Senior Citizens Who Vote for McCain Should be Required to Renounce Any Claim to Social Security or Medicare
MARK KARLIN'S EDITOR'S BLOG
October 6th
Let's make it quite simple: any person over 65 who votes for John McCain should first be required to renounce all claims to Social Security and Medicare.
Why? It's quite simple.
McCain's largest age group of support (by percentage) is Americans over the age of 65. Since McCain and the Republican Party have as their main message (other than "we are the party of white people") shrinking the size of government and letting everyone sink or swim on their own, I do not believe that seniors who vote for McCain are entitled to Social Security or Medicare, and that's just for starters as far as government support of the elderly.
John "7-11 houses" McCain himself proudly collects and cashes his social security check (and we are not making this up), as well receiving a disability check from the government. He also has received government medical care (which might have otherwise bankrupted a struggling working stiff due to McCain's history of multiple melanomas) for decades. In fact, McCain's entire adult life -- except for a brief stint working for his wife's beer distributorship -- has been on the public payroll. In short, we the taxpayers, have paid for McCain's salary and benefits. (You would think that with a fortune worth over $100 million dollars, enough that he can gamble away tens of thousands of dollars a year, he might sign over his social security check to charity, but not John McCain. He's all for "socialism" for number one, himself.)
McCain is a glaring, gluttonous example of the GOP denouncing "socialist" government programs, but benefiting from them at every turn. There's only a couple of Communist countries left in the world, and the Marxist ideology is basically dead and buried, but go to CafePress.com and see how many buttons and stickers claim that liberals (and Obama) are Communists. It's like there are a group of right wing Republicans (that's probably a redundant phrase) whose brains are petrified rock, solidified during the Cuban Missile Crisis.
So here's the nut of it. If you are a senior citizen in a trailer park or even in a luxurious condo in the Sarasota/Bradenton area (just as an example: the former congressional district briefly represented by the infamous Katherine Harris) and you talk over your bingo games and in your barber shops about what a "liberal socialist threat" Barack Obama is to America, we have a suggestion for you: burn your Medicare and Social Security Cards and send a letter to the U.S. Government informing them that you are now going to personally pay your own bills for healthcare and want no more Social Security checks sent to you.
You see how easy it is to personally reject "socialism" in your life.
Oh, and when you get too feeble to live on your own, remember that you can't sign your assets over to your children and then have Medicaid pay for your nursing home care, because that's "socialism" too, right? So save up, cause that nursing home care gets costly without the government covering it.
And if the $700 billion (you know that it's going to be a trillion or more in the end) socialism for Wall Street scheme doesn't work and your bank collapses with your life savings down the drain, please tell Washington that you don't want them to insure your savings because that's "socialism." You'll just eat the loss of your retirement savings because you're a John McCain sort of person (not that he would turn back the FDIC insurance check from the government.)
Oh, and if you are a senior for McCain because you want to prevent "dreaded liberal socialism" from spreading and are disabled, please return your government disability checks to the Treasury. You can personally strike against "big government" all by yourself. Just send the check back.
And if you get senior discounts on public transportation, stop taking them. Demand you pay the full amount in your crusade against "socialism." And when you need rehabilitation homecare because you fall and break your hip, tell the "big brother government" to take a hike and that you'll pay for it yourself.
I can go on and on with easy, personal actions seniors who support McCain and the GOP "war against the welfare state" can take to rid their lives of "socialism." There are so many daily protests that you can do to increase your personal expenditures and get government financial assistance out of your lives.
So before you vote for John McCain and Sarah "I bilked the state taxpayers for daily travel home and didn't even pay taxes on it" Palin, please show your solidarity with their cause by renouncing and rejecting all forms of "socialist" government financial assistance.
Any volunteers?
I don't see any hands. How come?
MARK KARLIN'S EDITOR'S BLOG
- Login or register to post comments
- Printer-friendly version
Buzz this on Buzzflash.net




Technorati Tags:
Life without SS would be much better, Coward
Voting for McCain? Call your doctor.
I'll take on Sewcalledl's propaganda, Karl !
WHAT IS WITH America's millions of "conservatives" who DERIDE "LIBERAL SOCIALIST PROGRAMS" - even as they benefit from Social Security, Medicare, GI bill, put their children through state colleges, etc? Working construction in Florida - hundreds of "active adult" gated, up-scale but affordable communities - I realized long ago that the people who were the biggest BENEFICIARIES of New Deal & LBJ Great Society programs, were donating their FEDERALLY INSURED savings dollars to... the very Republicans politicians who would put us back in a Great Depression in a New York minute!
Worse - what about the RIGHTY BUSINESS GROUPS that benefit from our SOCIALIZED big government spending? For example - the US ROADS and HIGHWAY SYSTEM! _Only _ THE BIGGEST construction project in human history, the font of many wonderful, good paying "private" jobs... and the BEDROCK upon which ENTIRE American industries were built, industries like the uber-conservative TRUCKING industry, the real-estate, construction, development and housing industries (suburbs would be impossible without SOCIALIZED TAX DOLLARS building access highways), the Right-Wing AUTO industry itself, and above that.. the Holy of American Right-Wing Holies, the OIL industry = ALL 100% DEPENDENT on our SOCIALIZED roads and highways.
And how many Wall Street fortunes have been amassed investing (or writing bonds for) those BIG GOVERNMENT SPENDING programs?
All successful "Conservative" politicians - Strom Thurmond, Trent Lott, Jesse Helms, Tom DeLay, Bush, Cheney, etc. - got their success BRINGING PORK big government spending home to their consituents and (especially) lobbyists and donors.
Now, clearly, Righty PROPAGANDA _DOMINATES_ the national discourse on these above issues, but especially regarding Social Security.
Social Security should really be very simple: taxpayer are "taxed" 6.25% per dollar _mandatory_ contribution, 6.25 _matched by employerss for a total witholding of almost 13%.
IF RUN CORRECTLY, Social Security is NOT a tax: IS IS A weekly CONTRIBUTION to YOUR PENSION retirement _AND_ DISABILITY INSURANCE funds!
No one would expect State Farm or Allstate Insurance to GIVE YOU DISABILITY INSURANCE for free... No one expects any corporate pension fund or Wall St. managed 401-k to DISBURSE PENSIONS FOR FREE... THESE ARE all CONTRACTS WE BUY into and make payments on!
Social Security, ideally, is slightly more than fully TEN PERCENT of EVERY labor dollar in America GOING TO FUTURE RETIREMENT or DISABILITY INSURANCE for that working dollar earned!
THAT - TEN PERCENT of EVERY DOLLAR EARNED - is the kind of money that drives Wall St. money-men MAD with LUST & ENVY!
To get their hands on that WORKING MAN's POT OF GOLD, saved by MANDATORY government witholding from millions of Americans, the Financial men are willing to be patient, persistent, and relentless demagogues.
They will tell us "PRIVATE MARKETS CAN DO BETTER!" even though Social Security runs at a 1%, ONE-PERCENT administrative overhead rate - quite impossible for any private industry to match.
So -Righties WILL TURN TO TURN Social Security INTO A TAX, so their lobbyists in Government can FUNNEL the funds to well-connected corporations, banking, and brokerage houses. (Actually, government can and has simply SEIZED some portion of Social Security trust funds to pay for general government expenditures - this is LOOTING Social Security to allow for TAX CUTS elsewhere.)
In sum, YOU MUST PAY IN - government powers of taxation - but what you get back will be SLICED, DICED, and FEE'd to death by the financial money men!
SOCIAL SECURITY is NOT an "ENTITLEMENT" any more than your life insurance policy with State Farm is an "entitlement".
Once again, another battle where the "Lefties" (like Rep. Dennis Kucinich) actually represent the solid, moderate, middle-road American point-of-view, but where RIGHTIES in press, media and corp. financed think-tanks DEFINE the narrative & terms of discussion as anyone to the 'left' of them is a flaming socialist commie pinko!
In sum, Righties ALWAYS LIKE a LOW WAGES, NO OVERSIGHT, NO regulations and NO social safety net economy.
That agenda will ALWAYS lead to thousands and millions of Americans being tossed out on the street, whether in boom-&-bust economies, or as a 3rd world banana-Republic way of life.
This election, American voters can see that agenda, stripped of its think-tank, corporate media, and GOP candy-coated talking points. Unfortunately, with the incredibly WEAK Democrat Party, we are ONLY entitled to an opposition party AFTER Republicans and Big Business WRECK everything in sight!
People are really stupid
Absolutely ignorant rant
the most ignorant rant
Be more careful.
sorry.... we ALL get what the MAJORITY chooses..as it SHOULD BE
Democracy?
Plus ça change
65 and never voted Republican
Mark -
Do you have data to share showing majority support for McCain by 65+?
When Bush went barnstorming the country in 2005 to push for privatizing Social
Security, figuring he had election credit to spend, he was stonewalled almost
everywhere. Except for the likes of Paulson, I'm not aware of any popular support
for decimating Soc Security. Are all senior citizens half demented? I doubt it.
There are those who advocate "means" testing for Medicare. That's a really pernicious
idea. Nothing can undermine a good universal program faster than making it look like
it's something for the "needy."
Colleen Clark
Cambridge, MA
"Rich and Ignorant for McCain"
Before I learned all about
If McCain wins...
You have to believe that a
Great suggestions..
One thing though, as I learned from personal experience parents cannot just sign their assets away to their children to avoid surrendering them to pay for care prior to joining the Medicaid roles, at least not in my state at the time (early 2001). If any attempts have been made to transfer assets prior to allowing access to Medicaid are discovered those assets must be returned or repaid prior to receiving any Medicaid support. I had to prove this to my father when our family faced long term care because he wanted to try and save his meager life savings from "those bastards in the government" (his words).
Granted this was a number of years ago and I don't know if the law has changed, or if there are loopholes that fancy lawyers and accountants can utilize to side step this law. I speak from past personal experience as an average American. Also from personal experience I can tell you that the amount of monies paid by Social Insecurity is a terribly paltry sum and doesn't even come close to cover the average cost of housing alone, not to mention food and utilities. Another sick joke is the level of "Health Care" that Medicaid provides. Just visit practically any nursing home and you'll see exactly what I mean.
Dump Benefits to Anyone Who Votes for McCain
Any children they have
Selfish republicans