Nikolas Kozloff: Anthony Bourdain, Coolness Factor Wearing Thin
BUZZFLASH GUEST COMMENTARY
By Nikolas Kozloff
Celebrity Anthony Bourdain has never made a secret of his disdain for vegetarians and vegans. In his best-selling book "Kitchen Confidential," the former New York cook remarked somewhat amusingly, "Vegetarians, and their Hezbollah-like splinter faction, the vegans, are a persistent irritant to any chef worth a damn." After his book became a hit, Bourdain moved into television and currently hosts No Reservations, a rather unusual and unorthodox travel show that examines far-flung cultures and exotic cuisines of the world.
Over the course of his career, Bourdain has cultivated a cool, bad-ass image and during his program, he sports a black leather jacket. On one of his shows shot in San Francisco, he made a point of taking on political correctness by heading to an old steak house and feasting on prime rib. "To me," he has written, "life without veal stock, pork fat, sausage, organ meat, demi-glace, or even stinky cheese is a life not worth living. Vegetarians are the enemy of everything good and decent in the human spirit, and an affront to all I stand for, the pure enjoyment of food."
A few days ago, Bourdain took his relentless campaign against vegetarians and vegans to new heights on CNN. Speaking on "Larry King Live," the TV personality remarked that we were designed by evolution to eat meat. "We have eyes in the front of our head. We have fingernails. We have ... teeth and long legs. We were designed from the get-go ... so that we could chase down smaller, stupider creatures, kill them and eat them," he said.
The conversation focused on contaminated burgers that had sickened, paralyzed, and even killed some people who had eaten them. Bourdain conceded that factory farms and large meat processors had developed "unconscionable" practices that "bordered on the criminal." Expressing concern about chopped meat, Bourdain said "The stuff they're putting in these burgers would not be recognized by any American as meat."
Still, the popular Travel Channel personality could not bring himself to turn against a carnivorous lifestyle. "I think certainly we could eat better in this country," he remarked. "It would probably not be a bad thing if we ate less meat, if the ratio of animal protein to vegetables changed along the lines of the Chinese model. But to talk about eradicating meat is silly."
At this point another panelist on King's show, Jonathan Foer, rightly took Bourdain to task. Foer, a best-selling writer and author of the upcoming book "Eating Animals," declared "What Anthony didn't say, and I wish he had, is that 99 percent -- upwards of 99 percent of the animals that are raised for meat in this country come from factory farms." Foer added, "When we're talking about meat, when we're talking about the meat they sell in grocery stores, when we're talking about the meat we order in restaurants, we are effectively talking about factory farms. I think it's a wonderful thing for someone with a reputation and as much intelligence as Anthony has to come out against factory farms. The crucial part of the picture is to say to America, this is almost everything."
Foer is right about how enmeshed Americans have become in the factory farm system. Yet, the discussion on Larry King about meat and its downsides did not go far enough. Today, meat production is putting our planet in peril and hastening global climate change. It's an issue ignored by the likes of CNN but one which I deal with at considerable length in my upcoming book, No Rain in the Amazon: How South America's Climate Change Affects the Entire Planet (Palgrave-Macmillan, April 2010).
Here's the problem Bourdain and other blissful carnivores choose to ignore: the worldwide cattle industry is linked to destructive deforestation and our climate destiny. Worryingly, deforestation is currently the second largest driver of carbon dioxide emissions after the burning of fossil fuels. To put it in concrete terms, tropical deforestation accounts for a whopping 20 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions. The Amazon rainforest is of particular concern and accounts for nearly half of the carbon dioxide emissions resulting from tropical deforestation.
In the Amazon, the cattle sector is the largest driver of rainforest destruction, accounting for 60 to 70 percent of deforestation. To put it in concrete terms: every 18 seconds, one hectare of Amazon rainforest is being lost to cattle ranchers. As if the carbon emissions resulting from cattle deforestation were not enough, consider bovine methane emissions (or cow farts, if you want to be less delicate). While much of the debate surrounding global warming has centered upon carbon dioxide -- the world's most abundant greenhouse gas -- methane, which has 21 times the warming potential of carbon dioxide, is seldom mentioned.
In Brazil, rainforest cattle have accounted for much of the country's domestic demand in recent years. But now, the cattle and climate dilemma is becoming internationalized as the South American giant moves into the global marketplace. So far Brazil has exported most of its beef to Europe, though the country's meat may have qualities that some markets view as favorable. Indeed Amazonian cattle are certainly free range, grass fed, and possibly organic, depending on your definition of the term. Ever wonder where that hamburger you just ate came from? There's a chance it might contain meat from the Amazon rainforest.
In light of our climate difficulties, we're going to have to reconsider our dietary choices. The United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization finds that meat production gives rise to more greenhouse gases than either transportation or industry. Furthermore, beef is the most carbon-intensive form of meat production. Consider: a one-pound patty results in about 36 pounds of carbon dioxide emissions, 13 times the emissions from chicken.
In order to feed the world's rapacious demand for meat, Brazil has turned large tracts of land over to soy production. Soy has long been popular among vegetarians but it is now prized as a quick, cheap, and safe animal feed for poultry, pigs, and cattle. The Chinese and Europeans have become voracious consumers of Brazilian soy, catapulting the South American nation to agribusiness giant status. In China, soy imports have increased exponentially, in large part because of growing affluence and a shift in the local diet. For many Chinese, consuming meat and dairy products symbolizes wealth, status, modernity, and escape from rough rural life.
Though the average American eats more than 250 pounds of meat ever year, the Chinese are now catching up and currently consume 115 pounds. Per capita consumption of pork in China has meanwhile almost doubled. Though China produces a lot of soy on its own, it is now the world's largest importer of soy to feed its growing livestock sector. In Europe, demand for soy has skyrocketed.
Though the soy planters cut down some forest, their influence is often more indirect. Once ranchers have cleared land in the Amazon, the soy planters buy up property and move in. But as they take up cleared land, savanna, and transitional forests, the soy magnates push others such as slash-and-burn farmers even further into the forest. Soy then acts as a significant push factor and catalyst of climate change. The farmers who get pushed into the rainforest by agribusiness quickly find that Amazonian soils are notoriously low in fertility. After several harvests, crop yields start to disappoint and eventually farmers abandon the land altogether or convert it to cattle pasture. In addition to pushing ranchers and slash-and-burn farmers into the forest, soy magnates exert pressure on the Amazon in other ways. For example, they lobby for highways and infrastructure projects that pave the way for yet more deforestation.
In Brazil, it is large international companies fueling the soy bonanza -- companies such as Minnesota-based Cargill. It's a fact that apparently eludes Bourdain: speaking on CNN he remarked that it would be "ridiculous" and "silly" to replace Cargill, a huge corporation, with a food system based on fruits and vegetables. Bourdain has apparently failed to consider the nefarious social and environmental costs associated with corporate agribusiness. Perhaps he should talk to poor farmers in Brazil who have been displaced by soy production and must head to the rainforest to practice subsistence agriculture --- all in the name of fueling agribusiness exports and expanding the global meat-eating lifestyle.
It's perplexing how Bourdain, whose show is easily one of the most lively and intelligent on TV, has become such an impassioned foe of "silly" vegetarians and their "Hezbollah-like" vegan cousins. Considering all the disadvantages, perhaps one of the best things anyone can do to tackle climate change is to have one meat-free day a week and gradually decrease meat intake thereafter. It's not enough, however, to simply transition toward a vegetarian diet that includes lots of milk, butter, and cheese -- this probably won't reduce emissions significantly as dairy cows would still release methane through flatulence. While it may sound a bit naive to think that people will change their eating habits any time soon, such a move is certainly much less complicated than getting people to switch their mode of transport.
Tony Bourdain has a cool show though his overall coolness is rapidly wearing thin. Maybe he should channel his constructive energy into lambasting corporate cattle ranching and agribusiness as opposed to vegetarians and vegans. The "No Reservations" host has a great appreciation for traditional cultures and local folk. Why not air a program about how soy and our unsustainable consumerist lifestyle are displacing poor people while simultaneously fueling deforestation and climate change? Now THAT would be a show worth tuning in for.
BUZZFLASH GUEST COMMENTARY
Nikolas Kozloff is the author of the forthcoming No Rain in the Amazon: How South America's Climate Change Affects the Entire Planet (Palgrave-Macmillan, April 2010). Visit his blog at http://senorchichero.blogspot.com/.
- Login or register to post comments
- Printer-friendly version
Buzz this on Buzzflash.net




Technorati Tags:
ye old "think global, act local"
Massive agricultural efforts to produce the GMO soy, wheat, and corn to produce vegan mock-meat are just as horrible as factory farming. This same sort of fake-food will make you sick, give you joint problems, vitamin deficiencies, mood problems and autoimmune disorders. Been there, done it, recovering from it, moving on. Meat eating vs vegetarianism is not the issue; it is the way food is produced in assembly line factory style. Food doesn't come from a box. We are all human and no one is better or worse than any other for their diet choices. Do everyone a favor and stop purchasing nonfood that comes in boxes, and support your farmers markets, encourage your friends to shop farmers markets. The only way to kill the agriculture beast is to ignore it.
buy local and don't eat meat
Meat-eating vs. vegetarianism IS the issue when cattle ranching requres deforestation, inefficient use of water, energy, grain and soybeans and methane emission. Humane slaughter is a fantasy, so to ethically equate my occasional patty-from-the-box, wheat-meat sandwhich with beating and maiming, then killing cattle is, to me, disproportionate.
"Coolness factor" wearing thin? says who?
Bourdain's comment about the meat industry shows that you can be a carnivore and be aware of practices that are harmful to the environment. Unfortunately, for many vegetarians, diet has become ideology, hence the "Hezbollah" remark.
And one question I have for Nikolas--one that no vegetarian has ever been able to adequately answer, as far as I know: If we all decide to love animals by not eating them, how would that reduce the methane emissions and the demand for food to keep all of these existing adorable creatures alive? (Surely, PETA and their ilk wouldn't be for thinning out the heard, for the sake of the ozone layer?)
Finally, your closing paragraph is just too precious for words. You simply pronouncing something as being somehow less cool than before does not make it so. My experience is that ideological vegetarians live in an echo chamber of their own, in which they can imagine that they are the masters of pop culture...its too bad that groups which advocate the rights and well-being of human beings don't have the resources that are at PETA's disposal...
stupidity factor alive and well...says me
last time i checked, supply decreases when demand evaporates. fewer carnivores = less demand = less breeding = thinned herd (so I heard). no mystery there.
there is no reason to demean those of us who choose to live meat-free; I have never met anyone who eschews meat because cows are cute.
promoting vegetarianism is actually good for humans and the environment; wanting the best for animals and human/environmental health are not mutually exclusive pursuits.
the meat industry, to which you seem to be beholden, goes nuts when the poorly understood connection between meat and environmental ruin makes the news. americans, in particular, are woefully ignorant of the true cost, to the animal, the environment, worker safety and their health, of meat-eating.
and those pointy teeth of mine? they do a fine job of tearing up root vegetables.
I only eat locally..
I am not in anyway beholden to the meat industry, jigsaw.I live in northern New Mexico and I know exactly where all my meat comes from..Local ranchers here raise cattle, elk and even ostrich for human consumption..The animals there have a better existence than 80% of the humans on this earth and the ranchers out here are strong advocates for alternatives to animals slaughtered by Big Meat which is, I agree both inhumane and harmful to our earth...That said, I love cooking vegetarian and often go meatless, both for my own health and for the good of the earth...
Sorry if you found my comment demeaning (at least i didn't assume you were stupid)--there are many ignorant, morbidly obese morons in this country who consume mindlessly and destructively..Ijust don't happen to be one of them.
Respectfully disagree
"'It would probably not be a bad thing if we ate less meat, if the ratio of animal protein to vegetables changed along the lines of the Chinese model. But to talk about eradicating meat is silly.'"
This is essentially my attitude. Yes, the things they do in cattle and poultry farms is horrible; so quit buying frozen chicken and wal-mart meat. As with so many other things, buying local makes more and more sense, especially since, if you eat less of it, you can afford better quality. Or hunt your own; the wildlife population is in trouble because there aren't enough predators, so this is an area where you can really help at a fundamental level.
Imagine, helping the environment by eating meat. Heresy, right?
I don't go so far as to attack vegetarians, although I have had a number of friends who have "gone veg" and then had severe malnutrition because they didn't bother to find out what vegetables you need to eat to replace meat (or worse, simply refused to eat them, "I don't like beans").
The fact is that humans do not "need" meat, necessarily; we are not obligate carnivores. At the same time, we have these sharp, pointy teeth next to our incisors that have only one function: rending flesh. It would appear that evolution has provided us the means of surviving on more than one kind of food. I am not offended at the suggestion of vegetarianism, as Mr. Bourdain seems to be, but to take offense at eating meat is equally closed-minded.
But then, I didn't watch the show to begin with.
Wrong Focus
Tony Bourdain isn't the problem. It's those who sponsor his show, and those of so many others, who promote the continuance of the most destructive lifestyle the world has ever known. These shows - along with travels shows and other enticements to experience the upper income lifestyle whether or not you can afford it - instill a false set of values in their viewers, and generate a misimpression that things are fine and it isn't necessary to listen to those who prclaim that the end of the Good Times is at hand. Maybe to many there is a glimmer of a hint that they subconciously get this, or else why would disaster, space alien, and horror flicks be so popular right now? But these movies - and the subtle thoughts they feed on - can be discounted, for as Hollywood once broadly promoted, "it's only a movie."
And now, back to our special feature. Tony Bourdain shows us how to make Endangered Species Stew!