I wish I could think of something a bit more uplifting than Robert Reich's urgent assurance: "This is not Armageddon."
That salve, spoken last night on one of the many cable-news programs in mourning, only reminded me of those once-youthful assurances I would hear about some possible blind date: "She's not, really, well, you know, ugly."
Yeah, we get the picture. And probably the best snapshot was that taken by a friend of Paul Krugman's, who said of our current, hard-fought status: "We are a banana republic with nukes."
Whether we achieved that ranking yesterday or at some other precise moment within the last eight years is open to reasoned debate. But whenever it happened, there is absolutely no doubt that we are now a bumbling, dysfunctional, nucular joke of a democratic circus whose better angels have disgustedly flown the coop.
"This is a major, major change," proudly announced Speaker Nancy Pelosi the day before yesterday, when it still looked like Congress -- which had been unconstitutionally bypassed and derided for years by the Bush administration as a collective body of indecision and ineptitude -- would act decisively and, well, eptly.
But, as it turned out, the Bush administration, of all things, was right, and Republican Senator Judd Gregg, the ranking member on the Budget Committee, was philosophically spot on: "If we don’t pass it, we shouldn’t be a Congress."
It's been 50 years so perhaps few remember John Kennedy's Pulitzer-prize-winning Profiles in Courage: its theme, that is, which was an internal, personal exploration of the essence of a working, representative democracy -- a case-by-case analysis of individual acts of decidedly unpopular responsibility over popular parroting.
Last night, Chuck Todd of MSNBC could think of only two House members -- two, out of 435 -- who were known to have voted their self-examined consciences rather than acted out of blind ideology or political cowardice. More than a few in tight reelection campaigns, especially, uncourageously collapsed and went with the mob. Simply put, their jobs were far more important to them than yours is.
There's no question that the congressional Pelosis and Franks and Dodds egregiously mislabeled this thing to begin with. They should never have characterized it as a "bailout" and from the get-go should have whacked that phraseology like the destructive mole it was.
It was a loan or investment -- a partially recoverable, if not fully recoverable or even profitable financial accommodation intended to unfreeze the credit markets for the next couple of years, on which -- Hello! -- the nation's economy depends. That would be our economy, not just Wall Street's.
I wouldn't have much cared if Congress had decided to hang every corrupt Wall Streeter from New York City's highest lampposts. But the legislation was never, for Christ's sake, about the Wall Streeters. In the hands of ideologues and demagogues from the right and left, however, the congressional debate morphed into almost nothing but.
Although the House may still set it right, yesterday was little more than a twisted saga of specious bipartisan opportunism -- yet more paradoxical proof that our national experiment in representative democracy too frequently works all too well. The multitudes' angry ignorance bubbled up and exploded in the lower chamber. Lord, how justified were the founders in their fears.
There was one upside, though. Actually, two. First, the price of oil dropped, although the accompanying downside there is that the price of oil dropped only because that commodities market no longer expects to be lubricating much of a global economy, thanks to the United States House of Representatives.
The other upside is that John S. McCain came out of this debacle looking like an even bigger idiot. Yes, he accomplished what heretofore had only seemed like the impossible.
McCain was out of this brawl, then in it, then out of it again, then pre-triumphant, then red-facedly back to blaming Barack Obama for the whole mess. His finger sure must be tired, what with all that pointing.
I thought the juxtaposed Washington Post headlines of yesterday afternoon said it best, all by themselves. The first was, "Obama Urges Calm," and right next to that was, "McCain Blames Dems." What a perfect encapsulation of their antipodal leadership styles in a crisis.
One might hope, if nothing else, that that encapsulation's thrust will trickle down into the masses' political consciousness. But who knows. McCain could yet figure a way to demagogue this thing before the vast throngs of ignorance that we so accurately call a representative democracy.





Buzz this on Buzzflash.net
OK P.M. I have a bridge to sell you
We are heading for depression, no way around it. This was true before all the hullaballo in the last few weeks, and will still be true in the coming months. Many rational economists have been predicting it for years. To exist as a debtor nation and a debt & borrow economy is ultimatley unsustainable. Adding so much addtional debt will not soften nor shorten the depression. If the money were going to infrastructure projects, or mass transit, clean energy, healthcare or education it might actually lessen the coming depression, much as the New Deal did. Unfortunatley, Pelosi and your Saint Obama (who can do no wrong apparantly) are no Roosevelts.
I am heartened to see most of the other comments already here in vocal disagreement with you. You are no fifth columnist. I have for several years read your blogs, usually agreeing, but on this one you have crossed the line. You are wrong, and very wrong. I think you know you are wrong too, just as all the timid members of our congress were cowed into voting for war,and knew in their hearts it was wrong, you have given into the fear and hysteria.
Bush and his allies have resigned themselves to an Obama victory this year. They are doing everything they can to make it a phyrric victory for him. The deeper they can make the coming depression, the worse it will reflect on his abilty to cope with it. The more Deomocrats in congress in the comng years, the easier it will be to blame them later. What happens? Republicans sweep in to every office in 4 years and ensure their "permanent majority". I fear, though I hope I am wrong, that Obama has taken their bait. Maybe he's clever enough to work us out of it once he is President. Only time will tell.
If we're all in bread lines in a year, so be it. I'm about a month away from being in one myself. I just want the CEOs and Wall Street crooks to be in line with me, not escaping the depression in golden parachutes.
Better to let this ship sink. The sooner it does, and the less money we spend (and borrow) trying to save it, the sooner we can get to work on building a new ship. A better ship. Not a Titanic, but a Phoenix.
What, US Panic?
As the markets around the world clearly demonstrated today, the hurry-up offense of the Bush administration is entirely a fabricated situation. There is no need to believe those liars.
So who to hear on this bill? It is extremely rare for me to agree with the ultra-conservative Republicans who blocked the bailoout, but I agree with some of their proposals in principle if not in fact. I was hoping to hear more about them, but MSNBC cut off this caucus as they were getting into their details today.
The propaganda didn't stop there. CNN had on some "experts" (including one of their own reporters) who insisted that if people "truly understood" what was in this bill, we wouldn't have opposed it so strenuously.
I didn't bother with FOX, but everywhere else I tuned, similar "opinions" were expressed. It's clear that the full-court media manipulation press is on and the propaganda machine is expected to carry the day and persuade We, the People to allow rescue the fat cats of Wall Street with our pensions and 401Ks.
But to get back to the rebel Republicans, I hope that they find a way to get their ideas out into the mainstream where the rest of us can peruse them. If after thorough examination they prove worthy of support (as my brief initial impression suggests), then we should insist of our "representatives" that these points be included in the final bill.
Who will trust any plan,
Who will trust any plan, good or bad, right, wrong, left or center?
Who?
No trust is deserved. However, the responsibility is not the president's, not Congress', not Wall Street's.
The responsibility is ours, the people's. We deserve what we allow.
Now that trust and responsibility are dead, what hope is there that it won't all come crashing down?
Fine.
Go lemmings, go.
This is a lifeboat for the rich
bail out...
Could This Be The Moment?
The solution is to grow up
Trickle-down economics has failed spectacularly and repeatedly. The Billionaire Bailout Bill is a gigantically cancerous version of trickle-down economics.
The New Deal and the WPA got us out of the last depression. Grow-up projects have also been used by other countries. Grow-up projects are much more beneficial than trickle-down economics.
The solution starts with bringing our troops home and closing 90% of our overseas military bases. Our military needs to be sized to defend us, not for maximum profiteering. The money thus saved can be invested in the grow-up economy - highways, bridges, levees, broadband, and universal single-payer health-care. The resulting economic gains will ultimately allow us to pay down the debt.
To avoid future bubbles we need four things - strict regulation of Wall Street gamblers, criminal prosecution of fraudulent derivatives valuers, civil recovery of the proceeds of fraud, and a mechanism to prevent corporations that are "too big to fail". The latter is simply accomplished by a progressive annual wealth tax on any corporate assets (not offset by liabilities) exceeding one billion times the minimum hourly wage.
But most importantly, we need to bring American jobs home. We can do this by changing the tax code to encourage investment in America rather than Mexico and China.
It's hard for bribed politicians, but for honest Americans the solution is simple. Rather than being trickled on, we just need to grow up.
You People Are Insane - and No Better Than Right Wingnuts
Though from your incessant Obama-hating and Nader-pimping, I should have known you don't give a fig for anything but Tearing Down The Establishment, and don't care who or what you destroy along the way.
If the bailout bill was so Gawdawful BAD, tell me what would be good by your standards - or do you have anything at all that isn't just "Stickit2daMan!"...?
What would be "good"
Okay, THAT Would Be Good
The Bailout Vote and the Tyranny of Representative Democracy
Hey, P.M.
That taste of burnt almonds in the Grape Kool-Aid? That was the cyanide! What was it that made your mind snap and you become a member of the dim, dumb and deluded. How absolutely pathetic.
I have often in the past viewed your articles as examples of perspicuity,perspicacity and erudition. Based on this piece which in my opinion is one of the most fatuous bits of vacuity on this subject, my opinion has dropped like the Dow and Nasdaq on 9/29/08
The Skeptical Cynic doth spake!
Santa knows when you are sleeping,
He knows when you're awake.
He knows if you've been bad or good.
Unfortunately, so does Bush,
Cheney, Rice, Mukasey, and...
the FBI, ONI, ASA, MCIA, CIA,
NSA, DIA, MI6, MOSSAD...
What a hack...
Why is this neocon blogging on Buzzflash?
The Billionaire Bailout Bill has more loopholes than my gardening sweater.
The elite don't have to repay the loan from our grandchildren. All that is required is that some future president propose a repayment mechanism. It will never be enacted.
The limit on executive compensation isn't. It simply makes excessive executive compensation non-deductible. But elite corporations don't pay tax anyway and this won't change anything but a couple of bookkeeping entries.
The limit on golden parachutes isn't. It's a small tax - less than the income tax paid by honest working Americans - and it only applies to lump sums, not "deferred compensation". And it only applies to future CEO's, not the CEO's who actually gambled and lost.
There is no regulation of Wall Street gambling. The elite will be able to continue shooting craps with a new pile of a million million-dollar chips donated by our grandchildren. Think what just one of those chips could do if invested in local schools rather than gambling parasites. As before, the elite still get to keep their winnings and working Americans cover their losses.
There are no prosecutions. No fines. That's all water under the bridge. We must look forward not backward. I mean, it's not like these people stole a loaf of bread to feed their children. They stole peoples homes and savings and pensions. Wholesale. They stole millions of peoples' American Dreams. Some corporations are too big to fail and apparently some criminals are too generous with their campaign donations to prosecute.
The only real question then, is why is P.M. Carpenter blogging here in defense of Bush/Cheney and Neocon Nancy and the Wall Street elite? There are plenty of places for wingnuts to hang out and regurgitate their propaganda points. Why does Buzzflash allow itself to be polluted with this stuff?
I, too, have to disagree with you, P.M. --
Yet another thing to be angered about?
Of course the people are
well put, SD!
How did Herman Goering put it, during the Nuremberg trials as he was debreifed by an American psychiatrist (shortly before he was condemned to death and took cyanide capsules)? --
-- "Why of course the people don't want war. Why should some poor slob on a farm want to risk his life in a war when the best he can get out of it is to come back to his farm in one piece? Naturally the common people don't want war neither in Russia, nor in England, nor for that matter in Germany. That is understood. But, after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy and IT IS ALWAYS A SIMPLE MATTER to DRAG THE PEOPLE ALONG, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, THE PEOPELE CAN ALWAYS BE BROUGHT to do THE BIDDING OF THE LEADERS. That is easy. ALL YOU HAVE TO DO IS TELL THEM THEY ARE BEING ATTACKED, and DENOUNCE THE PEACEMAKERS for LACK OF PATRIOTISM and EXPOSING THE COUNTRY TO DANGER.
It works the same in any country."
(Needless to say, this basic truism is all the more reprhensible, brought to America's current politics by people who were the victims of the above climate of war frenzy and terror, but the story of how the Democrat 'leadership' has been CO-OPTED by the WAR LOBBY is another story.)
whew !!
The Failure of the Bailout
PM, your panic is unbecoming..!
This was an ESTABLISHMENT vs "small-d" democracy bill, plain and simple.
#2. Yesterdy I watched Nancy Pelosi, the nominal "leader" of the Democratic Party (at least until the Dem. presidential candidate was decided), spend ten full minutes - twice, three times as much time as the other Representatives were allowed - blasting President Bush, the Bush administration, and the Republican Party, for bringing America's economy to the brink of the abyss, if not total ruin.
The clueless Pelosi then turned on a dime to her own Congress-men & women, and instructed them to....
...GIVE a SEVEN-HUNDRED-BILLION DOLLAR __BLANK CHECK__, at taxpayer expense, to BUSH's OWN Secretary of Treasury, with only the flimsiest, most ephemeral of strings attached to that BLANK CHECK !!!!
That would be SecTreasury Hank Paulson, a guy who amassed $432 MILLION dollars in Goldman Sachs stock in his 15 years there, the last seven years as G-S's chief.
A guy who was in the THICK of Wall Street's aggressively pushed, exaggerated, bloated, hyped portfolios, and "SECURITIZED" and "DERIVATIVE" Enron style market securities flim-flam!
Come On, PM, Pelosi is as much of a DISASTER for America, as Paulson, Bush, Cheney, Grover Norquist, Karl Rove, James Inhofe, Tom DeLay, Antonin Scalia, Trent Lott, and Newtie-pie Gingrich (et al, ad naseum).
Indeed, the only reason the American public and American voters don't DESPISE the above Republicans as the SNIDELY WHIPLASH cartoon villains who destroyed the American economy (today's market levels are where they were - before Bush took office!) is because Speaker Pelosi has taken not only impeachment "Off the table" - but therefore EVEN THE MILDEST, most cursory OVERSIGHT and Democratic PUSH-BACK. We effectively have only a RUDIMENTARY "opposition party" -
the FOXES are IN THE HEN HOUSE, the THIEVES are in the guard shack, the LOOTERS are IN THE BANK VAULT!
Henry Waxman writes up a dozen reports "there were some foul doings here" - and Speaker Pelosi, Steny Hoyer, Harry Reid, Jay Rockefeller, Dianne Feinstein (et al) all JOIN the Republicans and corporate media in tossing a big, wet blanket on Waxman's findings! At Least Joe Lieberman has the conviction to Give Bush and McCain a hug & kisses with his stab-Democratic-voters-in-back treachery!
And NOW Pelosi WANTS TO HAND that very, insanely corrupt Bush administration.... a ONE TRILLION DOLLAR CASH GIFT, at workin' stiff taxpayer expense, moments (hopefully 2 months) before Bush & Cheney walk out the door?
SPEAKER PELOSI, ARE YOU DAFT ?
That 10 minute lecture you made to your fellow Democrats yesterday, about how Bush-Republcian policies are killing the American economy, YOU SHOULD MAKE TO THE PRESS CORPS EVERY damn DAY! But like Sarah Palin, you are long on rah-rah, SHORT ON SPECIFICS. YOU, Speaker Pelosi, CAN NOT COMMUNICATE to the American public THE GREAT DAMAGE the Bush administration has done to America - unless you are moments away from handing those very bums ANOTHER TRILLION DOLLARS of taxpayer money, DEBT that, applied to America's exisiting $11 TRILLION credit card, would mean that taxpayers would pay twice to THREE TIMES AS MUCH before that credit card is actually paid off!
Unfortunately, there is not another Congressman/woman in Congress who would do much better than Pelosi in the Speaker's chair. Most of the others have had the fire-in-their-belly beat out of them a long time ago by the corporate media and Democrat "leadership" over these last appalling 8 years of BushCo, and Dennis Kucinich is just too honest and too straightforward to appeal to much of "What's the Matter with Kansas?" America. (Sarah Palin's America.) (Although if Kucinich had an HONEST media, he would be far more popular nationwide than he is.)
Well, there you have it. The PELOSI BLANCK CHECK was a FREE GIFT, a GET OUT OF JAIL FREE pass for the VERY lame duck Bush administration.
Pelosi's CLUELESSNESS (giving her the benefit of the doubt that she is not ABJECTLY CORRUPT), is exactly why her DISMAL 9% 110th Congress APPROVAL RATINGS are WORSE than Bush's, the Republican Party's, or even Dick Cheneys approval ratings!
THREE CHEERS VVVC1
Mostly ditto, but ...
... Peter DeFazio of Oregon would be a great Speaker of the House.
Ditto to Rigel's comment too, and perhaps the biggest benefit of this is we now have more time to consider ......... everything.