Is This America? Is This Separation of Church and State? And Who Set the IRS on Obama's Church?
A BUZZFLASH NEWS ANALYSIS
by Christine Bowman
Surely one of the greatest things, and a defining characteristic of the United States of America in contrast to the rest of the world, is our Constitutionally guaranteed separation of church and state. It gives us the freedom to worship or not; it gives our political leaders the responsibility to work for all Americans, not just for their own religious camp; it gives the religious organizations the freedom to meet and speak and honor their unique spiritual traditions without fear of political interference. Right?
Wrong. At least, not lately, and not in certain cases.
On Monday, February 25, the national headquarters of the United Church of Christ, Senator and presidential candidate Barack Obama's church, received a letter from the IRS questioning whether the church "has engaged in political activities that could jeopardize its tax-exempt status." They were given 15 days to respond.
The IRS is scrutinizing specifically an address given by Barack Obama last June. Church leaders appear confident that all rules for tax-exempt groups were met, and they clearly address the issues in a post to their website February 26. If they're correct, then does the IRS probe constitute harassment and a Bush administration breach of First Amendment rights?
The Rev. John H. Thomas, the UCC's general minister and president, called the investigation "disturbing" but said the investigation would reveal that the church did nothing improper or illegal.
Obama, an active member of the United Church of Christ for more than 20 years, addressed the UCC's 50th anniversary General Synod in Hartford, Conn., on June 23, 2007, as one of 60 diverse speakers representing the arts, media, academia, science, technology, business and government. Each was asked to reflect on the intersection of their faith and their respective vocations or fields of expertise. The invitation to Obama was extended a year before he became a Democratic presidential candidate.
"The United Church of Christ took great care to ensure that Senator Obama's appearance before the 50th anniversary General Synod met appropriate legal and moral standards," Thomas told United Church News. "We are confident that the IRS investigation will confirm that no laws were violated."
Obama's General Synod speech prompts IRS to investigate UCC's tax-exempt status
Appropriate outrage is reported in the political blog of The Hartford [CT] Courant:
Hartford Mayor Eddie A. Perez asked Congress today to investigate the IRS' threat to strip the United Church of Christ of its tax-exempt status over Barack Obama's speech to a church convention in Hartford in 2007.
"If the IRS is successful, every church synagogue and mosque that invites an elected official to speak on issues such as the war in Iraq, abortion, the environment, labor and other issues of social justice could fear loss of their non-profit status," Perez said.
He is asking U.S. Sens. Christopher Dodd and Joseph Lieberman and U.S. Rep. John B. Larson to intervene.
"This IRS action should outrage members of both parties and people of faith throughout the country," Perez said.
The Bush administration is famous for embracing select religious causes, blurring the line between church and state and catering to the religious right wing that helped them win office in 2000 and 2004. The Terri Schiavo circus in Washington was just one of many examples of that shameful political strategy.
Furthermore, the Bush administration also has pushed the envelope of executive power when it comes to meddling in all kinds of government departments to gain a political edge -- in the Department of Justice, with political tainting of the US attorney appointments, for instance, and with top-down interference in scientific reports from NASA -- basically, giving departments under White House influence a mandate to further political goals at the cost of neutrality.
Well, now we have the IRS probing Barack Obama's church. A church that condones activism, but whose members lean Democratic. What a coincidence. As the blog Attytood suggests, could there be a "Double Standard" here? (There were concerns of this nature in 2004, as well.)
Barack Obama discussed his faith at a large religious gathering during a campaign season. Just as George Bush and others have done.
Oddly enough, no government agency is investigating the President's spiritual advisers.
A BUZZFLASH NEWS ANALYSIS
- Login or register to post comments
- Printer-friendly version
Buzz this on Buzzflash.net




Technorati Tags:
The real source of the IRS complaint against the UCC
Friends,
It has become clear that the IRS complaint against the United Church of Christ is the work of a waggish, negative website operated by a disgruntled former United Church of Christ member named James Hutchens. Hutchens has long been a regular poster under his own name and various pseudonyms at the discussion boards at UCC.org. A few years ago he began to blog incessantly on his own website UCCTruths.blogspot.com.
I urge you not to go to the website the same way I would encourage anyone I care about not to dive into a pool of liquid fertilizer. However, a link to a pdf file containing the original IRS complaint that was filed back in August appears on the website's front page!
For the sake of truth and justice, I would encourage you to forward this to three to five people. The truth needs to get out there.
Thanks,
Jeff Johnston
a concerned UCC pastor from Illinois
Some Truth Might be Nice
Where is there a Constitutionally guaranteed seperation of church and state? I've read through the Constitution and Bill of Rights many times, but have yet to see this stated or implied anywhere. What I have found is a prohibition on the US government establishing it's own religion, and against making any laws the prohibit the free practice of religion, but nothing about a seperation of church and state. As an agnostic, I believe in no religion, but I do believe in the truth.
Just for the record, the Founding Fathers wrote the establishment clause of the Constitution in order to prevent a recurrence of the Church of England fiasco. After King Henry VIII was denied a divorice by the Pope, he created the Church of England, and put men in its leadership who would give Henry whatever he wanted. At that point you had a monarch acting as head of state and head of the religion. Later, when people refused to join the church, the British government put laws into effect that made it impossible for people to live or work in England without being a member of the church.
The Founding Fathers had no issues with religion being involved in government affairs, but they did have an issue with government being involved in church affairs. They did not want the government establishing it's own religion, whereas the government would decide what the doctrine and laws of the church would be. The government could follow the laws of a church, but not create their own. Also, they did not want the government telling any citizens that they must follow any particular religion or deny their access to religious practices. Like most rights, this is an individual right, meaning that if the government follows the rules of the Catholic, Protestant, Muslim, or any other church, the citizens cannot be compelled to belong or worship at that church.
Thank you Buzzflash
I wonder why there is a religious right. Could it be the hostility and rejection progressive religious organization get from their ostensibly progressive brethren in the secular realm. Thank you BuzzFlash for practicing your politics with integrity, perhaps some of your readers would like to follow your example. Maybe it is time to offer Rabbi Lerner's book again.
Christine Bowman.....
Where have you been?
The cults have been meddling in politics since before you were born!
It's time to eliminate their tax exemption status.
Ramón
Tax churches? Hell YES!
In the last 20 years or so, I've been observing ALL denominations and ALL faiths meddling in politics. Since they are represented without taxation, they not only should be taxed this year, but they should - ALL of them, - pay taxes retroactively for some 20 years back. That would be righteous.
OK, Now investigate the churches of:
Pat Robertson, Schuler, Falwell, Catholic, etc, etc ,etc