Get FREE BuzzFlash News Alerts

Email:  

Martha Rosenberg: Are You Bipolar? A Drug Company Hopes So

A BUZZFLASH GUEST CONTRIBUTION
by Martha Rosenberg

If 100 million Americans have high cholesterol and only 8 million have schizophrenia or bipolar disorder, how can AstraZeneca's Seroquel, not its cholesterol pill Crestor, be its second best selling pill?

Right after its number one pill, the Purple Performer Nexium? Can anyone say disease mongering?

For years, AstraZeneca has tried to convince depressed people they are really bipolar and need to take the atypical antipsychotic Seroquel (quetiapine fumarate), which is only approved for schizophrenia or bipolar disorder.

"Is It Really Depression or Could It Be Bipolar Disorder?" trumpet the ads, urging unaware victims to take a Symptom Quiz and find out how sick they really are.

Full color spreads run in general interest magazines showing a rampaging woman her mouth contorted -- think female Dark Knight -- asking readers, is this you?

"Are there periods of time when you have racing thoughts? Fly off the handle at little things? Spend out of control? Need less sleep? Feel irritable? You may need treatment for bipolar disorder."

Now the FDA says AstraZeneca can not -- repeat not -- market Seroquel for depression. In December the FDA denied approval of Seroquel for major depressive disorder and asked the company instead for more information in a complete response letter (CRL).

Oops.

Of course to be AstraZeneca's number two pill, Seroquel must be used by more than the nation's schizophrenia and bipolar disorder patients who number only 8 million.

Almost half of Seroquel's 2006 sales were for off-label uses, says Bloomberg news, including depression, autism, and hyperactivity in adolescents and dementia, insomnia, and Alzheimer's disease in the elderly.

Which wouldn't be so bad if Seroquel were safe. But AstraZeneca faces 9,000 lawsuits -- 15,026 plaintiffs -- alleging the company failed to adequately warn patients about Seroquel side effects such as severe weight gain, diabetes, and pancreatitis.

Even as AstraZeneca vowed to defend the suits on their merits and not capitulate like Lilly with its $1.48 billion settlement with 32 states over similar drug Zyprexa this year, more bad ink spilled. Documents surfaced in December that showed AstraZeneca knew as far back as 2000 about Seroquel's dangerous side effects at a pretrial hearing in a Tampa, Florida federal court for an upcoming Seroquel trial.

There was "reasonable evidence to suggest Seroquel therapy can cause" diabetes and related conditions documents show, Wayne Geller, AstraZeneca's Global Safety Officer, wrote after analyzing available studies and internal trials, says Bloomberg news.

Created in 1988 and approved for schizophrenia in 1997, Seroquel had an "efficient" journey from R&D to sales. But in 2005, an article in the New England Journal of Medicine found Seroquel and other atypical antipsychotics except one had no advantage over the older antipsychotics such as Haldol and Thorazine, including the reduction in rigidity and tremors, which was sold as their advantage over the old drugs!

The same year, an article in the British Medical Journal found Seroquel and a similar atypical antipsychotic were ineffective in reducing agitation among Alzheimer's patients and actually made cognitive functioning worse.

And in AstraZeneca's own clinical trials, 2.4 percent of people who began treatment with normal blood sugar became technically diabetic after 52 weeks on Seroquel, plaintiff lawyer Paul Pennock testified at the Tampa pretrial hearing -- almost a 70 percent increase over those not taking the drug.

Nor can AstraZeneca claim it has marketed Seroquel legally and for approved uses only. On Thursday, January 3, 2008, an AstraZeneca sales rep "made an unsolicited sales call to a physician at his office" and "stated that Seroquel was approved for treatment of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD)," charges a letter in December sent to James L. Gaskil, Pharm.D., Director of AstraZeneca's Promotional Regulatory Affairs from FDA Regulatory Review Officer Amy Toscano, Pharm.D.

When the physician asked for written information, the rep sent a mailing with "information about Seroquel and Seroquel XR's use for MDD, and included summaries of eight clinical trials with referenced citations. This mailing was not the result of an unsolicited request by the physician, but rather was prompted by the sales representative's statements," charges the FDA.

AstraZeneca reps were even coached to sell product using the Winnie the Pooh figures Tigger -- bipolar! -- and Eeyore -- depressed! -- reports the pharma site Pharmalot.

The characterizations could come in handy. In December the AstraZeneca sought approval from the FDA for its ulcer drug Nexium for the "overlooked GERD population" of "patients ages 0 to 1 year old." Yes, infants!

"While some reflux and regurgitation are normal in infants and may not require medical treatment," says Marta Illueca, MD, AstraZeneca's Nexium Brand Medical Director, "Close medical supervision is key in the appropriate diagnosis and choice of treatment for these infants."

They may have bipolar disorder too.

A BUZZFLASH GUEST CONTRIBUTION

Martha Rosenberg is a Staff Cartoonist for the Evanston Roundtable.

 

Martha Rosenberg: Are You Bipolar? A Drug Company Hopes So

Additional Help

Most people don't realize that bipolar can be treated more effectively with proper medication and with structured guidance. Cynthia Sabotka, author of "Life is Like a Line," which exposes the difficulties of mental health and the prospects of survival. It is the most vivid and helpful description of living with bipolar disorder I have ever read.

Drugs Under Investigation

Currently, across the nation at secret biochemical research centers, prescription drugs are being studied to ascertain whether or not compunds have been added to cause additional ailments, which in turn can be treated by more precriptions. In simple words, as has been suspected for more than two decades, are drug companies giving people more ailments in order to sell more remedies and make big bucks? The interest began in 1982 when whistleblowers from major drug manufacturers came foreward to warn that the multi-billion dollar a year industry was not interested in finding cures to major diseases, which would eventually lower their profit margins. The obvious response was, if they have found cures and are not publishing them, are they also giving people diseases? The results of these studies may never be available to the public, as drug companies are seeking federal legislation to protect their compounds from independent study because the exact chemistry is an "intellectual product," a new legal tactic to get around patent protection limits. The issue could become a criminal case that surpasses Wall Street's greed. If that fails, watch the drug companies claim that all their products have contraindications they cannot control. For example, Prozac has been found to cause diabetes by researchers overseas. Let's hope the new president will keep his ear to the ground on this explosive issue.

side effects

Prozac causes diabetes. Oh, yes! They DO have something for the diabetes - and the little glucose meters fly off the shelves, too!
Statins (Pravastatin, Advicor, Vytorin) cause joint and muscle deterioration. This is a first hand experience I am talking about. I am not sure what's the name of the pill that counters that side effect, but I am sure it is out there.
Fosamax and other osteoporosis drugs cause dead jaw syndrome. Anybody knows what is the name of the miracle pill that cures dead jaw (and causes something else to go out of whack)?
Erectile dysfunction drugs cause blindness and deafness. Sure, but they can sell you something that will make you see and hear again. I imagine the sales pitches from the makers of hearing aids that arrive in the mailbox of a viagra user.

Why is it in this fsckd up country, that health equals profits?

Take profit out of health care, and we will return to safe, proven (older) drugs that have minimal side effects, no more than an upset stomach.

Big Pharma has to be strictly controlled and regulated by an appropriate, not for sale, government agency who will have staff made up of doctors and pharmacists not associated with any of the pill peddlers. I would suggest that penalty for betraying the people by approving something that should not be approved is death by the very pill...

Oh, really?

"the FDA says AstraZeneca can not -- repeat not -- market Seroquel for depression"

I guess they did not find the right person with the price tag. Once the price is met, FDA will gladly allow AstraZeneca to market Seroquel for depression, for hangnails, and for hemorrhoids too.

otherwise known as "squirrel kill"

I recently left a position as an RN at a private school for "troubled boys" due to what I deemed is unethical use of psychotropics in children. I'm looking for someone to help me research and write my article; "Legalized Chemical Restraint of America's Youth". Seroquel is only one of the psychotropics prescribed regularly for off-label use, in children for god's sake. Geodon, lamictal, zyprexa, add some lithium, a little depakote...I've seen them all, often times as a cocktail thanks to handy diagnoses like bipolar or oppositional defiant. Show me one adolescent who isn't. My latest piece of information on this phenomenon comes from working with juvenile offenders, many of whom are of course getting seroquel, but guess what. The seroquel has to be crushed prior to giving because of how often they try to "cheek" it. Seroquel, or "squirrel kill" as they call it, can scramble up the brain pretty good for those seeking a high. Anyone who wonders how so many doctors nationwide could possibly participate with prescribing unapproved medications that aren't even studied in children, seroquel just one of the culprits. Look at who's doing the influencing. Charisma isn't a new thing. Check out a job description on AstraZenaca's website for a pharmaceutical sales rep. Trust me, they and other pharmaceutical giants who, by the way, own our fricken country and the supposed research many of our universities conduct (another subject but certainly related). Look at the type of person who's out there wining and dining the docs, loading them up with free samples, free logo office supplies and 'subconscious obligation factor'. My interpretation of those job descriptions and type of people who end up with the jobs; must be very driven to make those sales regardless of consciousness or better judgment, must be young, good looking, capable of charismatically persuading doctors to create diagnoses in individuals to legally prescribe our medications. Hefty bonuses part of the plan. In summary, must be psychologically able to manipulate the intelligent minds of the very people the rest of us seek to "make us all better". Our doctors are being led by pretty, charismatic sales reps who make a ton of money selling their snake oil. The little Jimmy and Johnny's who once ran and played to take care of their "opposition", well, welcome to modern culture and legalized chemical restraint. This discourse is only part of what has been brought to my attention regarding the over use of dangerous psychotropics. Wait till I get going about the use in elderly... Somebody help me...my email is Tluwho@gmail.com