Get FREE BuzzFlash News Alerts

Email:  

Martha Rosenberg: New Year's Resolutions for Big Pharma

A BUZZFLASH GUEST CONTRIBUTION
by Martha Rosenberg

It was another year of fighting black boxes, sweet talking juries, and burying incriminating clinical data for Big Pharma.
 
But before its reputation is completely gone (How many pharmaceutical salesmen does it take to change a light bulb? It doesn't need to be changed; it just needs a new name and formulation before the patent runs out), Big Pharma could make the following New Year's resolutions.
 
1. We will instruct our reps not to waltz into doctors' offices ahead of patients many of whom are -- hello! -- not feeling well and have been waiting a long time. We will admonish them to stop high fiving after a sale and using verbs such as "aced " and "got over big time." They will never call the doctor "dude."
 
2. We will stop pushing schizophrenic drugs such as Seroquel and Zyprexa to the depressed, anxious, moody, confused, aged, and people we can convince are bipolar through alarmist ad campaigns. ("Are you sure you don't have racing thoughts?") We will admit they are dangerous drugs with serious weight gain, hyperglycemia, and diabetes side effects that we tried to bury until The New York Times outed us.
 
3. We will stop selling depression to people with simple life problems -- "Tired of your commute? Weather got you down? You might be depressed!" -- to boost SSRI sales. We will admit they are dangerous drugs that can cause, not prevent, suicide in all age groups except the old who we have on Seroquel and Zyprexa, anyway (see above).
 
4. We will stop trying to resuscitate HRT -- "it's good for women between 49 and 49 1/2 with intact uteruses and no history of heart disease or bringing lawsuits" -- and admit we perpetrated a 40-year lethal hoax and should be keeping Bernie, Skilling, and Fastow company at Club Fed. We will acknowledge the other "females" HRT harmed and release mares and their foals from Premarin farms immediately.
 
5. We will stop trying to replace the HRT market by conducting osteoporosis scare campaigns starring Sally Field and Cheryl Ladd and admit bisphosphonates by stopping bone remodeling can cause, not prevent, fractures (see SSRIs, HRT). We will further admit bisphosphonates can cause jaw death, a painful and deadly side effect we weren't going to mention until loudmouth dentists spoke out. (Thanks a lot, buddies.)
 
6. We will stop marketing the newer sleeping pills such as Ambien as "safe" and "nonaddictive" and admit they are the club drug of choice across the nation and a leading cause of traffic accidents and air travelers who don't know which side of the ocean they're on. We will withdraw our application to start selling Ambien to children and ask ourselves what were we THINKING?
 
7. We'll stop relying on agricultural antibiotics for the bulk of our revenues and admit they are causing antibiotic resistance in our own pills and focusing attention on our failure to create new antibiotics in the last decade. We will further admit they enable factory farming conditions so sickening you don't want to look at them before eating.
 
8. We will stop exploiting childhood behavior problem with antidepressants, antipsychotics, "mood stabilizers," and other pediatric straightjackets. Despite the fact that our demographic data tell us "get them at 5, keep 'em for life," we admit we are creating a generation that will be ready for rehab by middle school. ("Remember when were straight -- in the second grade?")
 
9. We will stop financially inducing doctors to attach their names to journal articles we have written that promote our drugs, bash our competitors, and just happen to address the main areas of concerns prescribers have. Not only does it fool no one, but also we've been busted twice by JAMA.
 
10. We will stop paying the FDA to fast track our drugs. Even though early approval means a quick killing in sales, the lack of follow-up clinical data can produce other "quick killings" we don't need. After all, Vioxx didn't cause heart attacks in monkeys.
 
11. We will replace our salesmen, psychologists, and integrative marketers with biologists and chemists. Sure they cost more, but instead of coming up with new drug names when a patent is running out and new diseases to sell Americans from their TV sets ("Hey Doc, do you think I have this?") they can come up with new drugs. What a concept!

A BUZZFLASH GUEST CONTRIBUTION

Martha Rosenberg is a Staff Cartoonist for the Evanston Roundtable. 

 


The first thing of order

Since Big Pharma won't do it - the Congress should get off their collective lazy ass, and do it for them: make advertising of any prescription drug on TV, directly to the public, illegal. I would love to add: punishable by firing squad, but after all, I am a peacenik.

Another thing that must be made illegal: advertising prescription drugs at doctors' offices, in magazines and any place else. It is not the patient, who decides what drug s/he needs. There is a doctor for it, and the doctor must not be influenced by a patient repeating symptoms heard on TV, or read in a three-page magazine ad.

Big Pharma could be allowed to send information pamphlets to doctors. About new developments, about promising drugs. No hard sales allowed. Not even suggestions. Just information in its dry, unpalatable form. All the possible side effects, and all the interactions of the drug would have to be listed right under the drug's name.

I know, FDA gets paid by "fast-tracking" drugs. Maybe they should take drugs they're about to approve - say, for a 24 months period. If the human guinea pigs at the FDA office are still alive and kicking at the end of those two years, the drug gets approved. If there are problems, then whoever decided to get the drug approved in the first place, faces firing squad. Oh, wait, I am a peacenik. No firing squad. Jail. Weld the door shut and throw the torch away.

Will this ever happen? Nope. Don't hold your breath. Could it happen? Wouldn't you love it to happen? Just thinking about it makes me feel warm and fuzzy....

Happy New Year, all. May it be not worse than the previous one.

Zyprexa Saga

Eli Lilly stalling on Zyprexa claims! Eli Lilly makes billions on diabetes treatment and also gets $4.2 billion a year in sales of their biggest cash cow Zyprexa which has been scandalized as *causing* diabetes as a major side effect. Eli Lilly Zyprexa cost me over $250.00 a month supply out of my own pocket X 4 years and has up to ten times the risk (over non users) of causing diabetes and severe weight gain. My chief complaint with the Zyprexa issue is,Lilly's credibility over their continuous propaganda on how they are going to pay out $1.2 billion in damages. As long as they keep up this rhetoric and don't actually pay the issue won't go away. They need to think about 'putting their money where their mouth is'. http://www.zyprexa-victims.com Tell the truth don't be afraid-Danny Haszard

They could but they won't.

It's about making money, not about doing good. US legal codes mandate that corporations give the maximum return to the shareholder. There's nothing in there that says they have to behave responsibly at the same time, or treat customers well.

Yes, there's a long-term benefit to treating your customers well. But in the short term ripping your customers off pays better. As a famous economist once said: "In the long term we'll all be dead."

How do I maximize my pay right now? By maximizing my company's profits right now. Ten years from now that might reduce profitability but ten years from now I might be dead or in a different job with a different company.

The "free market" cannot address this injustice. That's why government regulation is needed.