How About a New Yorker Cover with the Editor's Head Up His Ass?
THE BUZZFLASH EDITOR'S BLOG
Mark Karlin
Editor and Publisher
July 15, 2008
I tried my mightiest not to write about the appalling and inexcusable New Yorker cover that provides a racist, right-wing stereotyping caricature of the Obamas. From our view, knowing a thing or two about public relations, the decision of The New Yorker editor to run the cover probably included the likelihood of massive free publicity: mission accomplished. So I didn't want to help them out.
![]()
But I got a call yesterday from a long-time reader (since 2000) who occasionally e-mails us tips and with whom we have grown close in that Internet sort of way. (I won't reveal his name because he is in the media business in Manhattan and his feeding of information to BuzzFlash could cause his professional life a setback, to say the least.) He was distressed by the cover, in fact in pain. He was concerned that, given that there was no context to the so-called parody (The New Yorker could have had Rush Limbaugh popping pills and hallucinating the image of the Obamas with a contented druggy smile on his face, but the Conde Nast empire and its owners, the Newhouse family, probably doesn't want to offend Rush and his backers), and that a display of bigoted images on newsstands around the country (without any indication except inside the heads of the cartoonist and New Yorker editor that they were meant as "parody") could help further incite racism and a fear of Obama.
More stunts like The New Yorker pulled off could lead to setting off an assassination attempt.
The New Yorker is one of the best publications in America in terms of political writers and content. It, unlike The New York Times news section, regularly blows big wide holes through the lies of the Bush Administration and the status quo in D.C. It has a stable of some of the finest, most conscientious political-government journalists in the United States, including the incomparable Seymour Hersh. Today, July 15th, a book that blows the lid off Bush Administration war crimes in relation to torture is being released. It is by New Yorker writer Jane Mayer.
So what happened?
We can only speculate that a combination of a desire to get free publicity (The New Yorker has nearly a million subscribers -- more in California than New York by the way -- and is actually growing), New York insular smugness, arrogance, insensitivity, and a horribly misguided concept came together to cause a Frankenstein cover, in a magazine that has been known for its droll artwork.
It's inexcusable, and instead of apologizing or promising that McCain and his wife will get the same treatment, the editor of The New Yorker has indicated, with dripping disdain for critics, that they may or may not do something similar with the McCains (which is not really going to undo the original wrong, just compound it equally.)
If the Obama cover were not so radically devastating in fanning the flames of racial and political stereotyping, it would be something to move on from. But the cover of the July 21st New Yorker (weekly magazines dateline themselves a week ahead so that they appear timely on the newsstands) will be seen at bookstores, magazine stands, airports, doctors' lounges, etc., for quite sometime. This is not short-term damage to civility, but a contributing factor to the inflaming of the crackpots in our nation and the nurturing of the lies behind the caricatures. In short, the images on the cover don't debunk or sneer; they promote the lies themselves.
As one blog that a reader posted on BuzzFlash.net suggested: "Well, The New Yorker has published some of the great cartoons of our age. Here's an idea for a new one: a cartoon about a cartoonist penning a cartoon, and editors approving it, all with their heads up their ..."
Sometimes the insularity of Manhattan can be as confining as small town prejudices. Living and working in the world's most self-important city doesn't give one the right to act irresponsibly.
It just may mean that your head is stuck up your ass -- and you can cause great harm due to your smugness and a desire for some free publicity by creating a gaper's block that can harm the basic civility of our nation.
THE BUZZFLASH EDITOR'S BLOG
- Login or register to post comments
- Printer-friendly version
Buzz this on Buzzflash.net




Technorati Tags:
Obama says New Yorker insulted Muslim Americans
Like Jon Stewart says ...
It's just a f@cking cartoon!"
Buzzflash Cartoon: Jesse Helms hung by testicles not offensive
I wouldn't be offended by it, Norm ....
McCain Dirty Yellow Submariner Y(es)man says:
I could care less if he would be offended ...
But more importantly, I almost missed it! You're ridiculous attempt at an analogy focused on Jesse Helm's testicles!!!!
Hahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahhahahahahhahahahahahaha..........
Moronic McCain Y(es)man
??????????????
Dirty Yellow Bellied McCain Y(es)man
Try that again in English, Norm ...
Moronic Yellow Bellied McCain Y(es)man
Thanks, Norm ....
Your mother has my underwear.
.............................................. Could you get her to return them?
Y(es)man
Thanks, Norm .... Re: the contact info ...
Just ask your mom ...
............................. or your sister. ;)
Yellow Bellied McCain Y(es)man
Just me, Norm ....
......... How many guys do you think they're bangin'?
Ohhhhhhh ................... I see.
Y(es)man, I know you don't share your sister with anyone
???????????
?????????
Satire
watching from overseas
New Yorker cover
THE BOAT CAME & WENT
LMAO!!!!!
Right on Buzzflash! New Yorker Should Fire Remnick
Terrific!
I like it
Where's the evidence?
"Raised" as a Muslim? Because he went to school in Indonesia for
a year or two?
1. What is being "raised as a Muslim" exactly?
2. And if he had been, so what?
Colleen Clark
Cambridge, MA
Mr. Pell Likes It
Ed Pell is a Pinko Commie
Huh?
bettysdad
TNR's Ryan Lizza "The Agitator" lent out to The New Yorker
New Yorker
Really?
How about some of your lies, Mikey
Since when do you have a problem with lies and information you made up? Let's see. Just a few of your lies about Sen. Clinton:
1) She was fired from her job as an attorney on the Watergate committee. Only she wasn't, as pointed out by none other than the accuser himself (Jerry Zeifman) and Media Matters. http://mediamatters.org/items/200804040011?f=s_search
2) She graduated in the bottom third of her law school class. Of course, a few days later you said bottom sixth, so it's probably even lower now. In reality, she was an editor of the law review.
3) You claimed she lied when she said she "helped" the Northern Ireland peace process. Then you claimed John Hume said she was only a cheerleader in the process. In reality, it was another participant who said that as far as he knew, she was a "cheerleader." Of course, many of the other important players in the process acknowledged the importance of her contribution to the process. Heck, even the Obama campaign acknowledged her contribution.
Then there's a myriad of lies by others on Buzzflash and other progblogs (the Trina Bachtel non-lie, the racism accusations, blah, blah, blah). Of course, I guess being in advertising you're used to the bar being set pretty low, huh?
Progressive?
No.
tennismom, I understand McCain is still looking...
You'll have to excuse Norm
His posts tend to fixate on his own sexual musings.
Been a loooooooooooooooong time for old Norm.
how About a New Yorker cover with the Editor's Head Up His Ass?
Wrong.
Not
Wrong
Bettysdad HATES the Clintons ....
Even more than wanting Obama to win, he wants Hillary Clinton to lose. He even said he wants them "ground into the dirt", and he will no longer support Obama if he chooses her as his VP.
He's not a Dem ....... he's a nutjob.
Y(es)man, Another McCain Dirty Yellow Submariner
My sister? She told me she was YOUR sister!
Hey ........ you should be happy for her, Norm. At least someone from your family's gettin' some.
As for the genetic defects, I had to get over that once she told me she was your sister.
BTW - Thanks for proving my point about your tendency to fixate on your bizarre, sexual musings.
Dirty Yellow McCain Submariner Y(es)man
Meds a little off, Norm?
Why would a "Black" family make someone a "good little neo-Nazi"? And "Pinko Commies" support John McCain? Do you know what "communist" means? Stop giving communists a bad name.
Hey, wait...... just noticed. No bizarre sexual references.
Wait a second .................... what did you mean by "Dirty Yellow (McCain) Submariner"?
Dirty Yellow McCain Submariner Y(es)man
Having "Black" adoptive parents ...
"Sign up for duty in Iraq and make us all proud of you"?
You mean ................. you're not proud of me already? (sniff, sniff)