Get FREE BuzzFlash News Alerts

Email:  

The digital TV transition is another huge mess Obama inherits from Bush

For some Americans getting "free TV," this may be what is on their screens even if they had a converter box or a digital TV. 

A BUZZFLASH NEWS ANALYSIS
by Chad Rubel

We talk about the many "gifts" the Bush Administration is giving the new president-elect. But there is one that may not seem important, but to those who are directly affected, it might have more meaning.

I'm talking, of course, about the transition from analog TV to digital TV.

The Bush Administration's Commerce Department has been running the process, yet when the deadline comes on February 17, Barack Obama will be president. And things aren't looking good for the transition, increasing the chances government will get blamed. And that might be Obama, not Bush.

Oh, TV stations are broadcasting in analog and digital. Wilmington, NC even had a market test. You've seen 10 million PSAs for the change, whether this affects you or not.

So what have the Bush people done wrong? Let's start with the most obvious part. Those who get their TV via the antenna (i.e., not cable or satellite), and don't have a digital TV will need a converter box. The boxes cost about $50-$60, but the government promised two $40 coupons for every household. (Would the boxes be as high as $50-$60 if there wasn't a built-in $40 coupon deal??)

Unfortunately for competence and sanity, the people running the system made the coupons void after 90 days. If you wanted more coupons, you were out of luck. And as we are finding out now, the Commerce Department has run out of money, yet hasn't run out of people wanting the coupon. Even Obama has expressed concern over the coupon issue.

Now these are the obvious problems. But there is an underlying issue that all the 10 million PSAs you've seen have completely ignored, and it has the potential to make a certain percentage of the population even angrier at government.

What the clever PSAs don't tell you is that digital signals don't travel as far as analog signals. And that many of the VHF channels (2-13) will actually broadcast their digital signals on UHF frequencies (14-69). Oh, and UHF signals don't travel as well as VHF signals.

So you might have a friend who has a converter box, and is all set to continue to watch broadcast TV, and that person might find that, oops, they can't get all or some of the signals. Some might get most channels but not NBC or PBS.

So now, besides a converter box, this person has to buy a stronger antenna, or rehook up the antenna on the roof - in the middle of winter. Or there is no roof antenna or the antenna can't pull in the shorter range of the TV signals, then free TV might not exist for them.

Even a digital TV won't solve this problem. So these people who were getting free TV signals for years, and shelled out $40 for a converter box, still won't be able to get TV -- unless they get cable or satellite. This is when people will really start screaming.

There will be charges -- right or wrong -- that this transition is a conspiracy to get people to buy cable. And while the facts don't back that up, it will be difficult to disagree with that assessment.

Buffalo and Denver are two major cities that will have trouble. And a lot of people live in smaller cities near a TV market, but not in a TV market. Anecdotally, my mother lives 40-50 miles from the nearest media market, so she is destined to live with cable or no TV. For these people, "free TV" no longer becomes free, even with a digital TV.

Many people, whether they get their TV from broadcast, cable, or satellite, do rely on broadcast stations for emergencies, such as tornadoes and thunderstorms. When the World Trade Center collapsed in September 2001, many New Yorkers relied on broadcast channels for important information. Though ironically, only WCBS-TV was available by antenna, since the station had a supplemental antenna on the Empire State Building. (The other stations had antennas on the WTC.) On September 11 in New York City, you could receive the broadcasts via cable or satellite, but if you had an antenna (digital TV or otherwise), your options were down to one channel.

There are legitimate reasons for making the move from analog to digital broadcasting, but there has been a woeful lack of coverage about why that is true, and the stark reality that many, even with a converter box or a digital TV, will have to start paying for "free TV" through cable or satellite. The government is going to get blamed for that. And thanks to the incompetency of the Bush Administration, once again, Obama could quote the words of Oliver Hardy: "This is another nice mess you've gotten me into!"

A BUZZFLASH NEWS ANALYSIS

http://www.antennaweb.org/ is a great Web site to determine whether you can pick up digital signals in your area.

https://www.dtv2009.gov/ is the government's Web site for the transition.


Satellite TV

Its a crime that satellite TV is not free! It transtmits on the people's airwaves, the same as ground transmitters do. The airwaves are public property and should not be "owned" by any corporation. Sure it costs to put that bird in the sky, but it also costs to build and operate a ground station. The ground stations have stayed in business for many years just by advertising revenue.

If the poor...

If the poor can't have all the T.V. they want, two things might happen, both salutary. 1. The kids start to read. 2. The poor start a class revolution against the rich.

Digital Conversion

How many years warning has everyone had about this upcoming transition? No one really has the right to claim they were surprised or only given short notice. Years and years of warning have been on the offing. Perhaps the Bushies didn't handle everything about this exactly as it should have been done, but that goes for just about everything they touched. That being said however, one thing they did do was notify everyone well in advance, and also laid out the methods and options one had to make the transition.

14 years

Our home has not had a TV since 1994, and trust me ......... we have not missed it at all!

It is now quite hard to sit and watch a TV at friends for too long before wanting to do something else. Find some of the good old VHS tapes [they are very cheap now] to watch if you absolutely must have a video fireplace in your house, and get what worthwhile news exists off the web and radio.

Got a battery powered digital TV for emergencies? I doubt it.

If the cutoff comes on Feb 17, the natural or man-made disasters can happen the very next day and leave us in the dark and much worse off. Of course, you'd never see pictures of Katrina's aftermath without a TV.

I guess we can all go down to the movie theater and watch the newsreels.

There are no battery or cigaret-lighter digital TVs for sale. You'll be back in the 1940s or early 1950s, with your radio.

It'll make all those Civil Defense TV tests over the years a complete waste of time.

This, in addition to telling all those people whose coupons got lost in the mail that they're out of luck, or those people in nursing homes or assisted living that they don't qualify since they don't have an apartment number.

America cut off from boob tube?

Maybe it won't be so bad after all. When the source of misinformation and infomercials is silenced, with nothing better to do, folks will go to their public libraries to occupy their feeble minds with BOOKS! Oh, I forget the right wingnut hate radio - but maybe we can figure something out to put that on the fritz too.

Maybe, just maybe, it will turn out to our advantage. Minds, when fed properly, get stronger. Some of them even start generating original thoughts.

Viva la revolucion! Pitch your TV (HD or not) out the window. You'll be so much better for it.

Analog TV Spectrum Uses

Incomplete roll-out of DTV and the badly handled converter box program is only part of the problem. The sell-off of the radio spectrum being vacated is another aspect of this bush debacle. Verizon and other mobile phone providers are scrambling & lobbying to get their claws into this valuable spectrum for their own purely commercial purposes. Are more cell phones the best possible use? President Obama's plan to improve our information infrastructure should include a review of what's been done so far and make appropriate revisions to it. Publicly owned WiMax transmitters could extend internet service to rural areas and give people in urban areas an alternative to expensive cable and DSL. Another thing that occurs to me - and this may seem trivial to some - is the ignominious termination of analog transmission. Americans have for the most part been well served for almost 80 years by the old NTSC standard. The FCC protected American's investment in B&W TVs when color was first introduced. The story of Philo T. Farnsworth and his Green Street Labs here in San Francisco is an important part of television history: http://www.noehill.com/sf/landmarks/cal0941.asp http://www.adherents.com/people/pf/Philo_Farnsworth.html David Sarnoff and RCA eventually won out (of course) but Philo (a farmer) put up a valiant struggle and he was actually awarded the original patent for broadcast television. When NTSC signals are finally shutoff shouldn't it be an occasion worthy of note? How can we know where we're going if we don't know where we've been?