The Rift Between Teachers and Democrats Widens
SHAMUS COOKE FOR BUZZFLASH
The corporate media is brutally honest on rare occasions. Take for example a recent article in The New York Times Magazine, titled "The Teachers’ Union’s Last Stand" (05-23-10).
The title itself is surprisingly sincere, since it admits that the nation’s teachers are being targeted for attack by the Obama Administration through his “Race to the Top” education reform. And although the article has an inherently corporate bias, it contains many revelations that have been otherwise ignored in the mainstream media.
The article outlines the two contending forces behind the national education “debate”: the corporate “reformers” and the “anti-change” teacher unions. Who are the reformers? The New York Times answers:
“…high-powered foundations, like the [Bill] Gates Foundation…and wealthy entrepreneurs, who have poured seed money into charter schools.”
Other reformers include: “… a new crop of Democratic politicians across the country — including President Obama — who seem willing to challenge the teachers’ unions.”
Top on the list of objectives for the reformers — Democrats and corporate groups — is the creation of charter schools, which stand in total opposition to public education. The New York Times article speaks at length about the biggest obstacle to the charter school “movement” — the teachers’ unions.
Examples are given on a state-by-state level where teachers’ unions have stalled or defeated attempts of the corporate-backed “reformers” to shift public funding toward private charter schools.
But the article also mentions instances where teachers’ unions have made shameful concessions to the reformers, such as in Washington, D.C., Tennessee, and Rhode Island. The main concession is the job security of teachers. How is the job security of teachers and the creation of charter schools related?
Because teachers’ unions are the biggest obstacle to the creation of private charter schools, unions must be undermined. Unions are powerful because union members cannot be fired for engaging in political activity. Union workers are thus able to help organize their workforce and communities to pursue political objectives — such as saving public education — without fear of being fired.
Destroying teacher seniority is thus the primary goal of the corporate education reformers. This is the hidden motive behind all the media attention towards “firing bad teachers.” The reformers want the ability to fire any teacher at any time, consequently undermining teachers’ unions.
Thus, teachers are supposed to be rewarded — by keeping their jobs or with raises — based on their students’ abilities to achieve high test scores, regardless of the number of children in the classroom, or the poverty level of the students, or whether or not enough classroom materials exist to do the job.
Sadly, the President of the American Federation of Teachers (AFT), Randy Weingarten, has agreed to abandon teacher job security in recent bargaining negotiations. The New York Times reports:
“[The Washington, D.C.] contract…now makes it possible… to fire any teacher with tenure…if the teacher is evaluated as 'ineffective' for one year or 'minimally effective' for two years. The criteria used to define 'ineffective' or 'minimally effective' are, according to another clause, 'a nonnegotiable item' determined solely by [school administrators].”
Language like this will be used to destroy teachers’ unions. School administrators will determine that union activist teachers are “ineffective,” those teachers that criticize work conditions will be labeled “minimally effective,” etc.
If Weingarten thinks that making this kind of concession will quiet the demands of the “reformers,” she will need to think again. Giving sharks tidbits merely sends them into a feeding frenzy.
Indeed, the frenzied demands of the corporate groups to privatize public education are more than Weingarten can keep up with. The other, larger national teacher union, the National Education Association, has yet to make the large concessions Weingarten’s AFT has.
The Democrats demanding these concessions are creating conflicts between the unions to an unheard of degree. If a complete break happens between the unions and Democrats — as it should — the repercussions would be enormous. The New York Times explains:
“If unions are the Democratic Party’s base, then teachers’ unions are the base of the base. The two national teachers’ unions — the American Federation of Teachers and the larger National Education Association — together have more than 4.6 million members. That is roughly a quarter of all the union members in the country. Teachers are the best field troops in local elections…. In the last 30 years, the teachers’ unions have contributed nearly $57.4 million to federal campaigns… and they have typically contributed many times more to state and local candidates. About 95 percent of it has gone to Democrats.”
Teachers’ unions cannot continue to support a political party that aims to destroy them.
Even Weingarten was forced to admit “deliberately or not, President Obama, whom I supported, has shifted the focus from resources and innovation and collaboration to blaming it all on dedicated teachers.”
The Democratic Party is dismantling public education on a state and municipal level, picking each target at different times to hide the enormity of the attack, while confusing teachers, parents, students, and community members about the overall agenda.
Only an organized and aggressive response can stop the privatization of public education.
Both national teachers' unions — along with regional teachers' unions — must adopt common positions on the total defense of fully funded public education while also demanding that teachers’ job security be protected. A campaign that involves rank-and-file teachers, students, parents, other public workers, the labor movement as a whole and the larger community can be united around the slogan: fully fund public education by taxing the rich and corporations!
Shamus Cooke is a social service worker, trade unionist, and writer for Workers Action (www.workerscompass.org). He can be reached at shamuscooke@gmail.com
SHAMUS COOKE FOR BUZZFLASH
»
- Login or register to post comments
- Printer-friendly version

Thanks
fivefingers is your best choice
VIBRAM FIVEFINGERS,VIBRAM MENS are fit for travelling, you’ll have fun walking around different amazing and beautiful places without your feet hurting afterwards. You can bring vibram fivefingers men's shoes,vibram five fingers men's shoes anywhere because they are luggage friendly and does not occupies too much space on your bag.
idle fresh designer jewelry
idle fresh designer jewelry wholesale rapidly than its non-distressed cheap Cartier counterparts, further when very designer jewelry sale kin trust the curb cheap designer jewelry of a agility this designer jewelry expensive, durability is a cheap designer jewelry concern. Hindmarsh beyond compare replica Christian Dior for sale just now her handbag fashion designer jewelry occupation at the struggle discount Cartier on sale promote of 19. missy Pandora for sale due to has 46 shops worldwide and was the perfect thesis o
Teacher Union Members are Wimps
First of all let us set the record straight. Stop calling The National Education Association a union it is NOT and never has been. A few years back there was talk of AFT and the NEA merging but the BIG sticking point was allowing teachers bosses to be members of the union. The NEA has administrative personnel as members so any time there is a conflict between a teacher and a principal who is a member also they always side with the principal. That doesn't sound like a union to me.
Second, compared to other unions, teachers are wimps. They are afraid of a fight and having casualties (teachers who lose their jobs in the course of the fight). I was a teacher in Savannah, GA and a member of SFT (AFT's local) and in the course of protesting wrongs by the school system I was targeted for retaliation because of my action. I never got any support from the local and as a result I lost my job. You see some of the members were witness to my principal stating that she was going to go after those who had protested but would never come forward to testify. Instead they ran away and hid the fact they belonged to the union. This was a battle that could have been won and would have given the union a much stronger position with the system. Now they have to deal with "cut backs" and once again they are scattering rather than solidifiying. Next year they will have to work 10 days without pay (imagine any other union doing that, I don't think so) and new "accountability" standards that will make their job more difficult.
Third, now the national is wimping out too. Ok, I know that the UAW had to make concessions on wages and the like but that was do or die. How many school systems are in danger of shutting down totally? The national needs to draw on the AFL-CIO for resources on dealing with school systems. They also must be willing to do the "S" word. Yes, I mean strike! Here in Savannah union members are almost 50% of the teachers here. Imagine if 1 out of 2 teachers didn't show for work. Principals would have to double and triple up classes, keep them in the gym all day, or even worse send them home to very angry parents who don't have daycare outside of school. Ask for support from the other unions in the area because they also working for the school system. No electrical, plumbing, and construction/repair people coming in to work either. No lunchroom staff coming in too. Yes there will be casualties but no school system can replace that many teachers and personnel as quickly as would be needed. Trust me, the other unions will be very supportive. They were present at the protest I was talking about that got me fired.
Lastly, during the presidential campaign I had the distinct pleasure of working with the AFL-CIO. I got to meet and talk with so many union members and find out what a "real" union does and how it is supposed to act. AFT needs to take lessons from them and start protecting its members or I can guarantee that it will cease to exist. Teachers are fighting for their livelyhood but don't realize it yet. All the "new" ideas being supported by the Obama administration are not new and are counterproductive to real education in the classroom. Right off the bat incentive pay for having a successful class on tests is a terrible idea like for profit healthcare and we see how well that has worked out. As a teacher you get a class of challenging students (behavior, low achievers, special education, etc) and that teacher can kiss any merit pay goodby. Even further, that teacher must worry about keeping his/her job because of the underperforming students. Oh and it is all the teachers fault! So NOT true!!
I have ranted enough but my points are true. Teachers need to grow a backbone, actually support their union and recruit new members like crazy to reverse the tide. Teachers cannot be afraid to get their noses bloody. This is very much like when unions first came into existance. This is war and one we must win. Not just for ourselves but most of all for the students.
The Union's enemy is tenure, not Democrats.
I am 100% behind well funded public education, the right of teachers to be well paid and have the right to organize. That being said, there is one thing that most everyone resents and that is tenure. None of us in the business world have it and it encourages those who do have it to lose their competitive edge, become complacent and resistant to improving. Because taxpayers resent tenure, good teachers don't get the respect they deserve and the bad ones ruin it for everyone else. If they want people to respect the teacher's union, make employment contingent on merit rather than longevity and end tenure.
Tenure
First off, education is not a business and should not be run like a business. That is where we are headed though. Corporate schools, for profit schools, is that what we want? Look at healthcare and tell me that is where we need to go. If it is then don't complain when your child doesn't get educated because you don't have the money to pay for it. I lived as a teacher in the era of nontenure and your pay though you signed a contract for a set salary, said pay in reality, was based upon the amount of funding that was available which meant that if there was a 20% shortfall your pay was decreased by 20% while your bills remained at 100%. Also a wage freeze in economic times when inflation was double digit (17%, 12% 18% get the idea). In effect my wages were reduced by almost half. Tenure never meant that you could not get rid of a "bad" teacher. It was a protection against the whims of a principal. You had to have real hard core evidence before that teacher was fired. Would you have stayed in your profession if this was done to you? Also what you don't mention is that it takes a number of years to achieve tenure. Up to ten years is some states and never in others. Most principals will let teachers go before they reach tenure because they can fire without good cause until the teacher reaches tenure. Tenure was brought about because teachers had no union to shield them from their employer.
Once again, merit pay is a terrible idea, imagine you go to work and your underlings are behavior problems, underachievers, etc. and you cannot fire them. But the fact they don't produce is entirely your fault. Your boss will not support you in any way and constantly threatens to fire you. Could you work that way? Teachers do every day. When business operates that way then tell me how merit pay is such a good idea.
your anti union
The reason people like you are against tenure is that it is the basis of all good unions and because teachers with the most senority get the highest pay.The public sees this as a way of saving money by getting rid of experienced teachers,who have all the bugs worked out unlike many new teachers.What you are doing is destroying the unions by letting administrators fire who they want,with teachers not protected there is no need for a union.Be honest you are a union busting Republican just like Obama.
A good citizen is a stupid citizen?
And if a corporation can make a buck, while dumbing down another generation, that's a bonus, sheeple! With this two-faced one party system, this country deserves no less. If we need brains, we'll import them with working visas from India, or from Bangladesh. If we need workers who work hard, and are not afraid to get dirty, we import Latinos from anywhere south of our borders. If we need consumers, to dutifully consume all those goods and services, we turn to American sheeple, who will perform this duty without objections whatsoever.
Oh, and Obama and this so-called Democratic party, better not count on my dollar, or my vote.