Get FREE BuzzFlash News Alerts

Email:  

McCain - - Mr. Foreign Policy?

FINDING A VOICE by Ann Davidow

 

How is it possible that failures and poor judgment can be turned into measures of success and recommendations for future leadership? Has party loyalty blinded voters to the stupidity and intransigence that have brought our country to an economic standstill and advanced foreign policies that weaken us as a nation and increase volatility throughout the world? It's almost as if we have become a parody of ourselves, a satirical take on good government and democratic ideals. Honest debate about how best to serve our interests here and abroad is often lost in a din of incomprehensible partisan rhetoric.

How can McCain suggest, for example, that Barack Obama is to blame for high gas prices? Do the people running things at McCain Central think that just because Obama is out of the country, anything they serve up will be favorably received, when the public is far more likely to be tuning in to videos that convey the excitement and good will the Obama trip is generating abroad? It probably doesn't help either, that while Republicans think it's a splendid idea to keep up a drill, drill, drill mantra, oil man T. Boone Pickens says we can't drill our way out of our energy crisis; he's putting a portion of his considerable wealth into promoting solar projects and other energy alternatives.

But why, in any case, would a campaign management team put out such outrageous foolishness? Senator McCain has been guilty of promoting a series of gimmicks and factually-challenged statements that fail to excite any but the most rabid of his supporters. His gas tax holiday has been exposed for the stunt it is, and even without it, people are driving less, creating a shortfall in the funds the gas tax provides for bridge and highway projects. And while, the McCain people keep belittling Obama for his limited experience, one has to wonder why, after his many years in the Senate, their candidate failed to come up with a viable plan of his own to address our energy concerns.

And why do McCain and his surrogates keep trying to suggest that Obama has been negligent in not holding any meetings of his subcommittee on Afghanistan? As Obama's Foreign Policy Advisor, Wendy Sherman, explained, the subcommittee has been folded into the Foreign Relations Committee with Obama chairing the discussion within that committee - - a session McCain did not attend. And while neither candidate's attendance record has been exemplary, McCain has cast fewer votes than Obama so it is ludicrous for his camp to make this an issue. Is the McCain campaign so disoriented and their candidate so disengaged they aren't aware of these things?

We are told repeatedly that John McCain is Mr. Foreign Policy. He served in the military and he's been in the Senate forever, and those two things should count for something really important, we are told, like being the next president. But, as time goes on, it becomes increasingly clear that Senator McCain is not all that well versed in foreign affairs and isn't all that knowledgeable about domestic policy either. How can anyone who served on the Foreign Relations Committee or, even just picks up a newspaper now and then, fail to know that Czechoslovakia doesn't exist as an entity anymore or that Pakistan and Iraq do not share a border?

It's hard to say which is worse - - that he doesn't have a clue about these and many other things or that he just gets confused at times and misspeaks. Whether it's his age or the fact that, as Chris Hayes of The Nation put it, there are lots of people in the Senate who actually are foreign-policy experts, but quite possibly McCain has been credited with an expertise that "just wasn't there." As the campaign rolls along the McCain mystique appears to be more a political invention than a reality. And his age is less the issue than what might be called his old-school thinking. Just saying you are a change candidate doesn't make it so, neither does claiming to be a foreign policy expert.

The American people have a right to expect their president to know more than most of them do about the workings of the world and not take them for fools who will accept half truths and gibberish for policy. As famously noted "You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time", but we are at the last stage now when most of the country is saying, enough! "You can't fool all of the people all of the time" and for those who keep trying to do so, your time is up.

 

 

 

 

Please respond to Ann Davidow's commentary by leaving comments below and sharing them with the BuzzFlash community.

FINDING A VOICE by Ann Davidow




good points tinker_toy

Even the "Democratic Royal Family" is regretting their support of Obama. http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/trailmix/2008/07/ dems-royal-left-grows-uneasy.html It makes me sick to hear the spinners doing their scam. Discussing issues like we can believe anything they say. Sorry Davidow, I don't believe you and i most certainly intend to votenader.org Lets take our government back from the sorry liberals and neocons who do not have the same interests as the American people. I'm sick of all of them. Remember when the liberal money bags gave Gore the boot and forced Kerry off on us so that whether a liberal or neocon got into the White House our middle east policies would be the same? Like they don't own Obama. Well they can have him. I don't want him or McCain in the White House. votenader.org

Age is part of the problem.

It is not ageist to point out that McCain is probably suffering from mild cognitive dysfunction, which is associated with advanced age. This is the likely explanation for his frequents goofs and is not a condition that we should want in a president. It is wrong for the media to cover up his frequent mental lapses. Since 1980, we have had one president (Reagan) with early alzheimer's disease and another (G.W. Bush) with mental impairment on some kind. The subject of McCain's mental fitness is something that should be discussed openly and sensitively.

as disgusting as McCain really is

Wall Street is favoring Obama 2 to 1, that alone should tell a 5yo what we're in for with Obama in the White House.

As for his foreign policy, Obama is not advocating withdrawal, he’s advocating redeployment with an unspecified number of residual forces remaining in Iraq, including possibly halting the redeployment at any time. In addition, he has not called for the dismantling of any of our current airfields or bases, or for that matter, our fortress embassy.

Obama’s plan would leave at least 80,000 “non-combat” troops in Iraq in order to 1) provide security for the people privatizing Iraq’s economy in the “Green Zone” 2) Train Iraqi “security forces,” School of the Americas-style, ie. in internal repression 3) fight “al-Qaeda,” meaning any Iraqi who dares to resist the occupation. 4) protect American interests in the region (the theft of Iraqi’s natural resources for the next 50 years).

McCain and Obama, 2 peas in a pod. The only real alternatives are McKinney and Nader.

you can fool the NASCAR dads pretty much all of the time....

where else would you find such bullshit BUMPERSTICKER logic being taken as reality-------------