There’s a surrealistic tinge to the politics of today, an almost insurmountable hurdle that subverts any possibility of reaching viable solutions for the troubling issues that confront us. It is we the people’s business our elected officials are chosen to conduct. Regrettably, the means to deliver on that mandate is often stymied by opportunistic propaganda and partisan contempt for truthful dialogue and the corruption of meaningful process.
The president delivered a message to school children encouraging them to make the most of their school experience - - do their homework, read, pay attention in class, be careful what they post on Face Book. But some parents, ‘enlightened’ no doubt by those strange eerie voices on the right, objected to their kids hearing what they claimed would be a radical rant. “I don’t want my kids being taught to become little socialists” one woman declared. In fact there was nothing radical about the speech as anyone who cared to listen can affirm. But what’s the cure for stupid? And how does one go about prying open the closed minds of those who listen without hearing?
A sorry display of partisan rancor emerged during the president’s address to a joint session of Congress Wednesday night. Questions may remain about the details in various versions of health-care-reform legislation, but when did members of Congress in the past hold up signs confronting the president or make loud comments during a speech? There were numerous occasions when such observations might have been justified in the Bush years - - remember WMD, yellowcake, solutions to our energy addiction which turned out to be a call for more domestic drilling, oil revenue from Iraq that would pay for the war there? - - the list is as they say, endless, though President Bush was not subjected to any rude interruptions when he addressed Congress.
But Representative Joe Wilson, R. South Carolina, sank to a new low when he shouted “you lie” as the president spoke. And his apology was the typical gibberish politicians often use to excuse bad behavior. “While I disagree,” he said, “with the president’s remarks regarding coverage of illegal immigrants” in the health-reform legislation, I apologize for my lack of civility. Basically, he was still implying that the president lied. How did a president of the United States come to be treated in such a disrespectful manner? Why is it suddenly acceptable for people who would undoubtedly describe themselves as patriots to engage in unseemly behavior that demeans the office? What will school children make of this; what will people in other lands make of such conduct?
In his remarks to Congress the President said “we must “meet history’s test” to provide adequate, affordable health care for all because “that is our character”, our “moral imperative.” And he said “when reason and civil conversation become impossible we lose something essential about ourselves.” After his inspiring words, the Republican response from LA’s Representative Charles Boustany, (a cardiologist) was about as lame as it could possibly be. One could ‘sing along’ with the familiar refrain his party uses to pretend they actually have a health-care plan - - medical savings accounts, tort reform, the usual drill.
Over at Fox Sean Hannity, supported by Michelle Malkin, criticized the president for not saying something positive about “the best health-care system in the world.” Some agree with that assessment although they add “if you can afford it.” As Barbara Ehrenreich put it in her book This Land is Their Land, “…we Americans just couldn’t figure out the technology for distributing health care to the people who need it. We left the whole business to business, and business screwed it up.”
There is a large contingent of Republican doctors in Congress, people who represent the medical establishment in close alliance with the health-care industry. One wonders why, if they are so committed to the cause of good health, they don’t continue to practice their craft instead of practicing political gamesmanship.
But at least one question was answered by the behavior of Republicans during the president’s health-care speech - - the looney-tune outbursts at town-hall meetings are in sync with their looney-tune counterparts in Congress. It is also the case that the cries of socialism and other departures from rational thought are the result of those who derive their talking points from the demonic utterances of truth-challenged demagogues.





Buzz this on Buzzflash.net
When I heard Charles Boustany's response I had to wonder
It was so-o-o-o obvious that the response had been prepared in advance and based on what the Republicans want us to believe would have been in the speech and had no relation to what the President actually did say. It should be quite apparent by now that to the Republicans, the insurance companies, the financiers and the other fat cats in that squalid cohort, that the average American is not a human being with the innate rights and dignity that should entail, but merely a resource to be exploited and harvested the same way that an oil field is drilled and drained. I am by no means a communist, but capitalism run rampant is no great shakes either. Every system needs its checks. Eventually, someone will escalate the incivility and shots will be fired. Let us hope that when that happens, instead of going up in flames, we will stop, think about what has been happening, and take stock of ourselves.
NANCY PELOSI APPROVES OF UNCIVIL DISCOURSE!!!
NANCY PELOSI APPROVES OF WILSON'S CHILDISH TEMPER TANTRUM INTERRUPTION OF PRESIDENT OBAMA THE OTHER NIGHT BECAUSE SHE REFUSES TO ALLOW THE HOUSE TO CENSURE WILSON!!!
SHE IS JUST ANOTHER GENERAL BETRAYUS!!!
SHE AND THE REST OF THE DINOS NEED TO BE VOTED OUT IN THEIR NEXT DEMOCRATIC PRIMARIES EARLY NEXT YEAR!!!
CAN YOU HEAR ME NOW?
NO!!!
Try it again.
LOUDER THIS TIME!!!
Thanks.
noise and silence
There's noise coming from the wingers and pap from the "center". Progressives are not heard outside the internet. So the voice of reason comes from the Democrats? Its smoke and mirrors, folks. The killing goes on and you'll get what Big Pharma, Big Insurance want you to get. As the day dawns, I learn of another friend facing medical/economic disaster while the whores in Washington try to divvy up the loot. Civil discourse? Parisan rancor? There's no business like show business!!
If Obama were a leader...
... instead of a summer camp activities coordinator, this situation would already have been ameliorated. To clean up an old schoolyard taunt, we need a leader - not a [corporate phallus] eater. We were led to believe we were voting for a leader. We didn't receive the delivery we contracted.
What we did get was sold out. Instead of bailing out the banks, he should have been bailing out the inverted homeowners by buying up their mortgages from these very banks and reissuing them at market value. Instead of wasting billions we will never recoup rescuing the buggy-whip auto makers, he should have begun funding all those "shovel ready" jobs he claimed would put Americans back to work so that they could pay their mortgages. The list of Obama letdowns can grow without too much effort.
I happen to know that the South is hard hit both by unemployment and inverted mortgages. Giving a Southerner a job to save his reduced-mortgaged home would take away much (not all!) of the rancor they hold toward Obama. It would have made a huge difference in public opinion. All the tea-bagging we endured in August wouldn't have rated an honorable mention on the news broadcast by KLAN - a Fox Affiliate - because people wouldn't have had so much idle time on their hands to be used up by Limbaugh and Hannity and Beck to rouse the rabble. They may be crazy, but they aren't all that stupid when it comes to kissing the hands that feed them! those hands could have been Obama's.
excellent post
seeing it all unfold is terrible, even though I thought i was prepared for it.
This voice of reason is tired...
This loud and long winded voice for reason and civility is tired, worn out by the repeated ridiculous robotic responses of the wingnuts... This has been non-stop since the Republican Convention, and they lost! Maybe we should send 'em a memo, "YOU LOST! SIT DOWN AND SHUT UP!"...
Screw civility, ram it down their throats, the response won't change, they will say we rammed it down their throats, ran roughshod over the Constitution, ignored opportunities for "bi-partisanship", whether we do or not... They will call it Socialism and compare it to Hitler (?!) at the same time they carry buckets of water for the Corptocracy, no matter how often we negotiate with ourselves or how much we "compromise"...
It's starting to sound like an invitation... So why not?
If we already have the blame, then why not the game?
RGJ/Dallas112263
Obama speaking to the Independents
Like it or not, Obama was elected ultimately because of the swing votes of the Independents. He has to hold them or the whole thing falls apart. The polls say that he picked up a lot of them on Wednesday night. While Wilson certainly rallied the wing nuts, he did anything but for the rest of the nation. Unless pressure from those Independents comes to bear sufficiently on the Blue Dogs, there's no way Obama can get anything like real health care reform through. If you were in his shoes, what would you do? Think about it. The complexity of the strategy is mind-numbing. And where it leads is, I believe, to some form of public insurance as a safety net and check on the insurance companies. He knows that there must be something like that. He knows that nobody will come up with another solution that is workable. Ergo, there is a good chance that we'll see something that will work, even if it needs more tweaking later as some of FDR's legislation did.