Get FREE BuzzFlash News Alerts

Email:  

Obama's presser and the politics of focus

THE FIFTH COLUMNIST by P.M. Carpenter

It was Barack Obama's rimshot line of the evening, a sarcastic putdown laced with a rare but muted display of anger, a kind of "Go away, Sonny, you're annoying the adults" dismissal. But that curtness, directed at CNN's Ed Henry's unwithering probe into the president's purportedly delinquent outrage, said far more than just about anything else spoken last night:

"It took us a couple of days because I like to know what I'm talking about before I speak."

Ouch. Bada-bing. A journalist's execution, live, right on the air; but perhaps it took just that to concentrate the national mind -- a stark, White House dispatch that the days of frivolous distraction are over, at least when it comes to what this president is willing to entertain.

Focus. That's pretty much all he was saying. He kept saying it, in a dozen other less lethal ways, for nearly an hour -- and one could see that he's still reading his American history, for it had a reassuring touch of the Rooseveltian in it:

"I think, when it comes to the banking system, you know, it was just a few days ago or weeks ago where people were certain that Secretary Geithner couldn't deliver a plan. Today, the headlines all look like, 'Well, all right, there's a plan.' And I'm sure there will be more criticism, and we'll have to make more adjustments, but we're moving in the right direction."

In short, you do what you can in the most immediate manner to fix the most vexing and immediate problems. Work through the crises, call audibles, make adjustments, do whatever is doable -- for now -- while keeping in mind and quietly working toward the larger goal of broad, sweeping reforms.

To attempt a comprehensive, best-of-all-worlds upheaval in every category, however -- say, in the banking industry -- while assorted crises of credit freezes and skyrocketing unemployment are boiling over, would be suicidally counterproductive; in part, because an outraged public made it so.

There was, simply and absolutely, no way the Obama administration could procure the necessary fresh appropriations from a mimetically outraged, bailout-exhausted Congress to seize the bloody lot of our criminally stupid bankers. The White house knew it, Treasury knew it, Congress knew it -- in fact, virtually everyone knew it and was willing to concede it, upfront, except Tim Geithner's harshest critics.

Righteousness is fine for Sunday mornings; but it won't move legislation, however intellectually holy and spiritually satisfying it be, through Congress.

Focus: deal with problems with the tools you have, which is merely what Obama and Geithner did. And for this potentially salvational act, they got vilified (as, by the way, did FDR, for similar acts of realistic immediacy) by both the left and right, especially the anti-pragmatic far left and far right, which, sadly, are rapidly morphing into indistinguishability.

Ameliorate the crisis first, and once the most threatening storms have passed and nerves are a bit less rattled, then you move in with an organic, re-regulatory regime and a whittling down of intolerable financial "bigness." But for heaven's sake, one must first weather the bugger.

Obama also sent an unambiguous signal that he's been conserving his political capital's firepower for more targetable game and longer-term recoil: his staggering $3.6 trillion budget that does tackle systemic reform in health care, education, energy and fiscal housekeeping.

He's been hoarding his ammunition, suffering bombardments of acute dissatisfaction over this, that and the other thing, while, to reference the aforementioned, keeping in mind the larger goal of sweeping reforms.

Doable ones -- but they wouldn't have remained doable had he squandered his bullets on other, massive reforms that were, alas, doomed with predestinate certainty.

Some don't care for the analogy of politics as a game, but it is a game -- of chess. And, as has been clear since the presidential primaries, as Obama's opponents ponder their next incisive move he has already calculated and maneuvered his way into the sixth or seventh. Through focus.

What's most peculiar is that as Obama progresses across the board, so many of his progressive critics don't even realize it -- which rather amusingly makes them seem less ungrateful than just plain, strategically obtuse. But that, too, is just part of the game, I guess.

 

Please respond to P.M.'s commentary by leaving comments below and sharing them with the BuzzFlash community. For personal questions or comments you can contact him at fifthcolumnistmail@gmail.com

THE FIFTH COLUMNIST by P.M. Carpenter


Obama's Tactic: Hiring Bad Guys

I was among the joyously hopeful millions who welcomed President Obama to the helm of our nation, at the same time realizing he may not have made it there had Bush/Cheney not been so god-awful cruel and unusually bad. I'm still glad Obama is leading us, but I maintain my right and duty (read Thomas Jefferson and listen to Thom Hartmann) to be wary of our sitting government and openly critical of it. Okay, P.M. Carpenter makes good points in showing what he believes (and I hope) to be Obama's apparent plan of putting out the fires first, then going after the arsonists. The problem I have is in Obama's tactic, quickly becoming a habit, of hiring the arsonists to douse the flames. The latest is Gary Gensler, 18 years with Goldman Sachs (again!), being brought aboard to run the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. Are there no other candidates to get us out of this financial mess than the bad guys who got us into it, or at least worked for those who got us into it? Reminds me of a town in Georgia near where I spent several years in which the town council hired criminals into the police department under the belief that it takes a thief to catch a thief. You can imagine how that town was run. So, I suggest to our president, if he wants to see what New York looks like, don't cruise on the Goldman Sachs yacht, take The Circle Line with the rest of us commoners. --- Rrrandy Wurst (wurstwisdom.com)

Where's the Love, Carpy?

"Some don't care for the analogy of politics as a game, but it is a game -- of chess. And, as has been clear since the presidential primaries, as Obama's opponents ponder their next incisive move he has already calculated and maneuvered his way into the sixth or seventh. Through focus.

What's most peculiar is that as Obama progresses across the board, so many of his progressive critics don't even realize it -- which rather amusingly makes them seem less ungrateful than just plain, strategically obtuse. But that, too, is just part of the game, I guess."

Why is Carpenter ranting on about nothing, spewing ad hominem slurs at progressive Obama critics?

Is this a continuation of his smearfest against Krugman and other critics of the Fascist Wall Street MULTI TRILLION DOLLAR Bailout?

A fantastic moment during the press conference!

I loved Obama's quick, intelligent response to this idiotic question! Go the the Naughty Corner with Chuck Todd and stay there for about six months! Just zip it!

I wish Paul Krugman, who

I wish Paul Krugman, who after all is now a newspaper writer, had been there to receive a sharp comment. It’s amazing, and for me disappointing, how people encounter Paul Krugman these days and then run around as if they are on fire, which really is worse than would be going unafraid, and confident of eventual success, into a depression

Krugman Outmanuvered Obama

Krugman's assessment is correct. He has exposed the criminality of the Wall Street Bailout.

If the U.S. is going to bailout the banks, then the U.S. should own the banks. Socializing loses but privatizing profits may sound a bit cliche by now, but that is exactly what is going on, and it needs to stop.

Taking over failed banks and insurance companies is not socialism, rather, it is greedy idiots getting kicked out of their jobs, hopefully without bonuses.

Why Carpenter appears to be in favor of this theft of more U.S. tax dollars and seemingly willing to become Rovian in its defense is quite puzzling.

Swish!

That's the sound of Ed Henry's head going through the hoop for a three-pointer from Obama. Better bring game next time, tool.

Ed Henry

People need to hose down the corporate media whores more often.

Good for Obama

Sometimes the press needs a pushback. Obama's remark to Ed Henry about thinking before he speaks is the big news of the day. Come on!!! Maybe the public would like it better if Obama sat in the Oval Office Bubble or butchered the English language with incoherent ramblings and malaprops. Obama has a plan with goals and is responsible, flexible and willing to admit mistakes if he makes them. The tone of the country is changing for the better and that is the first step to better times. Good for Obama!!!

Politics as a game

Mike5000 has already covered the "saving your ammunition" bit so let’s take a look at “doing the doable” and politics as a game. At certain points in history, tactical victories aren’t enough. What good is it if you win the game or even the set but lose the match? Questions like a wholesale reform of the country’s monetary and banking system assume black and white dimensions. It isn’t a question of righteousness, Mr. Carpenter. It’s a question of survival. I suppose 80 years ago FDR could be forgiven for concentrating on weathering the most threatening storms and “acts of realistic immediacy”. 80 years ago he and we – a LOT fewer of us -were sitting on a continent still brimming with natural resources and a transportation infrastructure still in tact in spite of substantial encroachments from the automobile. It can be argued that FDR’s incrementalism, his refusal to tackle the larger issue of Wall Street and banker power – the Money Power – head on lead more or less directly to WW II. A lasting fix for the problems that caused the first Great Depression called for much more than “an organic, re-regulatory regime and a whittling down of intolerable financial "bigness."” Take a look at the work of the Nobel prize-winning CHEMIST Frederick Soddy in the area of monetary reform. It was written in the 1920s and 30s but reads like it was written yesterday. For that matter, take a look at any of the writings of monetary reformers for the last 300 years. Sometimes, Mr. Carpenter, it is necessary for leaders to lead. When they consistently fail to do so, it is not just the fortunes of their party that are at stake; it is respect for law and the Western tradition of political democracy. When you are right, particularly on issues of pressing urgency, if the people don’t see it immediately, the forces of history will insure they see it soon enough. For close to a century, the Democratic Party has approached politics as a game, a game most people believe they have played abysmally, incidentally. If, instead of playing along with the Defense Department’s covert Empire and jobs programs, the Democratic Party had insisted upon a real program of national defense – no more, no less – what’s left of this country’s industrial base might be something more than just a giant death factory – and, we might actually be able to defend it. If, instead of playing along with Bush’s phony “War on Terror”, the Democratic Party had exposed it as yet another cheap trick to defend an indefensible status quo, 1.5 million Iraqis and 5,000 plus US service men and women might be alive today. Sorry, Mr. Carpenter. For them and the countless millions of others whose lives have been devastated by war and economic violence, politics is much more than a game.

Please. Tell me of these "trillions".

What are the "trillions" that Obama has "blown" through? He ushered in a 787 Billion dollar stimulus package. He asked from the previous administration, to ask Congress to authorize the second half of the $750 billion dollar TARP package already authorized ($350 billion.). So where are the "trillions"? Please, oh, omniscient one, where are the "trillions"?

Where are the trillions?

Take a look at the PRIVATELY-OWNED Federal Reserve's books, at the debts it is creating for which you and your children will be responsible unto the nth generation if Obama and the banksters succeed in saving the status quo. Take a look at the work of Dr. Michael Hudson, http://michael-hudson.com, or for that matter any respectable economist. (Or for that matter, the words of Herbert Hoover's Treasury Secretary, Andrew "Purge the rottenness!" Mellon.)

Again.

The vast majority of those "trillions" were spent before Obama came to office. Not going to indict you as a hypocrite (Yet.) but I have a question for you. Did you have this outrage when Bush passed 3! major tax cuts , that when they end in 2011 will have equaled 2 TRILLION dollars? Did you have this outrage when he ushered us in to a war based on lies, that will equal at least 1 TRILLION DOLLARS? And did you have this outrage when Bush and his regressive cronies rammed through medicare part d, that costs 60 billion dollars annually, and in a 10 year span will cost at least 8 TRILLION DOLLARS, when the government could have negotiated the cost of prescription drugs and actually saved money? Frankly, I the problem that I have with Obama's proposals so far is that they may not go far enough, but know this. I think Obama is trying to do what is right fot the middle and working classes in this country, and for that I find no fault with him at all. If another president had done this before, we probaly would'nt be in this situation in the first place.

You asked for someone to

You asked for someone to tell you where the trillions Obama has “blown’ through were. I believe I did. I don’t have the exact numbers but believe Obama has to take responsibility for somewhere on the order or 2 – 5 trillion added to the nation’s debt on his watch. Of course, as you observe, even that is chicken-feed compared to the countless trillions that have been frittered away on bogus tax cuts that started, by the way, long before GW Bush. I believe under that raving socialist Dwight Eisenhower the top rate was 89%. And then there are all the wars and the obscene public works program we call the Department of Defense. Yes, you are correct. I should have been outraged from the moment I was born (probably long before). I sincerely hope you are right and Obama really is trying to get this country back on track. Ellen Brown, the author of the book “Web of Debt” – http://webofdebt.com – believes there is just a chance he may be. The acid test will be whether he nationalizes the Federal Reserve System, turning it and the nation’s banking and monetary systems into something that serves the interests of the American people, not Wall Street, the banks and a government that uses both to covertly finance its pursuit of empire.

brilliant... and true... what a combination....

smart enough to know which fights to pick, with a vision several hundred yards ahead of his own moves--- i knew i was going to like obama. as for spending his "political bux", so long as he keeps showing results for what he does, he should have the support of enough people to guide the country.

Hoarding???!!!

> He's been hoarding his ammunition

Not even close. Obama has blown trillions in two months. He's given 90% of it to Wall Street gamblers - a complete waste.

That's trillions of dollars that should have been spent on economic stimulus. That's trillions of dollars that Obama has borrowed from Wall Street gamblers to give to Wall Street gamblers. That's trillions of dollars that we and our children and our grandchildren are going to work like dogs to repay to the uber-rich.

Obama has blown more ammunition in two months than anybody, anytime, any place has ever done before.

Tonight On I HATE OBAMA!

The Part of epppie, or YMan, or Neva Stolz, or ThomasM Will be Played by Mike5000!

I don't often agree w/PM Carpenter - but he's got a point here, as did the President. And you just proved both their points by criticizing President Obama for the high crime of not acting before he knew what he was talking about - which is, as per normal for you so-called "progressives", exactly what you all do, rantingly and repeatedly....

There's plenty of things to be unhappy about in the Obama Administration - for a big one, his unwillingness to do more than (occasionally) verbally slap down the traitors and media enablers of the Bush Regime for their war crimes. I absolutely agree there can be no "reconciliation" without punishment of the Treasonous Right - as witness the insane Confederate-tinged gibberings of not just Limbaugh and the usual Right-Wing Echo Chamber, but Chuck Norris(!) and Pat Boone(!!!) as well, because they feel they have no need to fear an Obama Administration coming down on them with both feet (though, oh, how they LOVE to imply otherwise!). I share Jonathan Turley's feelings of anger and frustration that these people aren't on the dock wriggling and twisting to avoid their just desserts, With the Whole World Watching....

...But, I don't think he's going to go there because he doesn't want to further divide an already-divisive nation - at least, not until he can look like he Has No Other Choice. What we can do, Mike, is keep the pressure on so that we can bring that happy day to pass, yes?

Divide a nation you say?!

Divide a nation you say?! Remember the saying " .. the office that sanctifies the holder of it.. '? How can you think that one moron would break that 'office' ... it is more accurate to say that the perception of the morons believing in that saying would bring down the balloon and not the fact that an idiot has been able to become preznit ... such a stupid fuck as bush is a record, I have to agree that he was 'special', but not the first idiot and certainly not the first or last thief who will be running the country .... and that is more due to the image than to the substance of the job. ... well over 99% of merkuns are of a stupidity that borders mental retardation -probably from the water-. You will never divide 'them'. They are too retarded to 'fly' too far from the nest/bunch. You have a nation that thinks and acts on fantasies and discards facts faster than flipping a channel on your tv set. .. a true tv nation ... Division would require thinking/reflecting and there is not one single thinker in the country .. that I know of anyway ... You affix way too much value on an 'office', a piece of cloth -flag- or a piece of paper -constitution- or even on the fact that you are an american to be able to think linearly enough to reach the 'scary' conclusion that the 'system' -all systems- does not work .. can not work because of the failed human element in it. To sum it up: humanity does not work! Humanity in a social context that is. Comfort yourself in knowing that the rest of the world is the same and therefore not better ... some countries are less 'dangerous' and have populations that are a little better educated but still the 'moneyed' ones run everything and it will always be ... the only time we hear of/witness some 'supposed justice' is when 2 of those 'power' factions fight between themselves to get a bigger piece of the pie .. as happened with bush who had enough money from everywhere to go for the 'putsch' ... Witness the religious/repub buffoons who are still trying to gauge 'growth' in their ex-leader .. bush is so static -cerebrally- the proof of his mental defect is so flagrant that no one can believe that he is still as stupid as he was 8 years ago .. in fact he is stupider from that fact. Having not 'grown' with all the stimuli shows a lack of mental powers/prowess to absorb and grow .... Still proud to be a merkun after 8 years of such pure crap? If you think you are special for being merkun -a fact in which you had absolutely no part or say in choosing- say bye bye to the last empire. You know how to 'read as a nation' -in view of all the latest shit that has been flung all around the world by the US- you really must read something better than your Superman comic books ... Superman was not real ... even Rambo did not happen .... good luck.

Tonight on "I Can't Read English"

The part of "Doc", will be played by drprodny, who, while not possessing an actual medical degree, is able to diagnose all sorts of imaginary maladies in others (most commonly "Racist!!!!"). Hate to break the news to you, "Doc" but I don't hate Obama. In fact, I (gladly) voted for him in the GE. It's just sort of fun to rub it in the noses of the "True Progs" like yourself when he does something that you guys would never have imagined he would do (the FISA "compromise", "Reverend" Warren's invocation, Wall St. bailout, etc.). Could you imagine the outcry from the "True Progs" if Hillary Clinton had done any of these things? Woooooo-Hoooh! Of course, I would have preferred to have Edwards as the nominee (at least, up until the affair was revealed), but you know how that is, right? It's gotta be because we're both white guys, right?

So it's a head fake, huh, "Doc"? This is all for appearances, huh? He's not going to bring justice to bear on Bush until it looks like he has no other choice, huh? OMG you are toooooo funny. Tell ya what, "Doc." I'd be more than happy to put $1,000 into escrow as a wager on that one. I'll even sweeten it a bit for ya. I'll give you 3-1 odds. If Obama prosecutes Bush or any high level Bush administration appointee for war crimes at any time during his term(s), you get the money. If he doesn't, I win. (We'd probably need to agree on who would be included as a "high level appointee"). You could win $1,000 for risking just $333, "Doc"!

C'mon "Doc" .... put your money where your mouth is for a change. Think of all the anger management sessions you could pay for!