Bill Quigley: Locked Outside the Gates: Tasers, Pepper Spray, and Arrests in the Struggle for Affordable Housing in New Orleans
A BUZZFLASH GUEST CONTRIBUTION
by Bill Quigley
In a remarkable symbol of the injustices of post-Katrina reconstruction, hundreds of people were locked out of a public New Orleans City Council meeting addressing demolition of 4,500 public housing apartments. Some were tasered, many pepper sprayed, and a dozen arrested. Outside the chambers, iron gates were chained and padlocked even before the scheduled start.
The scene looked like one of those countries on TV that is undergoing a people's revolution -- and the similarities were only beginning.
Dozens of uniformed police secured the gates and other entrances. Only developers and those with special permission from council members were allowed in -- the rest were kept locked outside the gates. Despite dozens of open seats in the council chambers, pleas to be allowed in were ignored.
Chants of "Housing is a human right!" and "Let us in!" thundered through the concrete breezeway.
Public housing residents came and spoke out despite an intense campaign of intimidation. Residents were warned by phone that if they publicly opposed the demolitions, they would lose all housing assistance. Residents opposed to the demolition had simple demands. If the authorities insisted on spending hundreds of millions to tear down hundreds of structurally sound buildings containing 4,500 public housing subsidized apartments, there should be a guarantee that every resident could return to a similarly subsidized apartment. Alternatively, the government should use the hundreds of millions to repair the apartments so people could come home. Neither alternative was acceptable to HUD. A plan of residents to partner with the AFL-CIO Housing Trust to save their homes was also ignored.
Outside, SWAT team members and police in riot gear and on horses began to arrive as rain started falling. Those locked out included public housing residents, a professor from Southern University, graduate students, the Episcopal Bishop of Louisiana, ministers, lawyers, law students, homeless people who lived in tents across the street from City Hall, affordable housing allies from across the country, and dozens of others.
Inside the chambers, Revered Torin Sanders and others insisted that the locked out be allowed to come and stand inside along the walls -- a common practice for over 30 years. No one could recall any City Council locking people out of a public meeting. The request to allow people to stand was denied. The Council then demanded silence from those inside. Those who continued to demand that the others be let in were pointed out by police, physically taken down, and arrested. Ironically, some young men were tasered right in front of the speaker's podium.
This was a meeting the council had repeatedly tried to avoid. It was only held after residents (100% African American and nearly all mothers and grandmothers) got an emergency court order stopping demolitions until the council acted. The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) announced long ago it was going to demolish 4,500 public housing apartments despite the Katrina crisis of affordable housing, no matter what anyone said. HUD had no plans to ask the council or anyone else for approval. The judge said otherwise, so the meeting was scheduled.
Leaders of the U.S. Congress, Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid, asked that the decision be delayed 60 days so they could try to move forward on Senate Bill 1668, which would resolve many of the demolition problems. This request was backed by New Orleans Congressman William Jefferson, Louisiana Senator Mary Landrieu and Presidential candidates John Edwards and Barack Obama.
Opponents cited the affordable housing crisis in New Orleans. Homeless people camped across from City Hall and for blocks under the interstate. The number of homeless people have doubled since Katrina. Thousands of residents in FEMA trailers across the Gulf Coast were being evicted.
More on the reasons to oppose demolition can be found here.
Solidarity demonstrations opposing demolition were held in Washington DC, New York, Oakland, Minneapolis, Houston, North Carolina, Maine, Philadelphia, Cleveland, New Jersey, and Boston. Thousands of people across the country contacted city council members. Dozens of community, housing, and human rights groups petitioned the Council not to demolish until there was an enforceable requirement of one-for-one replacement of housing.
But hours before the meeting began, a majority of the council publicly announced on the front page of the local paper that they were going to approve demolition, no matter what people said at the meeting. The paper, the developers, and others were delighted. Residents and affordable housing allies were not.
Inside, the council started the meeting surrounded by armed police, National Guard, and undercover authorities from many law enforcement agencies.
Outside, the locked out could see the people who had been arrested on the inside being dragged away to police wagons. A few of the protestors then pulled open one of the gates. The police started shooting arcs of pepper spray into the crowd. A woman's scream pierced the chaos as police fired tasers into the crowd. Medics wiped pepper spray from fallen people's eyes. A young woman who was tasered in the back went into a seizure and was taken to the hospital.
Inside and out, a dozen people were arrested -- most for disturbing the peace. They joined another dozen who had been arrested over the past week in protest actions against the demolitions.
The City Council meeting continued. Supporters of demolition were given careful, courteous attention and softball questions by council members. Opponents less so.
Despite pleas from displaced residents, dozens of community organizations, and federal elected officials, the New Orleans City Council voted unanimously to allow demolition to proceed. In their approval, the Council did promise to urge HUD to listen to residents and to work for one-for-one replacement of affordable housing. Several city council members read from typed statements about their reasons to support demolition: the deplorable state of public housing; the lack of available money for repair; the oral promises of all, the federal government and developers, to do something better for the community.
After the meeting, residents vowed to continue their struggle for affordable housing for everyone and to resist demolitions -- putting their bodies before bulldozers if necessary.
The struggle for affordable housing continues as does the campaign to stop demolition until there is a real right to return and one-for-one replacement of housing. Residents and local advocates applaud and appreciate the support of allies from across the nation. Critics label national supporters as "outside agitators" -- exactly the same charge leveled at civil rights activists historically. But people understand that injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere. Public housing residents and local affordable housing advocates welcome the humble participation of social justice advocates of whatever age, of whatever race, from whatever place, who join and act in true solidarity.
Residents vow to make sure that the promises made by the Council and the Mayor are enforced. For example, New Orleans Mayor Ray Nagin announced that he would not allow HUD to demolish two of the four housing developments until HUD gave documentation of funded plans including one-for-one replacement of the housing demolished and details of the developments and their plans.
The Senate will continue to be lobbied to pass SB 1668 -- which would really guarantee one-for-one replacement of housing. It is currently stalled in the Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee because of opposition by Louisiana Republican Senator David Vitter.
Litigation is still pending in state and federal courts to enforce Louisiana and U.S. laws that should protect residents from illegal demolitions. Investigations into the legality of locking people out of a public meeting, the legality of a law passed at such a meeting, the indiscriminate use of tasers and pepper spray, are all ongoing.
Padlocked and chained gates will only amplify the voices of the locked out calling for justice. Pepper spray and tasers illustrate the problems but will not deter people from protesting for just causes. Bulldozers may start up, but just people will resist and create a reality where housing is a real human right.
Stephanie Mingo, a working grandmother who is one of the leaders of the residents, promised to continue the resistance after the meeting: "We did not come this far to turn back now. This fight is far from over. We are not resting until everyone has the right to return home."
Those wanting additional information should look to: justiceforneworleans.org or defendneworleanspublichousing.org
A BUZZFLASH GUEST CONTRIBUTION
Bill Quigley is a human rights lawyer and law professor at Loyola University New Orleans. Bill is part of the team of lawyers representing displaced residents of public housing. You can reach him at Quigley@loyno.edu.- Login or register to post comments
- Printer-friendly version
Buzz this on Buzzflash.net




Technorati Tags:
So What's the Answer?
I'm confused. Presuming Quigley is a goofball, isn't the fear of the original tenants here that they will be unable to find affordable housing if redevelopment goes through? So why haven't the developers or the city/state/federal government provide them with some sort of guarantee or, at least, assurance that their housing needs will be met if, after all, they can prove that they occupied these units before Katrina?
I haven't seen the newspaper ad referred to by Quigley. However, if there haven't been such assurances, this ad and the council lock-out by the city and the developers looks like a fascist land-grab against the poor that is similar to what developers did to stressed property owners after the Indian Ocean tsunami.
Public housing in New Orleans
There are hundreds of vacant public housing apartments in New Orleans right now. HUD can't find anyone who will move into them, or take the Section 8 vouchers that are available.
The people who occupied the apartments at the time Katrina struck are now somewhere else (Atlanta, Houston, etc.) and have made a new life there. Most were simply given apartments in public housing or Section 8 vouchers. Very few are ever coming back. There is no need for the kind of massive, awful, public housing developments that were used to warehouse poor people in NOLA before Katrina.
This entire controversy is because the pre-Katrina political establishment (all Democrats) needs to be able to force large numbers of African-Americans BACK into "the projects" so they can be kept poor and uneducated. That is the only way the pre-Katrina political establishment can hang onto their power - and it isn't going to happen.
The Mayor is more than aware of the real situation, but he is part of the pre-Katrina political establishment. The City has basically (and I believe deliberately) surrendered media relations on this issue to the activists/"protesters" who tried to disrupt the City Council meeting.
Quigley's "news story" is a lie.
The New Orleans City Council (4 Whites/3 Blacks) met two weeks ago and unanimously approved permits to demolish the unoccupied, condemned public housing developments HUD wants to replace with much nicer housing.
The New Orleans City Council Chamber holds about 250 people and was filled to capacity. Members of the "protest" group were among the audience and were on the agenda to address the Council.
The "protesters" inside the Chamber attempted to unlawfully disrupt the proceedings before they started and deny the residents of New Orleans their rights to the democratic process. One "protester" inside the Chamber was so violent that a taser was used to subdue him. Representatives of the "protest" group were heard once order was restored.
The other "protesters" outside demanded entrance to the Council Chambers, even though it would have been a violation of the fire codes. It was a deliberate, calculated tactic intended to attract the attention of the news media.
The disturbances outside were by about 75 (NOT "hundreds") of professional protestors who were acting out for the news media. Pepper spray was used on them when they literally broke the lock on the gate to the Council Chamber and tried to storm the meeting. The police used great restraint and only acted to prevent the unlawful disruption of the weekly City Coucil meeting. No one was harmed during the multiple attempts by the mob to storm the Council Chamber.
Very few of the "protesters" are from New Orleans and the local TV stations could not find a single one who had ever lived in public housing anywhere. All of the actual New Orleans public housing residents who could be interviewed were in FAVOR of the demolitions. The protesters are the ones trying to silence the voices of NOLA public housing residents.
There are many more available apartments in public housing NOW than there are applicants. That does not include the widely available "Section 8" housing, which are regular apartments/homes with the rent paid for by HUD vouchers.
The public housing developments in question were built 50 to 70 years ago and were in very bad condition BEFORE they were flooded by Katrina. In addition to the storm damage, they were constructed using lead-based paint, asbestos, and other toxic materials. The developments are UNOCCUPIED and CONDEMNED and have been unoccupied since August of 2005.
The "protesters" claim the demolition of unsafe, unhealthy public housing so it can be replaced by something better is racist. They want African-American people to be forced back into the old developments so they can be kept poor & uneducated and >>> voting the way they are told <<<.
The conversion of failed, large-scale housing developments to "mixed income" housing has been going on across the country for decades and during both Republican + Democrat administrations. The process started in New Orleans long before Katrina struck.
I am a New Orleans resident who worked in NOLA's public housing developments for decades.
Watch carefully my friends as Fashism tightens it's grip.
Sorry for using the "F" word (no actually I'm not), but that's all I can see happening in New Orleans. Let's see armed police (whatever happened to "peace officer"?) preventing people from attending a "public meeting" because their views are seen as unpopular by the local government. It's friggin here people, right here, right now.
"The scene looked like one of those countries on TV that is undergoing a people's revolution -- and the similarities were only beginning."
As I read this I thought back to my feelings of shock and disbelief as I watched the debacle unfold during the flooding. It was as if the city had been transported to some 3rd world country, as if it didn't (or couldn't) be happening here in the United States. But it was, and it continues...
So watch carefully my friends, hope and pray that our infrastructure never fails, because what you see in New Orleans is exactly how things will go if the fecal matter ever really hits those whirling metal blades...
"We need a hero..."
You Need To Shut Up
Looks good on paper....in reality, those projects needs to be re-built....the majority of people protesting were from out of town, for several months they have had 300 units available for rent and no one is renting them....it's not about cheap housing....it's available, it's about giving these people a better place to live. BTW, I was born in the Iberville projects and lived there for 5 years, so I am one of "those" people. They interviewed several residents living in the projects as we speak and they were all in favor of demolishing these 80 year old rat infested buildings, and replacing them with the current plans. Bill Quigley is a GOOFBALL!