Get FREE BuzzFlash News Alerts

Email:  

Obama, Dems need to expose true GOP financial philosophy to get stimulus relief

A BUZZFLASH NEWS ANALYSIS
by Chad Rubel

Republicans like to pretend that they don't like spending money. House Minority Leader John Boehner has been leading the charge that government spending on domestic issues is a misuse of government money.

But Republicans like to spend money on their own constituents. They like to spend money to give corporate fat cats huge tax breaks that won't help the economy. They like to spend money overseas, preferably to companies who work on the wars the GOP loves so much, even the ones started for legitimate reasons.

So what we have is a dose of hypocrisy. Republicans claim they hate spending money, except they will spend money on people they like.

We have on the table an $825 billion stimulus package, coming shortly after a $850 billion TARP package, with $700 billion going to banks, insurance companies, and Wall Street. The upcoming $825 billion package is split 2/3 ($550 billion) in spending and 1/3 ($275 billion) in tax cuts.

Since at least $700 billion of the first $850 billion is going to the constituency of the Republican Party, then a larger percentage should go to those sympathetic to Democrats.

But Republicans are crying foul (again). Even though the new package has 1/3 of unnecessary tax cuts, they still aren't happy. They want more.

President Barack Obama has been good about showing bipartisanship. But the Democrats gave too much in September, and they seem ready to give out more. Subsidies for family planning? Gone. Obama might have been correct that those subsidies should be dealt with separately, but again, there's more anger and concern with the left than with the right.

Republicans dug in their heels in September and are digging in now is that they love the perception that they are the party for fiscal responsibility. The MSM gives them a pass on this issue, and the Democrats seem afraid to portray it as otherwise.

If only Obama and the Democrats came out and said, "Republicans are fighting us tooth and nail because they don't want to spend money. But in reality, they do spend lots of money; they just don't want to spend money on you unless you already have money or you are a big corporation."

Portray them as the party that spent us into this recession on intangible results on U.S. soil. Note the wasted money spent in Iraq. Tie in L. Paul Bremer who couldn't account for missing money.

The Democratic Party is in a key position to say, "Money has been spent, but not on you. We are here to spend money on what is important to you. They don't want to help you unless you give them lots of money."

Right now, Republicans have no reason to be scared. Their core philosophy, which has more holes than Swiss cheese, is kept intact in the public realm. Don't wait for the MSM to challenge the idea; that won't ever happen.

And if the Democrats do stand up, there are great benefits. First of all, the people will be thrilled that someone in government will stand up for them. There is a swell of people who feel alienated because no party will stand up for them.

The GOP will become less of a force since they will be challenged. Sadly, the only thing a bully respects is a bigger bully. Alan Colmes might have respected Sean Hannity, but Hannity never felt that way about Colmes. If the Democrats stand up, the GOP might not like it, but they will respect it.

President Obama has strong approval ratings on his side, and a desperate financial situation among the people. If Obama and the Democrats can't stand up now, when will they ever have the cojones to stand up for us?

A BUZZFLASH NEWS ANALYSIS


Promoting the Stimulus

President Obama ought to hold a prime time newsconference from the Oval Office, or the East Room, and bring lots of charts and graphs to show examples of were we're at. The distinctions will be obvious to all. Let's show America what a Liberal Administration can do to help, since the Republicans refused to do so, so long ago.

Heads up Obama

Republicans are testing their influence. Obama is extending bi-partisan gestures. Don't look now President Obama, but these hypocritical republicans are taking your bi-partisan gestures as a sign of weakness. Isn't it time for El Kabong Obama to whop 'em up side the head with the congressional hammer?!!!!!

Reaching across the aisle

Obama has reached out to the other side with an open hand, and what did he get? a fist in his face! The Repugs weren't happy until the family planning was taken out of it (God forbid if we go forward and do not multiply), tax-cuts which have been proven not to help jump start this recession, and other things, and we get a diluted proposal that the rat finks don't vote for anyway! What were you going to do if you got a fist in your face, Pres. O???? Don't get fooled again!

What the ruling class wants

It is as amazing to see the newly converted Rethugs of fiscal responsibility as it wwas to see Rethug peaceniks during Clinton's term. The ruling Class always wants the same thing: EVERYTHING ( I forget who said that but it is so true). Obama is playing a good cop/bad cop game but it is great for the Dems to point out that the "permanent Republican majority" of the early 00's shut out the Dem's entirely. We are the adults however it is useless to bemeoan this and want the rethugs to get their own medicine (which is SO richly deserved...

Americans are with Obama

Americans are with Obama because we understand that the relentless 8 year authoritarian assault against intelligence - is over - we can tell. This is bigger than just the stimulus and the Republicans are clearly going to get cleared out of the way.

Those who do not heed the lessons of history...

President Obama needs to learn from the Clinton administration. The Repugnants are evil. They view a willingness to compromise as weakness. They will operate on a policy of obstructionism to prevent any change from occurring. Mr. O needs to start playing rough. Compromise when reasonable, but do not cave in.

Constituents?

Is it their constituents that Republicans want to spend money or or is it their donors?

I suspect you would be hard-pressed to find an impoverished constituent that any Republican Congressman or Senator cared to waste money on. Why give help to someone who is undeserving?