Get FREE BuzzFlash News Alerts

Email:  

Attorney General Mukasey Obstructs Justice: That Makes Two AGs in a Row

THE BUZZFLASH EDITOR'S BLOG

Mark Karlin

Editor and Publisher

July 17, 2008

Chuck Schumer and Dianne Feinstein should hang their heads in shame for wholeheartedly supporting former New York Judge Michael Mukasey as Attorney General.

Just like his predecessor, Alberto Gonzales, Mukasey has comfortably settled into the role of obstructing justice rather than enforcing it.

In particular, Mukasey has become just another consigliere for the Bush Administration, as is evidenced most recently in his letter asking Bush to assert executive privilege over DOJ documents concerning the roles of Cheney and the gang in the outing of Valerie Plame as a CIA covert operative.

As we noted in a BuzzFlash News Alert the other day, the tenacious Henry Waxman, Chair of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, had subpoenaed documents relating to the investigation of the Plame leak by U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald. These are all documents directly resulting from a DOJ investigation and therefore any of them potentially could have become public in the course of Libby’s trial if Fitzgerald had deemed it necessary.

The assertion of executive privilege, from a justice standpoint, is actually the obstruction of justice and a violation of a congressional subpoena. Most news accounts headlined and characterized this story as indicating that Bush asserted executive privilege. That is technically true. But it was Mukasey who officially wrote a letter urging Bush to keep the material from Congress, in defiance of a subpoena. In fact, as a Fire Dog Lake blog entry reveals, Mukasey may have also used the executive privilege letter to tip off Cheney and Bush as to what Waxman was looking for.

Now Waxman is considering holding Mukasey in contempt of Congress.

But that will lead nowhere because Mukasey has asserted – and we know that this is starting to sound unbelievable – that he will not enforce any contempt of Congress charge relating to executive privilege. So, he certainly won’t enforce one against himself by bringing it before the D.C. U.S. Attorney.

Oh, man, Mukasey makes justice in an old Soviet courtroom look good.

What’s more is that Bush has packed the court with GOP political hacks like Justice Bates who recently indicated that he couldn’t intervene (did someone tell him that he was a judge?) on the issue of the DOJ not enforcing Congressional contempt charges because it would upset the balance of powers. "Both sides have the same argument," Bates said. "Whether I rule for the executive branch or I rule for the legislative branch, I'm going to disrupt the balance." Of course, that is exactly what a federal judge is supposed to decide.

So what does a nation do when its Attorney General is obstructing justice and sending helpful signals to the defendants in the White House?

We don’t know, since he is the chief law enforcement officer of America – and happens to be as crooked as a cop on the take with the mob.

THE BUZZFLASH EDITOR'S BLOG


It's startling

For lo these past 7 years, I've wondered how these people manage to find each other. Is there a list of Republican criminals needing jobs? Mukasey was retired. How'd the Bushies know to bring him out of retirement? Or even to approach him about AG? I've heard that alcoholics can find each other. And of course Gaydar. But Fascists? They can sniff each other out?

When is enough, enough?

If the electorate is completely ignored by the administration, the legislators, and the judicial, when is it time to get out the pitchforks and torches? Vincent Bugliosi has offered a prime solution in his book, The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder but not enough people have read it.

Attorney general just another hack

Scumbags of a feather Flock together

Thanks, BuzzFlash...

your last paragraph nails it! Anything more said on the subject would be a complete waste of time and words.

No Lesson Learned

When will the American public learn the several lessons here: 1. Bush is a singular president with total power and control. 2. His Republican allies in Congress are in lockstep with him on everything. 3. The Dem 'controlled' Congress is nothing of the sort. They have no majority. 4. Bush knows he will never be prosecuted for anything EVER. Get over it, people. 5. Bush knows he will leave office on a high note. 6. The MSM will have a massive orgasm when he leaves, highlighting his wonderful legacy. 24 hours plus of how incredibly fortunate we were to have a Republican in office for 8 long glorious years. 7. No one will ever be able to tell the MSM otherwise - because the MSM is owned by Republicans without EXCEPTION. 8. History will only footnote his dictator-like power and control because... 9. Very shortly we will have entered an entirely new historical pattern: Peak Oil and Extreme Climate Change. 10. Both of those massive cultural changes will be so severe as to make everyone forget WHO WAS SINGULARLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THAT HUGE CHANGE. So, people. Forget ever prosecuting Bush and his friends for anything. They have not been called on ANYTHING so far. WHAT MAKES ANY OF YOU THINK IT WILL EVER BE ANY DIFFERENT. Congress backs him! You people are dreaming out your a.s.s.e.s if you think anyone will ever be able to change anything while he's in office or bring him to 'justice' after he's out.

Yuk.

I never thought of #6. Thanks for ruining the weekend.

Too late

Leader, your #8, #9, #10 are extremely depressing. I believe you are totally right. What good will it be to blame Bush, Cheney, etc. when we are wallowing around in the filth they left us........none! Some of us die-hards still have hope with the end of the Bush regime, but the sad truth is that although a Pres. Obama may prolong the inevitability of doom for our once great country, somewhere we have gone past the point of no return. President McBush will just get us there a little faster. Sure, it was Bush and the mega corporations, the rich & the media, but they couldn't have done it without all the ignorant people of our once great country. God help America.

Who is Mukasey Representing?

I thought he was the AG of the people of the US and not the personal attorney of the POTUS. His arrogant, condescending, totally evasive MO in Congressional hearings is repulsive. Impeach the creep for obstruction.

So when is Mukasey going to get impeached?

Impeachment is the proper course of action to deal with this pompous ass! One would hope that Kucinich or Wexler will introduce an impeachment motion on this con artist ASAP!

Impeachment, Amen

Feinstein will doubtless be "censured" by the Democratic Party in California, I believe over 100,000 Democrats signed onto a petition to that effect; too little, too late, unfortunately. After eight years of the Bush Cabal and their merry bunch of collaborators in Congress, nothing should surprise us. However, it is not the time "to throw in the towel" and watch the ship of state sink. These clowns are not immortal, somewhere there is an Achilles Heel that is vulnerable to the slightest injury and obviously we have a few untiring Congress folk that are still plugging away at exposing these crooks. Impeachment of Mukasey might be more "doable" and he certainly has earned it. The mood of the electorate is bound to get uglier. There are no quick fixes to the mess our leadership has created.

Only the second obstructing AG?

I admit that I don't specifically remember Ashcroft accused of obstruction of justice. And after all, he did declare himself too sick, at least, to approve Bush's torture directive. On the other hand, did the politicization of the US attorney's offices begin under his time in office? Plenty o' justice was obstructed by the political appointees to those posts, so I would have to research further to convince myself that Ashcroft's hands were so much cleaner.