Get FREE BuzzFlash News Alerts

Email:  

Evan Bayh: From Possible Obama VP to Backstabber

A BUZZFLASH NEWS ANALYSIS
by Chad Rubel

If we go back all the way to the third full week in August 2008, we saw that there were three unofficial nominees for Barack Obama's running mate: now VP Joe Biden, Virginia Governor Tim Kaine, and Senator Evan Bayh (D-IN). Bayh seemed to be the odd figure in that group: he was plenty conservative and a huge Hillary Clinton supporter when she ran for president. But despite the differences and potential awkwardness, Obama thought highly of him to seriously consider him for the job.

You would think that such trust and appreciation would lend itself well in future interactions. But seven months later, Bayh is leading a group of Democrats committed to halting necessary legislation that Obama thinks we need to get this country moving forward again.

As the O'Jays put it, "They smile in your face; All the time they want to take your place; The back stabbers."

Everyone is aware that there are moderate Democrats, some of them bending over backwards to please the Republican overlords. Watching Sen. Ben Nelson (D-NE) on Rachel Maddow's show was nauseating enough. And some of those moderate Democrats don't always feel the same way on several key issues.

But the time to organize this group would have been 2001 or 2007, so the better question is not "Why" but "Why now?"

We have already seen the damage done by the moderate Democrats to the stimulus bill, and they weren't organized as a group.

Bayh's Conservadem group has gained strength from some of its newest members: Mark Begich (AK), Michael Bennet (CO), Kay Hagan (NC), Jeanne Shaheen (NH), Mark Udall (CO), and Mark Warner (VA). All but Bennet did get help from Obama to get elected, and Obama won all their states except for Alaska.

There are the two other leaders, Blanche Lambert Lincoln (AR) and Thomas R. Carper (DE), along with Herb Kohl (WI), Mary Landrieu (LA), Claire McCaskill (MO), Ben Nelson (NE), Bill Nelson (FL), and of course, everyone's "favorite" "Independent Democrat," Joe Lieberman (CT).

But clearly, the leader and organizer of this non-pitchfork mob is Bayh. One intriguing area where Obama and Bayh also have commonality is that they have both been keynote speakers at the Democratic National Convention (Obama in 2004 and Bayh in 1996). Since then, Bayh has been a bridesmaid when it comes to VP possibilities: 2008 was the third consecutive presidential year where Bayh was a serious VP contender.

Bayh is also up for re-election in 2010, but has had an easy time winning races so far in Indiana. If his efforts in establishing this group are motivated by re-election possibilities, Bayh could have done a lot less and protected his chances.

Bayh said on MSNBC that "we care about our country more than our party, and so we want to get things done."

If that were true, the group never would have formed. These centrist Democrats, who admittedly are concerned about the size of the deficit, though they didn't speak up for the last eight years, would have realized that growing the deficit short-term is necessary to get us out of our deep economic downturn. They would have swallowed their pride, and later put pressure on Obama to reduce the deficit, though they did no such thing when Bush was in power.

It's difficult to believe Ben Nelson is sincere when President Obama wants to save money by eliminating private funding of student loans -- more money for students while saving taxpayers money -- yet Nelson is vehemently opposed to doing so.

But like some Republicans, these centrist Democrats aren't concerned about the deficit itself, they are focused on what we are spending the money on. When we spend money on Iraq, that's okay with them. When we spend on money on people and programs here in the United States (where we all live), then the pocketbook concerns suddenly spring up.

Ironically, if they were concerned about the party, they would stand up with Obama, since if Obama doesn't succeed due to underfunded programs perhaps due to meddling by centrist Democrats, they will suffer as well. Some of these freshman senators might be worried about that less than 6 years from now.

In the group's introductory press release, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, who praised the group, said, "If we are going to deliver the change Americans demanded and move our country forward, it will require the courage to get past our political differences and get to work." But what Reid doesn't get is that this group is designed to embrace those political differences, not set them aside.

Barack Obama has had many challenges on his plate, and very little cooperation to speak of so far. He reached out to Congressional Republicans in ways not seen in decades, and was rebutted. His dealings with centrist Democrats when they weren't organized went sour when they felt it necessary to do even more damage to the stimulus bill.

Bayh summed it up well in the MSNBC interview in terms of getting legislation passed. "And it's going to take the centrists to get us there. And so we want to help make the changes we need. And that's -- that's what our group is all about."

No, the group is all about reducing the domestic spending we need to recover from the failed policies that they embraced from the other major party. It's bad enough when those on the other team aren't amenable, but when your own teammates won't help, Obama's presidency will just be that much rougher.

A BUZZFLASH NEWS ANALYSIS


This Makes Me Wanna Puke!

I'm just sicken by this. We elected President Obama to do EXACTLY what he's doing. Who are they to say other wise. These centrist dems makes me so damn angry I can " SCREAM "! My prayer is that we're able to abolish those blue dogs and BLOW UP Evan Bayh and crew! God, please let there be some strong dems to challenge them when the time comes! I cannot express enough how SICK to my stomach I am when I think of em'...ALL OF EM!

An arrogant Dem in name only

I am a California resident and life-long Democrat. In August, 2007, I mailed letters to Senator Bayh and other Democrats who voted to extend the "Protect America" Act. My letter to Bayh said: "As a lifelong Democrat, I am writing to tell you in no uncertain terms that your recent vote for the so-called “Protect America” act will cost the Democratic Party its integrity. In voting to extend the previously unlawful powers of a president (and attorney general) who have lost all credibility with a vast majority of Americans - and who have demonstrated nothing but contempt for Congress and the Constitution - you and your 15 fellow turn-coat Democratic colleagues apparently acted out of fear of being labeled 'soft on Terrorism.' Senator, in that vote, you revealed yourself to be 'soft on Democracy.' The Democrats were given control of Congress by the voters precisely because the party offered our last, best hope for reining in an executive that has methodically been undoing the delicate balance of powers that has protected our system of government and way of life for more than two-and-a-half centuries. Please explain the logic behind your support for this defamation of our Constitution." In September, I received a card from one of his staffers informing me that, since I was not a constituent, my mail had been forwarded to "a Senator from your state". By dismissing a complaint from a US Citizen regarding how he voted on an issue with national/international implications - on top of his unwavering (and, as it turned out, continued) support for illegal wiretapping and eavesdropping - Senator Bayh revealed to me that he is a Republican enabler hiding behind the progressive aura that his father had built around the family name. I expressed this in a second letter: "First of all, I acknowledge that I am not a constituent. I did not and will not vote for or against you in any election. And so my opinions are not a matter of your immediate self-interest. However, may I remind you that your title is 'United States Senator.' And I am a citizen of the United States. In that context, your votes in the senate can - and often do - have a direct and visceral impact on my life and well-being - and that of my country. On August 8 of this year, I took the time and trouble to write you a letter expressing my dismay - or, better disgust - at the vote by yourself and several Democratic colleagues in favor of the so-called 'Protect America' act that undermines some of my basic Constitutional rights. A copy of that letter is attached. In response, your office sent a post-card informing me that, because I am not a constituent, you could not help me and so my letter was being forwarded to the office of a Senator who represents my state. Apparently you and your colleagues do not read your mail beyond looking at the postmark. As someone who helps to pay your salary, I resent your callous response to a citizen of this country whom you do represent on matters related to national and international affairs." No surprise: I heard nothing more from the offices of "Democratic" Senator Bayh.

an arrogant toadie

Yes, Bayh is very arrogant and it shows in the attitude of his staff. I call his office regarding The Protect America Act, expressing my opposition to it and was hung up on. He thinks his constituents are peasants, to be ignored. Congress as a whole forget that they are the hired help.

Evan "W" Bayh

Evan Bayh's father was a progressive Democrat and well respected by both Republicans and Dems alike. His son is a corporate shill and hack and like "W" feels weak and inadequate when compared to his father. I live in Indiana and I'm ashamed of both our Senators, Lugar and Byah always vote against Indiana's citizens.

Words matter

For a couple generations Republicans have been trying to convince America that they are the norm, and Democrats start out left of center, and move further down that continuum. By definition, the majority is the center. Democrats are the majority, therefore the center. "Liberal" democrats are the majority among Democrats, therefore the center. Bayh and his merry band of traitors are "right-wing" Democrats, aka Republicans. They are NOT "moderate" or "centrist" Democrats. Do not allow this huge PR campaign to continue, and for any thinking person to be a part of it. Especially here.

"He reached out to

"He reached out to Congressional Republicans in ways not seen in decades, and was rebutted." Rebuffed?

Rebutted is right

Second definition here for rebut is to repel. I needed a stronger word than rebuffed. But rebuffed isn't a bad choice.

There stands Harry Reid, hat in hand....

What a sad commentary on his lack of leadership....I guess these "conservadems" saw how much funit was to roll and bully Reid and decided to join the fun

Vote Them Out in Their Next Primaries!

We just got rid of the Republicans. Now it is time to get rid of the Blue Dogs, DINO-Fascists, Pelosi and Reid.

VOTE THEM OUT IN 2010!

BRING BACK HOWARD DEAN!

Evan will never be President of the United States

There is no way on earth that Evan Bayh will get through a Democratic primary. This guy defines manchurian candidate. No way, no how.

Bayh is the next Lieberman

Perhaps Bayh will lose his primary and then run again under the Lieberman Party.

still waiting for someone to paint a big red 'R' on Lieberman's Senate door.

Evan Bayh stabs every one in the back

if they get between him and his lobbying friends with money