Get FREE BuzzFlash News Alerts

Email:  

Was 20 Million Dollars Paid to Free Betancourt and 3 American Hostages in Colombia?

THE BUZZFLASH EDITOR'S BLOG

Mark Karlin

Editor and Publisher

July 8, 2008

A report from Swiss public radio that $20 million was paid to release three American hostages, Ingrid Betancourt, and 11 Colombian soldiers and police officers is being pretty much roundly ignored in the United States.

Not so the case in the UK, where the Times reported the allegation on July 4th:

But while she [Betancourt] was still in the air, the Swiss radio station RSR broadcast a report questioning the official version of the operation to free Ms Betancourt and 14 other hostages – saying that money, not cunning, had clinched their freedom.

According to Bogota, the hostages were freed in an elaborate ruse by Colombian intelligence agents who had infiltrated the Marxist Farc rebels holding them.

But RSR said that the 15 hostages “were in reality ransomed for a high price, and the whole operation afterwards was a set-up". Citing a source "close to the events, reliable and tested many times in recent years", it said that the United States – which had three citizens among those freed – was behind the deal and put the price at $20 million.

The Colombian Foreign Ministry furiously denied the allegations, with a spokesman calling them "completely false." He added: "They are lies".

General Freddy Padilla, head of the Colombian military, categorically denied they had paid "a single peso" to Farc.

"As the General Commander of the Armed Forces and on my military honour, I deny that the Colombian Government has paid a single peso, a single cent," he said.

Please note the plausible deniability in the statement of the Colombian Armed Forces Commander.  One, if the U.S. paid the money, then he is correct to say that Colombia did not pay it.  Two, the money may not have been paid directly to FARC, but paid through an intermediary, or paid as a bounty fee to defectors.

Far be it from BuzzFlash to claim first hand knowledge of such a $20 million dollar pay-off.  But it wouldn't be the first time that the Bush Administration has claimed that it won't negotiate with terrorists and then paid ransom money behind the scenes. 

The rescue also comes at a curiously propitious time for the Bush Adminsitration and its "made man" in Colombia, President Alvaro Uribe. He is seeking to pass a plebiscite to allow him an unprecedented third term. Furthermore, Uribe is being used by the U.S. as a proxy opponent to Chavez in terms of leadership in South America. In addition, let's not forget that the controversial Columbia "Free Trade Pact" is stalled in Congress.  Finally -- and most curiously -- John McCain inexplicably showed up in Colombia around the time of the "rescue."

BuzzFlash wants to make it clear that FARC is a motley and dreadful "guerilla force" that is as corrupt and reprehensible as the right wing Colombian death squads who are killing trade unionists -- with a wink and a nod from the government -- in that nation.  We share in the joy of anyone receiving their freedom, particularly given the length some of these hostages were imprisoned in dire and harsh circumstances.

But the fact that the American media has once again unquestionably advanced a made-for-tv-movie narrative of the rescue proves, yet again, that our media -- particularly television -- has pretty much abandoned probing news for entertaining, government story lines.  There are far too many unexplored details in the official Colombian-American-French rescue account, and no indication that the American press is exploring any of them to any significant degree.

That is a dereliction of journalistic duty.

One of the few exceptions regarding the ransom allegations was the LA Times, which posted an article on July 7th:

Colombian authorities sought over the weekend to discredit a Swiss academic and former intermediary in talks with a left-wing rebel group who has been linked to a disputed report that officials paid $20 million for last week's release of 15 high-profile hostages.

A Colombian government official who asked to remain unnamed said Sunday that authorities suspect Geneva-based Jean Pierre Gontard was the source for the Swiss radio report last week stating that officials paid a ransom for the release of the hostages.

Officials have denied any ransom was paid and said the rescue was based on subterfuge and infiltration of the rebel high command. The notion of paying ransom is extremely sensitive here, since U.S. and Colombian authorities have labeled the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia, or FARC, a terrorist group and have ruled out payments to terrorists.

Meanwhile, Colombian Defense Minister Juan Manuel Santos told the newspaper El Tiempo that captured rebel computer files name Gontard as the courier for $480,000 seized by Costa Rican police at the behest of the Colombian government this year from a FARC hide-out in San Jose, the Costa Rican capital.

What's interesting about the last paragraph, which we first saw in a Chinese publication of all places, is that the Colombian government is now trying to impugn the apparent source of the ransom allegation, even though he was apparently a sanctioned go-between at one time.

Finally, in an online New Zealand publication, we found this tidbit:

The French online news daily MediaPart yesterday contradicted the account put forward by the Colombian government, that its agents had infiltrated the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (Farc) and freed Betancourt and 14 other hostages through a clever ploy.

MediaPart reported that it had learned that the hostages had actually been freed through an agreement between Bogota and the Farc, in exchange for political asylum for Farc members in France and the payment of a ransom.

"Shock and awe," "Made for TV Rescues," "Jessica Lynch Heroic Action Figure Tales": is there any difference between fictional war flicks and manufactured news anymore?

We can't conclusively say, because the corporate media isn't doing its job; it's just providing us with government-issued story lines that hold our interest by entertaining us with "heroic feats."

But what if the heroic feats are as finely tuned as a Hollywood script, but financed by our government -- as they publicly espouse the hypocrisy of not negotiating with "insurgents" -- instead of some LA moguls?

THE BUZZFLASH EDITOR'S BLOG

Technorati Tags:Technorati Tags:

Standard practice for hostage release?

In the mid-80s I had my first full-featured computer setup at home and got all excited about sending protest letters to foreign governments about releasing their political hostages. Truth is, I got disgusted with Amnesty International. Their newsletter was all about sending in the money, money, money, money, money with about a 1/3 page on foreign addresses a person could write to to protest the imprisonment of political hostages. To be clear, I have _no_ evidence whatsoever but since then I've always wondered whether political prisoners are usually bought out of jail.

"BuzzFlash wants to make it clear that FARC

is a motley and dreadful "guerilla force" that is as corrupt and reprehensible as the right wing Colombian death squads who are killing trade unionists -- with a wink and a nod from the government -- in that nation." What a bullshit caveat. Farc is opposing Drug Cartels, the CIA, the DEA, and corporatist death squads. What do you want, a pacifist revolution? Gandhi wasn't facing the opponents Farc is facing. If he was he would have been assassinated before he even got started. Revolution is a dirty business. Guerrilla warfare isn't pretty, or nice. Farc are no angels by any means, nor are they even the ideal, but they are not as bad as the drug cartel controlled government, the CIA, the DEA, or the fascist death squads. There were places in Southern Colombia where a person couldn't go out on the street in the middle of the day without being raped, robbed, or beaten. There is security there now because of farc. Unfortunately, in Colombia, the struggle can't always be a noble exercise of civility.

Previous offer of payment

U.S. and Colombian authorities have labeled the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia, or FARC, a terrorist group and have ruled out payments to terrorists.

This statement is simply false. In March of 2008, Uribe himself offered FARC $100 million for the release of all hostages.

Colombian President Alvaro Uribe has said he would pay cash to the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) for release of hundreds of hostages from its captivity. He said he would pay the amount from a fund of $100 million for the release of hostages, including former politician Ingrid Betancourt, many of whom were held by the group for several years.

The MSM propaganda machine!

The government, and the media, must think the public are really stupid! This whole rescue movie was as contrived, and easily seen through as all the rest of the propaganda schemes dreamed up by our crooked government! The hostages who were interviewed by the media were first debriefed by the FEDS, and not allowed to speak until they agreed to follow the government script. The statement by the one hostage who blasted FARC, sounded like something that Karl Rove would dream up. It was so phony, that only a kool aid drinker would believe it was sincere. As far as McLame being in Columbia, just in time to share the limelight! My God!! What a pathetic little mentally disturbed idiot he is, to think that people would believe it just wasn't a photo op! And, if I recall in one of the news clips, wasn't that Joe LIEberman lurking in the background? I guess he went along for the ride in case McLame once again needed someone to whisper in his ear to correct a potential gaff! Thankfully, the American people are no longer paying attention to the propaganda being spewed over what used to be the public airwaves! The harder things get, the more people wake up. It is finally time for the citizens in this country to get together to remove and imprison the crooks in government who are destroying America! The alternative is to KISS DEMOCRACY GOODBYE.

Hostage release - not rescue

To its credit, BuzzFlash has been on this since the event happened, as have BuzzFlash.net contributors. There's much to speculate about, especially if you "connect the dots." A super-conspiracy can be built up, with the U.S. planning attacks on Venezuela, via the Fourth Fleet. Will try to get that together.. but in the meantime, it's good to see more and more news people getting on board the "backlash" to ths obvious scam. McClatchy is on it -- On BuzzFlash.net check out INSIDE SOUTH AMERICA: Betancourt rescue: The backlash begins-McClatchy News http://www.buzzflash.net/story.php?id=58681 (you probably will have to paste the url into your browser -- this part of the Buzzflash comunity is a bit behind the curve on the use of urls.)

Anybody remember how they cut Jimmy Carter's throat?

Now they did just that - pre-emptively - trying to prove that presidential hopeful McCain is safer for the country than presidential hopeful Obama.

I sincerely hope EVERYBODY remembers that the hostages were taken on bushwa's watch.

Also, the current misadministration and the presidential hopeful McCain is dealing with terrorists.

So much for the war on terror, right? All it takes is some taxpayers' money, and lo and behold, the hostages are free to go. With a big front page story about miraculous recovery of hostages by some pachyderm heroes...

Just a co-inky-dink folks !!

"...Finally -- and most curiously -- John McCain inexplicably showed up in Colombia around the time of the "rescue." _______________ June 24, 2008 - McCain announces trip to Colombia and Mexico Posted: 06:55 PM ET - From CNN Political Producer Peter Hamby RIVERSIDE, California (CNN) – John McCain announced Tuesday that he will travel to Colombia and Mexico next week...called Colombia a “vital ally” and praised the “enormous battle that they are waging against the drug cartels which have had such a damaging effect on their country but also on ours.” McCain also contended that Colombia is “succeeding in combating the FARC,” the left-wing guerrilla group that has carried out attacks and kidnappings against the government since its formation in the 1960s. Uribe, the popular second-term president whose father was killed by FARC rebels in 1983, has made eliminating the rebel group a central cause of his administration. He has also clashed publicly with Venezuelan president Hugo Chavez, whom McCain has called a dictator. ____________ McCain Briefed Yesterday on Hostage Rescue Operation WP - The Trail - Juliet Eilperin - Posted @ 7:16 PM ET 070208 ABOARD THE MCCAIN CAMPAIGN PLANE -- While Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) spoke repeatedly over the past 24 hours about how he would work as president to free three American hostages held by leftist guerrillas in Colombia, he did not reveal one key fact: Colombian President Alvaro Uribe and his aides had briefed him Tuesday night about the plan to rescue the Americans, along with 12 other captives. "These are very high-risk operations," McCain said, adding that the plan was unconnected to his visit yesterday to Colombia. "I would remind you that these things require incredibly long planning and coordination, etc., there's no way possible that it could have had anything to do with our visit that I could imagine.... It's a very happy moment." ______________ Hostage Rescue Is Happy Coincidence for McCain in Colombia By ELISABETH BUMILLER - Published: July 3, 2008 The timing of the rescue, which occurred while Mr. McCain was in Colombia, was in many ways a fortuitous turn of events for a presidential candidate who is using a three-day trip to South America and Mexico to try to show that he is a more agile foreign policy hand than his Democratic competitor, Senator Barack Obama. Although the timing of the rescue was a coincidence and Mr. McCain’s trip to Colombia had nothing to do with it, the event nonetheless put him in the middle of classified talks about covert operations with the head of another government. The talks about the planned rescue, which Mr. Lieberman described as detailed, delayed the start of a news conference on Tuesday that Mr. McCain held with Mr. Uribe outside the presidential retreat in Cartagena. In the news conference, Mr. McCain gave no hint of what he had just learned, although he mentioned the American hostages and praised Mr. Uribe’s efforts to battle FARC. “I thank you for the success you have achieved at great sacrifice on the part of Colombian citizens in trying to eliminate the flow of drugs and the struggle against the FARC and other paramilitary groups that have caused so much difficulty for the Colombian people,” Mr. McCain said at the news conference. “And I also want to urge you to continue your efforts, as I know you will, to free those people who are being held by the FARC. Our thoughts and prayers will always go out to the three American citizens who have been held captive for a number of years.” Mr. McCain mentioned the American hostages again during another news conference in Cartagena on Wednesday shortly before he learned the news of the rescue. ________________ CNN Betancourt, U.S. contractors rescued from FARC - 1225h 03 July A senior State Department official said the United States played no role in the operation, though it was briefed on it ahead of time. The official called the operation "brilliant" and "a huge success," saying it involved a deception operation against the FARC. According to Pentagon officials, Colombians told the United States about the operation in the past few days. The U.S. approved the plans but had no part in them. _______________ Press Briefing by Dana Perino or Immediate Release July 3, 2008 James S. Brady Press Briefing Room - 1235 EDT MS. PERINO: Sure. I think you just heard from the President -- I don't know if you've seen it yet, but he was able to make a couple of comments about the hostages being released from the FARC down in Colombia. The President got a call yesterday from President Uribe to let the President know that the operation had been successful. The United States had been working with the government of Colombia for the last several years, ever since the American hostages had been taken, in order to try to free them safely and successfully in a way that would not cause any harm to the individuals. And thankfully, that's what happened yesterday. We were aware of the operation in its planning stages. We provided some specific support, which I'm not allowed to go into the details on, but President Bush was certainly supportive of it. But I will say that President Uribe and his government and his military really get the credit for successfully freeing these hostages, because they conceived of the operation and then they carried it through -- with some support from us, but it was largely a Colombian exercise. And the President congratulates President Uribe and the military. Q After the U.S. learned that this rescue mission was going to go forward, did at any point any U.S. officials loop in Senator McCain? There seems to be a lot of speculation about why Senator McCain happened to be in Colombia right on the eve of this -- MS. PERINO: I don't know. I think this was long in the planning stages and I think the Colombians were able to take action when they were ready to and there was actionable intelligence to be able to carry out the operation. I've heard nothing to suggest that there was any connection. I just think it was a coincidence, but I did read somewhere that President Uribe let Senator McCain know about the possible operation when he was down there, but there's no connection in terms of timing. Q But you're not aware of anyone here at the White House or the State Department who briefed Senator McCain? MS. PERINO: Absolutely not, no. And President Bush yesterday -- just a little bit more -- he was yesterday getting ready for -- to do some of the Japanese television interviews. He was informed by the Chief of Staff and the National Security Advisor at about 3:00 p.m. or 3:30 p.m. yesterday afternoon that the operation had been executed and that it had been successful. And he's very happy for all of the families today, and he's glad that they're able to be reunited on the 4th -- right before the 4th of July. MS. PERINO: Okay. What I can tell you is that the whole world now saw who is responsible for releasing the hostages, and that was President Uribe, who deserves all of the credit. We certainly supported the operation and provided some specific support. _____________________ Hmmm... - McCain talks daily with Bush. - Bush was notified 10 days in advance (June 23-24) of the operational date (July 3/4). - McCain 'surprises' with Colombia trip announcement 24 June. Just a 'Co-Inky-Dink' IF you're a 'low informmation voter' ('idiot;) OR a NYT steno 'plant' (Liz Bumiller, sure sounds/writes a lot like Judy Miller, doesn't she?). I'm REALLY looking forward to someone/anyone with REAL investigative journalistic cred (probably a European) to 'flush out' the Swiss News Agencies speculation. Kenneth E. Tucker One PISSED OFF Viet Vet ('72-'73)

you got it

nice info, thanks Kenneth. Sure are a LOT of coincidences with rescue operations and stories of bravery- or Osama tapes, or terrorist alerts- when the news is so bad there's no spinning out of it, or away from it. The more I think about it, the more convinced I am the official story is "absolutamente ciento percento BULLSH*T!"

so sad

f-ing pathetic u.s. media. I really don't care as much about the method as I do about those poor people being free, but considering Lynch, Tillman, et al, one almost has to conclude that this whole thing was a Bush-op. Don't be surprised if that turns out to be the case, in which case we'll be the last to know. Or rather, MSM will will be the last to report. There are several other disturbing factors IF a payment was made, as in now terrorists might start taking more hostages for money, and that these people were used as props for propaganda. Illiteration aside... also keep in mind that the general was forced to concede that a U.S. spy plane was monitoring the whole thing, after insisting that it was "absolutamente ciento percento" a Colombian operation.

Credibility Lost

Those who control the information, control the people. Considering the loss of credibility of current leaders and the disemmination of "official" carefully crafted wordage--many times it's not what is being said, but what is left unsaid that is important- who and what can be believed? The lust for greed and power at any cost have become more important than honesty, integrity, and simple truth.