Joe Lieberman: From Mensch to Schlimazel in Just Eight Years

The Infamous Bush-Lieberman Hug and Kiss Session after Bush's 2005 State of the Union Address
MARK KARLIN'S BUZZFLASH EDITOR'S BLOG
Of course, we don’t approve of Harry Reid getting all wimpy on a Sunday political gabfest by indicating that Lieberman was both a Benedict Arnold and a fine progressive. In short, Reid was signaling that he wasn’t going to unilaterally strip "Joementum" of his chairmanship of the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee or toss him out of the Democratic caucus.
Reid seems content to let Joe get by with a mere public expression of disapproval for avidly supporting McCain, and being John’s "brain double" on foreign affairs.
Say what?
Let’s put it simply, Lieberman’s acts of betrayal and bizarre alliances aside (he not too long ago praised fruitcake, bigot John Hagee as another Moses, which kind of is insulting to both Moses and Jews, even if Lieberman is Orthodox), he’s become a schlimazel. What is a schlimazel, to those who don’t know Yiddish words that have made it into the American lexicon?
Well, we’ll quote from the most famous popular chronicler of such words, Leo Rosten. Rosten wrote in his classic "The Joys of Yiddish" this anecdote to illustrate a schlimazel:
Mintz came to his rabbi and said, "Whatever I do goes sour. My wife and children soon won’t have anything to eat. What can I do?"
"Become a baker," said the rabbi.
"A baker? Why?"
"Because if you’re a baker, even if a business is bad, you and your loved ones will have bread!"
Mintz pondered, "And what if the day comes when I don’t have enough money to buy flour?"
"Then you won’t be a baker," said the rabbi, "but a schlimazel."
"Joementum" Lieberman has been gambling his flour for the past 8 years, ever since he conceded Florida early, inadvertently helping to set into motion the Bush theft of the presidency from his presidential running mate, Al Gore.
Since he became an "Independent" and founded his own party after his Democratic primary loss to Ned Lamont in 2006, Lieberman has accelerated his role as a bad luck charm to anyone he supports. Just ask John McCain.
Lieberman didn’t just support McCain, he was assigned to be Sarah Palin’s "tutor" on foreign policy. Have you stopped laughing yet?
Yes, it is true that Lieberman votes progressively on a couple of issues: choice and gays, for example. But he did everything from help the Republicans fast track partisan GOP hacks to get on the federal bench to support Alberto Gonzales’ infamous torture memo: "You can agree with Judge Gonzales’ position in this matter or not. I happen to agree with the ultimate decision made. And the decision was, in my opinion, a reasonable one, and ultimately a progressive one," Lieberman said inexplicably in his effusive statement of support to confirm Alberto the consigliere as attorney general.
Of course, lest we forget, Lieberman has been on the losing side of the Iraq war cheerleaders and those who advocate bombing Iran. In fact, Lieberman has been a complete schlimazel when it comes to foreign policy and candidates, playing the 2008 GOP convention role that Zell Miller played in 2004.
Those who argue that Lieberman represents Jewish voters have it wrong. In fact, Obama received a higher percentage of Jewish votes in 2008 than John Kerry did in 2004, falling just short of 80%.
When the Alaska, Minnesota, and Georgia Senate seats are finally decided, it is probable that the Democrats will fall just shy of the so-called 60-vote filibuster-proof senate. However, there is nothing that forces members of the Democratic caucus to vote with the majority anyway. If Joe Lieberman stays in the Dem caucus, expect him to regularly defect to the Republicans on filibuster votes.
Reid would be better advised to try and pick off a couple Republicans from Blue States to vote with the Dems when it comes to filibusters.
Harry Reid is a nice guy, but we don’t need Mr. Softy leading the Democratic caucus at a time that we must have bold leadership. Let "Joementum" join the GOP and start planning for defeating him in 2012.
A man should never gamble more than he can afford to lose, and Joe bet all his wheat that he would become Secretary of Defense in a McCain-Palin administration. It was the final step in his transition from a mensch to a schlimazel.
It’s time to cut him loose.
Joe is just plain bad luck.
MARK KARLIN'S BUZZFLASH EDITOR'S BLOG
- Login or register to post comments
- Printer-friendly version
Buzz this on Buzzflash.net




Technorati Tags:
Joe Lieberman: From Mensch to Schlimazel in Just Eight Years
malignant Joe Lie-berman
malignant Joe Leiberman
Jesse Jackson is and always has been BLACK BALLED. I will agree that Jesse has had his moments when ego clouded his judgment but overall his accomplishments in seeking social and economic justice not only for African Americans but for all low wage workers should go unrecognized."...In 1984 Reverend Jackson secured the release of captured Navy Lieutenant Robert Goodman from Syria, and the release of 48 Cuban and Cuban-American prisoners in Cuba. He was the first American to bring hostages out of Kuwait and Iraq in 1990. In 1999 Reverend Jackson negotiated the release of U.S. soldiers held hostage in Kosovo.
Jackson subscribed to the notion as expressed by the late John L.Lewis,
"He that tooteth not his own horn, the same shall not be tooted." And - being a man of the cloth he would also have knwon the following from The Good Book,
"Hide not your candle under a bushel basket..."
The reason Joe Lieberman is so useless is that when he underwent his Bris Mila,the mohel retained the prepuce and discarded the penis.
The Skeptical Cynic hath spake!
Santa knows when you are sleeping,
He knows when you're awake.
He knows if you've been bad or good.
Unfortunately, so does Bush,
Cheney, Rice, Mukasey, and...
the FBI, ONI, CIA, MCIA, NSA,
DIA,MI6, MOSSAD, AIPAC,
Third Kisser?
The graphic in this article reminds me of the Zapruder film. The choppy video, the slow motion, the way some guy gets in the way right at the moment of the kiss.
Now I wonder... was there a third kisser? From the grassy knoll, perhaps?
I can't wait for the Oliver Stone interpretation of this scandal..... oh, wait! http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1175491/
I would like to see Ried (the weak) gone along with LIE-berman
Joe Lieberman good for the USA or Democratic Party?
A reasonable suggestion is that the only reason that Lieberman is being given any consideration is because powerful special interests such as AIPAC see it as in their interests to keep Lieberman in place. It's not because he would be good for the USA or he would be good for the Democratic Party, but because he would be good for Israel.
That’s the way Washington works. It’s not what’s good for the USA but what’s good for the special interests and all too often it revolves around AIPAC. We had the same thing happen when Pelosi, Reid and Hoyer took impeachment of Bush and Cheney off the table. It was about avoiding the embarrassing revelations regarding 9/11 and the Iraq War that such an intense investigation would very likely uncover.
I don't know much Yiddish
Lieberman's Flirtations with Neo-Con right LONG before Nov 2000
In fact, Lieberman's association with the Neo-Con right can easily be dated to... June 3, 1997, when Cheney, Libby, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz (note how I pair Cheney-Libby & Rumsfeld-Wolfo) Perle, Feith, Jeb Bush, Steve Forbes, and others signed Bill Kristol/Donald Kagan's __(Project for a) NewAmericanCentury.org __.
(Since Kristol stopped paying the web-hosting bill, you have to go here to see the now infamous document.)
http://web.archive.org/web/20070810113753/www.newamericancentury.org/statementofprinciples.htm
The chances that fellow, uber (how do I say this...?) (AIPAC!) Neo-Con Lieberman was not aware of Kristol, Kagan, Libby, and Wolfo's brainstorm are.... zero. By 1997-1998, Lieberman was already far more closely aligned with the Republican Neo-Cons, than he was with the Democratic agenda of Clinton or Gore - which is exactly why he was THE most outspoken Clinton "MORAL VALUES!" critic in the entire Democrat Party. (Lieberman's own DIVORCE and TROPHY WIFE notwithstanding!)
The tragedy is, that had AL GORE simply FOLLOWED the WINNING Clinton campaign formula - TWO WHITE, SOUTHERN, MALE candidates for 2000 presidential election (i.e. another White Southern moderate/progresive male as Gore's VP running mate), Gore could have EASILY won the White House - and CONTINUED TO then PUSH his more liberal, multi-racial, truely democratic cabinet and agenda into public acceptance.
We probably would have avoided 9-11 and the "PHIL GRAMM DEREGULATION!" that led to this current fiscal crisis as well... (just as Gramm's S&L deregulation led to the S&L debacle and Bush-1 Recession in late 1980s) - and we CERTAINLY would have avoided the misbegotten invasion of Iraq.
The irony is (as others have pointed out), that Lieberman IS POISON to ANYONE who associates with him.... which is EXACTLY why Reid should STRIP Lieberman of his committee assignments - FOR REID's OWN GOOD, duh!
Lieberman sort of the Democrat version of "THE CURSE OF DICK CHENEY" !
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/6450422/the_curse_of_dick_cheney/
Reid is a hypocrite
Bad Example
Only reason Joe's a Dem is that he's not a Repug
This putz, Joe Lieberman, is a Democrat because that's the only way he could defeat liberal-Republican Lowell Weicker, Jr. back in 1988! I mean, would a "liberal" Democrat accept campaign advice and donations from William F. Buckley? Joe did.
We can only speculate, but perhaps Joe was in on the 2000 Florida debacle so he wouldn't lose his U.S. Senate seat from Connecticut so he could make mischief on Senate Democrats from the inside?
And, as far as his '06 re-election, Washington-insider Democrats only have themselves to blame. Their support of Ned Lamont was lukewarm at best.
You're on to something here, ETS
Reid, Pelosi and the rest need spinal implants
schlemiel? schlamazel? I know we can at least agree upon this
by any name.. http://reid.senate.gov/contact/index.cfm --->
Let Joe Stay!
OFFENDED???
Ta ta
This is Joke, Yes?
Lieberman is a quisling and a traitor to the Democratic Party - and should be removed from politics altogether, for ALL time.
Here's a Hebrew term to go along w/all the Yiddish being slung around today....
Selah.
Unpardonable sin after unpardonable sin...
Schlimazl
::groan:: Obviously No New Yorkers in THIS Bunch!
What Lieberman is is a goniff and a momser who thinks he's a macher - kind of like some people I used to work for, who think if they screw their own business contacts and employees over enough they'll get rich. Yes, he certainly is a putz - but he didn't have to become that, it was clearly there from the start, given his Nineties handwringing about "unacceptable videogames" and being the Democrat who agitated for Clinton's impeachment. (Why the Clintons kept siding w/him after that is one of those Eternal DLC Mysteries that we can hopefully just bury, along w/the DLC itself, in a deep hole somewhere for all eternity.)
Gevult! I'm a transplanted goy from the Bible Belt - and I know that much...
From another 'goy'...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_English_words_of_Yiddish_origin
Have to admit though I still don't get the use of the Hebrew word 'selah' in a post above, unless what was meant was 'Shelah' who according to biblical references was a son of Judas, now that would fit given the 'kiss'...
'Putz' is also right on target, and fits for Lie-berman Pull-o-see, and Reid. Spinal implants anyone? I'm hoping that Rahm Emanuel can teach the Dems what's needed as far as having the chutzpah needed to get the job done.
When is Reid Up For Re-Election?
I wish it were only Joe the turncoat
Since Economics is front and center and folks were willing not to make too much fuss about the bailout before the election, it is there that the rubber is really hitting the road.
Two names are notable by their absence. The first is Naomi Klein who has been in the lead in pointing out the theft inherent in the Milton Friedman economics, and would be a strong signal and actuality to making sure actual homeowners and taxpayers got an even break.
But even more is the real powerhouse of actual change that nobody could downsay having just gotten the Nobel Prize for his work on what happens when thieves loot a country's wealth. For those who have been living in a cave or watching only Fox news that would be Paul Krugman.
The folk actually chosen have been fairly obscure, but everything I am learning is not good things. Please Mark, if you have any say whatever, try and get these two in the discussions. The concerns of the whole World ride on what Obama does in the next few months.
If the Gang Of Pirates think that the only good Democrat is a dead Democrat, only a fool would think it bipartisan to accommodate them.
Respect?
Lie-berman