"This is exactly what I was afraid was going to happen. They are going to just keep standing there and pounding each other and bloodying each other."
That pugilistic quote appeared in a NY Times' article whose headline -- "The Bruising Will Go On for the Party, Too" -- was inspired by the metaphor-invoking governor. This primary race is no longer reflective of any internal, Democratic values; it's merely a slugfest for the benefit of one.
Amid all the lopsided cheering and hallelujah hallucinations, the article's author, Adam Nagourney, pointed to the clearer light of day: "Mrs. Clinton’s margin was probably not sufficient to fundamentally alter the dynamics of the race, which continued to favor an eventual victory for Mr. Obama." There are, after all, and as Nagourney understated it, "significant hurdles" obstructing her nomination -- such as Obama's delegate count, lead in the popular vote, number of states won and, by now, the little time that's left.
None of this, of course, has fazed Hillary in the least. With each passing hour, it seems, and always out of whole cloth she conjures a new argument for the urgency of her democracy-toppling nomination. Her latest is that she actually leads in the popular vote, assuming one counts a couple of major states that don't, and in no way can, count.
Yes, yes, I know, it's laughable. On the other hand, Hillary knows her target audience -- those kings of vacillation and spinelessness, the uncommitted superdelegates. They could have secured the nomination for the party's still-presumptive nominee by now, so that he could get on with the more urgent contest of boxing McCain rather than shadows, but that would be too institutionally businesslike and politically sane for these grand poobahs of Democracy. Better to wait a while longer and test the political winds once again, and again ... and again. One never knows, is their motto.
But let's try to think like a superdelegate for a moment and join with Hillary in putting aside all those "significant hurdles." Just forget about them, as Hillary and her supporters are somehow able to do. Let us assume that Obama has no real lead in any of the above and customarily decisive categories. From this artificial balancing we start from scratch; the candidates are even-steven -- right?
Wrong. Because still trailing Hillary like toilet paper stuck to her shoe is that little matter of her negatives, something you and the superdelegates won't ever hear Mrs. Clinton advertising. They are grim, devastatingly grim, over-before-it-starts grim, and which the Washington Post deconstructed last week.
To quoth the black raven sitting atop her electoral burial marker: "While Clinton retains a big edge over Obama on experience, public impressions of her have taken a sharply negative turn. Today, more Americans have an unfavorable view of her than at any time since The Post and ABC began asking the question, in 1992." Pucker up, Mrs. Clinton -- as well as all you uncommitted superdelegates -- because "54 percent said they have an unfavorable view" of you.
That, right there, is the game ender, as virtually any objective political adviser would agree. No presidential candidate with negatives in the high 40s, let alone in the mid 50s, is going anywhere after an election but home. That's just a fact of political life that's also going ignored amidst all the Clintonite hoopla.
And it gets even worse. An accompanying WaPo piece noted that "Clinton is viewed as 'honest and trustworthy' by just 39 percent of Americans ... compared with 52 percent in May 2006. Nearly six in 10 said in the new poll that she is not honest and trustworthy. And now, compared with Obama, Clinton has a deep trust deficit among Democrats, trailing him by 23 points as the more honest."
The real killer, of course, was her Bosnia fantasy, against which Obama's "bitter" comments or guilt by pastoral association pale. There's a huge and game-ending difference between recidivist lying to successive public audiences and dropping indiscreet remarks to a few privately huddled San Franciscans, and don't think Americans -- not to mention the salivating GOP machine -- don't know it.
Hillary's verbal contortions regarding her Iraq-war vote have been bad enough; her Bosnia-war whoppers are but 60-second visuals of the final touches, encased as they are within indiffusibly negative atmospherics.
So back to reality as we reassemble things: Obama leads in the delegate count, the popular vote and states won and nothing will change these dynamics, while Hillary leads only in historic negatives. And what conclusion do the uncommitted superdelegates derive from all this? Let us, they say, wait and see.





Buzz this on Buzzflash.net
DELEGATES-HE WON'T WIN...TO RISKY!
Well, Well, its...VoteIRresponsiblyIQ:08....
I bet you didn't know I'd be up working late tonight---now did you? Gratefully too, or otherwise, I'd have missed your latest offering, which is, as usual, stupid. But, I hope you're a (wo)man of your word, when you say, " Any man (or woman, I presume) that associates with Anti-Americans can not be President!"
Because when a man has made a 110 million dollars in the last seven years...OVERSEAS... making "speeches" (wink, wink, nod, nod)...I hope you'll get off your lazy ass----ask yourself 'how'---and then research it, instead of, crossing over here to spread your ignorant spiel-----AGAIN! You take your blind, inaccuate observation of why YOU think someone stutters and then, try dis-jointly, to apply that to some Anti-American association of your imaginings---you're even dumber than I thought you were.
I could list a bevy of Hillary's Anti-American activities, but I'm not going to do your homework for you. However, I recommend you purchase the following book by Bill Gertz, aptly entitled: "Betrayed"; (assuming you know HOW to read), it examines how:
"Gertz also makes the case that the Clinton administration's sale of sophisticated computer and satellite technology to China was influenced by campaign contributions to the Democrats from Chinese and American executives.....He further charges that the Clinton administration has attempted to downplay the Chinese threat to U.S. security even though "China has undertaken a steady military buildup that is directly aimed at fighting a future war with the United States."
http://www.amazon.com/Betrayal-Administration-Undermined-American-Security/dp/0895263173
(How the Clinton Administration Undermined American Security)
But, you'll only falsely argue and whine: but thats BILL--not Hillary, need I remind you---THEIR BANK ACCOUNTS ARE JOINT. But, Hillarys a piece of work on her own, for example, you think association should eliminate a candidate, we'll see, how 'bout Hill here:
http://www.anorak.co.uk/politicians/180379.html (Hillary Clinton Funding Problems And Mehmet Celebi)
((Hillary Clinton Funding Problems And Mehmet Celebi))
It ends with the interesting observation:
"Can she check everything every donor is involved with?" Apply the same standard to Obama and his "responsibility" for what OTHERS utter!
I won't even bother going into Hills association with her 'religious cult'--The Family--and its membership of many so-called Americans---who have betrayed this country.
http://www.motherjones.com/news/feature/2007/09/hillarys-prayer.html
So when you say the above, idiot, make sure you know WHAT, and WHO, you're talking about, and also that its applied evenly. STILL WANNA TALK ABOUT 'TRAITORS'??
BTW: do you get commissions for that redundant, simple-minded ending, you're so fond of copying each and every post??
1. I think Obama is
CJ GOT PROPER CONGRATULATIONS
Destruction of the Democratic party
and no sense of personal responsibility....
Look at your post, no where, no, not ONCE, did you address ANYTHING that Hillary has said, done, alluded to, has responsibility for, has authority over, has an obligation to, has conspired with, or....simply, LIED about. No where is there any reference to her campaigns racist and sexist manipulations of all of you----All documented VISUALLY as coming OUT OF HER MOUTH. Later, duly reported by, and in, the PRINT media. But, in the end, YOU blame THE MESSENGERS.
I find it amusing that when you did get around to blaming someone--it is Obama. Your justification for this "destructuion"? He's "An African-American with a Muslem(sp) name with a opinionated wife and a radical black reverand(sp) ...." See? Hillary's racist and immoral campaign HAS A VERY OBSERVABLE EFFECT----not on anything you all argue---YOU CANNOT, AND OFTEN DON'T, ARGUE THE INDEFENSIBLE---but, with every word you type, with every post you make, with every thought you think pertaining to this........you demonstrate every delusion we're all burdened with......by you.
You Know!
YOU DON'T....
VoteIRresponsiblyIQ:08....
"Those that bring up race is a racist in the closet.. We proved very little racist since Iowa..That Obama has used his card...absolutely!"---WTF?!? Two words:
COGNITIVE DISSONANCE-----It'll help you understand the disconnect with Hillary and her campaigns actions. You say 'those who bring up race is a racist'...OK, well lets look at WHO "brings it up"...
http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/mark-finkelstein/2008/03/11/olbermann-ferraros-statement-clearly-racist-are-we-south-africa
(Olbermann: Ferraro Statement 'Clearly Racist)
http://blackrepublican.blogspot.com/2008/01/hillary-clinton-shows-her-racist.html
(Hillary Clinton Shows Her Racist Underbelly)
http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2007/12/hillary_campaign_acknowledges_that_hillary_backer_passed_along_obama_madrassa_email.php
(Hillary Campaign Acknowledges That County Chair Backing Hillary Passed Along Obama Muslim Smear Email)
http://obamain08.wordpress.com/2008/01/17/racism-hillary-clinton-chats-with-barack-obama-in-08-elections/
(Racism: Hillary Clinton Chats with Barack Obama in 08 Elections)
http://themoderatevoice.com/at-tmv/newsweek-blogitics/18861/if-hillary-clinton-cant-run-a-campaign-then-how-can-she-run-a-country/
and I've got at least, twenty more on file I could cite. Give it up, voteIRresponsibly----YOU CAN'T DEFEND THE INDEFENSIBLE--live with it!
PA voters
Obama outspent Clinton 3 or 4 to one and still lost. Clinton lead among white men and white women, union members, senior citizens, Jews and Catholics, blue collar workers, families with incomes of less than $100,000 and non-College graduates. Obama received 92% of the Black vote. What does that mean?
IT MEANS.....
That the propaganda of racist dissemination and disinformation, and the politics of primitive, tribal fear-raking have WON. It means that the Clintons took note, and learned most astutely, HOW the Republicans acquired power and have been the SOLE power brokers of this infant millennium.....At the expense of everything that should STILL MATTER..and the deep-rooted beliefs we USE to stand for.
It means that there are those who fearfully believe, that although they are drowning beneath water levels above their noses---alls well--as long as they're made to believe that they are standing on the shoulders of someone else.
It means that those who possess the least sense of self-esteem among whites, those 'denied' their 'entitlements' (as they see it), those who are feeling overwhelmed by 'enemies'--all about them---real or imagined----"Anti-Americans" that can be kept at arms distance----because they still possess their guns; ITS US versus all those "others"------you know, the ones...in urban centers of black lawlessness, in barrios of latino illegalities--those taking 'their' jobs, 'their' taxes, 'their' benefits; those 'Commies' in halls of higher learning where 'Liberal Arts' and largess bestow THEIR taxes, THEIR sweat, THEIR childrens bread and future, TO ENRICH ALL THOSE OTHERS...those Black minority 'elites', those sneaky Asians, those terrorist Arabs, those greedy Jews, and ALL THOSE OTHER 'FURRINERS'----who are not for some reason, from THEIR neck of the woods.
It means that it becomes far more important, to them, every four years or so, with each passing election----that ALL recognize its their time to get THEIR RINGS KISSED; that ALL recognize THEIR wants, THEIR needs, THEIR priorities-----how THEIR deserving of this attention, this adoration, this....pandering. After all, they feel, the politicos have screwed them for the intervening three years....so The Politicos cannot disappoint them; and every election descends into an orgy of values re-examined, and irrelevant heart-rending over gay marriage, the American flag, flag pins themselves, abortion rights, border protection, so-called Democratic mis-deeds, and all else that might disturb the sensitivities of this group.....all with the ultimate purpose being, to persuade these Reagan Demos, these 'closet' conservative Repubs, cloaked as Democrats--and who will JUST THAT--WHEN ALL IS SAID AND DONE. But, what history has proven, time and again, is that THEY WILL BETRAY THEIR OWN INTERESTS , if necessary, if made to feel "secure"...Politicos, knowing this, prey on their fears and insecurities, all with the monolithic thinking of..., and the ultimate goal being: ......SO GOES THIS DEMOGRAPHIC--SO GOES THE NATION....AND DEMOCRATS HAVE BEEN BETRAYED BY THEM---EVERYTIME---LIKE A BRIDE LEFT STANDING AT THE ALTAR.
What does it mean?--What has it wrought? --Fear-based politics of muck-raking mirages; Fear-based policies of first-strike initiatives; Fear-based fomentations of imaginary enemies, Fear-based screeds of 'obliteration' of nations; Fear-based actions of fearful isolationism and xenophobia; and fear-based fears of religious intolerance.
It means that for 28 years, or so, of Republican under-financing of, and pillaging from, educational programs and budgets has engendered a less-informed, less-prepared, less inquiring, and frankly, a more stupid, dumbed-down American populace--who sit there, barely cognizant of the mind-games played upon them by arrogant, self-absorbed, no-nothing 'experts', and 'strategist', and 'pundits'--who, are often more wrong than right..yet, we still listen to them and their lies---as if they warrant (or merit) attention. This is what has become of the sons, daughters and grand-children of 'the greatest generation'--we have devolved to a population that can't read the mortgage contract they just signed, the degree they just earned, the diploma they just received, and the homework their child just handed them. Nor, can they decipher the subtle distinctions between the nuances of Hillarys tabulations and the soundness of real-world mathematics....it means...that this is how you set the table for Fascist dictatorships.
It means that VISUALS become TRUTHS, and DELUSIONS become REALITY, and MYTHOS becomes FACT. It becomes why we believe a Connecticut blue-blood is a Texas cowboy; a multi-millionaire is a gun-totin' assembly-line worker; the abuses of a septenarian war victim are certifiable credentials for leadership. It becomes why we fall for false images of Katrina restorations, 'mission accomplished', and 'Bosnia-sniper missions'.
It means, that we can be told 9.4 is a 'double-digit' blow-out,..and believe it is so. It means we can be told that a Black Man---running for president of the U.S.--with a bulls-eye on his back---is, somehow, FEARFUL, A COWARD AND WEAK--for refusing to descend into the mire with a woman of little principle...and believe it is so. It means that HRC's camp can twist and distort, ANY fact, ANY point, Any rule, to serve whatever is expedient for them to win...at THAT moment...and believe it is so.
It means it is why we cannot see....that the removal of that same woman...will allow that man to heal the rift with all you listed. It is why we cannot see....that without her disruptive presence he could soothe the latent anger of Michigan and Florida before November. It is why we cannot see....what a lack of Hope---under the guise of false 'experience', and cleverly stolen slogans, and gross managerial skills, and arm-twisting in smoky back-rooms is, somehow, an apt substitute for the much-scorned ideal of Hope.
It means, finally,.....all will be everything it was...times three.....of what you have been complaining about, and hoping for....before you sought solace in "YES SHE CAN", and before you abandoned Hope.......just a short half year ago.
Math
bettysdad
Toxic stew...
Congratulations.
Obama should stick to his message...
The superdelegates who aren't coming to dinner
Blind Ambition...
Molly Ivins Knew Better
Stick a fork in us....
Al Gore?
Al Gore? Leader?
Hillary Rules
The politics of negativity
You are so right
No, it's the destruction of the Party
It's the money, stupid
Fdcgjc