Get FREE BuzzFlash News Alerts

Email:  

Remember When the GOP Called Al Gore a "Sore Loserman" in 2000? Well, Norm Coleman is the Real Thing

A BUZZFLASH NEWS ANALYSIS
by Meg White

After going three months over the period it took to decide who was going to be the new president in 2000, former Sen. Norm Coleman (R-MN) still won't give up the ghost. The most recent panel of judges to whom Coleman has appealed to please, please give him back his Senate job said "no" this week. Now Coleman is promising to appeal to the state and U.S. Supreme Court, should that become necessary.

We've known for weeks that writer Al Franken would be Minnesota's new senator. We've known for approximately that same period of time that Coleman is being a total baby about conceding. But we haven't heard that most obvious electoral joke that spread across newsstands like wildfire in 2000: Sore Loserman.

Come on, people. Norm sounds like Sore. Coleman - Cole + Loser = what? Hello?

To be fair, the analogy is out there, just not to the degree it was in 2000.

Media Matters has already made the connection, noting that Al Gore and Joe Lieberman were called sore losers in the media almost 900 times, while Coleman has only been referred to with those words a handful of times. In a column criticizing the hypocrisy of the media's labeling of the two post-vote campaigns, Eric Boehlert says the media is allowing the Coleman camp to drag this out longer without worrying about the consequences:

As Coleman and his attorneys look over their recount legal options, they in no way have to be concerned about or factor into play the potential "sore loser" meme that could do real damage to his effort. They can play hardball with impunity because they're getting a free pass from the press...

...But imagine if the roles were reversed and Franken, the Democrat and former comedian (the press loves to stress that fact), had pulled a last-minute, let's-change-the-rules stunt while his attorneys plotted out even more long-shot legal appeals. I suspect that not only would the story have been thoroughly chewed over by Beltway scribes, but the media disdain would have been unmistakable and unvarnished.

Just ask Al Gore. In 2000, during the contentious recount process in Florida, the press made it abundantly plain that Gore not only faced an uphill battle winning the recount, but that he ran the risk of being dubbed a sore loser, a risk that had to weigh heavily into his recount strategy. The legal action surrounding Florida lasted just five weeks -- compared with the almost 20 weeks already taken up by the Minnesota wrangling -- but the "sore loser" meme was everywhere.

Journalists do have an important role in reporting post-election antics, but it's not to give out nicknames (that's what pundits such as us do!). So I can't say I'm terribly upset the media isn't calling Norm Coleman a Sore Loserman (even though he is). I'm more upset about all the other stuff they're neglecting to talk about honestly in this electoral mess.

To his credit, Boehlert comes down hard on the Beltway media for not pointing out the ridiculousness of Coleman's request for a revote. But there's other stuff missing, too.

It would be great if we could hear a bigger uproar over what this is really about: the 59th Democratic vote in the Senate. Many Republican senators have been totally upfront about imploring Coleman to stall as long as possible to make vote-getting more difficult for the majority. If the situation were reversed, I bet we'd hear a lot more about Democrats preventing Minnesotans from full representation in clear violation of the Constitution, as well as their blocking the Republican agenda in a time of serious fiscal crisis.

Or, hey: How about talking about the way the Republicans run roughshod over states' rights only when it might net them greater representation in Washington? Instead of reporting on state law and precedent, which clearly indicates that the Minnesota Supreme Court has final say in the matter, the national media is all worked up about Coleman's supposed date with the nation's favorite judicial ennead.

Yeah, I realize it's a lot easier to refer to Democrats as losers, and I'm not looking for an apology for the media's behavior in 2000. What I'm saying here is that, if the media is not going to apply the "whining little baby" image to political also-rans of each stripe equally, the least they could do is report on the facts of the case. And the fact here is that the GOP is openly manipulating Coleman who's clearly manipulating the judiciary.

What a loser.

A BUZZFLASH NEWS ANALYSIS


A very big difference

There's a very big difference between 2000 and this Minnesota Senate race that no one seems to have figured out. In this Minnesota race, all of the votes have actually been counted. All of the votes were never counted in Florida in 2000. No one should ever forget that all of the votes weren't counted in 2000. The so called "sore loserman" was a big fat lie by the repugs to hide the truth that Al Gore in fact had gotten the most votes in 2000. I will say that the Senate democrats are behaving every bit the wusses with this Minnesota Senate seat as they did in 2000 by doing nothing to defend the peoples right to vote and have their votes counted.

Mr. Coleman has become for those of us in Minnesota

The prime example and poster child of what "Republican" really stands for: "I," "Me," "Mine," "I get to keep what I have and I get to rearrange the world so I can take what you have too," "You don't count, only I count," "Rules only apply to people less important than myself..." I could go on ad infinitum, ad nauseum, but you get the idea. Meanwhile, the few wingnut-loyal Republicans left reveal themselves to be exactly as psychologically dysfunctional as Norm and his legal team (and they have no clue why the rest of us healthier people have a problem with that). I miss the good old days when Republicans had brains and hearts and cared about the well-being of the nation as a whole, as the Democrats still do, but only disagreed over how the "common good" could best be accomplished. Because of their psychological dysfunctions, which leave them stripped of all empathy and compassion, today's Republicans worship the angry, vengeance-filled, evil image of god that Jesus Christ came among us 2,000 years ago to correct by teaching that God is a God of love and compassion. They have no comprehension of "common good." The only thing that matters to them is how to accomplish what I've described above, including how to force their angry god, the antithesis of everything Jesus taught and did, down the rest of our throats. It doesn't matter if Minnesota has only one senator straight through until the next election as far as they're concerned as long as it gets them closer to their goals.

I agree with everything

I agree with everything you've said except for that "compassionate" jesus description. He was every bit as vengeful as his 'father'...

The good & the bad

I have read the MN election law, and Sec. 209 states that in the case of a disputed election, the challenging candidate is granted sufficient recourse by the mechanisms of state law. So, legally speaking, Coleman is well within his rights to appeal this decision to the MN Supreme Court. However, upon either the court's decision to deny the appeal or a subsequent finding in favor of Al Franken, it is then put to Sec. of State Ritchie to issue an election certification and deliver it to Gov. Pawlenty for his signature. As much as I would LOVE to see Coleman bow out gracefully here, I must recognize that he is legally allowed the opportunity to appeal to a higher court. But, the courts have already rejected several of his legal arguments and the MN recount process (and, for that matter, their election law in general) has been excruciatingly fair and transparent. So, let him appeal. It is his right under the law. The fight to be fought is the real possibility that the Governor may refuse to sign the certification pending an appeal in federal courts. This would NOT be legal, and should the situation arise, it would behoove all involved to be able to point to a history of abiding by the legal statutes set forth by MN state law. Regarding the order of a new election, this is not feasible. The laws dictating the recount process very clearly state that, unless there is demonstrable evidence that the disputed contest was carried out in bad faith of some sort, the courts have no authority to overturn the results. You may read for yourself the relevant statutes regarding election contests here: http://www.sos.state.mn.us/docs/2008_chapter_209_-_6-24-2008_final.pdf

Bush v Gore

No more sound legal logic is required of the RATS than that underlying the 2000 Putsch.

The Gang of Pirates will delay Franken taking office by all possible means ......... count on it.

I wonder ...

... how all the shallow-thinking BUZZFLASHers who voted for Cheney as evilest GOPer over the RATS will feel whence they rule a new election is required in Minnesota?

It will happen, and their deep evil will go on & on & on & .........

this is about more than just the 59th vote--

I've said this before in these comments...Paul Wellstone was assassinated in 2002 because of his vocal opposition to Bush's illegal war...In the war hysteria of the time, that fact was swept under the rug. But this seat is the GOP's war trophy..a Dem in that seat, especially a smart tenacious Dem like Franken would make those responsible very nervous...That seat is their war trophy I hope Franken is prepared for the danger he is in for. The GOP will target him as soon as he is sworn in and his party's leadership--well, I know how I would feel going into this situation knowing that leader Harry Reid (Weakest, most timid excuse for a leader.Ever) does NOT have my back... You talk about if situations were reversed, I know that Harry Reid would trip the fuck over himself to seat Coleman, just to show his GOP colleagues that he's not going to be trouble for them.. This story is exhibit A on what a pathetic mess the Dem senate leadership is....

Norm Coleman, ha ha, nothing

Norm Coleman, ha ha, nothing but a sore loser, trying to cite Bush v. Gore - hey - Judge Per Curiam said him or herself there isnt any precedent, it says so right in the decision. Arent you glad this loser lost, now that you see the lengths he goes against Minnesotans.

Just get over it Norm!

Just get over it Norm!