Get FREE BuzzFlash News Alerts

Email:  

The Administration May Have Changed, But the NRA Is Still In Power

A BUZZFLASH NEWS ANALYSIS
by Christine Bowman

Back during the primary election season, Democrats vilified "lobbyists" as the enemies of the people. No self-respecting Democratic candidate was going to let the unscrupulous K-Street lobbyists run Washington any more!

Too bad they didn't really mean it. Now that Democrats have won the White House and solid majorities in Congress, one of the nation's strongest lobbies, the National Rifle Association (NRA), has been on a real upswing. As it turns out, "Fear of Obama's been good for business," Scott Vogel of Freedom States Alliance told BuzzFlash today -- which is ironic, since the NRA poured some $40 million into the 2008 elections trying to defeat Obama and other Democrats.

But since January, the NRA has enjoyed tremendous message success along with legislative success. On the message side, the NRA did everything in its power to scare the wits out of conservatives. "They're coming to take your guns away," was the warning, with the result that there was a tremendous run on guns and ammo. Buyers literally emptied gun store shelves, and dealers and manufacturers, who provide deep financial support to the NRA, raked in the dough.

And as Josh Sugarmann of the Violence Policy Center observed in February, "Military-style weapons are the guns that are flying off the shelves and into the homes of people frightened about the 'change' that an Obama Administration represents." Assault weapons, high-powered hand guns, sniper rifles, oh yeah. This was not about a sudden urge to go duck hunting.

Meanwhile, of course, in Washington this year there hasn't been the slightest move to take guns away or curb gun ownership. That's just right-wing mythology. In fact, only one regulatory baby step that could be construed as "anti-gun" has been taken since Obama's inauguration. The new administration did slightly alter the Tiahrt Amendments, so that a city's police chief -- but only that person -- now may access records that trace guns involved in criminal activity.

Is it a new era of government "transparency"? In this case, Obama created at best a little translucence. Prior to the first Tiahrt Amendments of 2003, records tracing the ownership of crime-involved guns had been open to anyone via a Freedom of Information Act request. Now, thanks to NRA lobbying and congresspersons like Todd Tiahrt (R-Kan), it's illegal for even a mayor or elected city council member to see where guns used in crimes came from. You've got to wonder, just who gets protected by that?

While the Obama Administration and pro-regulation legislators have maintained a low profile on gun issues, the gun lobby and their allies have moved swiftly to fill the leadership void. They attached a gun amendment to the very popular credit card bill ostensibly to "protect innocent Americans from violent crime in national parks and refuges." To their discredit, the Democrats were split evenly on that vote, 27-27 with 3 abstentions. Senator Tom Coburn (R-OK) championed the move that will bring the most liberal gun-carry law of any local jurisdication into Yellowstone or Williamsburg or any other national park. On their website, the NRA's lobbying arm, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) kindly thanks those who were most helpful: "We appreciate the efforts and leadership of Senators Max Baucus (D-MT), Mike Crapo (R-ID) and Representative Doc Hastings (R-WA) ..."

How does the gun lobby intimidate or coopt politicians of both parties? First, by boasting of "nearly 4 million members" who supposedly oppose regulation of guns altogether, and supposedly will vote accordingly. Second, with dubious evidence, they convinced many politicians that the partial assault weapons ban enacted in 1994 and then allowed to expire in 2004 led to Democratic electoral defeats. And, finally, they have deep pockets. "In NRA Headquarters in Fairfax, Va., and in offices in Washington, D.C., and in Sacramento, Calif., the Institute employs a staff of more than 80, with a team of full-time lobbyists defending Second Amendment issues on Capitol Hill, in state legislatures and in local government bodies." That's just one arm of the lobbying force, not it's entirety. And they've lobbied successfully for state and local laws like the new one in Tennessee that allows carriers of concealed guns to freely enter bars and restaurants.

Meanwhile, the opposition -- the anti-violence, pro-regulatory advocates -- must make do with meager funding and overworked staffs.

The result of this imbalance in lobbying power is that guns are everywhere and making headlines. The right-wing militia movement and other extremists have been emboldened and are recruiting, as a leaked Homeland Security memo revealed in April. Mexican drug cartels, which operate also inside the US, are heavily armed and freely assassinating Mexican police officers.

Since January, well-armed political extremists in the US have shot dead a clinic doctor in Kansas, a museum guard in Washington, DC and a young soldier at a military recruiting office in Arkansas. A man on parole and convicted of prior firearm assault killed four law enforcement officers in Oakland, CA. A white supremacist in Pittsburgh, PA killed three more officers.

Is this the "well-armed militia" that our Constitution assured and envisioned as needing weapons? Does the NRA, which has fought to make guns available to everyone including these extremist killers, believe that?

Who knows. It hardly matters whether the gun lobby is unprincipled or irrational. They'll use the Second Amendment to argue against local regulation such as the gun laws enacted to protect Washington, DC or Chicago. Then they'll turn around and use the Tenth Amendment to argue against national regulation. They'll even use a credit card bill, of all things, to extend concealed carry laws into states and cherished national wilderness lands that didn't need or want them.

Cartoon

They're the NRA. They're omnipotent gods. They've constructed convincing myths that keep them growing. Now, even chaos fueled by hate and well-aimed bullets -- bordering on domestic terrorism -- seems insufficient to rally the principled opposition and the less militant. Unless you count baby steps.

A BUZZFLASH NEWS ANALYSIS


observations

As that great Scot's poet, Robbie Burns said, "O a God the gifte ge us to see oursels as others see us." The land of freedom ringing seems to have turned into a land of fear. Wasn't it that cartoon character Pogo who said, "We have met the enemy and he is us." Hoping America that you get a glimpse of yourself before it is to late. Really, can you imagine a country where everybody is a Bill Oriley, do you think it would be peaceful??

NRA Members

I won't analyze the rest of your blog entry, but with regard to this comment: "First, by boasting of "nearly 4 million members" who supposedly oppose regulation of guns altogether, and supposedly will vote accordingly.", of the 100 or so NRA members I have met, this is the case with all of them. Given the utter failure of all gun laws that this country has seen at every level, it's very easy to be against regulation of guns. Gun regulations are simply ignored by the criminals, but create substantial barriers to gun ownership by lawful people. Gun regulation is a lose-lose situation. It really is just that simple.

Just the FACTS M'am!

"Given the utter failure of all gun laws that this country has seen at every level..."

You state the opinion above as if it were a FACT!

Let's have some hard evidence (other than rising crime rates {which were rising BEFORE the advent of regulations} or NRA-manipulated "statistics").

The problem with people who

The problem with people who don't know anything about guns, or those who don't want to know, is that they get all the facts screwed up. The assault weapons ban required removal of the bayonet lug from imports and prevented the importation of large magazines. I have not heard of a crime being committed using a bayonet, but I guess it is possible. Existing magazines went up in price and large magazines were manufactured here -- a good thing, I guess. This also caused the price of the old imports to go up, because few collectors would want a gun that has been modified the same as any other modified collectible like coins and antiques. The guns that were and are being imported are not assault rifles. They are semi automatic. It is illegal and has been illegal to own a fully automatic rifle or pistol since the 1930s without a federal license. This is when the Thompson sub-machine gun was banned due to use by organized crime. All guns sold without a license must be semi-auto, that is, the trigger must be pulled each time the gun fires. To equate the second amendment to the era of muzzleloaders is the equivalent of saying that free speech does not apply today because we have the internet. The court has already determined that the second amendment applies to individuals. While I personally think that .50 rifles and machine guns have no real purpose other that for the personal enjoyment of those shooting them on a range, I would be hesitant to put an all out ban on them because (as far as I know) they have not been used in any crime. If anyone has any data that shows that crime rates increase, rather than decrease, in areas or regions of the country that have concealed deadly weapons licenses, I would like to see it. I have nothing against banning weapons in bars since the purpose of a bar is to drink alcohol. I guess someone could go to a bar to dance or pick up drunks. I do have a problem of banning cdw in restaurants that serve alcohol, because the purpose of a restaurant is to eat. I support cdw license holders and/or open carry of firearms in national parks and wilderness areas while passing though in their cars and when hiking on the trail or camping. Has anyone ever walked upon a marijuana patch by total accident? Or walked some of the trails in Appalachia? Or camped out near a public road? It can get real scary at times. A lot of the people that I know who are hunters, collectors, or target shooters would never vote democratic because of the history of screw ups made by the democrats in regard to guns. Mainly because these people do not know what they are talking about and really do not want to learn -- sort of like the right wingnuts. We have a lot of education to do to convince gun owners that liberals are not going to take their guns -- or do we want to if we could? Obviously many still believe that democrats are going to take their guns. These radical authoritarian ideas only serves to drive up the price, create artificial shortages, and cost the democrats votes. I do not support the NRA, because their criticism of Obama during the campaign was way over the top and for some of their other right wing ideas. However, I also do not support anyone who can not prove to me, using valid data and scientific analysis, that giving up one of my rights, gun ownership, will make me safer. Please get off this kick and focus upon the real causes of violence. It is something that all of us, including gun owners, can support. Bill - Kentucky

Guns in National Parks and Wilderness Areas

As an ex-Marine, I've wracked my brain for reasons why anyone might want to carry a firearm in national parks or wilderness areas.So far, I've only come up with one: protection from big critters like grizzly bears and maybe mountain lions as well. Hikers in places like Yellowstone and Glacier Parks, and the Bob Marshall Wilderness, for example, do occasionally encounter these critters. Me, if I were to go hiking in one of those places, I'd like to pack along one the new 50-caliber magnum pistols. One of those would really stop an attacking grizzly. There's only one problem that I can see with packing in one of these monster firearms: when firing of them, one better wear ear muffs or fancy ear plugs. Unprotected, I expect that one's ears would "ring" for at least a week or maybe more. What should a hiker do? Ask the bear to stop for a minute so you could put in your ear plugs?

The problem with people...

...who get on the cases of progressives who have a problem with the NRA approach to gun ownership and who claim that progressives "don't know anything about guns," Bill, is that such poorly-chosen words encourage folks like the two posters below (PINKIE on Wed, 06/17/2009 - 1:17am and DavidofColorado on Wed, 06/17/2009 - 12:00am).

It indicates they have permission to excoriate progressives and say hateful things that inflame the NRA nut jobs, who consider ALL progressives (inclucing YOU) to be "the enemy," in need of being "eliminated." One day one of the nut jobs could "do a Scott Roeder" on someone you care about. Think about it.

Bill, Make that THREE posters!

Add Armed Geek on Wed, 06/17/2009 - 5:31pm (below), to PINKIE on Wed, 06/17/2009 - 1:17am, and DavidofColorado on Wed, 06/17/2009 - 12:00am.

Re: Bill, Make that THREE posters!

Dude, did you actually _read_ my post? I tried to use short words just for you.

The problem with people...

...who try to silence opposing points of view is that they expose themselves for the politically correct fascists that they are. 1) AS A GENERAL RULE, progressives don't know anything about guns, 2) their phobia of weapons in general points to some rather significant psychological issues such as lack of self control and projection, 3) a large percentage of the American citizenry aren't buying the pap that the Democratic leadership doesn't want to ban any guns. 1) They persistently target "ugly guns" as being more dangerous, powerful, or accurate that typical sporting guns, when generally the differences come down to manufacture with modern lightweight materials and stock design. Gun design has basically consisted of refinement of existing designs since about 1895. I have a semi-auto .22 from the turn of the LAST century that cautions the user to select only "smokeless" .22 cartridges, since black powder ammo would gum up the works. 2) The perennial "blood in the streets" bleating every time concealed carry laws are bolstered in any way. National Parks, or restaurants or whatever. This has been going on for nearly 30 years, and IT HASN'T HAPPENED YET. Yes, criminals kill people. I'm talking about concealed license holders. They are the single most law-abiding segment of the population: arguably more so than the police. 3) The buying frenzy, especially with regards to ammunition, is still on. If you have ANY doubt about that, go to any Wal-Mart that sells ammunition and look at the empty shelves. I currently have a .45 on order from Kimber - they are back-ordered through December 2009. Immediately after the election, the Obama transition team posted as one of their Urban Policy bullet points the 1) the reinstatement of the 1994 assault weapons ban, 2) the repeal of the Tiahrt (sp?) amendment which limits gun trace data to police actually investigating a crime, 3) the push for "smart guns" which can only be fired by the owner, and 4) one other which I don't remember. If you think #3 is a good idea, try to convince a cop that it needs to apply to their weapons also. Gun control isn't about guns, it's about control. It is about the ability of the individual to defend himself against younger/larger/stronger/multiple opponents. Therefore you have certain "progressive" groups who are adamantly opposed to more gun laws. ex. The Pink Pistols - GLBTG people who are concerned about their ability to defend themselves from a mob. Gak. I hat this thing is removing all my formatting. Sorry about that. Had it broken up into paragraphs.

push back

Recent events-- Tiller, the Holocaust Museum shooting, the ambush of the Pittsburgh police--indicate that lefties better cozy up to the 2d amendment and thank the NRA for helping us to do so.

DONT beleeeeeeve it!

ITs all Lib Media hype & hysteria, about all these people buying guns and stuff. Atty Gen'l Holder SAID so back in Feb.! And while many gun stores in the Midwest HAD [past tense] reported "brisk" sales, they're now telling nothin trendy now. In fact, Business has actually dropped off for MOST of the stores in America!! Someone needs to stay away from the brownie jar now! Shame. Shame. They're just gettin scared for nothing. cause it really IS! Gosh. Go find a JOB. We all have REAL worries to worry about, not this sky-jive. Now, where was that Help Wanted Ad again... Bye.

You couldn't be anymore wrong...

You couldn't be anymore wrong about gun owners. 4 million people make up the NRA and their are 80 million gun owners in America. A small fraction are members are NRA members like the numbers say above. But if you really want to know what a special interest is? The Brady Bunch has a small group of employees and no members. They derive all their money from foundation (socialist foundations like the Joyce Foundation) and they are the real minority in the gun community. What is a high powered hand gun? Did you know that the failed Assault Weapons Ban was a weak ban concocted by people have no idea what a gun is and can only describe a gun by its features that look scary. Its nothing more than a con game to try and collect power from the people. And if have been conned if you think any gun ban is going to stop criminals. Its only going to hurt the law abiding.

I'm surprised the NRA membership card

doesn't feature the caption "I feel naked without my gun." Or, for all I know, maybe it does.