Get FREE BuzzFlash News Alerts

Email:  

Gregory Mysko: The Necessary Comeback of American Manufacturing

BUZZFLASH GUEST COMMENTARY
by Gregory Mysko
 
America's most valuable treasure, its people, and their talents are being sacrificed to a ridiculous dogma called "Globalization and the Free Market." Too many Americans are out of work or underemployed. And the only ones who aren't underpaid are the Wall Street executives and media pundits who promote this process that is bankrupting everyone else.
 
As the election season of 2010 starts to rev up, one phrase used by Democratic and Republican politicians over and over is "new jobs." None of them say specifically what those jobs are. It is an abstract concept. The mainstream news media has done a superficial job of covering the extent and dynamics of job losses while focusing instead on sad human interest stories of the unemployed and their financial struggles. And the reporting of the reality of where "new jobs" will be created is a collection of platitudes and repetition of business school palaver. But to people who have lost their jobs, there is nothing abstract about any of this.
 
According to American Manufacturing Trade Action Coalition (AMTAC) Executive Director Auggie Tantillo, "Running a trade deficit for natural resources that the United States lacks is something that cannot be helped, but running a massive trade deficit in man-made products that America easily could produce itself is a choice -- a poor choice that is bankrupting the country and responsible for the loss of millions of jobs." That sums it up most accurately.
 
A trip to any hardware store can reveal this major absurdity of the American economy. If you buy a flashlight, mousetrap, or clothes pin, the label will likely read "Made in China." At one time, those products were made somewhere in the United States giving Americans jobs. Now those factories are shut down and the most rudimentary products we buy come from China or elsewhere. Unemployment is about 10 percent. And economists wonder why this particular recession is so severe? Mousetraps imported from China? Really?
 
But to those who complain, McGraw-Hill Companies CEO Harold McGraw has an answer: "Dislocated workers as well as those just entering the work force must have access to education and training to acquire the skills they need to secure high-paying jobs." That is all you need to know. Of course, like other globalization boosters, McGraw neglects to outline exactly what those "high-paying jobs" would be or what college curriculums are needed. It's just more theoretical hype.
 
The solution to the employment crisis in the United States is very simple: To bring back jobs and prosperity to the United States, we must bring back American manufacturing. As a nation, Americans need to again start making the basic products we consume.
 
That is easy to say, yet hard to bring to reality. There are those, such as regular readers of the Wall Street Journal, who will laugh off this suggestion. However, the rest of us who have been deeply affected by the mistakes of the Bush years need to start looking objectively at the damage done to the country by the loss of manufacturing jobs.
 
Since the election of Ronald Reagan in 1980, the leaders of corporate America have been shifting manufacturing out of the United States. How did this happen? There are many reasons combined under one major premise: Keeping factories in America open cuts into the paychecks of the executives running those operations. Forget about maximizing shareholder value. Executives don't care about shareholders. The major motivation to outsource manufacturing is to maximize the bonuses of the top executives and their direct reports. They have been the only true beneficiaries of off-shoring no matter what the free market cheerleaders of globalization say in the media.
 
Another major motivation to shut down American factories is to eliminate the need for the bothersome environmental regulations that countries such as China and Mexico don't have. Production waste and chemicals can be cheaply disposed without following U.S. environmental laws.
 
And American wages are too high they say, even in non-union locations, to satisfy these economic captains. Moving production to countries with a docile workforce controlled by oppressive governments makes perfect sense. The results are long hours, few days off, child workers. Slave wages too. No union issues would be found there. Pass the savings on to the bonus checks.
 
In the meantime, American skill sets are rapidly evaporating. This is very critical for the long-term economic survival of the country. How many people will be left in 15 years who know how to setup and use machinery to make shoes, furniture, or clothing? How many engineers will be left to do research and development for even simple items such as toaster ovens or refrigerators while all that work flies off to China? The machinist trades are being hurt as fewer young people are learning those skills when all the work is in China. The old-timers with that knowledge are retiring and quickly fading away.
 
As manufacturing assembly work has been exported outside the United States, so have high-paying engineering jobs. American graduates from engineering schools in recent years have discovered the hard reality of globalization along with blue-collar workers. Entry level jobs are harder to come by for engineers who found the work has gone overseas. Engineering is being exported with long-term consequences being an eventual loss of domestic talent. Increasingly, in the last year, according to industry reports, more high level research and development work still done in the United States has been outsourced overseas to save costs for corporations. This is not good for long-term economic security. There is no credible defense for this.
 
Bringing these lost jobs back to America needs to be a very high priority for Congress and the Obama Administration. So far, Obama Administration efforts have focused on "green jobs." Manufacturing power generating wind equipment made in America was one direction stated. Solar power was another. But those particular "green jobs" will only replace a tiny fraction of the tens of millions of jobs lost. Americans need to be back to work manufacturing the everyday commodities we consume such as coffeemakers.
 
Speaking of coffeemakers, I had an opportunity in 1976 to interview the late baseball legend Joe DiMaggio who, at the time, was gaining new national stature as the media spokesman for Mr. Coffee. DiMaggio was proud of his involvement with what was still at the time an American manufacturer. He told me he made an investment with the company to build a new facility in south Florida during their expansion. "I am proud to use my good fortune to bring jobs to people who live in my community and help them to support their families." he said. If he were alive today I don't believe Joe DiMaggio would have anything to do with anyone involved with globalization and exporting jobs out of the country.
 
Statements from the business community and their media propagandists are pitched as a patriotic duty for Americans to go to out and spend and spend. But for what? During the Christmas holiday buying season, that call to open the wallet is even more urgent for Americans to keep those Chinese assembly lines producing microwave ovens, I-Pods, high def televisions, and the latest fashions in winter coats. A trip to Wal-Mart, Target, or Costco is nothing more than a personal investment in the Chinese economy.
 
Since the recent exodus of jobs, with one figure from the AFL-CIO placed at 15 million, it is inevitable that social dislocation would occur. Wall Street executives do not publicly acknowledge the devastation left on families and communities when they close down factories and their jobs disappear. The rise of homelessness has been reported in tandem with the rise of drug and alcohol abuse and the rising unemployment rate.
 
Reports from around the country show homeless families have moved into camping tents. Local governmental social service agencies struggle to help these people as they deal with their own budget cuts. As author David Glenn Cox stated, "Almost 10 million homes have been foreclosed on in the last three years. That means 40 million Americans have been dispossessed. That number does not include renters who have also been evicted." He continues, "The problem is not drugs or alcoholism or even homelessness; the problem is jobs. Strange, isn't it, that when America had a strong manufacturing base and a strong job market that we had few so-called defective people."
 
Off-shoring has been touted by the mainstream media and both Democratic and Republican politicians as the blessing of globalization that provides the benefits of cheaper products from Wal-Mart. Does spending for Chinese made computers, toys, kitchen gadgets, and coffeemakers do anything to boost the American economy by putting people to work? No. But it does benefit that elite group of executives quite well, thank you.
 
We, as a nation, are wasting our national treasure of talented Americans from various industries and professions who are either unemployed or working in jobs not utilizing their talents and skills. It is time to start putting these people back to productive work making things in America again. How do we do that? Bribe the multinational corporations with tax breaks to reopen the plants they closed down? Give entrepreneurs incentives to open up new manufacturing shops? That is the discussion we need to be hearing now from the candidates for Congress in 2010.
 
This "free market globalization" touted by top executives and business media pundits is a dangerous pipe dream started long ago by devotees of an extremist economic ideology masquerading behind conservatism that has evolved into a massive scam that has bankrupted the country and financially hurt too many Americans. It is time now to have some common sense take hold and start re-opening manufacturing facilities in the United States and re-employing Americans. Enough of "Made in China." Let's start demanding to see "Made in USA" again on the products we buy.

BUZZFLASH GUEST COMMENTARY

Technorati Tags:Technorati Tags:

America is crazy & doomed

That fact is so irrefutable to anyone paying attention it needs no reinforcement.

So ......... what will the sane World & China do without us?

The Democrats let it all happen!

Any "solution" to this problem that doesn't involve replacing the corrupt Democrats as well as the corrupt Republicans is doomed to failure.

The Democrats, like the Republicans, get the majority of their funding from corporate sources.  That's why any suggestion of withdrawing from NAFTA and the WTO is effortlessly snuffed out by the Democratic Party, the majority of whom depend on corporate funding for their campaigns.

They're selling out OUR interests to fund THEIR campaigns!  Many of us find this unacceptable.

The Green Party doesn't accept ANY corporate money and represents CITIZENS' interests, such as single-payer health care and pulling out of these corporate trade agreements.  They follow a set of 10 Key Values that contribute to forming a just and peaceful society:http://www.gp.org/tenkey.shtml

The Green Party is the third-largest and the fastest-growing party in the US.  Virtually every country on Earth has a Green Party.  And all these Green Parties share the same 10 Key Values.  This makes the Green Party uniquely positioned for the international cooperation needed to stand up to the multinational corporations.

Yes, when you vote Green, your candidate will probably lose.  But it's an ELECTION, not a HORSE RACE!  Your losing Green vote sends a message to the corporate parties that their business-first agenda will lose them votes.  Your losing vote encourages others to start voting Green.  And your losing vote contributes to the mere 5% needed to get matching Federal funds for the Green Party in the next election.

Pretty good for a "losing" vote!  And a lot better than a losing ticket at the race track.

VOTE GREEN!

What jobs?

What jobs would you bring back? 

I really don't think it's going to be possible to bring manufacturing jobs back.  I completely get what you're saying, but let's be realistic.  I recently visited the countries where my five favorite items of clothing were made.  I was blown away by how labor intensive the process is.  85 people have a hand in sewing together a pair of blue jeans. 85!  And that doesn't count the room of girls who fray the pockets and and put holes in jeans with grinding stones by hand.  They get paid $50/month. We can't compete with that.  Not even if they were paid 5x's that amount.

The garment inudstry isn't coming back.  So, what industries do you think could come back.

 

--- Kelsey Timmerman Author of "Where Am I Wearing? A Global Tour to the Countries, Factories, and People That Make Our Clothes."

Jobs need to come back home

Sounds like you are a spokesman for the garment industry.  What is that corporate party line these days? "Manufacturing jobs are gone forever and never coming back."

Who funded your plane tickets and expenses to the Third World so you can tell us to forget about opening up factories again?  Just wondering.  There are millions of more jobs gone in many other industries.  Perhaps you can write a book by travelling around the United States and having dinner with those unemployed whose job "isn't coming back". Yah-sure.

Americans are also the problem

We, the people, are also part of the problem.  We continue to buy all of the imported stuff on the shelves.  Next time you go to a store, look at the country of origin labeling.  If there is a Made in USA choice BUY IT.  If there is no Made in USA choice, complain to the store manager!  As long as no one complains, there is no problem.

We should also start demanding that our representatives in Washington start working for US again instead of doing everything in their power to make Walmart more profitable.  We need to tell them to get rid of the "free trade" agreements.   "Free trade" agreements basically say that other countries can dump their products in the US and we have little to no access to their markets...sounds really "free" to me.

We need FAIR Trade agreements.  We need to reimpose tarriffs that served this country extremely well for 200 years.  When we got rid of tarriffs we also started losing our high paying manufacturing jobs and turned this country into one filled with low wage service workers.  The only ones that have benefitted are the top 5%.  The rest of us have been told to bend over, grab our ankles and say "Thank You" for allowing them that priviledge.

The "free traders" argue that bringing back tarriffs would cause a trade war.  "Trade war" is another way of saying lowering their stratospheric incomes a little.   We, as a nation, created the strongest economy on Earth with tarriffs on our imports that kept Americans healthy, wealthy and EMPLOYED.

    As a resident of

    As a resident of western Pennsylvania, the once major manufacturing Pittsburgh area, I still feel desolation in viewing the miles of abandoned factories that are everywhere here.  My father, a skilled laborer with no higher education made a very good living for our family in the fifties and sixties and sent his children to college (my mother began working outside the home by choice, rather than neccessity and so provided some additional luxiuries.)    Your article sums up our current situation wonderfully, if tragically.  How short-sighted to destroy an entire economy for bigger profits in the here and now(of course, the spoiled offspring will benefit. )

      Talk about  unimaginable greed and ever more  immediate gratification.  How much more can the tiny top percentage of our richest expect?  I was fortunate enough to quite working and become a stay-at-home mom during my daughter's pre,-school years.  My now adult daughter, the college educated child of two college educated parents, has had little luck in finding the sort of job that was found without question in her parents' era.  Fortunately she is working in the field she chose; unfortunately she is working for a very small-scale business depending on (hopefully) paying clients for income and no benefits.

  Despite being only a few courses and a dissertation short of a doctorate (and there are many unemployed doctorates) in my field, I retired, took early Social Security and am working  part-time retail to keep busy and supplement my income.

Yep, things are great out here.