Only in this Post-Sanity Age of Republicanism could one of its adherents be so clinically flaky as to first "reach out" and "offer" his name to a Democratic president for a cabinet position, as the White House press secretary's office insisted he did, and then abruptly reveal to the nation that his steadfast conservatism might fail to seamlessly mesh with the president's non-conservatism.
And then quit, on the spot, in an amalgamated moment of personal epiphany. "I couldn’t be Judd Gregg and serve in the Cabinet," the self-referencing senator told the Politico. "I should have faced up to the reality of that earlier." You think?
Obama corroborated his press secretary: "It comes as something of a surprise, because the truth, you know, Mr. Gregg approached us with interest and seemed enthusiastic," he told the State Journal-Register in Springfield, Ill. yesterday.
Yes, "something of a surprise," something akin to a 'Dear John' letter sent to Private Obama as he was out there selflessly fighting for a new era of bipartisan cooperation in the service of economic recovery.
The truly amusing part, though, was the White House's formal statement issued shortly after aides confessed to having been "blind sided" by Gregg and "totally caught off guard" by his unrequited love.
Robert Gibbs' delicate press release heroically tried but understandably failed to gussy up these two basic points of stunned disgruntlement. It said, in effect, that 1) the Big Cheese in charge was never about to modify his views to accommodate the lowly Gregg, which was made "very clear throughout the interviewing process," and 2) the New Hampshire senator is, in the White House's revised opinion, a slightly disingenuous and grossly inconvenient jerk.
I'll give Gregg some credit, though. He did seem conflicted and somewhat tormented at his embarrassed debutantish, not-coming-out-after-all press conference -- he seemed sincere in wishing Obama the best, as well as the president's receding dreams of bipartisanship -- but why it took so bloody long for the New England senator to comprehend that "this is simply a bridge too far" is, for now, a mystery perhaps too deep.
One can, however, speculate, for whatever that's worth.
Rather than accepting in a wholesale way Gregg's official objections to stimulus packages and Census methodologies -- he never, never foresaw any mammoth obstacles in the road? -- one should leave room, for example, for Karl Rove's rejoicing in this morning's Washington Post: "It is welcome news for the country that there are still people in politics who put principle above personal advancement."
Wrote, too, former Reagan aide Ed Rogers: "Obama can't have Cabinet secretaries from the core of the Republican caucus because the core of the party has too many sincere disagreements with Obama's liberal approach"; and another Reaganite, Linda Chavez: "Bipartisanship is highly overrated, especially when it means compromising on principles."
I can just imagine the accumulating, crushing pressure on Gregg as these and quite similar sentiments cascaded from other ideological mossbacks onto his Blackberry and into his inbox and all over his office phones. Gregg has a long, tribal relationship with these philosophical xenophobes, and my not unreasonable or lone guess is that they played an oppressively instrumental role in constructing his "bridge too far."
Obviously the peculiar issue of Judd Gregg's truncated tenure is but another morsel within our 24-hour news-cycle feast. But just as obviously it again preshadows yet another issue of sturdier stuff.
I once sympathized with Obama's primordial reaching out to Congressional Republicans; dignified gestures were long overdue in our abundantly uncivilized politics and I couldn't help, however guardedly, but be approving. But now enters reality, Mr. President: They just aren't interested. They'll say they want to work with you on this difficulty or that crisis, but when the time comes to act they'll nearly always present themselves as nothing but a huge platter of your indigestion.
Obama as president very much wanted a nice, pleasant and Kennedyesque game of touch football, but Republicans see themselves as apocalyptic commandos in the throat-cutting Thunderdome.
Ironically, the president's bipartisan overtures could in the years to come eventuate an intensifying partisanship. I can easily envision near-future Dems campaigning for high office, avowing that they have little good to say about crossing-the-aisle attempts. Just remember all the heartburn President Obama suffered when he tried that routine, they'll say, and they'll further promise not to make the same mistake.



Buzz this on Buzzflash.net
Forget Conservatism...
Let's Call The Republican Opposition What It is!
De-fanging the Right
In football we tacklers...
....were always taught to look at the ball carrier's hips, not their legs - Why? Simple, they can't lie with their hips.
There is no mistaking where the GOP is going. Their current strategy - play the refs in the MSM. The GOP lost playing by the rules in two election cycles, that is: they got no game. So cry and scream and overwhelm the refs to get their message out. Hence, they've been in full attack mode from day one of the Obama Administration. I understand the Boehner even instructed House GOPers to vote against the stimulus bill before one was even proposed. There are way too many faux-journalists in the MSM looking for the easy story – the one that writes itself. Catchy, but disingenuous rhetoric blaming Obama for everything, even from both sides of a topic ("He’s naïve in his attempt at bipartisanship" ‘slap' to one cheek - and "He's not being bipartisan with us" ‘slap' on the other)…I guess the GOP speaks out of both orifices…
But Democratic party defenders in Congress are beginning to read the GOP’s running route. There is serious talk of re-instituting the fairness doctrine. We need to. The GOP rules by virtue (excuse the term) of Private Corporate conglomerates holding numerous broadcast permits on Public airwaves. But having so many leased frequencies on Public airwaves, they have demonstrated they are not interested in a balanced public dialogue, like we learned about in high school civics class. No, they are simply interested in pushing their political agenda on the under-educated, slightly bigoted, and very fearful American lower Middle Class. And it has clearly paid off. How else could the ruling elite BS so many American's against their own interests? Push their bigotry buttons, get them to refine their hatred of gays, immigrants and those scary Arabs...It’s clear they have no interest in “fair and balanced” journalism. And the mantra that Hannity and the other hacks are profitable, well, it certainly helped to have Murdock's wallet behind them for the first 5 or 6 years Fox News lost money...
If Congress has the Kaunas to do this, they will have sacked the QB – and forced a fumble…..
Is Obama dumber than Dubya?
He only left to spare himself
BIPARTISAN ATTEMPTS CAN ACCELERATE DIRE CONSEQUENCES
So Many Great Comments...
...and so little space to add to them! The one I will take up is the thought that Obama is trying way too hard to be Lincoln in ruling this nation.
IIRC, Lincoln didn't have control - much less cooperation - over his Cabinet until well into his first administration. It wasn't until about the time of Antietam that he could even get a near-unanimous consensus out of them. So, Barack - what's the rush to establish your wet dream of bipartisanship with the current Republifascisti?
You have the power to go over their heads as you just did in Peoria. Use it. You are about the only Democrat who can drag the M$M kicking and screaming along with you wherever you go. Do that. Tell the people the truth about the crisis, and give them choices so they can participate.
After that, the GOP can go to hell and rot. They aren't about to respect you, and without respect you aren't going to have bipartisanship. Quit wasting our time on our dime!
"It's another Obama misstep!" Spins the M$M
At least that's what we are lead to believe if you trust lazy White House reporters like the Washington Post's Chris Cillizza.
What is left unsaid is this small news item from a week ago:
The rabid dog right was frothing at the prospect of their guy losing control of the census. I'm sure the rabid dog right figures, if the Census Bureau reports directly to the White House of a "Negro" president, (we) White people could lose even more House seats in the next election!
Am I reading more into this than is really there? Here's what a commenter posted at conservative columnist Michael Barone's US News and World Report blog:
Horrors! An executive branch function under control of the executive branch! Of course now that the political shoe is on the other foot the rabid dog right sees dictatorship just around the corner. Never mind that the last president, George W. Bush, under the tutelage of "unitary executive theory" gurus Dick Cheney and David Addington, "...assert[ed] from the outset of his presidency" that presidential power "must be unilateral, and unchecked[,]" Obama is our Cesar Chavez! And anyway, the rabid dog right comforts itself, what happened under George W. Bush happened a long time ago, so it doesn't apply to the present.
Gregg's withdrawal of his name for Commerce Secretary may have caught the administration by surprise, but for its suddenness not because it was unexpected.
And I am sure we are all "misunderestimating" President Obama's bipartisan outreach program, for it appears he is playing chess to the GOP's checkers. For had the president marched into Washington with a ready-made cadre of lock-step ideologues for his top cabinet positions the rabid dog right would howl that he was being too partisan. Never mind that this is exactly what Obama's predecessor did under a mandate of five Supreme Court Justices in 2001.
Now, perhaps, President Obama can abandon all pretense of "bipartisanship" and get on with the governing of the country.
I fear this bi-partisan experiment is far from over
Here's a Mad Thought.....
I will admit that I'm the last person to think "bipartisanship" with the current Right a good idea in any form. I believe I've suggested, frequently, that the only way to deal with Rethugs is w/your foot on their throats and a shotgun shoved into their mouths, like Wyatt Earp did to the cringing-cur Ike Clanton in TOMBSTONE. But - I'm beginning to wonder...what if I've been wrong because of my desire to see The Treasonous Bush/Cheney/Gonzalez Nazis humiliated and crushed, and President Obama has a way to do it that, while not as satisfying, will nonetheless ensure the Republicans' complete destruction as a political force...?
Winning over the citizenry
Republicans Think They Can Muscle In On Obama
Frog and Scorpion
Re: Frog and Scorpion
You're right, they cannot be trusted. After all, no matter what they say and no matter how pleasant they try to appear, it is their nature to be harmful and deceitful.
Now, mind you, I am not calling for annihilation of all Scorpions.
About the repubies, however, it is entirely different matter.
I think the Census was Gregg's target; and he was blocked
Bingo, and...
Personally I'm glad Gregg backed out, the idea of a Rethug in the Commerce cabinet post made me shudder from the start.
And to Rove's comment, it's too bad he forgot to finish his statement with "unlike me.", that would have justified his opening his turd-hole.
The consummate liberal
Gregg Is Wrong, It IS Obama's Fault...
Obama has been "bipartisan" and accommodating to EVERYONE but Progressives, who uniformly told him that "bipartisanship" with NeoCon Republicans is the equivalent of Charlie, Lucy, and the football.
Since Obama has tried EVERYTHING else and ended up loooking like an incompetent bufoon, he needs to listen to Progressives for a CHANGE. Otherwise, all he will have is "HOPELESSNESS We Can Believe In" by the time he leaves office in 2013!
Once there was a frog and a
another parable:
Difference Is, Lucy Doesn't Die Too - and the Scorpion Does
President Obama - Rachel Maddow is right, The Republicans Just Aren't That Into You. Cut the cord....
Bipartisanship
bipartisanship