Hundrends of thousands of those that fled Katrina are still homeless. In 2008 blacks in that disaster saw their government abandon them and you are talking ro me about not being able to get married. You racist piece of....... Black children and babies are left out on the streets to die and you are talking to me about about not being able to OPENLY run for President. Many blacks the BOttom Ward who were trying to survive were labeled as criminals, many lost their ability to vote, bury love ones, and even go to their local church and you have the audacity to talk to me about your private pains. Blacks are OPENLY being murdered, incarcerated and vilified and folks like you think because now that Obama got elected blacks should shut up about the discrimination they OPENLY face not only everyday but before they even come out the womb. White Gays with their white privilege can still do the Tom Foley, Larry Craig, Barney Franks, Dryden thing. The reason black Gays cannot be elected to more offices is not because of them being gay it is because of their color. If blacks had not got out in record numbers Obama would not have gotten elected. And the reason Gays voted for him was because they know he is better then McCain/Palin. Obama is a student of coalition buiding. Rick Warren is going to join the fold.

You mean "operative", ...

not "optimum", although in either case you'd be wrong. Your argument that "Gays" have it easier because they can hide their status is ridiculous, and only one (small) step removed from the argument that discrimination against homosexuals can't be analogized to discrimination against AAs because they choose to be gay. Both are bullshit.

What's even more bullshit is the suggestion that anti-Semitism is old news. In terms of the holocaust, my point was that AAs aren't the only ones who have been murdered (by the millions, by the way) while the media and the world looked the other way. Funny how you think 1942 is old news, yet you cite the Middle Passage (hundreds of years ago) as evidence of how AAs have it worse than homosexuals. Do you seriously believe that there aren't contemporary examples of anti-Semitism? You do know that there are Jews being beaten and murdered today because they are Jews, right? Come to think of it, I guess you're right, though ...... unlike AAs they could just hide the fact that they are Jewish, so what the hell are they complaining about? Yeeeesh ....... get over it already.

I do like this one, though: "You see he (Obama) even got a lot of so-called liberals who were really UNDER COVER RACIST (sic) to vote for him." Is an "undercover, racist liberal" like a Narc? How many is "a lot", and how do you know they exist? Don't bother answering ... the answer is obvious.

You just make it up.

And who said AAs should shut up about discrimination now that Obama got elected? Not me. I think everyone should speak up loudly against discrimination in all its forms whenever they see it. I also think that we should not legitimize those who promote discrimination (i.e. Rick Warren) by allowing them to give the invocation at a Presidential inauguration. Beyond that, those who whine that homosexuals, despite being discriminated against (including employment, marriage, adoption, inheritance, and yes, being raped, beaten and murdered) have it easier than AAs because "They can hide, we can't", are just another form of bigoted assholes. I would be just as outraged by a homosexual activist complaining that AAs better not compare their discrimination to "gays" because, hey ... in addition to being discriminated against (including being murdered), homosexuals can't serve in the military. They can't marry. They can't get health benefits and legal protections for their families. AAs can do all of those things, so they better not dare compare their discrimination to the real discrimination suffered by homosexuals.

See? ..... It's a stupid argument.

BTW, "Do you know your history fool." (sic) Yeah, ....... I also know my English.

BBTW, dumbass, you seem to be under the impression that I'm gay.

As usual, you're wrong.

Childish imbecile

DC Even a child can see through your stupid rational. You make up things then argue against it. So really you are aguing against yourself. I never said homosexuality was a choice those were your words. Then you try to tie anti-semitism to this when I have argue strictly on the basis that the experience of gays and blacks is not same. Gays have not experienced a Middle passage nor a holocaust. Your trying to tie Gays to both groups is just your way of minumizing those experiences. Thus, it tells me you really don't give a damn about either group. There is no comparison Third we absolutly know there are many under-cover racist that voted for Obama. As I and other diverse groups of people made phone calls for Obama found out that many of the young people that we talk to were having to convince their liberal parents to vote for a black man. There was even a video put out by the comedian who said she would have convince her Jewish grandparents to look beyond color. These people would not call themselve a racist but said that Obama was smart but they just had trouble with his color. Once, again many under-cover racist did vote for Obama. Where do I start on you next stupid line of questions. There is not comparison when it comes to who is most left out on health care benefits. Just because blacks have the right to health care does not mean they have BENFITED more. You made my point idiot. Even with rights blacks still have less heath care then white gays. With so-called equal protection under the law blacks are sentenced to longer terms in prison. Even with access to education blacks boys are ten times more likely to get suspended from school,placed in special ed then white gays, more likely to get pulled over and shot by the police, get cancer,high blood pressure, and now even die from complication from HIV/AIDS. Even with all these so-called rights you chump the unemployment rate in the black community is probably five times higher then it is in the white gay community. So you see I could careless about your sexual preference the topic is Civil Rights. More so it is taking care of the least of these in this country and the least of these has been and still is the poor and people of color. When the poor blackd and brown people secure those rights it usually bodes well for every other group. In fact many groups benefit even more then blacks. Next to your point that Obama will legitimze racism by having Rev. Warren speak is just crazy. Frederick Douglas at one point believed that President Lincoln legitimized racism but that did not stop him from talking and befriending him. Dr. King believed that many white pastors legitimized racism but that did not stop him from inviting them to his church and befriending them. Through those friendships these great men were able to change America. Your childish view of now that we liberals are in charge we need to do like the so-called religious Right wingers and shut them out of every important event is just that childish. How stupid and petty can you get? It proves that our leaders should not think like idiots like you. We need leaders, men and women, gay and straight folk who are the smartest people in the room. It is the GOP that likes to pick people that are just lije them (Sarah Palin). Obama ran on change is going to change the way politicians relate with those that don't always embrace the same views. The GOP in the debates said that if Obama sit down and talked with leaders of Iran and Cuba he would in your word "legitimize" their beliefs and lift their status. Voters including gays didn't buy the arguement then and we are not buying it now. Unlike Obama I have traded insults with you because I presume you to be a jerk not gay. I have longed viewed people that talked big on the internet as those who emulate the KKK. You hide under the hood of being anonymous. Being anonymous is like an alcoholic who finds courage to insult others after he/she has had to much to drink. If you really are as bold and big as you think you are. I will give you and e mail address and you can let me know where I can meet you anytime and any places to continue the conversation face to face. Because in the end your arguement is moot. Rev. Rick Warren is going to speak and four to five million people are going to hear and listen to what he has to say and then decide where needs to happen. That is just the American way. All voices need to be heard. The ACLU has made it a point to defend even the worst voices in America and I thank God they have. Thank you and have a nice day.

Darnell, Darnell ....

You seem a little ....... angry, Darnell.

Trying to "tie Gays" to discrimination suffered by AAs and Jews is attempting to minimize the suffering of AAs and Jews? Nooooo ......... whining about analogizing the civil rights of "Gays" to AAs and then trying to demonstrate how easy "the Gays" have it (after all, they can hide) compared to AAs is minimizing the suffering of "Gays", Darnell. What's even worse is when it's done by someone who is totally ignorant about history (Well, to be fair ....... ignorant in general, as well). How can anyone who is even semi-educated make the ridiculous claim that "Gays have not experienced a Middle passage nor a holocaust"?


Really?!?!?!



Do you have any clue what this is Darnell? Let me help you out once again. It's a memorial to the homosexual victims of the Holocaust who, along with Jews, Slavs, the disabled, and other political/religious groups were specifically targeted by Hitler for extermination. In fact, here's a little light reading for you, Darnell. "Gay men suffered unusually cruel treatment in the concentration camps. They faced persecution not only from German soldiers but also from other prisoners, and many gay men were beaten to death. Additionally, gay men in forced labor camps routinely received more grueling and dangerous work assignments than other non-Jewish inmates, under the policy of "Extermination Through Work". SS soldiers also were known to use gay men for target practice, aiming their weapons at the pink triangles their human targets were forced to wear. There were several cases in which gay men imprisoned in camps ripped the Star of David Patch off dead Jews and put it on it place of theirs, hoping it would grant them better treatment."

Beyond the Holocaust, Darnell, you should know that the modern persecution of homosexuals was inaugurated in 325 CE by the Council of Nicea. Since that time, homosexuals have been persecuted and discriminated against across the entire world in the vast majority of cultures. They have been socially ostracized, beaten, imprisoned, raped, mutilated, burned at the stake, castrated and murdered, simply because they were gay. To this day, homosexuality is still punishable by death (sanctioned by the governments) in seven countries, and imprisonment in many others. The fact that you would even attempt to deny that homosexuals were victims of the Holocaust demonstrates that you are precisely that which you accuse others of being ..... an ignorant, homophobic bigot.

As you say, "Do you know your history, fool"? (That's a hypothetical question, Darnell ...... the answer is obvious).

BTW, angry Darnell. Happy to meet with you to "continue the conversation 'face to face'". Curious, though ........ Why is it that the angry, ignorant idiots who want to "meet face to face" are always the same ones who are unable to form a logical argument? It's kinda funny, too, because they're also the biggest "wussies" ......

..... with a capital "P".

Boy you are clever but wrong

DC It is amazing how you keep trying to turn this discussion into a discussion about anti-semitism. Thank you for the information on the Memorial. You did educate me and I will keep that in mind. But my larger point is our discussion on oppression and as it is dealt with America. It was also on Rev. Warren being invited to give the invocation. You are like the Religious Right who love to take one scripture and distort the whole view of the bible. It is a clever tool but wrong of course.
Here what you forgot to discuss. Many great men in America started off as bigots but through discussion with people like Frederick Douglass, Dr. King, Ralph Abernathy their views changed and our country was made the better because of it. That too was discussed in my last post but you seem to miss that.

So let me remind your sorry ass again about what is going on here in America in 2008 not in 325 C.E.
From BUZZFLASH Report: White vigilante groups blockaded small town in post-Katrina New Orleans and murdered blacks.»
Earlier this week, A.C. Thompson of The Nation revealed that after Hurricane Katrina, white vigilante groups patrolled New Orleans, blockaded streets, and shot at least eleven black men. It “was like pheasant season in South Dakota. If it moved, you shot it,” said one vigilante. Color of Change is organizing a campaign to tell Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal (R) and state officials to investigate the shootings, as “Louisiana’s broken law enforcement agencies have refused to investigate these crimes.” Watch Thompson’s video on his report:

Thousands of blacks were displaced, left homeless, put in mobile homes by our government that created negative health issues. You intetionally left out the fact that dispite blacks having rights they are still far more underserved in education, health care, the justice system and employement then anyothe group exept maybe Native Americans. All of this did not happen at the Council of Nicea but at the White House and Congress in 2000 you ass hole.

It is amazing that you quote events from the Council of Nicea and its discriminating lanquage against homosexuals but that Council also dealt with and decreed against what they concluded was heresy. Proponents of those decreeds would eventually lead to the Crusades which millions of Arabs would be wiped out.

It seems your only focus is on gays and anti- semitism. The difference between you and Obama he is not just about securing rights for blacks or gays but all American. Blacks fought for Human rights you just want to secure rights for gays.

Obama went against black preachers when he refused to give "walking around money" in Philedelphia to secure their vote. I am also glad he is standing up to people like you who want him to just focus on one issues. He is trying to do what has been lacking the past eight years and that is find true bipartisan to address issues of all underserved people. I talked about that in the last post but you failed to address that.

In the general election people like you who voted for Obama rejected the notion that the GOP voiced. They too said that if Obama sat down with Iran and Cuba dictators that they would legitimize those leaders. They too said Obama should not give those haters a worldwide plateform. But now when the shoe is on the other foot you change your tune. You fu..HYPOCRITE. I wrote about that in the last post but you forgot to mention that issue.

Let me tell you what i saw in Israel. I went to the Holocaust Memorial. I also went to the Temple Mount where I saw a little Palestinian boy walking down the street Israelie troops jump out of thir jeep, shoved the boy against the wall and stuck an AKA at his head. After detaining that young man for what was about ten minutes for me and probably and eternity for him they let him go. They laughed mocking at him as he walked away. That young man's experience reminded me of what thousands of young African-Americans like myself have gone through. Let me remind your dumb ass again that racial profiling drains the African-American community of hundreds of millions of dollars through fines,higher insurance rates,court cost and lawyer fees. Many of those poor, blacks and brown folks are now incarcerated for crimes that whites get probation for.

I talked about that in the last post but you failed to mention that.

Thus, the negative affect on families is devastating. Palestinians have to have cards and ID to get through check points. They have a fence that separtes them from the Israelies. It keeps them boxed in so the Israelies basically dictate the very existence of the Palestianians. I do not say this in judgement of the Israelies, both sides have work some things out. I only say that to say their are many places where blacks are still fenced off in America.

Blacks today in many places in America have to show ID to get in certain neighborhoods. Yes, in Washington D.C blacks had to show ID to be in a particular place. I don't have to go back to 325 C.E you bitch laws are still being put in place to detain people of color. Again, to have a right does not mean that those rights are being upheld by the courts. The Bush administration is not even looking into the thousands of black voters that were disinfranchised in the 2000 and 2004 elections.

Hispanics Americans have to show drivers liscense in some places to vote go to school and to provide for their families. So while it was terrible for gays to wear pink and be tortured in concentration camps in Nazi Germany in 1942 how much more wrong is it that a nation that is suppose to be free can hold Muslims, blacks and brown people without any charges. It allowed a blacks to be shot 50 times for pulling out their wallets.

Police officers putting plungers up the rectum of those they are suppose to protect. In the state of Ohio there has been a average of 5 blacks a year being killed by the police for the last ten years. Police in Los Angelas had a choke hold just for black and brown men. You must be losing your short term memory so let me remind you. We are not talking about these events happening in "seven other nations" we are talking about America where the rule of law is suppose to be equal for all.

Your sorry ass wants to quote from an article about the events of 325 C.E what a dick. Here is my email Secretadd7@yahoo.com tell me the place and the time bitch. Again people like you feel secure under the sheet. But this is a new day and we have a President who is President of blacks, whites, brown, gay, straight, disabled, liberals,conservatives and yes even closet bigots like yourself.

I am "cleaver"?

No, Darnell ..... I'm not a heavy, broad-blade knife. Then again, even most inanimate objects would find it easy to take apart your arguments. It's like arguing with a pre-schooler.

Honestly, ............... I feel kinda bad.

And I'm not trying to turn it into a discussion about anti-Semitism or homophobia, except to point out the hypocrisy of those who attempt to minimize the suffering of other minorities by whining about drawing analogies to discrimination against AAs. And I don't have to go back to 325 CE to show examples of homophobic hate crimes (although it's funny how you have no trouble citing the Middle Passage. Weird, huh?). My point was that homophobic bigotry began hundreds of years before the Middle Passage, and still continues to this day. I could post pages of hate crimes committed in the United States in the last 20 years against homosexuals, but then I'd have to wait several days for you to figure out how to read it, then try to wade through your meandering, incoherent response, so I thought I'd make it easier on both of us. What can I say, Darnell ........ I'm just a nice guy.

Finally, I don't want Obama to focus on one issue. I'd prefer he focus on discrimination against all Americans, including those who's experiences are minimized by uneducated idiots who whine "Don't you dare compare your experience to AAs! You don't have it nearly as bad as we do ....... At least you can hide! And 'the Gays' didn't have a Holocaust!" I'd prefer that he'd support gay marriage, but I don't expect him to, particularly since he said he does not favor gay marriage. So if you want to be accurate, when you argue that Obama is fighting for equal rights for all Americans, you should say ... "sort of".

As for your tough-guy act, I'll be happy to meet you. Tell you what ...... I'll be doing a little shopping at the Toys R'Us in Times Square (that's NYC, Darnell) the day after Christmas, so I'll be out front at 1:00 (black Northface jacket, grey wool cap, just to make it easier).

Oh ..... and no need to thank me for educating you. Some people just need to be "schooled" now and again.

OTOH, in your case, it's now and again ....... and again ........ and again ....

How about Gene Robinson and Rick Warren

On the Stage Together. With Comments by Sam Smith. That would be Change to believe in.

If the Gang Of Pirates think that the only good Democrat is a dead Democrat, only a fool would think it bipartisan to accommodate them.

I'm boycotting the whole thing too.

This will be the first inauguration that I've missed in my 69 years - except for those years when there was no TV back in the dark ages. If this pseudo Christian, Warren, is there I won't be there and I hope all g/l/b/t people and their supporters will boycott it as well. Tens of thousands of us worked for Obama. It would be the equivalent of Obama saying that he needs to be inclusive and inviting the Grand Wizard of the KKK to do the invocation. What would the African American population think was going on? Well, that's what I think is going on. You may invite Hitler to the conference table, but you can bet that what he really wants if everything you have including your life.

How about no invocation?

Whether it be Rick Warren or any other religious official giving an invocation, the inauguration of a president of the United States should be a secular event for all Americans, including non-believers. While the first amendment separation of church and state doesn't apply to a presidential inaugural, its spirit ought to. As for the reality of Barack Obama's choice of Mr. Warren, I don't like it at all, but there are far more important issues in our society with which to be concerned. And Barack Obama, who is still 31 days from entering the White House, appears to be the kind of highly intelligent individual who will listen to criticism and learn. At least we can hope. I first voted for president in 1968, and one thing I've learned over the years is that there is no such thing as perfection. To state an obvious point, we are never going to have a president or even a candidate with whom we agree 100 percent of the time. The choice of Warren was a mistake, but a relatively minor one in the big picture. The important thing is what Obama does when he's in the White House. I suspect his views on gay rights are substantially different from Rick Warren's and that is what should matter.

please stop pushing religion on atheists

I'm not a believer, and as a DoD employee, I'm sick to death of religion being pushed on me, especially during the group prayers on base. Bush pushed religion everytime he opened his mouth. Let's get back to a secular government with speakers who will promote secular ideals.

Enough Mr. Obama

Always believed if you can throw over your pastor of 20 years, the pastor who presided at your wedding and nurtured your ambitions - then you are capable of most anything. How many more times can we rationalize Obama's Cabinet selections and have any hope of progressive change? Not another time - Warren's gift of high honor will be cause for celebration for a true minority of the people. As the only means of peaceful protest in 2009, hit the heart of this country - in the pocketbook. Cancel all plans for attending the inauguration, even if it means losing a few dollars. If you're not there, you're not giving validation to just another of a long line of political pastorites. Pastorites, men primarily- put all they do and believe in someone more righteous yet unseen deity. This means Warren and his tribe, can say, do and act in the most unrighteous, hideously inhuman manner - and offer praise for this. So please don't go. Make a stand and stay home. The whole world now sees the absolute ruthlessness of the USA when it comes to dollars. The USA will kill you, steal from you, and force you into a losing survival maze - tokenless - with no way out. WAR ON IRAQ: 4,408.S.A. soldiers dead; over 650,000 noncombatant Iraqis dead; 845 billion U.S.A taxpayer dollars spent. When is enough enough?

I will not be watching my President being sworn in.

For the first time in my life. I choose not to be part of this great event. He has made an unforgiveable mistake as far as I am concerned. I am not part of the community which he has stabbed, just an American who believes in all Men and Women have equal Rights in all things. Marriage is a Basic Human Right. The Supreme Court agrees with me on this one.
That a man who is being sworn into the position of President of the United Staes, because many of those who are LGBT fought for his Right to be a full American citizen, is using a person who denies their Rights as American Citizens to gain points with those people who deny Rights to those they oppose, is outrageous.
I would think that Loving v. Virginia, would make this whole argument mote. This is what the trial judge said which was overturned in this decision on marriage: "Almighty God created the races white, black, yellow, malay and red, and he placed them on separate continents. And but for the interference with his arrangement there would be no cause for such marriages. The fact that he separated the races shows that he did not intend for the races to mix". Does this not sound like every Christian extremist when they quote the Bible for their stand against Gay Marriage?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loving_v._Virginia; one would think that the decision ending all race-based legal restrictions on marriage in the United States would have covered this whole debate. But for some reason Race being used to deny the Right to marry is different than Sexual Preference. Hopefully the Loving ruling will eventually aid the marriage equality movement for same-sex partnerships, if courts allow the Equal Protection Clause to be used. But only if we do not give a platform to those who oppose Equal Rights for All Americans.
I have given Mr. Obama some slack on his appointments, which have disappointed me to no end. Where is the Progressive, Fresh, Non-Washington Insiders that we were promised? He was elected with a Mandate to change this country, to change Washington, to bring Justice back. To bring about a more perfect Union. To stop with the old Extreme Religious Right ruling of our Country.
Then he goes and gives a world platform to the New Face of the Hateful Religious Intolerance that American's said "NO" to with our money given to elect Mr. Obama, with our hard work by the millions, to get Mr. Obama elected and with our precious vote, which did get Mr. Obama elected. We told him what we wanted. He said he listened and would always listen to us. And he told us that he was CHANGE! He told us that words did not do it, but to watch him and by his actions we could judge him. He told us that those who hate would not have a place at the table anymore. That Justice mattered. Well, he has given a hateful little man a place at the table. There were so many other Spiritual Leaders he could have chosen for this position. The whole world will be watching and will believe that Mr. Obama agrees with this man and the hate that he preaches, the divisive that he lives, and that America has not changed.
I have now judged Mr. Obama by his actions. And found him wanting. I am looking for a person who will do as she/he said she/he would and bring about true justice for all Americans. I am afraid that it past time for a new Party to emerge. Maybe two new Party's. One for the Conservatives and one for the Progressives. I think all sides are becoming more and more disappointed in the two Party's we now have.
Keep religion in the homes and churches and out of our Government. The Founding Father's had much to say about this subject. Look it up and read about it. Then let's talk. Don't allow those who believe a certain way, which hurts fellow Americans, a place at the table. Only those who want all Americans to be able to stand up and count on their Basic Civil Rights, which the Supreme Court said that Marriage was, a Basic Civil Right.
I am sorry about my vote. The first time that I have been sorry so soon afterward. I am ashamed that a man used me and millions of others to get power, but then turns on our core beliefs, because he now has this power, and thinks he does not need his base.
Too bad he thinks this. He will find out that he does. He truly does need the Progressive base.
Where does he think all the money came from? Where does he think all the passion came from? The volunteers were Progressive! The money and the passion are with the Progressives. The most Progressive people in America, and he has just slapped them down. Bad move, Mr. Obama!

People have given him a soap box

To be upset would be to give in to the guilt that Religion has the power to control. If Mr. warren is true to form, his closet will open someday and the skeletons will tarnish another person that people have placed upon a pedestal. I think that his acceptance of Barak Obama's invitation can be looked at in another way; Own new President has been very vocal about his acceptance and tolerance to the LGBT community and its issues. This is seen by me that Mr. Warren although publicly will denounce issues important to us he privately knows that we are not lepers and that we will in time have the rights that are rightly ours. I still have family that after 20 years still has issues over who I am... I haven't shout them out yet... I pity them for being so blind to the world that they live in and for there belief that it is there way of thinking or no way of thinking. And, they haven't sold nearly as many books as Mr. Warren. Feed his ego and he will continue to tell you how to live. Stand up to your beliefs and not those of a few story tellers from 2000 years ago and he will not warrant another word of discussion.

Inauguration Day - New Beginnings and Finding Common Ground

Inauguration Day is about new beginnings. Barack Obama has always said he wants to unite us because we are torn apart in so many ways. Rick Warren has said things that hurt many of us. But he has also said (and this is where Obama gets this) that we should not demonize others, that we need to start with what we have in common. Then we can go from there. Obama brought this to his campaign: Having Rick Warren at the invocation does NOT mean we accept his beliefs or that he represents this country's beliefs. It does represent a blueprint for what Obama hopes to achieve, not only in this country but around the world: to start with finding common ground. Then maybe both sides can start to hear what the other is saying. It's a start. Christy LA

Rick Warren

Terrible choice. I am a gay Californian and am horrified. I was so moved by having the first black president win election, the very same election which broke my heart as Prop 8 passed. He has no empathy for the millions of people affection by prop 8? People took to the streets across the country on this issue. Poor, poor judgement which will probably not ever be forgotten by the gay community. Certainly not by me. Rick Warren could have his seat at the Obama's table another day, but not on THIS day.

I'm Not Sure If It Changes Anything...BUT....

has anybody looked at Rev. Joseph Lowery's views on gay rights and same-sex marriage...? Apparently he's pro-LGBT rights, pro-gay clergy, and pro same-sex marriage - in other words, the polar opposite of Warren on this most divisive issue.

I STILL think that makes his choice as cynical a case of unprincipled triangulation as you'd get from the Clintons - and yes, I see that pissy little Hillaryinsta troll Yman worming his way through this thread, so I know what response I can expect for disrespecting His Empress Hillary. But - I put Lowery's record out there for your consideration, just the same....

Who cares ...

... about Jospeh Lowery? You can't balance out a homophobic bigot by having a reasonable person give the benediction, "Doc". But if it helps you rationalize the decisions of your candidate, knock yourself out. Not trying to rationalize it? Then why bring it up? It's irrelevant.

BTW - You keep calling Obama's decision a "Clinton"-like decision. Hate to tell you. But HC didn't choose him. She didn't decide to expand the war in Afghanistan. She didn't decide to keep Gates. And she didn't vote for the FISA "compromise". You can keep whining "Hillary would have been worse!!!" all you want. It doesn't make it true.

But like I said, if it makes you feel better about being duped yet again, I understand

I feel your pain.

BTW - "Empress"? Naaaaahhhhhh .....

But it's nice to know you think so highly of her.

And "pissy little Hillaryinsta troll"??? "Doc" ........ I'm hurt.

Change

change gay to black. change same-sex to inter-racial. change warren to decider. change yer mind ....

Political necessity

For his second inaugural he can choose to cancel the barbaric practice of prayer at national events. For now he has to continue the pandering to christian nutcases that has continued since the McCarthy era. I hope all patriotic Americans will stop trying to be nice to factions that try to shred the constitution and upset the education system by promoting flawed science. I used to try to show respect to their religion, however embarrassing, but now know I have to let them see how silly and/or hypocritical they seem to me. Let's remove their tax-exempt status as they have chosen to influence politics, and let's try to keep their influence out of schools, and boycott television stations that pummel us with that brain numbing drone.

It's Time

There is no graver threat to our democracy than religious leaders like Warren who seek to merge the church and state, usurping our Consititution. This day is a victory of sorts, as it is motivating, and energizing people across the nation to stand up, and push back. Starting with challenging the tax-exempt status of every one of these groups/churches that uses the church as a front for a political agenda. We must also challenge them in court to get them out of our public schools; where they are trying to teach our kids religion, cloked under the deception of creative design. We must push back against Warren and others who are bent on denying the Constitutional Rights of Americans based on sexual orientation. It's a political necessity!

Rick Warren?

Some years back I actually read one of Warren's books, "The Purpose Driven Church" I think it was. The author emerged as the narcissistic sort one might expect from his ilk. In short, he's Jerry Falwell in West Coast surfer drag, shorts and a Hawaiian print shirt. Maybe his inclusion on the podium on January 20th will mark the beginning of cooperation from the rightwing religionists, but if it does I'll be very surprised. Maybe Obama is following Sun-Tzu's advice to keep one's friends close and one's enemies closer. We shall see.

a further notion

What if Obama had picked Gene Robinson, the Episcopal Bishop of New Hampshire to give the invocation. Robinson is gay, and his consecration has given the rightwing religionists the lever they've been wanting to force a schism in the Episcopal Church. It's not too late. Obama could still invite him to join the other dignitaries...

A Progressive Case for Rick Warren

Well, that's the title of the Washington Post article I found. Here's how they spin it:

"A Progressive Case for Rick Warren"

...The real story here is not that President-elect Obama has somehow blessed Rick Warren's views on abortion or gay rights, but that one of America's leading evangelical pastors has decided to bless the presidency of someone who is strongly pro-choice and committed to the civil rights of gays and lesbians. That's a rather extraordinary development.

..Rick Warren is the one who is making the bigger statement here. In no uncertain terms, the best known pastor of our time will be telling his followers and fellow evangelicals that there is nothing ungodly about a president who believes that government shouldn't interfere with a woman's right to choose and that gays and lesbians deserve the protection of our laws as much as any other American. That's a moment progressives should celebrate...

--------------------------------

IMO, prayer should actually be private.

Obama is just publicly saying to all those who did not vote for him: "You need not worry. Look who wants to pray with me."

In the meantime, try to remember this: Obama is in office -- and has power. That fact still counts. A lot. Do not feel sad that Obama does not want a civil war in this country. Neither do I. Those who lost this election will take heart when they see this pastor. That is something you should feel good about. Because: you are the ones in power. Be humble at times like this one.

Remember this: you have the power. (Thank God...)

independent florida voter - now registered as a Dem voter

The case for Warren is not progressive

No one wants civil war. If you are suggesting for one minute that Rick Warren is giving his blessing to Obama’s pro-choice, pro civil rights positions, just to name a few you are sadly mistaken. The “best known pastor of our time”…depends of who you are talking to. That Warren is telling his followers and fellow evangelicals there is nothing ungodly about a president who believes that government shouldn’t interfere…. That’s a moment progressives should celebrate.” With all respect, no sir. Clearly, Warren hasn’t just changed over night, and that is not the message he is conveying. Have you read any of these postings? We are not celebrating. If you actually believe what you just posted so be it. It doesn’t change the fact that it is not reality. Warren wants nothing less than to merge the church and state. We all want peace, but we also want equal rights, and separation of church and state. Our great nation is on the verge of Theocratic Facism. The State and Church must be kept separate if you believe in freedom and democracy. Warren does not. The laws, courts, and constitution must be used to the fullest to hold folks like Warren at bey. Open dialogue? Sure. Inclusiveness? No problem. The first voice we will here at this historic event. Wrong. Can’t you see people like Warren promote and foment hate? This is about civil rights, restoring our constitution, and protecting our democracy. Again, this is a civil rights issue in part, and putting the grand wizard of the kkk on stage to give an invocation would be an affront. Warren teaches, promotes, and foments HATE. He has no business on the stage. Your contention, that by having Warren give the invocation means we avert civl war is obsurd. With all due respect. Peace.

re your reply

Thank you for taking the time to reply. I respect what you are saying. (And, I do not have a "but" or "however" after that last sentence.)

I also want to respect the choice President Elect Obama made, even if the choice stinks, or others think it stinks. I want to celebrate the fact Obama is president, and not the KKK, for example.

As for civil war, as much as I like peace, I think this country is in for more hard times. Right now in Arizona they are training the military for how to handle "economic unrest" in this country. A military response. Inside the country. For protests. It sounds from the article below the Bush years have not ended. But I want to believe they have.

Peace to you, too.

Ariz. police say they are prepared as War College warns military must prep for unrest; IMF warns of economic riots

Sincerely,

independent florida voter - now registered as a Dem voter

My Country Tis of Thee, Sweet Land of Bigotry

Still reeling from this latest kick in the gut. My new President is embracing the bigotry that I have learned to live with for 45 years. Meet the new boss, same as the old boss. It is so clear to me now, that in order to get civil rights, my brothers and sisters, we need to take it by force. There will be bloodshed because the way is narrow. The fact is that the religious fanatic crazy people are throwing down the gauntlet again. We can't continue to stand by silently, while the immoral majority demonizes us with endless hate propaganda. Our backs are up against the wall. Eventually, we will have to fight the war, that the right wants so badly. When will we stand and deliver ourselves from this insatiable evil? The right won't be satisfied until we're all dead. When will we wake from our sleepless slumber? Obamas' choice, Rick Warren has been in keeping with his vote on illegal wiretaps. Go ahead, turn your backs quietly like you always do. No one will notice, the revolution will not be televised. "The tree of liberty grows only when watered with the blood of Tyrants"

A Fight To The End Is The Only Option!

I posted this earlier, but it fits your thesis. Just like Neville Chamberlin kissing Hitler’s ass failed, so too will Obama’s kissing of Warren’s fat ass. You don’t deal with thugs by groveling at their feet; rather you have to be firm and tough. We could start by yanking Warren’s IRS tax exempt status, based on the fact that his church is nothing but a front for a political agenda. I would argue for presenting charges to a federal grand jury for conspiracy to incite hate crimes. He does’nt just disapprove of gay unions, but rather refers to gay relationships as being synonomous with bestiality. Fanning the flames of hatred, ignorance, and intoloration, just as Adolf did. Warren seeks nothing less than to usurp the United States Constitution buy converting the United States into a Theocracy. Groups like this pose a clear and present danger to Democracy, as we know it. Anyway, I guess for those that are still going to watch the inaugeration, they will get to see the appalling spectacle of Obama kissing the sinister minister’s fat ass. In return, he can be guarenteeed in 2012, that Warren and his likes will be supporting Sadistic Sarah Taliban and Bobby Jindal for implementation of their “final solution.”

Rick Warren

I am not sure if the selection of Rick Warren is a serious mistake, it could be. It definitely is a slap in the face to all of the Obama supporters who support gay rights and a woman's right to choose and be something other than a "christian".Speaking for myself, believe that all people of faith, no matter which faith, are absolutely the same in the eyes of the Almighty, God, Allah, Shiva, Lama, whatever. Warren is definitely a polarizing figure and I believe a better choice would have been someone like Jim Wallis. I keep hoping that Obama is just trying to make everyone happy, but will then get some good progressive programs started. “You may say I'm a dreamer, but I'm not the only one.” — John Lennon