Get FREE BuzzFlash News Alerts

Email:  

David Calamoneri: And are public education, taxpayer-paid police, and fire departments examples of "socialism"?

A BUZZFLASH READER CONTRIBUTION
by David Calamoneri

After reports of 651,000 more jobs being lost in February, the national unemployment rate is now officially 8.1% and climbing. Unemployment is over 10% in California. Michigan's is at 11.6%. Seeing lines of suits going around the block at "job fairs" make one realize that the Obama Administration, and the 111th Congress, extension of unemployment benefits was a good idea, as was increasing funding for food stamps. A record 31.8 million are now in need of them (an increase in 700,000 last month). Helping millions of children get health care through SCHIP helps American people, who have children in need of medical attention, while they face the recent economic downturn. Spending billions in "stimulus" on health care may also help in curbing government costs. If health care was either provided for or really made affordable by the end of a year or two (a dream of President Obama's), it would not only help families, hit hard by lay offs, foreclosures, et al. to not have to choose between medicine or food, but also dramatically lower spending by state and local governments, and businesses who provide insurance. Not to mention the whole easing of the strain on the majority of the American people who are paying in some fashion for their own health care or don't have any at all (emergency room visits of the uninsured cost of all taxpayers money).

Isn't that who government should be in the business of helping? The majority, if not all, of the American people. A budget that cuts taxes for 95% of working families in the United States is more than making good on a campaign promise. It is also a good start at making our government change its focus from helping the wealthiest 10% or less and the military to helping the majority of the American people and the military. Defense spending is something that's not going to go down. The Obama budget proposes $75 billion more in '09 and $130 billion in '10 for the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, failures 43 failed to finish. It is a change from the last 8 years to actually include war spending in the budget.

The stock market has been nose diving (with the exception of the uptick with Citi's profit news) with every jobs report, report on consumer spending, or on the housing industry (12% of Americans with mortgages are in foreclosure). Reports stating that the FDIC, which insures the money you have in the bank, may become insolvent, and AIG, the world's largest insurer, needs another huge chunk of money to keep insuring the millions it currently does, haven't helped ease Wall Street's slide. Neither has news that GM is no longer viable and may go bankrupt or that GE is in some real tough shape. In the past, perhaps the 80s, when unemployment was this high and the market was falling, the Fed cut interest rates, which encouraged lending and borrowing. Problem is the Fed dropped those to zero before Barack Obama even took office.

President Obama's budget represents a real change in how and on whose behalf the United States Government spends, but there have been other marked changes from the past. The government seems hesitant to let Senator Leahy further a truth commission to investigate the laws failure 43 and his minions "may have" committed in prosecuting their war on the noun terror (see warrantless [FISA included] wiretapping, torture at American detention centers, extraordinary rendition). This is a marked change in Congress's willingness to investigate a former president's extra-marital affair and real estate deals he and his wife were involved in before they became the First Family. The release of the "shocking" to some memos from failure 43's minions explaining how, in the words of another President, "when the president does it that means that it is not illegal", further evidence the fact that for the last eight years (at least the second half of 2001 through 2007), we were ruled by a "unitary" executive with no checks and balances whose concern for the Constitution was not to uphold it, but to figure out how to get around it.

But while we debate whether or not the truth is important and whether taxpayer money should be spent to help the majority of the American people, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton told Israel it did something wrong and did so publicly. Her words were not as strong as Obama's National Intelligence Council pick, distortions of which have made his stepping down the right move. The State Department also announced that it will meet with Iran and Russia, when it comes to supporting NATO's effort in the Afghanistan War. The Obama Administration has also reopened talks with Russia, offering to ease up on the missile defense shield in Poland for some help in getting Iran to not build a bomb such as the thousands that we and Russia currently possess. On the domestic front, President Obama is reversing failure 43's decision's on stem cell research and science, endangered species, the office of "drug czar" being cabinet level, and carbon dioxide as a pollutant. (Does that mean we won't be allowed to exhale?). And of course, combat troops will start leaving Iraq in September.

I'll leave you with a few things I just don't understand:

Why is it, only Jon Stewart of the "liberal media," tore up CNBC for their "cheap populism" rallying the losers on the "trading floor" while assailing the "losers" who have lost their homes?

How can you care about the Dow going down and be against bailing out big companies?

Hasn't the Dow been dropping since October 2007?

Did you know that $3.8 billion in "earmarks" in the $410 billion budget is .01% of the total bill and that 40% of those "earmarks" came from Republicans? I guess that's why 8 R senators joined all but 3 D senators.

Does everyone who makes $250,000 a year own a small business?

How do tax cuts touted by most on the Republican side, help poor people making less than a taxable income, if any income at all? Anyone making under $250,000 will see their taxes cut or at least not go up with the Obama budget. Anyone over that will have their tax rate raised by a whopping 4.6%.

How can you complain about the wage of an assembly auto worker that works 40 hours a week and not have a problem with the salaries of upper management of major corporations?

Does anyone's health insurance allow them to choose any procedure they want and/or any doctor they want?

Does anyone remember that failure 43's "choice" for the second highest office in the land went to a CEO of the biggest no-bid contractor the U.S. employs? The ethical bar for the current administration is exponentially higher.

Are the Green Bay Packers communist because they are "owned by the community"?

And are public education, taxpayer-paid police, and fire departments examples of "socialism"? Big Hat Tip to M.M.'s movie Sicko for that one.

A BUZZFLASH READER CONTRIBUTION

David Calamoneri
Hoboken, NJ


Well Played!

Nice work Deke. That's a great way to make that point! To Progress!

Socialized Education and the Medical Profession.

deke4 In the mid sixties when Medicare was on the insurance and medical profession's hit list I had as a student the daughter of a doctor. The daughter had a problem that required a discussion with her divorced father. After the discussion the doctor invited me out for a cocktail where he was meeting a doctor of the opposite sex. While sipping on our cocktails both doctors started to talk about the evils of Medicare tying it to Socialism, Communism and other isms. They asked what I thought of Medicare and I responded that I whole heartedly agreed with them. That it was completely contrary of the capitalistic system and that we ought to rid ourselves of the isms they opposed. In fact, said I, "We ought to do the same with the education system. If you think I am an excellent math teacher than I should be able to charge so much a head for each student in my classroom. They on the other hand would have the freedom of choice to send their children to another math teacher if they don't care for my services". They countered with the idea that you needed public schools for such subjects as gym which would have to be built with taxpayer dollars. I responded with the usual, "I'll let the gym teacher worry about that". Furthermore I added most hospitals are built and equipped with taxpayer dollars, yet doctors use taxpayer built hospitals and equipment for which they pay little for except their normal real estate tax. I could tell that I immediately became persona non grata with those two. I also became convinced that should I need medical attention, I was going to use my freedom of choice and not use their services.

Re; taxpayer paid police/fire departments

Your comments David were great. I often thought why Mayor Bloomberg and the city council went out of their way to use taxpayer money for the new Yankee stadium? This should have been paid for by the Yankees as they are a business and charge high ticket prices to their fans - guess that is socialism? New Yorkers could have used that money to better use upgrading infrastructure on bridges, tunnels, MTA, etc. that would benefit the majority of people.

Call me a Socialist!

I had a health insurance peddler in my office yesterday trying to convince me to switch our company to his firm. He started talking about how bad it was that premiums kept rising and how switching to his firm might help us cut some costs. He told me that premiums will continue to skyrocket because and we have no choice other than to pay them.

The look on his face was priceless when I told him that I have been writing letters and making phone calls to make sure that national single payer coverage becomes a reality. That reality would put him out of business.

The broker that sells the insurance gets 7% of the premium we pay each month, EVERY month. All because he was lucky enough to print out our application form.

Health insurance companies and their agents are parasites. They add no value and just make health care much more expensive. Single payer health care is the way to go. If that's socialism, count me in!

What's So Good About Private Insurance?

I happen to have employer-paid insurance, and I'm told it's so good that it's better than what most people have. But even if I have it so good, why is it that my insurance company can play doctor and deny me certain prescribed medicines because they consider them "too expensive" ??? Bring on single-payer and to hell with the insurance companies!!!

My doctor doesn't want single payer medical insurance

I asked my GP doctor if he agreed with single payer medical insurance. He disagreed citing that the UK medical system was going bankrupt and patients can't get Lipitor in England and France from the government. I didn't pursue the matter, except this is a guy who advocates alternate medicine, use of vitamins and has Pacifica radio playing in his waiting room. Lastly, I told him that UK doctors are paid $250K/year according to MM's Sicko movie, to which he remained silent. I guess $250K/year is just not good enough for a lot of doctors and this doctor specifically... What does Pfizer pay doctors to prescribe Lipitor, anyway? Can I get on this gravy train, too? p.s. NJ's State Motto is: "NJ and You, F*&^ You!"

Where'd your doctor get the idea UK NHS's bankrupt?

I just Googled "british medical system bankrupt," and "UK national health bankrupt" and the only items I found that remotely had anything to do with bankruptcy and the UK's National Health System were news stories from three years ago saying obesity could bankrupt it.

Find another gp if you can.

I bloged about it years ago

I blogged about it years ago

The British system has trouble because they have their own gang of pirates who seek to destroy the system so they can say it doesn't work. As you can see from the link those with the weakest conservative party do the best.

BTW the original definition of Socialism was the opposite of Feralism. That is all the parts of society acting for the best of society, with Government as the final arbiter of that accountability, and the Courts and ballot box the main arbiter of accountability for the government. That is Socialized as a Socialized Child. The Soviets used the Orwellian definition just as they used the Orwellian version of freedom and democracy.

Feralism?

Is that like the study of wild cats?