Get FREE BuzzFlash News Alerts

Email:  

Joe Brewer: Where's the Healthy Debate, CNN?

A BUZZFLASH GUEST CONTRIBUTION
by Joe Brewer
The Rockridge Institute

When CNN airs a YouTube debate for Republican presidential hopefuls, you might think they'd select questions about the most important concerns Americans have. After all, the questions were taken from everyday citizens with a video camera and access to the Web. But health care wasn't mentioned.

As prominent health care diarist, nyceve, put it at Daily Kos:

I waited.

And waited.

And kept waiting.

But a single question about the plight of 47 million uninsured Americans, or the rest of us who have to wage an unending true holy war against the for-profit insurance industry, just didn't make the CNN cut.


This omission is shocking when you consider that health care is one of the most important concerns Americans have. A recent Washington Post/ABC poll shows that health care is right up there with the occupation of Iraq and economic woes as a major issue in this presidential election.

It certainly begs the question of why CNN chose to overlook all 40 YouTube questions about health care. Is it perhaps because they know that the Republican candidates don't have much to say about health care? After all, every general Democratic debate has included discussions of candidate plans.

Even CNN was on the ball when the same moderator for both debates, Anderson Cooper, introduced health care at the earlier Democratic YouTube debate with "One of the most popular topics that we got questions on was health care. We, frankly, were overwhelmed with videos on health care, so we put several of them together."

Why did he let the Republicans off the hook?

Think about it. We are in the midst of a health care crisis and a major media source leaves us in the dark about the views of presidential hopefuls who, presumably, will represent all Americans in the White House if they are elected.

We need a real and open debate about health care. If CNN won't allow it, perhaps those of us in the blogosphere will have to do it for them. (You can find additional resources about health care at the Rockridge Institute.)

Try to imagine all of the presidential candidates, of both parties, responding to this hypothetical question:

I've always considered myself lucky to get health insurance through my employer. But when my wife was recently diagnosed with breast cancer, I found that having insurance isn't enough to guarantee that she gets the treatment she needs. From denying tests that her doctors feel are medically necessary to refusing to pay for treatment they already approved, insurance companies are interfering with what doctors think is best.

What would you do to provide Americans with the security of knowing that we can get the health care we need? Not only the uninsured, but people such as us who are not secure even when we have insurance?

A discussion is needed of profit-first health care where profits arise through the denial of care. Consideration of the difference between more health insurance and more health care must be openly explored.

We need a public forum that promotes deeper and more substantive discussions of the major issues in America. CNN revealed a symptom of illness last night. Faced with lagging ratings, CNN turned to YouTube to create the appearance of participation. But if CNN isn't willing to raise one of the most pressing concerns of Americans, people will turn even more to forums where they are taken seriously.

A BUZZFLASH GUEST CONTRIBUTION

Joe Brewer is a fellow at the Rockridge Institute.




A Common CNN Tactic

It seems avoiding topics candidates are uncomfortable talking about is how CNN works. It doesn't just happen with Republicans.

While CNN does open up the discussion on health care with Democrats and avoid talking health care with Republicans, it certainly does not open the debate to single-payer health care, which would be a sure way to insure 47 million uninsured currently.

CNN does not talk with Democratic "Bush-Lite" candidates on topics that will force them to show their true colors, topics that could result in them becoming shifty-eyed or stuttering politicians that yammer on about important issues without offering Americans anything in the way of hope that this issue will be solved anytime soon. Instead, CNN keeps them going on topics they are fluent in or have prepared bits for like the "I don't take money from special interests or lobbyists" bit or the "We all support the troops" bit that every Democratic candidate has in his or her arsenal to use whenever necessary.

Frankly, I wouldn't be surprised if they start talking about how much they love their mothers. It worked for Republicans more than a decade ago. We just might fall for it again.

Joe Brewer: Where's the Healthy Debate, CNN?

re. "Joe Brewer: Where's the Healthy Debate, CNN?"

Well, Joe, you are spot-on with your assessment of CNN and the health-care issue. Don’t weaken!

I’ve seen the Repugs do this often and successfully: define their divisive issues for THEIR constituents, ignore the really important issues, and let the Dems cross over and address the issues the within Repug framework.

Surely the Repugs won’t visit CNN unless they can bring their rules with them, and I’m sure their rules include the few issues they will address.

Yeah, I’d like CNN or anyone to ask Romney and Huckabee why they obviously want a Theocracy here.

We’ve been taught that a healthy debate requires people who understand the issues, and by their participation, agree that the issues are important. Repugs can’t win a debate with their stand on Health care: it’s not important to the “I’ve got mine, screw you” crowd, they don’t want universal health care, they’re lose the debate on the merits of their (lack of) Health Care Plan, so they stay away from it. And, I'm sure they mandate that CNN stay away too.

Speaking of healthy debates: did all y’all’s know that BuzzFlash won’t allow healthy debate on some important issues to this once-great Country?

Yep. That’s right.

One example: Harvey Wasserman has a reserved soap-box at BuzzFlash for his anti-nuclear-power-generated-electricity opinions. That’s OK… he can do that. The 1st Amendment is GOOD for us all. And BuzzFlash is great for providing that soap box.

Ah, but send BuzzFlash letters that support nuclear power plants, as I’ve done several times, and where do they go? Who knows? Maybe they go to the little electron cemetery just outside Chicago.

It’s sad, because we all need to have the facts when making our decisions, facts that we can’t give out, like the missing facts on CNN’s Repug debate without addressing Health Care.

And from Harvey Wasserman, we get the 1970’s anti-nuke debate and a vision of a “Solartopia” that may or may not be based on facts, rather than a debate that speaks to the issues from a 2007 perspective.

Sorry I had to hijack part of this response for my own use, Joe, but feel free to do the same to me.

Bill Fahma Darbyshire
Galien, MI 49113