Get FREE BuzzFlash News Alerts

Email:  

Is David Gregory really the best NBC could find for "Meet the Press"?

A BUZZFLASH NEWS ANALYSIS
by Chad Rubel

So David Gregory is the likely pick to ultimately succeed the late Tim Russert as host of "Meet the Press" on NBC.

Yawn.

We waited through six months -- along with the vapid questioning of Tom Brokaw in the interim -- to hear Gregory's name. We could have predicted at the time that Gregory would get the post.

Yes, other names were bandied about. I threw out the name of Keith Olbermann - that choice got a "few" responses. Gwen Ifill's name was also tossed about at the time of Russert's death.

But Russert's death seemed the opportune time to reassess the direction of the Sunday morning political network talk shows. After all, Russert and CBS' Bob Schieffer both became Sunday morning hosts in 1991. And while ABC has had slightly more turnover in the last decade, the network has had fewer hosts than NBC since 1981. In fact, NBC was rotating hosts every few years during the 1980s and early 1990s.

Does anyone really think David Gregory will do this job for 17 years?

Of the four apparent serious contenders (along with Andrea Michell, Gwen Ifill, and Chuck Todd), Gregory is by far the safest choice.

And this video of Gregory doing back up for "MC Rove" still haunts my inner eyelids.

The pick seems very uninspired given how much the landscape of TV news has changed since 1991. A boring, corporate-media, white male such as Gregory feels like the wrong choice in 2008.

Why not Fareed Zakaria? Why not Lara Logan? Why not a newspaper person such as Chris Cillizza of The Washington Post? Why not match up David Sirota with a conservative equivalent? Why not just Sirota?

There are journalism skills and there are TV skills. The best combine both. It would be ideal to have a long-time, worldly foreign-based journalist come in and ask the tough questions, but that person might not be ideal for TV.

Gregory's resume seems pretty weak. Other than anchoring shows, he has covered George W. Bush since 2000. And while conservatives have gone after him for asking a tough question or two against Bush, he hasn't really shined considerably in that role.

By contrast, Schieffer is one of the few journalists to have covered the White House, State Department, Pentagon, and Congress.

The ideal host would be knowledgable, tenacious, and yet not a suck-up Washington brown-noser (yes, Brokaw, I am looking at you).

But for the Sunday morning, not rocking the boat, corporate MSM mentality, David Gregory will fit right in. But as consumers of the news and as people who like tough questions, Gregory falls really short of the milquetoast standard currently set by the talk shows.

A BUZZFLASH NEWS ANALYSIS




David Gregory's Complicit in the Press' Pre-War Malfeasance

Not only did he (and the rest of the press) never ask the questions that needed to be asked to reveal the administrations deceptions and falsehoods that took us into war; he also has the audacity to dismiss the press' malfeasance and, instead, justifies this complicity by saying they did a good job and that is not their role -- see his interview on Olbermann- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A20RagPirNo. His audacity and immorality is staggering -- this is exactly the role that the press should play in a free society and what we would have expected of the press, pre-Bush and 911. The mainstream press and David Gregory, in particular, could have prevented the Iraq War fiasco by simply acting like real professional journalists, instead of cheerleaders for Bush/Cheney during the run up to the Iraq Occupation. As such, the blood of Iraqi civilians and American soldiers is just as much on the hands of Mr. Gregory and his peers in the the mainstream press.

Actually

Rachel Maddow would be the closest host to fill the seat on Meet The Press. wisecountyissues.com

Bummer

Gregory is the one choice that will make me stop watching MTP as I don't consider him a fair arbiter. I have a long memory and his behavior in the first few years of the Bush Admin is enough for me to not trust him. Plus, I don't find him particularly fun to watch, charming, etc. And I think he's a prima donna based on what I saw, heard and read about at the Dem convention.

If they were looking for knowledge like Russert, that would have indicated someone like Chuck Todd or Ifil. If they wanted tenacious, Shuster has shown more ability to go after people on inconsistencies. I was prepared for a panel of several while they sorted through who would make the best permanent replacement. But Gregory is a poor choice IMO and I will definitely be switching to This Week for my Sunday political news. It's a shame, as NBC/MSNBC was showing real promise as presenting both sides of the story and I think Gregory is a huge step backwards.

I just hope this isn't an indication of where NBC is heading again now that Russert is gone. Brokaw returning to the network didn't thrill me and now Gregory makes me remember all those days gone by when I was really not liking NBC's political division, which was under orders from Jack Welch to make the news suit GE's corporate purposes. Bummer...

Is David Gregory really the best NBC could find for "MTP"?

Is David Gregory really the best NBC could find for "MTP"? No. Disappointing and drab? Yes, but between KO, Matthews, and Rachel Maddow (who undoubtedly would have Rocked in that role) he's by far the least likely to upset the apple cart, and you need corporate advertising to make money and pay the bills.

Off my "to do" list

MTP is now off of my "to do" list. Makes Sunday morning simpler.

It's all moving to This Week on ABC

George Stephanopolis, forgive my spelling, has so many Clinton contacts, including Ram Emanuel, that he will do well getting guests. Besides, they still have Will, Cokie & the worst hair in news atop Sam Donaldson. Libs will stick with Keith, Chris & Rachel and Katie remains third. Faux Newz will continue to do well in Appalachia and mid-West. Meet the Press has the big dog this Sunday but long term ABC will win Sunday morning during Obama's first term.

He's better than Tom Brokaw.

He's better than Tom Brokaw.

That's Like Saying Sean Hannity "is Better" Than Rush Limbaugh

Or syphilis is better than AIDS - possibly true, but they're both abominable.

exactly, well said

exactly, well said

Relevance

Meet the Press has become tattered and tired and is hardly relevant in today's mediascape. Whether it's David Gregory or Tim Russert, either reincarnated or appearing as a ghost on loan from God, the program is so tired and out of date. Hmmm… where'd they get that catchy name – Meet the Press – if there truly were any intent to present the bare truth with journalistic integrity they might return to the original format where the guest met the press. In the beginning there was a panel of journalists before whom the guest sat and responded to questions. Perhaps GE should just rename the program – call it a show – "Watch The Media Whore Shill for the Corporation Show." If they'd have posted Olbermann behind the desk it would have garnered my attention, but he was too mean and nasty (think honest) to the screaming Mr. Mathews at the convention so the Countdown host was erased, removed with a double strike-through. No I think I'd rather continue to watch the pertinent clips on Crooks and Liars… yawn.

Isn't Gregory the Guy Who Did TALKING HEADS TO THE WHITE HOUSE?

Is he a Republican - or just somebody with no politics or principles at all, who looks good in a suit and can appear vaguely interested no matter who's spewing what nonsense? Best thing about him as MEET THE PRESS host is that, when he goes on vacation or slips into a coma on-camera, Ryan Seacrest can step into his shoes - and nobody will notice the difference.

As for Olbermann - hey, I love him as COUNTDOWN host, but he's got the exact opposite problem as David Gregory. If Gregory seems to have no opinions whatsoever, Olbermann has quite a few - and he's happy to share them. Nobody to the Right of, say, Joe Biden would ever appear on his MEET THE PRESS, for fear he'd try to disembowel them...with a plastic spork...on camera...while reciting obscure sports statistics....

Gregory Is The Best Pick - For NBC's Purposes

I agree fully! Gregory is the perfect choice for Meet The Press, because he's relative young, healthy, and a sure Republican. He does what he's told, and fought back hard against the "bias" of those evil communist liberals Olberman and Mathews during the conventions, so the show anchor spot is his reward for faithful service to the Republican Party - I mean, NBC.