Get FREE BuzzFlash News Alerts

Email:  

The Third Debate: McCain's Secret Plan to "Get" Osama and Nixon's Secret Plan to End the Vietnam War

MARK KARLIN'S EDITOR'S BLOG

October 15

If you've listened to progressive talk radio lately, the biggest laugh quotation has been McCain telling his dwindling supporters on the stump, "We've got them just where we want them" in reference to the Obama campaign.

Who writes John's material?

Pundits are speculating about whether or not McCain will bring up the desperate and false Ayers and ACORN issues at the final debate.  But you know that Obama is going to see either of those dirtballs move slowly across home plate as he smashes them into the bleachers. After all, Obama made the unusual step for him of baiting McCain to bring such issues up to him personally.  That had the impact of challenging McCain's heroic "manly" image and also indicated that Obama was going to be ready to hit any desperation talk of Ayers or ACORN out of the park. 

Lord knows, Obama has the material to tie McCain and Palin more seriously to terrorists -- domestic and otherwise -- than the trumped up Ayers accusations.  After all, McCain's transition chief (which ain't going to happen) was a lobbyist for Saddam Hussein; McCain "pals around" with domestic terrorist advocate Gordon Liddy; and McCain was involved in at least one right-wing wacko anti-Semitic Iran Contra cabal.  As for Sarah Palin, do we need to say anything more than the Alaskan Independence Party (which is for secession from the "occupational power" of the United States) and the John Birch Society?

But I actually wanted to make mention of John McCain's last debate declaration that he has a "secret plan" to capture or kill Osama bin Laden.  This claim went largely unchallenged by Obama and the mainstream media at the time.  But any American with an ounce of common sense has to wonder, if McCain indeed has such a secret plan, why has he allowed us to be terrorized for years by not sharing it with the Bush Administration?  We guess John is just committed to confidentiality, eh?

Actually, like many people, McCain's assertion that he has a secret plan to get bin Laden reminded me of Nixon's "secret plan" to end the Vietnam War in 1968.  Like McCain, Nixon claimed that he couldn't share his plan with the American people because it would be giving the enemy an advantage.

After Nixon won an extremely close election over Hubert Humphrey, the Vietnam War continued for years. In fact, it didn't end until after Nixon won a second term and then was forced to resign from office.  We interviewed George McGovern (Nixon's '72 opponent) a couple of years back and he told us: "I think it was actually 40 percent of our total casualties occurred in the Nixon Administration, and that's too many. That's 40 percent that never should have died because Nixon came into office in January of '69 after campaigning on the pledge that he had a secret plan to end the war."

Like McCain, Nixon's "secret plan" was so secret that he didn't even know what it was, and we left Vietnam in chaotic defeat under Gerald Ford. 

The GOP has been refighting the Vietnam War -- which should have never been fought for a variety of reasons that are too numerous to get into at this time -- ever since the last soldier was airlifted out of that country.  The Republicans, like McCain, are upset not because Vietnam was a "just war," but because "American exceptionalism" doesn't allow for the perceived "loss" of any conflict, even if one comes to realize that it is unjustified, ruinous and ill-advised to begin with.

That is what you might call the "McCain Doctrine" -- fighting to the last person so that the U.S. can be perceived the "victor" of an unjust and crippling war, because "America is too great to lose to minor league nations and movements." 

But, of course, the costs of such delusions and a tin soldier sense of "honor" are not just hundreds of billions of tax dollars diverted from domestic needs; they are tens of thousands of Iraqi and American lives.

McCain has no "secret" plan to kill bin Laden or end the Iraq War in "victory."  Like Nixon, he is just taking our nation for a ride down loser's alley.

It's 2008, and we can't afford another Nixon-inspired "secret plan," because that means McCain has no plan at all.

MARK KARLIN'S EDITOR'S BLOG


McCain's "Secret Plans"

Robert Crawford sez:

The good Senator has not only declared a number of "secret plans," but also repeatedly said, of one towering challenge or another, "I know how to do this."

As you point out here, the patriotic thing for Senator McCain to have done, long since, was to share each of these secret plans or approaches with the American people, with our nation's intelligence agencies, or--as appropriate--with anyone who could actually bring this scintillating wisdom to bear on the crisis at hand.

That's what a "Country First" guy would have done. A "Me First" guy, on the other hand, would hold all this insider know-how, all this vision, close to his vest until it could bring him some advantage. Too bad that's the route Senator McCain has taken--assuming, of course, that he's not just blowing smoke up our .....

It had better be "kill" and not "capture"

I heard that Grampy HAD some secret information on Bin Laden's whereabouts when he went for his latest medical checkup and saw Osama's address on a box of dialysis equipment destined for Pakistan. Trouble is, he can't remember it and Lindsey Graham wasn't in the room to write it down. D'Oh! And if they "produce" Bin Laden before the election, it had better be "dead" because otherwise he might start talking about the free pass he got at Tora Bora and ever since. And he better have trillions of dollars in his pocket or Americans aren't going to give a hoot. It's the economy, stupid.

Simple reply

McCain: (mentions his "secret plan")

Obama: Well John, this secret plan sounds Exciting. I have only two questions about that. First, if you haven't shared it with President Bush already, then it really draws your patriotism and love of America into question. After all, why would you leave our young men and women dying in the sand in Iraq, just so that Americans would have to vote for you to find out your plan? And if you HAVE shared your plan with Bush, then either he will implement it soon, or I am sure I will be able to implement it when I am elected President.

Subtext: Go fuck yourself John.

Nixon's secret plan

There was a secret plan for ending the Vietnam war. It was reported by Dr. Michio Kaku in his book 'how to fight a nuclear war'. It was called Operation Duck Hook. Nixon and Kissinger envisioned the use of nuclear weapons on Hanoi to force an end to the war. The reason they didn't do it was that the anti-war protests of '69 made it clear that there was a sizeable minority of the US that wanted us out regardless of who 'won'. It was the protests at draft boards that also revealed the existence of cointelpro, and the fact that so many Americans were turning to direct action (rather than peaceful protest) to stop the war machine must have given Nixon and friends pause. Would McCain actually plan to turn the Afghan/Pakistan border into a nuclear wasteland in order to get one man? Is this plan so crazy that the Bush administration decided to forgo it? OTOH, McCain is clearly more of a unilateralist than Bush--witness his dismissal of meeting with the leader of Spain, a NATO ally, over the fact that Spain pulled out of Iraq. Beware of secret plans.

Secret Plans

Interestingly enough, Nixon did have a secret plan: he threatened North Viet Nam with the use of nuclear weapons. This worked for Eisenhower in threatening their use against North Korea if they didn't come to the bargaining table to discuss peace. Unfortunately for Nixon, the Vietnamese called his bluff. So nothing more was said about it. These tidbits are supposed to be documented but sadly I don't remember the sources that I read it in.