Get FREE BuzzFlash News Alerts

Email:  

McCain's Veteran Problem

A BUZZFLASH NEWS ANALYSIS
by Amy Weiss 

Senators John McCain and Barack Obama brought veterans' issues to the forefront in the presidential race as they addressed the Veterans of Foreign Wars (VFW) in Orlando this week. A response to McCain's remarks from the Democratic National Committee shows that, despite his pro-veteran rhetoric, McCain voted 27 times against veterans' health care needs; he has called the new GI bill "too generous"; and McCain misrepresents his own voting record compared to how key veterans groups have rated it. McCain's rhetoric is at odds with his voting record.

It looks like McCain has a veterans problem. This, despite being widely respected as a POW survivor of the Vietnam war. Another indication of trouble for McCain comes from a new report showing that active troops overseas are donating 6:1 to Obama over McCain.

As a former POW, McCain talks a great deal about his experiences in the military. He relied heavily on his experience as a former soldier and prisoner of war at Saturday's forum at Rick Warren's Saddleback church, and the stories made him a big hit with the Evangelical audience as well as many cable news pundits afterward. (Though some disputed their accuracy.)

In a 12,000-word article published in U.S. News and World Report in 1973, McCain recounted his experience as a POW in detail and it's pretty incredible--it's understandable why he's heralded as a war hero.

What's even more incredible though, is how, in spite of this, he has been able to vote so frequently against the best interests of the troops; how a man who should be empathetic in a way few others can, has been all talk and little action.

McCain brags about standing up to some members of his own party and it turns out he does. He was one of only thirteen senators to vote against an amendment to an emergency appropriations bill for 2006 "to provide an additional $430,000,000 for the Department of Veterans Affairs for Medical Services for outpatient and inpatient care and treatment for veterans," designating large amounts towards post-traumatic stress disorder treatment and readjustment counseling.

He voted with his party, however, to prevent the repeal of the Bush tax cuts and the closing of corporate loopholes in order to provide $1.5 billion in additional medical services to the growing veteran population in the 2007 budget.

He doesn't make veterans' issues much of a legislative priority either. According to the Vietnam Veterans of America, McCain is currently a sponsor or cosponsor of zero out of 38 pending bills on veterans' issues (Obama is a sponsor or cosponsor of eight.)

The Military Coalition (TMC), a group of over 35 veterans organizations (including the VFW), sent each member of the Senate a letter explaining why it was important for veterans that the Senate vote to reverse the 10.6% decrease in Medicare physician payment rates. This was the vote or which Sen. Ted Kennedy (D-MA) returned to the Senate to ensure its passage in July. McCain was not present for the vote, but said he would have voted against it.

The TMC also sent a letter urging senators to support Sen. Bill Nelson's amendment to the Defense Authorization Act of 2009. Nelson's amendment would repeal a law that deducts survivor benefits for military families from VA benefits. The amendment currently has 33 cosponsors, Democrat and Republican. Obama is one of them, McCain is not. Obama is also a cosponsor of a new bill, the Veterans Voting Support Act, which would make it easier for veterans to register to vote. McCain has "not yet formulated a position."

According to Project VoteSmart, McCain has had a spotty history with veterans groups. In addition to the 20% he earned from the Disabled American Vets in 2006, he also received a 25% in 2005, a 50% in 2004, and a 66% in 1999. He received 18% form the Retired Enlisted Association in 2006 and 0% from them in 2004. From the Vietnam Veterans of America he received: a 100% in 2003-2004, a 46% in 2001, a 0% in 1997-1998, and a 50% in 1989-1990.

In the interest of fairness, Obama's scores are not perfect either. He received a 12% from the Retired Enlisted Association in 2006 and a 92% and 80% from DAV in 2005 and 2006, respectively. Still, for a man who claims to have the market cornered on all things military, McCain doesn't seem to pay much attention to those who served in the military themselves.

McCain thinks his experience as a POW entitles him to the support of servicemen and women and veterans. He thinks he shouldn't have to try as hard to earn their support, that he should automatically have it. A man who served with McCain and was also a POW explained Tuesday why he would not be voting for McCain:

It is also disappointing to see him take on and support Bush's war in Iraq, even stating we might be there for another 100 years. For me John represents the entrenched and bankrupt policies of Washington-as-usual. The past 7 years have proven to be disastrous for our country. And I believe John's views on war, foreign policy, economics, environment, health care, education, national infrastructure and other important areas are much the same as those of the Bush administration...

Senator John Sidney McCain, III is a remarkable man who has made enormous personal achievements. And he is a man that I am proud to call a fellow POW who "Returned With Honor." That's our POW motto. But since many of you keep asking what I think of him, I've decided to write it out. In short, I think John Sidney McCain, III is a good man, but not someone I will vote for in the upcoming election to be our President of the United States.
McCain spent the better part of his speech to the VFW praising himself and criticizing Obama on judgment and "the surge," but he finally got around to saying this:
Those we depend on as troops should know, when they become veterans, that they can depend on us. Honoring this obligation will require leadership. And I pledge to you that as president I will lead -- from the front -- to reform our VA system and make sure that veterans receive the respect and care they have earned.
He then defended his position on the G.I. bill, which he first opposed and later missed a vote on. He claimed he "sought a better bill," even though a VFW spokesman called the Graham-Burr-McCain plan: "very partisan and is seen as a way to convolute the GI bill, or to slow the Webb-Hagel proposal down."

After McCain's 5-and-a-half years as a POW and many more years of service, you would think that looking out for servicemen and veterans would be a top priority. You'd think it'd be one of the few things that might warrant a one-day break from campaigning to return to the Senate and vote on. Maybe he would be inspired to author legislation on behalf of America's servicemen and women, or at least tack his name on someone else's bill. In the same speech, McCain made a bluntly hypocritical and ironic statement that sums up his own position perfectly:

"I suppose from my opponent's vantage point, veterans concerns are just one more issue to be spun or worked to advantage."

A BUZZFLASH NEWS ANALYSIS


It's Time For V.A. To Be No More

There are countless failures, if not out-right crimes, by this illegitimate, appalling administration. Nevertheless, something good can come of it.

Anyone who seriously doubts the need for health-care reform by this time is in need of help, from a professional.

What we have now is a patchwork quilt of health-care schemes, most of which are failing, miserably, including the V.A's.

Why not simply have one-single payer program which can be administered by private companies who can bid for the government's business. (no no-bid contracts and transparency. Not a request but a demand.)

Insurance companies have been growing more and more out of control since the 70s. The cost of diagnostics, medical care and medications have kept pace. Physicians and other care-givers have to hire whole staffs that do nothing but try to get payment for services out of these health insurance companies or spend more time on getting paid than time with their patients. Physicians have it bad enough. Private practitioners in mental heath have it much worse, and in these days and times, that could actually be dangerous for more people than just the single patient.

Please, no more non-profit hospitals that are anything but non-profit. No one should have to pay $5.00 for a Tylenol tablet. Actually, Tylenol probably costs more now in hospitals like those owned by Humana and others like it. as I recall, these health care schemes were supposed to make things better. Well, it didn't work.

Physicians and other care givers have to be approved to receive payment from many of these so-called health insurance companies. The companies do not seem so much concerned with the care-givers credentials as they are with telling those caregivers, up-front, that they must agree not to even mention certain diagnostic procedures, more expensive but more effective treatment or other health care alternatives to the patient.

Big Pharma should be barred from advertising their products, period. It's bad enough that many physicians are corrupted with trips to "exotic places" to hear all about the latest and greatest medications from this or that pharmaceutical company. Just in case there are Americans out there who don't know this, Big Pharma lies like a rug, not only to physicians, but now to the public in general, and quite a few have been caught in the last few years, on things like fudging their research and not being transparent enough about the dangers of the medications they are marketing, sometimes for a disease or disorder the medication is not equipped to handle. The price of medication has gone up considerably since this practice began. Advertising, as we all know, is not cheap. Why advertise something that it takes an Rx to get in the first place? I'll tell you why. So, that people will bug their physician for the "latest and greatest," when there is an "oldie but goody" which is proven and will easily suffice. Of course, there are exceptions. Many of the newer medications are better and may not have as many side-effects. They may keep people out of the emergency room and/or the hospital, which is obviously more expensive and where no one with a lick of sense really wants to be. Hospitals can be dangerous places, if not to your health, to your pocket book.

Which bring me to another subject. I could hear the hue and cry when one or two of the Democratic candidates said that in order for his/her health care program to work, everyone would have to buy insurance. OMG!!!!! They are going to make us buy health insurance!!! This must surely be a Communist plot! Well, here's the real story, unless everyone contributes by buying insurance, we are still going to pay for everyone else's insurance. The young in this country, often don't see the the need for insurance until they marry and have kids (and can't afford it) or they get a job with a company that pays for it (as part of their salaries, of course.) We pay for the uninsured young guy/gal on the motor cycle or in the car who has a horrific crash or who simply comes down with some horrendous diagnosis or chronic condition which costs thousands, at least, to treat and may well prevent them from ever getting affordable insurance.

We also pay for E.R visits for everything from the flu to strokes and heart attacks in the young and those who cannot afford insurance at all.

As my Oncologist once said to me, when I told him that I didn't want to run up huge medical bills, as my diagnosis is, essentially, a death sentence, "the system will absorb what your insurance doesn't cover." Oh, really. The system? That would be the taxpayers. So, I get to pay for my insurance, the monthly payments for which were getting bigger and bigger every year before the diagnosis of Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the lung, inoperable, but in remission, I get to pay more with my taxes as well.

This is why I say that the V.A. health-care system and Medicare should be shelved and in their place, affordable insurance for everyone; the same insurance we afford to our public servants. Who among us would pay for better insurance for people we hire than for ourselves. Our elected officials are hired by us, through our vote.

Our health-care system is a full-blown disaster! We are merely moving deck chairs on the Titanic and have been for more than 35 years.

I can already hear the hue and cry about how Vets have special problems and need to be treated together. B.S, I say. There is better treatment, right now, in the private sector for disorders associated with serving in a war zone, especially when it comes to psychiatric disorders.

If Vets are coming down with strange physical symptoms, like after the Gulf war, the medical community as a whole should be aware of it, as many people opt opt out of the V.A. system, either because it is too damned inconvenient or because the person wants no more to do with anything having to do with our government ever again.

In addition to that, the American people should know when our Veterans have been exposed to depleted Uranium and the like, by our own government. Those young people in every branch of our military belong to us. We pay their salaries, for their health care and other benefits, gladly in most cases. They are our blood and real treasure. Unfortunately, many of the corporations, the interests of which they are really defending, have moved off-shore or have found a gazillion other ways not to be taxed.

Change? We had all better believe that we need change, huge change. As Obama says, fundamental change in the way D.C. functions, but much more than that.

We the people, need to wake the hell up from our serf mentality and demand that change. If it it is not forthcoming from the people we elect, it will be sooner or later. Either the looming collapse, not just of the economy, but of many of our social institutions, will eventually bring about change, or the people will demand it in such a way that we cannot be ignored.

Either way, the times they are a changin'. This time, there is no doubt about that and it is going to be much more painful on most of us than when Dylan sang those words.

You don't understand the most basic problem.

"Why not simply have one-single payer program which can be administered by private companies who can bid for the government's business?" The ENTIRE problem is private FOR PROFIT companies. Maybe you don't know how capitalism works. A business makes money by 1- charging more than it's worth, or giving less than they charge for. Usually both. All you want to do is shuffle the paperwork. That'll just help paper mills. Tax funded single payer. Anything else is BS.

VA Healthcare

You a combat vet? I'm thinking not. Republican troll? I'm thinking so. How about single-payer healthcare, government funded, across the board. Maybe your in the insurance business. Hmmmm? Fuck off. Oh, and I might add that for many of the medical problems faced by veterans returning from wars, the civilian medical establishment has not even a clue, because even if they knew what the vets were exposed to, they don't have access to the damned stuff for research. You are speaking from, as Mr. Shakespeare said so aptly, your "nether throat."

Yoiu are wrong, Buddy

I am a Vietnam Vet, Naval Hospital corps, HM2. I saw, constantly, the results of war. I understand your concerns, but all of that can be taken care of, without such a huge cost toi the American Taxpayer and it will benefit Americans across the board. Quite frankly, sir, you are full of it. I took care of Vets from Vietnam long before PTSD ever hit the corporate media.

VA Healthcare

First, I'm not your buddy. Check. And healthcare for veterans is expensive, just like healthcare for civilians is expensive, if you hadn't noticed. And as Americans become aware of the expense of caring for service personnel wounded, injured or felled by disease or emotional trauma as a result of combat, perhaps we will start thinking about better solutions to foreign policy problems, and stop using Rangers and Marines as advance marketing teams for American corporate greed. I am part of McCain's veteran problem, and you better know it. And I live with the results of the war in Viet Nam daily. Now. As do many of my friends. Eliminate the VA, and...then what? Sell me insurance? I think you are the one full of it. How about government funded single payer for all...universal healthcare? Instead of, say, corporate welfare. We can afford it.

Oh, and I forgot!

Money is wasted like crazy! Staff take home supplies and food, and other things!!!! That's where a lot of the money goes, as well!!! The damn system has never been MANAGED PROPERLY!!!!! What we need is MEDICARE for all! We can choose our own doctors and hospitals! They pay 80% All you need is a Supplementary Plan like AARP to pay the other 20%. It works beautifully!!!

Having Worked In the VA System as a Nurse......

I can tell you that the treatment I observed, at least in the one VA Hospital in which I worked, was PATHETIC! (If it even can be called "treatment!") I worked on the first PTSD Unit in my state, and they didn't know what they were doing. The psychiatrist treated the veterans like his friends with no boundaries, gave them no psychotherapy, went out to lunch with them, gave them addictive pass medications to bring home, and drugs were used on the unit. Weapons were even found on the unit. I left that unit, although I really liked the population, because I felt unsafe. Shortly thereafter, one of the veterans committed suicide with his accumulated pass medications. This was only one particular unit of one building in one dysfunctional VA Hospital Much staff is foreign and many doctors are foreign-trained. Much of that education is sub-par. Supervision and continuing education leaves a lot to be desired. If staff commit repeated infractions, it is difficult to get rid of them, since the process is mired in paper work, as is everything connected with the government. It is nothing like Medicare, which works extremely well! The VA system is sub-par medicine, and I agree that it needs to go!!!!!!!!

VA Healthcare

I'm sure, er, well, maybe not sure, that what you are saying is true. I, on the other hand, have had excellent healthcare from the VA (West Los Angeles, a teaching hospital. The staff is trained there.), and trust them with my life. The bureaucracy stinks, but most do. We have already seen drastic cuts in healthcare benefits for veterans. New vets don't get half of what I do, and I get less than my father, a WWII vet, got. Until we have something better IN PLACE, the VA stays. I still say government sponsored single payer. We should catch up with the rest of the modern, industrialized world, instead of trying to lead it in a race to the bottom. Right now, most vets have a choice between the VA and no care at all. Do you honestly believe that if McCain and his band of lunatics (or any other republicans) were able to get rid of the VA healthcare system, they would replace it with anything other than an army of insurance salesmen, selling insurance policies that cover everything but what you've got?

war hero?

Sorry. I fought in Viet Nam, too. Grunt. Two tours. McCain was a Navy pilot, not a soldier, and he was shot down just after dumping a load of bombs on an electric plant in a heavily populated district of Hanoi. By the laws extant then as now, a war crime. He got off easy for his little romp. McCain has shown not little, but NO care, for the welfare of any veteran other than John McCain. Money that vets get is money that he doesn't have a chance to grab. McCain has no idea what a soldier is or does. He wasn't a soldier, he was a prisoner of war. He knows what a prisoner of war does. And he knows what a war criminal does. He is a man without honor, and the media has taken up his myth. His lie. He is a hollow man, to be filled with whatever bullshit his backers are trying to sell. The paint on the outside is faded and peeling, but the press isn't going to say so.

what war hero?

War hero? That’s how John McCain describes himself. “Vietnam Veterans against John McCain” whose website http://www.vietnamveteransagainstjohnmccain.com/ contains several passages in sharp contrast to the image McCain presents. Their name rightly describes their spin as they connect the dots. But embedded in their content are several genuine documents such as CSpan videos. If you can wade through the sometimes amateurish presentation, you will find some very dark glimpses of the character, temper, and judgment of the senior senator from Arizona.

Thank You

I've been saying McStain is a civillian murdering war criminal for years. I'm glad I'm not the only one with a legitimate sense of right and wrong.

little action?

He's been a lot of talk AND a lot of action, voting against veterans - that's action

There's One Problem With This Post

In attempting to argue that the veteran McCain doesn't deserve the veteran vote, you are using facts and verifiable figures. McCain's supporters have no use for either. Their faith in him is all they need.

That would be, what....

BLIND Faith?

I would imagine the poster

really meant deaf, dumb and blind.

Expect Crickets

That would be the sound of crickets in the MSM about McCain's lack of support for the troops. The MSM has made it extremely clear. They are owned by Republicans and they want a Republican in office. You and I are not in on the conversation about how to have him installed.

Votes of our troops in Iraq don't count

Obama's 6-1 advantage in fundraising among troops in Iraq isn't going to mean anything if the Republicans are successful in seeing that these votes don't get counted. It is disgusting that the media has ignored all of the illegal activities of this administration. One of the biggest stories you never heard!!! http://www.aznetroots.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=264

VA Healthcare, Veterans votes

I know. This is disgusting. I have lost any and all sympathy for anyone who claims the republican party as his/hers, and am losing what sympathy I may have had for "libertarians" and self-described "independents," who only want our deployed men and women to come home in boxes.